David A. Erlandson
Texas A&M University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David A. Erlandson.
NASSP Bulletin | 1981
David A. Erlandson; Margaret C. Pastor
Readers will find here a fresh source of evidence for some fundamental principles of school administra tion. The writers describe a study which purports to help the devel opment of produe tive teachers.
NASSP Bulletin | 1997
Luana Zellner; David A. Erlandson
Countless principals who have been on the job during the past 30 years will testify that the principalship has grown progressively more intense. This can be documented by a review of the tasks that have been added to the principalship, the environmental pressures that operate on the school, and the emerging interpersonal relationships by which the school is governed and does its daily work.
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education | 1991
David A. Erlandson; John R. Hoyle
The Management Profile is an appraisal measure that examines the actual job performance of a manager to ascertain relative strength in six management functions and three leadership roles. The management functions examined are administration, technical competence, influence/control, persuasion, training/development, aad forecasting/planning. The leadership roles examined are: evaluator, director, and motivator. This study examined relationships between tuo measures: the Perceived Performance Inventory (PPI) and the videotaped interview. The ?PI looked at perceptions of six skill areas that were largely parallel to the six functions examined by the videotaped interview. The PPI identified the perceptions that different audiences have of an administrators summarized performance. The videotaped assessment examined specific performances in specified areas and assigned ratings to them. Appended are (1) 10 references; (2) a management profile; and (3) eight data tables. (SI) *******************************************************************x*** r. Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can Le made from the original document. ***********************************************************************
NASSP Bulletin | 1993
B. Elaine Wilmore; David A. Erlandson
Described here is a method administrators can use to review their performance, evaluate, and plan for their own professional growth.
NASSP Bulletin | 1986
David A. Erlandson
welfare of the profession. The report focused on the design, delivery, and analysis of instruction in principal preparation programs. It looked at the relationship between traditional classroom settings and clinical and field-based experiences; it also suggested strategies for linking the two. It examined some promising practices and laid out in some detail a procedure whereby an institution of higher education could systematically examine the emphasis its own preparation program gave to various elements of program
NASSP Bulletin | 1983
Patricia S. Kusimo; David A. Erlandson
Most large schools, these writers say, operate with narrow, faulty, one-way channels of communication. If instruction is to be effectively served, however, communications must flow in multiple directions, as explained on the following pages.
NASSP Bulletin | 1980
David A. Erlandson
Heres a set of tools for analyzing and managing change. They have their base in general systems theory. The proposed instruments appear simple but grow in sophistication in the hands of the administrator who senses their potential and applies them to problems of change in the school environ ment.
NASSP Bulletin | 1987
David A. Erlandson; Sandra Lee Bifano
International Journal of Education | 2008
Mario S. Torres; Luana Zellner; David A. Erlandson
NASSP Bulletin | 1987
David A. Erlandson