David A. Gewirtz

Autophagy in malignant transformation and cancer progression

Autophagy plays a key role in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. In healthy cells, such a homeostatic activity constitutes a robust barrier against malignant transformation. Accordingly, many oncoproteins inhibit, and several oncosuppressor proteins promote, autophagy. Moreover, autophagy is required for optimal anticancer immunosurveillance. In neoplastic cells, however, autophagic responses constitute a means to cope with intracellular and environmental stress, thus favoring tumor progression. This implies that at least in some cases, oncogenesis proceeds along with a temporary inhibition of autophagy or a gain of molecular functions that antagonize its oncosuppressive activity. Here, we discuss the differential impact of autophagy on distinct phases of tumorigenesis and the implications of this concept for the use of autophagy modulators in cancer therapy.

Adriamycin-induced Senescence in Breast Tumor Cells Involves Functional p53 and Telomere Dysfunction

Direct experimental evidence implicates telomere erosion as a primary cause of cellular senescence. Using a well characterized model system for breast cancer, we define here the molecular and cellular consequences of adriamycin treatment in breast tumor cells. Cells acutely exposed to adriamycin exhibited an increase in p53 activity, a decline in telomerase activity, and a dramatic increase in β-galactosidase, a marker of senescence. Inactivation of wild-type p53 resulted in a transition of the cellular response to adriamycin treatment from replicative senescence to delayed apoptosis, demonstrating that p53 plays an integral role in the fate of breast tumor cells treated with DNA-damaging agents. Stable introduction of hTERT, the catalytic protein component of telomerase, into MCF-7 cells caused an increase in telomerase activity and telomere length. Treatment of MCF-7-hTERT cells with adriamycin produced an identical senescence response as controls without signs of telomere shortening, indicating that the senescence after treatment is telomere length-independent. However, we found that exposure to adriamycin resulted in an overrepresentation of cytogenetic changes involving telomeres, showing an altered telomere state induced by adriamycin is probably a causal factor leading to the senescence phenotype. To our knowledge, these data are the first to demonstrate that the mechanism of adriamycin-induced senescence is dependent on both functional p53 and telomere dysfunction rather than overall shortening.

A comprehensive glossary of autophagy-related molecules and processes (2nd edition).

The study of autophagy is rapidly expanding, and our knowledge of the molecular mechanism and its connections to a wide range of physiological processes has increased substantially in the past decade. The vocabulary associated with autophagy has grown concomitantly. In fact, it is difficult for readers-even those who work in the field-to keep up with the ever-expanding terminology associated with the various autophagy-related processes. Accordingly, we have developed a comprehensive glossary of autophagy-related terms that is meant to provide a quick reference for researchers who need a brief reminder of the regulatory effects of transcription factors and chemical agents that induce or inhibit autophagy, the function of the autophagy-related proteins, and the roles of accessory components and structures that are associated with autophagy.

Molecular definitions of autophagy and related processes

Over the past two decades, the molecular machinery that underlies autophagic responses has been characterized with ever increasing precision in multiple model organisms. Moreover, it has become clear that autophagy and autophagy‐related processes have profound implications for human pathophysiology. However, considerable confusion persists about the use of appropriate terms to indicate specific types of autophagy and some components of the autophagy machinery, which may have detrimental effects on the expansion of the field. Driven by the overt recognition of such a potential obstacle, a panel of leading experts in the field attempts here to define several autophagy‐related terms based on specific biochemical features. The ultimate objective of this collaborative exchange is to formulate recommendations that facilitate the dissemination of knowledge within and outside the field of autophagy research.

The Four Faces of Autophagy: Implications for Cancer Therapy

It is generally thought that autophagy has two primary and opposing functions in tumor cells in response to stress induced by chemotherapy or radiation. One is the cytoprotective function that can in theory be inhibited for therapeutic advantage by sensitizing the cells to these treatment modalities. The other is the cytotoxic function that is generally not observed with conventional treatment modalities, but that may function to promote tumor cell killing either alone or in association with apoptosis. In this commentary/review, we advance the premise that autophagy is actually populated by at least two additional players. One we have termed the nonprotective form of autophagy, where the cell is apparently carrying out autophagy-mediated degradative functions, but where autophagy inhibition does not lead to perceptible alterations in drug or radiation sensitivity. The other is what we now term the cytostatic form of autophagy in that its activation results in prolonged growth inhibition as well as reduced clonogenic survival (loss of reproductive capacity) but in the absence of actual loss of cell viability through apoptosis or necrosis; however, as is the case with cytototoxic autophagy, inhibition of cytostatic autophagy protects the tumor cell from the agent (drugs or radiation) that promotes the autophagic response. In view of current clinical efforts to exploit autophagy inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for sensitization of malignancies to chemotherapy and radiation, it is critical to recognize that if chemotherapy and/or radiation actually promote autophagy in patient tumors, the autophagy is not of necessity cytoprotective in function.

A comprehensive glossary of autophagy-related molecules and processes

Autophagy is a rapidly expanding field in the sense that our knowledge about the molecular mechanism and its connections to a wide range of physiological processes has increased substantially in the past decade. Similarly, the vocabulary associated with autophagy has grown concomitantly. This fact makes it difficult for readers, even those who work in the field, to keep up with the ever-expanding terminology associated with the various autophagy-related processes. Accordingly, we have developed a comprehensive glossary of autophagy-related terms that is meant to provide a quick reference for researchers who need a brief reminder of the regulatory effects of transcription factors or chemical agents that induce or inhibit autophagy, the function of the autophagy-related proteins, or the role of accessory machinery or structures that are associated with autophagy.

Effects of bryostatin 1 and other pharmacological activators of protein kinase C on 1-[β-d-arabinofuranosyl]cytosine-induced apoptosis in HL-60 human promyelocytic leukemia cells

We have demonstrated previously that bryostatin 1, a macrocylic lactone with putative protein kinase C (PKC)-activating properties, synergistically augments the antileukemic actions of the deoxycytidine analog 1-[beta-D-arabinofuranosyl]cytosine (ara-C) in HL-60 human promyelocytic leukemia cells (Grant et al., Biochem Pharmacol 42: 853-867, 1991), and that this effect appears to be related to sensitization to ara-C-induced apoptosis (Grant et al., Cancer Res 52: 6270-6278, 1992). In the present studies, we have assessed the extent of this damage by quantitative spectrofluorophotometry of small molecular weight, double-stranded DNA fragments in order to provide: (a) a more complete characterization of the interaction between ara-C and bryostatin 1, and (b) a direct comparison of the relative effects of bryostatin 1 treatment with other pharmacological manipulations known to modulate protein kinase C activity. Exposure of cells to ara-C (10(-9) to 10(-4) M; 1-24 hr) induced time- and concentration-related increases in the extent of DNA fragmentation. Treatment with bryostatin 1 (10(-11) to 10(-7) M; 1-24 hr) alone failed to induce DNA damage, but promoted substantial time- and concentration-related increases in the extent of fragmentation induced by a subsequent 6-hr exposure to ara-C. Maximal potentiation of fragmentation (e.g. 2- to 3-fold greater than that obtained with ara-C alone) was observed following a 24-hr pretreatment with 10(-8) M or 10(-7) M bryostatin 1, and correlated closely with enhanced inhibition of HL-60 cell clonogenicity. The stage-1 tumor-promoter phorbol dibutyrate potentiated the effects of ara-C in a biphasic manner, maximally augmenting the response at 2.5 x 10(-8) M, but exerting no effect at 10(-7) M, whereas the stage-2 tumor-promoter mezerein failed to augment ara-C-related DNA fragmentation at low concentrations, and antagonized ara-C action at high concentrations. In contrast, ara-C-related DNA fragmentation was attenuated or abolished either by continual preexposure to synthetic diglyceride or by pretreatment with exogenous phospholipase C at all concentrations tested. Increased DNA fragmentation was not specifically related to recruitment of cells into S-phase or enhancement of ara-C-related cellular differentiation. Finally, concentrations of bryostatin 1 that maximally potentiated ara-C-related DNA fragmentation were associated with virtually complete down-regulation of total cellular PKC activity, whereas diglyceride and phospholipase C, which suppressed the response to ara-C, moderately increased total PKC activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Autophagy, senescence and tumor dormancy in cancer therapy.

The relationships between autophagy and apoptosis have been examined quite extensively and have often been shown to be reciprocally regulated responses to stresses such as exposure of the tumor cells to chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation. However, there is now evidence that autophagy may also play a role in tumor dormancy. Given that tumor dormancy and disease recurrence are poorly understood phenomenon which are nevertheless critical elements of patient morbidity and mortality, this commentary develops the postulate that autophagy and senescence may be related responses that influence the capacity of the tumor cell to maintain a prolonged state of growth arrest that can be succeeded by tumor regrowth and disease recurrence.

p53-Dependent accelerated senescence induced by ionizing radiation in breast tumour cells

Ionizing radiation has been reported to promote accelerated or premature senescence in both normal and tumour cell lines. The current studies were designed to characterize the accelerated senescence response to radiation in the breast tumour cell in terms of its dependence on functional p53 and its relationship to telomerase activity, telomere lengths, expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT, the catalytic subunit of telomerase) and human telomerase RNA (hTR, the RNA subunit of telomerase), as well as the induction of cytogenetic aberrations. Studies were performed in p53 wild-type MCF-7 cells, MCF-7/E6 cells with attenuated p53 function, MDA-MB231 cells with mutant p53 and MCF-7/hTERT cells with constitutive expression of hTERT. Telomerase activity was measured by the telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP assay), telomere lengths by the terminal restriction fragment (TRF) assay, hTR and hTERT expression by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), senescence by β-galactosidase staining, and apoptosis by TdT-mediated d-UTP-X nick-end labelling (TUNEL assay). Widespread and extensive expression of β-galactosidase, a marker of cellular senescence, was evident in MCF-7 breast tumour cells following exposure to 10 Gy of ionizing radiation. Radiation did not suppress expression of either hTERT or hTR, alter telomerase activity or induce telomere shortening. Senescence arrest was also observed in irradiated MCF-7/hTERT cells, which have elongated telomeres due to the ectopic expression of the catalytic component of telomerase. In contrast to MCF-7 cells, irradiated MDA-MB231 breast tumour cells and MCF-7/E6 cells failed to senesce and instead demonstrated a delayed apoptotic cell death. Irradiation produced chromosome end associated abnormalities, including end-to-end fusions (an indicator of telomere dysfunction) in MCF-7 cells, MCF-7/hTERT cells, as well as in MCF-7/E6 cells. When cells were maintained in culture following irradiation, proliferative recovery was evident exclusively after senescence while the cell lines which responded to radiation by apoptosis continued to decline in cell number. Accelerated senescence in response to ionizing radiation is p53 dependent and associated with telomer dysfunction but is unrelated to changes in telomerase activity or telomere lengths, expression of hTERT and hTR. In the absence of functional p53, cells are unable to arrest for an extended period, resulting in apoptotic cell death while accelerated senescence in cells expressing p53 is succeeded by proliferative recovery.

Evasion of a Single-Step, Chemotherapy-Induced Senescence in Breast Cancer Cells: Implications for Treatment Response

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to define the mechanistic basis for recovery of proliferative capacity in breast tumor cells after chemotherapy. Here, we test the hypothesis that evasion of senescence confers resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and ionizing radiation. Experimental Design: MCF-7 cells were treated with a single, clinically relevant dose (0.75-1.0 μmol/L) of Adriamycin. Two weeks following induction of senescence, clonal outgrowths were expanded and characterized in terms of senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity, gene expression profiles (Affymetrix U95 probe sets, Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) with confirmatory Western analyses, and telomerase activity following a second drug treatment. Levels of intracellular Adriamycin, as well as cross-resistance to other therapeutic agents, were also determined to define the resistance phenotype. Results: A senescence-resistant (SR) clone (clone 2) was identified that was largely refractory to both Adriamycin-induced and γ-irradiation–induced senescence. Clone 2 continued to proliferate and maintain high levels of telomerase activity following a second drug treatment, when treated parental cells expressed very low levels of telomerase and many positive cell cycle regulators. SR clone 2 also expressed substantially more cdc-2 than parental cells and undetectable levels of MDR1, showed an intact p53 checkpoint and only a modestly lower level of intracellular drug accumulation, while exhibiting cross-resistance to other topoisomerase inhibitors. Conclusions: SR clone 2 is intrinsically resistant to DNA damage–induced senescence perhaps through an ability to prevent down-regulation of cdc-2. Telomerase is a marker of proliferative recovery for breast cancer cells after chemotherapy exposure. Evasion or escape from a single-step, drug-induced senescence may represent a unique and previously unrecognized drug-resistance phenotype.