David A. Karlin
Genentech
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David A. Karlin.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2011
David R. Spigel; Peter M. Townley; David Waterhouse; Liang Fang; Ibrahim Adiguzel; Jane E. Huang; David A. Karlin; Leonardo Faoro; Frank A. Scappaticci; Mark A. Socinski
PURPOSE Because of promising efficacy signals in single-arm studies, a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab to first-line standard chemotherapy for treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with SCLC were randomly assigned to receive bevacizumab or placebo, with cisplatin or carboplatin plus etoposide, for four cycles followed by single-agent bevacizumab or placebo until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Fifty-two patients were randomly assigned to the bevacizumab group and 50 to the placebo group; 69% versus 66%, respectively, completed four cycles of therapy. Median PFS was higher in the bevacizumab group (5.5 months) than in the placebo group (4.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.86). Median overall survival (OS) was similar for both groups (9.4 v 10.9 months for bevacizumab and placebo groups, respectively), with an HR of 1.16 (95% CI, 0.66 to 2.04). Overall response rates were 58% (95% CI, 43% to 71%) for the bevacizumab group and 48% (95% CI, 34% to 62%) for the placebo group. Median duration of response was 4.7 months for the bevacizumab group and 3.2 months for the placebo group. In the bevacizumab and placebo groups, 75% versus 60% of patients, respectively, experienced one or more grade 3 or higher adverse events. No new or unexpected safety signals for bevacizumab were observed. CONCLUSION The addition of bevacizumab to cisplatin or carboplatin plus etoposide for treatment of extensive-stage SCLC improved PFS, with an acceptable toxicity profile. However, no improvement in OS was observed.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009
John R. Eckardt; Dimitri L. Bentsion; Oleg N. Lipatov; Igor S. Polyakov; Frederick R. MacKintosh; David A. Karlin; Gizelle S. Baker; Hazel Breitz
PURPOSE This study was designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of picoplatin, a cisplatin analog designed to overcome platinum resistance, in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with platinum-refractory/-resistant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients received intravenous picoplatin 150 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. Adverse events were assessed for frequency, severity, and relationship to treatment. Quality of life was assessed with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale instrument. RESULTS Seventy-seven patients were treated with picoplatin (median number of cycles, two; range one to 10). Three patients (4%) had a partial response, 33 (43%) had stable disease (four of these were unconfirmed partial responses), 36 (47%) had progressive disease, and five were not assessable for response. Median progression-free survival was 9.1 weeks (95% CI, 7.0 to 12.1 weeks). Median overall survival was 26.9 weeks (95% CI, 21.1 to 33.4). The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (48%), neutropenia (25%), and anemia (20%). The most commonly reported adverse events of any severity included thrombocytopenia (64%), anemia (49%), neutropenia (39%), nausea (27%), fatigue (16%), and dyspnea (16%). No severe neurotoxicity or nephrotoxicity were observed. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION Picoplatin demonstrated clinical efficacy in platinum-refractory SCLC. The major toxicity was hematologic. These results warrant further evaluation in this patient population.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2011
John D. Hainsworth; Liang Fang; Jane E. Huang; David A. Karlin; Kenneth Russell; Leonardo Faoro; Christopher G. Azzoli
Background: Patients with predominantly squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been generally excluded from studies of bevacizumab treatment, because squamous histology was identified as a possible risk factor for severe (grade ≥3) pulmonary hemorrhage (PH) in a phase II study. BRIDGE was designed to determine whether delaying initiation of bevacizumab treatment and selecting patients without baseline risk factors for PH would lower the incidence of severe PH among patients with squamous NSCLC. Methods: Patients in this open-label, single-arm study were treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel for two cycles, followed by carboplatin/paclitaxel and bevacizumab in cycles 3 to 6, followed by bevacizumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible patients had stage IIIb, stage IV, or recurrent squamous NSCLC. The primary end point was incidence of grade ≥3 PH. Results: Grade ≥3 PH occurred in 1 of 31 patients who received ≥1 dose of bevacizumab: estimated incidence was 3.2% (90% confidence interval 0.3–13.5%). The patient experienced grade 3 PH, discontinued from the study, then experienced grade 4 PH 10 days later, and died of progressive disease. No other serious bleeding events occurred. Nine patients (29.0%) experienced grade 3 adverse events, including five with hypertension; five patients experienced grade 4 adverse events (dyspnea, PH, basal ganglia infarction, cerebral ischemia, and pain). Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months (95% confidence interval 5.32–7.62 months). Conclusions: The incidence of grade ≥3 PH was 3.2% (one patient). No new safety signals were identified. Although the rate of PH was low, the number of patients in this study was also low. Treatment of squamous NSCLC with bevacizumab should be considered experimental.
Archive | 2009
David A. Karlin; Ronald A. Martell
Archive | 2009
Ronald A. Martell; David A. Karlin
Archive | 2008
Alistair J. Leigh; Ronald A. Martell; David A. Karlin; Cheni Kwok; Christopher A. Procyshyn; Hazel B. Breitz; Paul L. Weiden
Archive | 2009
David A. Karlin; Hazel B. Breitz; Paul L. Weiden
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Neelesh Sharma; Robert Wesolowski; Laura Reebel; Mary Beth Rodal; Alexandra Peck; Brian L. West; David A. Karlin; Afshin Dowlati; Mai H. Le; Lisa M. Coussens; Hope S. Rugo
Archive | 2010
David A. Karlin; Hazel B. Breitz; Paul L. Weiden; Robert De Jager
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2010
Leonardo Faoro; John D. Hainsworth; David A. Karlin; Jane E. Huang; Liang Fang; Frank A. Scappaticci