David A. Sacks

Frequency of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus at Collaborating Centers Based on IADPSG Consensus Panel–Recommended Criteria The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study

OBJECTIVE To report frequencies of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among the 15 centers that participated in the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study using the new International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS All participants underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test between 24 and 32 weeks’ gestation. GDM was retrospectively classified using the IADPSG criteria (one or more fasting, 1-h, or 2-h plasma glucose concentrations equal to or greater than threshold values of 5.1, 10.0, or 8.5 mmol/L, respectively). RESULTS Overall frequency of GDM was 17.8% (range 9.3–25.5%). There was substantial center-to-center variation in which glucose measures met diagnostic thresholds. CONCLUSIONS Although the new diagnostic criteria for GDM apply globally, center-to-center differences occur in GDM frequency and relative diagnostic importance of fasting, 1-h, and 2-h glucose levels. This may impact strategies used for the diagnosis of GDM.

Pregnancy weight gain and risk of neonatal complications: macrosomia, hypoglycemia, and hyperbilirubinemia.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether pregnancy weight gains outside the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations and rates of maternal weight gain are associated with neonatal complications. METHODS: In a cohort of 45,245 women who delivered singletons at Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program Northern California in 1996–1998 and who did not have gestational diabetes as of 24–28 weeks of gestation, we conducted a nested case–control study with three case groups: macrosomia (birth weight more than 4,500 g, n=391), neonatal hypoglycemia (plasma glucose less than 40 mg/dL, n=328), and hyperbilirubinemia (serum bilirubin 20 mg/dL or more, n=432) and one control group (n=652). Medical records were reviewed to ascertain the woman’s prepregnancy and predelivery weight. RESULTS: Adjusting for age, race–ethnicity, parity, plasma glucose screening value, and difference in weeks between delivery and time when last weight was measured, women who gained more than recommended by the IOM were three times more likely to have an infant with macrosomia (odds ratio [OR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.19–4.26), and nearly 1.5 times as likely to have an infant with hypoglycemia (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01–1.89), or hyperbilirubinemia (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06–1.93) than women whose weight gain was in the recommended range. Women who gained less than the IOM recommendations were less likely than women in the recommended range to have an infant with macrosomia (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20–0.70), but equally likely to have an infant with hypoglycemia or hyperbilirubinemia. Similar results were obtained using other means of categorizing weight gain during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Maternal weight gain above the IOM recommendations was associated with an increased risk of the outcomes studied. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2

Gestational diabetes mellitus and lesser degrees of pregnancy hyperglycemia: Association with increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth

OBJECTIVE To investigate whether different degrees of maternal glucose intolerance are associated with the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS We performed a cohort study of 46,230 pregnancies screened by a 50-g, 1-hour oral glucose tolerance test between 24 and 28 gestation weeks at the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program. Spontaneous preterm birth was defined as an infant born at less than 37 gestation weeks with at least one of the following: spontaneous labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, or incompetent cervix. Glucose tolerance status was categorized as normal screening (1-hour plasma glucose less than 140 mg/dL), abnormal screening (1-hour plasma glucose of at least 140 mg/dL with a normal diagnostic 100-g, 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test result), Carpenter-Coustan (plasma glucose measurements during the diagnostic oral glucose tolerance test met the thresholds but were lower than the National Diabetes Data Group thresholds), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by the National Diabetes Data Group criteria. RESULTS One thousand nine hundred fifty-six spontaneous preterm births occurred. Age-adjusted incidences of spontaneous preterm birth were 4.0% in normal screening, 5.0% in abnormal screening, 6.7% in Carpenter-Coustan, and 6.7% in GDM. In a logistic regression model adjusted for age, race-ethnicity, preeclampsia-eclampsia-pregnancy-induced hypertension, chronic hypertension, polyhydramnios, and birth weight for gestational age, pregnancies with abnormal screening, Carpenter-Coustan, and GDM had a significantly higher risk of spontaneous preterm birth than pregnancies with normal screening (relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 1.23 [1.08, 1.41], 1.53 [1.16, 2.03], and 1.42 [1.15-1.77], respectively). CONCLUSION The risk of spontaneous preterm birth increased with increasing levels of pregnancy glycemia. This association was independent of perinatal complications that could have triggered early delivery.

The Relative Contribution of Prepregnancy Overweight and Obesity, Gestational Weight Gain, and IADPSG-Defined Gestational Diabetes Mellitus to Fetal Overgrowth

OBJECTIVE The International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) identifies women and infants at risk for adverse outcomes, which are also strongly associated with maternal overweight, obesity, and excess gestational weight gain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of 9,835 women who delivered at ≥20 weeks’ gestation; had a prenatal, 2-h, 75-g oral glucose tolerance test; and were not treated with diet, exercise, or antidiabetic medications during pregnancy. Women were classified as having GDM based on IADPSG criteria and were categorized into six mutually exclusive prepregnancy BMI/GDM groups: normal weight ± GDM, overweight ± GDM, and obese ± GDM. RESULTS Overall, 5,851 (59.5%) women were overweight or obese and 1,892 (19.2%) had GDM. Of those with GDM, 1,443 (76.3%) were overweight or obese. The prevalence of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants was significantly higher for overweight and obese women without GDM compared with their normal-weight counterparts. Among women without GDM, 21.6% of LGA infants were attributable to maternal overweight and obesity, and the combination of being overweight or obese and having GDM accounted for 23.3% of LGA infants. Increasing gestational weight gain was associated with a higher prevalence of LGA in all groups. CONCLUSIONS Prepregnancy overweight and obesity account for a high proportion of LGA, even in the absence of GDM. Interventions that focus on maternal overweight/obesity and gestational weight gain, regardless of GDM status, have the potential to reach far more women at risk for having an LGA infant.

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Initiative on gestational diabetes mellitus: A pragmatic guide for diagnosis, management, and care#

In addition to the authors, t he following people provided important contributions during the creation of the document. Thanks go to international experts: Tao Duan, Huixia Yang, Andre Van Assche, Umberto Simeoni, Tahir Mahmood, Biodun Olagbuji, Eugene Sobngwi, Maicon Falavigna, Rodolfo Martinez, Carlos Ortega, Susana Salzberg, Jorge Alvariñas, Gloria Lopez Steward, Silvia Lapertosa, Roberto Estrade, Cristina Faingold, Silvia García, Argyro Syngelaki, Stephen Colagiuri, Yoel Toledano, Mark Hanson, and Blami Dao. Special thanks, for FIGO guidance and coordination, go to President Sabaratnam Arulkumaran, President Elect CN Purandare, Chief Executive Hamid Rushwan, and Chair of the SMNH Committee, William Stones. The following external groups evaluated the document and support its contents: European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG), The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC), Chinese Society of Perinatal Medicine, Diabetic Pregnancy Study Group (DPSG), African Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (AFOG), South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (SAFOG), Australian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS), International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG), European Association of Perinatal Medicine (EAPM), Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI), and the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of Latin America. In addition to the FIGO Executive Board, all relevant FIGO Committees and Working Groups contributed to and supported the document. Acknowledgments

Prevalence and Timing of Postpartum Glucose Testing and Sustained Glucose Dysregulation After Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence of postpartum glucose testing within 6 months of pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), assess factors associated with testing and timing of testing after delivery, and report the test results among tested women. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a retrospective study of 11,825 women who were identified as having GDM using the 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) from 1999 to 2006. Postpartum testing (75-g 2-h OGTT or fasting plasma glucose [FPG]) within 6 months of delivery and test results from laboratory databases are reported. Postpartum test results are categorized as normal, impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and provisionally diabetic. RESULTS About half (n = 5,939) the women were tested with either a FPG or 75-g OGTT from 7 days to 6 months postpartum. Of these women, 46% were tested during the 6- to 12-week postpartum period. Odds of testing were independently associated with age, race/ethnicity, household income, education, foreign-born status, parity, mode of delivery, having a postpartum visit, having GDM coded at discharge, and pharmacotherapy for GDM. Of the 5,857 women with test results, 16.3% (n = 956) had IFG/IGT and 1.1% (n = 66) had provisional diabetes. After adjustment for demographic and clinical factors, abnormal postpartum test results was associated with having required insulin, glyburide, or metformin during pregnancy and with longer period from delivery to postpartum testing. CONCLUSIONS After a pregnancy complicated by GDM, automated orders for postpartum testing with notification to physicians and electronically generated telephone and e-mail reminder messages to patients may improve the rates of postpartum testing for persistence of glucose intolerance.

Racial and ethnic disparities in diabetes risk after gestational diabetes mellitus

Aims/hypothesisTo investigate racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes risk after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of women enrolled in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California health plan from 1995 to 2009. GDM status was identified on the basis of plasma glucose levels during pregnancy. The incidence of diabetes after the first delivery complicated by GDM before 31 December 2009 (n = 12,998) was compared with the experience for women without GDM (n = 64,668) matched on maternal age at delivery, race/ethnicity and year of delivery (1:5 ratio). Matched Cox regression was used to compare the RRs of diabetes associated with GDM within and across racial/ethnic groups.ResultsCompared with the women without GDM, the HRs (95% CI) of diabetes for women after GDM were 6.5 (5.2, 8.0) in non-Hispanic white, 7.7 (6.8, 8.7) in Hispanic, 9.9 (7.5, 13.1) in black and 6.3 (5.0, 7.9) in Asian/Pacific Islanders after adjustment for parity, maternal education, comorbidity and number of outpatient visits before the index pregnancy. The HR of diabetes for black women was significantly higher than that for non-Hispanic white women (p = 0.032). Further adjustment for prepregnancy BMI reduced the diabetes risk association with GDM for each racial/ethnic group, but did not explain the risk differences across groups.Conclusions/interpretationsRacial/ethnic disparities exist in risk of diabetes after GDM. Black women with GDM had the highest risk of developing diabetes. This highlights the importance of developing an effective diabetes screening and prevention programme in women with GDM, particularly black women with GDM.

Fasting plasma glucose test at the first prenatal visit as a screen for gestational diabetes.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether the fasting plasma glucose test administered at the first prenatal visit could serve as an efficient screen for gestational diabetes. METHODS A total of 5557 women not known to have diabetes were offered a fasting plasma glucose test at their first prenatal visit. Results less than 100 mg/dL were blinded. A glucose tolerance test was requested immediately of those whose screening test result was 100–125 mg/dL and of all women not identified as having diabetes by their 23rd gestational week. RESULTS A total of 4507 women (81%) complied with the protocol. Of the 302 women found to have gestational diabetes, 46 (15%) were detected before 24 weeks. A false-positive rate of 57% was found at a threshold fasting glucose concentration giving a sensitivity of 80% for the detection of gestational diabetes. CONCLUSION The fasting plasma glucose screening test at the first prenatal visit has good patient compliance. However, its poor specificity (high false-positive rate) makes it an inefficient screening test for gestational diabetes.

Issues With the Diagnosis and Classification of Hyperglycemia in Early Pregnancy

In 2010, the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) panel published consensus-based recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy (1). Within that document, the recommendations regarding early pregnancy testing were designed to facilitate early detection and treatment of hyperglycemia (HbA1c ≥6.5% [48 mmol/mol], fasting venous plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L, random plasma glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L with confirmation) that, outside pregnancy, would be classified as diabetes. The term “overt diabetes” was suggested to describe these women. Subsequently, the World Health Organization (WHO) adopted the IADPSG criteria with some modifications and promoted the use of the term “diabetes in pregnancy” (2) for this group. Cognizant that milder degrees of hyperglycemia would also be detected by early pregnancy testing, the IADPSG also recommended that fasting …

Recurrence of preterm premature rupture of membranes in relation to interval between pregnancies

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine whether the recurrence risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is modified by the interpregnancy interval (IPI). STUDY DESIGN We used the Missouri 1989-1997 longitudinally linked data to examine the recurrence risk of PPROM in women with first 2 (n = 150,929) and first 3 (n = 30,011) successive pregnancies. Race-specific recurrence risks were examined. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were used to estimate risks. RESULTS Risks of PPROM in the second pregnancy among women with and without previous PPROM were 5.7% and 2.3%, respectively, among white women (OR, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 6.7-11.4) and 10.3% and 4.3%, respectively, among African American women (OR, 7.2; 95% confidence interval, 5.1-10.1). Short IPI was associated with increased risk for PPROM recurrence, with substantially higher risk for African American women than white women. However, long IPI was associated with increased recurrence among African American women. CONCLUSION Women with previous PPROM are at increased risk for recurrence, and a short IPI is associated with increased risk.