Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David B. Lindenmayer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David B. Lindenmayer.


Forest Ecology and Management | 2002

Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example

Jerry F. Franklin; Thomas A. Spies; Robert Van Pelt; Andrew B. Carey; Dale A. Thornburgh; Dean Rae Berg; David B. Lindenmayer; Mark E. Harmon; William S. Keeton; David C. Shaw; Ken Bible; Jiquan Chen

Forest managers need a comprehensive scientific understanding of natural stand development processes when designing silvicultural systems that integrate ecological and economic objectives, including a better appreciation of the nature of disturbance regimes and the biological legacies, such as live trees, snags, and logs, that they leave behind. Most conceptual forest development models do not incorporate current knowledge of the: (1) complexity of structures (including spatial patterns) and developmental processes; (2) duration of development in long-lived forests; (3) complex spatial patterns of stands that develop in later stages of seres; and particularly (4) the role of disturbances in creating structural legacies that become key elements of the post-disturbance stands. We elaborate on existing models for stand structural development using natural stand development of the Douglas-fir—western hemlock sere in the Pacific Northwest as our primary example; most of the principles are broadly applicable while some processes (e.g. role of epicormic branches) are related to specific species. We discuss the use of principles from disturbance ecology and natural stand development to create silvicultural approaches that are more aligned with natural processes. Such approaches provide for a greater abundance of standing dead and down wood and large old trees, perhaps reducing short-term commercial productivity but ultimately enhancing wildlife habitat, biodiversity, and ecosystem function, including soil protection and nutrient retention. # 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.


Biological Conservation | 2000

An assessment of the published results of animal relocations

Joern Fischer; David B. Lindenmayer

We reviewed 180 case studies and a number of theoretical papers on animal relocations published in 12 major international scientific journals over the last 20 years. The study focused on re-introductions, supplementations and translocations (sensu IUCN, 1996. IUCN/SSC Guidelines for Re-introductions. 41st Meeting of the IUCN Council, Gland, Switzerland, May 1995. Http://iucn.org/themes/ssc/pubs/policy/hinte.htm.). We did not assess introductions. Re-introductions were the most common type of relocation (116/180); three quarters of these were conducted for conservation purposes. Supplementations (48/180) and translocations (36/180) occurred less frequently, and both were commonly carried out for reasons other than conservation. Simple descriptive statistics were used to analyse factors influencing relocation success. Translocations that aimed to solve human‐animal conflicts generally failed. Re-introduction success was not found to have changed over the last two decades, but re-introductions appeared to be more successful when the source population was wild, a large number of animals was released (n>100), and the cause of original decline was removed. More complex trends were found for the eAect of predation and the use of supportive measures such as provision of food or shelter, or predator control prior to release. The success of 47% of re-introductions was uncertain at the time case studies were published in journals. This was partly due to the lack of generally accepted and widely applied criteria to assess success. Very few case studies (3%) reported the cost of the relocation attempt. We conclude that there were three primary aims for animal relocations. These were to solve human‐animal conflicts, to restock game populations, and conservation. Our extensive review of the present literature leads us to conclude that the value of animal relocations as a conservation tool could be enhanced through (1) more rigorous testing for the appropriateness of the approach in a given case, (2) the establishment of widely used and generally accepted criteria for judging the success or failure of relocations, (3) better monitoring after a relocation, (4) better financial accountability, and (5) greater eAort to publish the results of relocations, even ones that are unsuccessful. # 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.


Science | 2008

Assisted Colonization and Rapid Climate Change

Ove Hoegh-Guldberg; Laura E. Hughes; Sue McIntyre; David B. Lindenmayer; Camille Parmesan; Hugh P. Possingham; Chris D. Thomas

Moving species outside their historic ranges may mitigate loss of biodiversity in the face of global climate change.


Evolution | 2003

Spatial autocorrelation analysis offers new insights into gene flow in the Australian bush rat, Rattus fuscipes

Rodney Peakall; Monica Ruibal; David B. Lindenmayer

Abstract Dispersal is a fundamental process that influences the response of species to landscape change and habitat fragmentation. In an attempt to better understand dispersal in the Australian bush rat, Rattusfuscipes, we have combined a new multilocus autocorrelation method with hypervariable microsatellite genetic markers to investigate fine‐scale (<1 km) patterns of spatial distribution and spatial genetic structure. The study was conducted across eight trapping transects at four sites, with a total of 270 animals sampled. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of bush rat distribution revealed that, in general, animals occurred in groups or clusters of higher density (<200 m across), with intervening gaps or lower density areas. Spatial genetic autocorrelation analysis, based on seven hypervariable microsatellite loci (He= 0.8) with a total of 80 alleles, revealed a consistent pattern of significant positive local genetic structure. This genetic pattern was consistent for all transects, and for adults and sub‐adults, males and females. By testing for autocorrelation at multiple scales from 10 to 800 m we found that the extent of detectable positive spatial genetic structure exceeded 500 m. Further analyses detected significantly weaker spatial genetic structure in males compared with females, but no significant differences were detected between adults and sub adults. Results from Mantel tests and hierarchical AMOVA further support the conclusion that the distribution of bush rat genotypes is not random at the scale of our study. Instead, proximate bush rats are more genetically alike than more distant animals. We conclude that in bush rats, gene flow per generation is sufficiently restricted to generate the strong positive signal of local spatial genetic structure. Although our results are consistent with field data on animal movement, including the reported tendency for males to move further than females, we provide the first evidence for restricted gene flow in bush rats. Our study appears to be the first microsatellite‐based study of fine‐scale genetic variation in small mammals and the first to report consistent positive local genetic structure across sites, age‐classes, and sexes. The combination of new forms of autocorrelation analyses, hypervariable genetic markers and fine‐scale analysis (<1 km) may thus offer new evolutionary insights that are overlooked by more traditional larger scaled (>10 km) population genetic studies.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2009

Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests

Heather Keith; Brendan Mackey; David B. Lindenmayer

From analysis of published global site biomass data (n = 136) from primary forests, we discovered (i) the worlds highest known total biomass carbon density (living plus dead) of 1,867 tonnes carbon per ha (average value from 13 sites) occurs in Australian temperate moist Eucalyptus regnans forests, and (ii) average values of the global site biomass data were higher for sampled temperate moist forests (n = 44) than for sampled tropical (n = 36) and boreal (n = 52) forests (n is number of sites per forest biome). Spatially averaged Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change biome default values are lower than our average site values for temperate moist forests, because the temperate biome contains a diversity of forest ecosystem types that support a range of mature carbon stocks or have a long land-use history with reduced carbon stocks. We describe a framework for identifying forests important for carbon storage based on the factors that account for high biomass carbon densities, including (i) relatively cool temperatures and moderately high precipitation producing rates of fast growth but slow decomposition, and (ii) older forests that are often multiaged and multilayered and have experienced minimal human disturbance. Our results are relevant to negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change regarding forest conservation, management, and restoration. Conserving forests with large stocks of biomass from deforestation and degradation avoids significant carbon emissions to the atmosphere, irrespective of the source country, and should be among allowable mitigation activities. Similarly, management that allows restoration of a forests carbon sequestration potential also should be recognized.


Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment | 2008

Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife‐friendly farming?

Joern Fischer; Berry J. Brosi; Gretchen C. Daily; Paul R. Ehrlich; Rebecca L. Goldman; Joshua H. Goldstein; David B. Lindenmayer; Adrian D. Manning; Harold A. Mooney; Liba Pejchar; Jai Ranganathan; Heather Tallis

As the demands on agricultural lands to produce food, fuel, and fiber continue to expand, effective strategies are urgently needed to balance biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. “Land sparing” and “wildlife-friendly farming” have been proposed as seemingly opposing strategies to achieve this balance. In land sparing, homogeneous areas of farmland are managed to maximize yields, while separate reserves target biodiversity conservation. Wildlife-friendly farming, in contrast, integrates conservation and production within more heterogeneous landscapes. Different scientific traditions underpin the two approaches. Land sparing is associated with an island model of modified landscapes, where islands of nature are seen as separate from human activities. This simple dichotomy makes land sparing easily compatible with optimization methods that attempt to allocate land uses in the most efficient way. In contrast, wildlife-friendly farming emphasizes heterogeneity, resilience, and ecological inter...


Trends in Ecology and Evolution | 2009

Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring

David B. Lindenmayer; Gene E. Likens

Long-term research and monitoring can provide important ecological insights and are crucial for the improved management of ecosystems and natural resources. However, many long-term research and monitoring programs are either ineffective or fail completely owing to poor planning and/or lack of focus. Here we propose the paradigm of adaptive monitoring, which aims to resolve many of the problems that have undermined previous attempts to establish long-term research and monitoring. This paradigm is driven by tractable questions, rigorous statistical design at the outset, a conceptual model of the ecosystem or other entity being examined and a human need to know about ecosystem change. An adaptive monitoring framework enables monitoring programs to evolve iteratively as new information emerges and research questions change.


Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment | 2011

The forgotten stage of forest succession: early‐successional ecosystems on forest sites

Mark E. Swanson; Jerry F. Franklin; Robert L. Beschta; Charles M. Crisafulli; Dominick A. DellaSala; Richard L. Hutto; David B. Lindenmayer; Frederick J. Swanson

Early-successional forest ecosystems that develop after stand-replacing or partial disturbances are diverse in species, processes, and structure. Post-disturbance ecosystems are also often rich in biological legacies, including surviving organisms and organically derived structures, such as woody debris. These legacies and post-disturbance plant communities provide resources that attract and sustain high species diversity, including numerous early-successional obligates, such as certain woodpeckers and arthropods. Early succession is the only period when tree canopies do not dominate the forest site, and so this stage can be characterized by high productivity of plant species (including herbs and shrubs), complex food webs, large nutrient fluxes, and high structural and spatial complexity. Different disturbances contrast markedly in terms of biological legacies, and this will influence the resultant physical and biological conditions, thus affecting successional pathways. Management activities, such as post-disturbance logging and dense tree planting, can reduce the richness within and the duration of early-successional ecosystems. Where maintenance of biodiversity is an objective, the importance and value of these natural early-successional ecosystems are underappreciated.


Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment | 2006

Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes

Joern Fischer; David B. Lindenmayer; Adrian D. Manning

Biodiversity conservation in forestry and agricultural landscapes is important because (1) reserves alone will not protect biodiversity; (2) commodity production relies on vital services provided by biodiversity; and (3) biodiversity enhances resilience, or a systems capacity to recover from external pressures such as droughts or management mistakes. We suggest ten guiding principles to help maintain biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience in production landscapes. Landscapes should include structurally characteristic patches of native vegetation, corridors and stepping stones between them, a structurally complex matrix, and buffers around sensitive areas. Management should maintain a diversity of species within and across functional groups. Highly focused management actions may be required to maintain keystone species and threatened species, and to control invasive species. These guiding principles provide a scientifically defensible starting point for the integration of conservation and production, which is urgently required from both an ecological and a long-term economic perspective.


Ecological Modelling | 1996

Modelling the abundance of rare species: statistical models for counts with extra zeros

Alan Welsh; Ross B. Cunningham; Christine Donnelly; David B. Lindenmayer

Abstract We consider several statistical models for the analysis of the abundance of a rare species and these are illustrated in detail with data for the abundance of Leadbeaters Possum in montane ash forests of south-eastern Australia. These data are characterised by a discrete distribution with the zero class inflated. In many statistical problems the parameters of this distribution depend on covariates, such as the number of hollow bearing trees. We advocate a conditional model which is simple to interpret and readily fitted. We show how to obtain standard errors for the parameter estimates. We also show how to estimate the mean abundance of animals at a site. The methods outlined in this paper offer a powerful framework for the study of problems having a discrete response (like abundance) with the zero class inflated.

Collaboration


Dive into the David B. Lindenmayer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ross B. Cunningham

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Damian Michael

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey Wood

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mason Crane

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adrian D. Manning

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip S. Barton

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip Gibbons

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sam C. Banks

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lachlan McBurney

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher MacGregor

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge