Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David B. Weiner is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David B. Weiner.


Nature Biotechnology | 2005

Antibody mediated in vivo delivery of small interfering RNAs via cell-surface receptors

Erwei Song; Pengcheng Zhu; Sang Kyung Lee; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Steven Kussman; Derek M. Dykxhoorn; Yi Feng; Deborah Palliser; David B. Weiner; Premlata Shankar; Wayne A. Marasco; Judy Lieberman

Delivery of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) into cells is a key obstacle to their therapeutic application. We designed a protamine-antibody fusion protein to deliver siRNA to HIV-infected or envelope-transfected cells. The fusion protein (F105-P) was designed with the protamine coding sequence linked to the C terminus of the heavy chain Fab fragment of an HIV-1 envelope antibody. siRNAs bound to F105-P induced silencing only in cells expressing HIV-1 envelope. Additionally, siRNAs targeted against the HIV-1 capsid gene gag, inhibited HIV replication in hard-to-transfect, HIV-infected primary T cells. Intratumoral or intravenous injection of F105-P-complexed siRNAs into mice targeted HIV envelope-expressing B16 melanoma cells, but not normal tissue or envelope-negative B16 cells; injection of F105-P with siRNAs targeting c-myc, MDM2 and VEGF inhibited envelope-expressing subcutaneous B16 tumors. Furthermore, an ErbB2 single-chain antibody fused with protamine delivered siRNAs specifically into ErbB2-expressing cancer cells. This study demonstrates the potential for systemic, cell-type specific, antibody-mediated siRNA delivery.


Nature Reviews Genetics | 2008

DNA vaccines: ready for prime time?

Michele Kutzler; David B. Weiner

Since the discovery, over a decade and a half ago, that genetically engineered DNA can be delivered in vaccine form and elicit an immune response, there has been much progress in understanding the basic biology of this platform. A large amount of data has been generated in preclinical model systems, and more sustained cellular responses and more consistent antibody responses are being observed in the clinic. Four DNA vaccine products have recently been approved, all in the area of veterinary medicine. These results suggest a productive future for this technology as more optimized constructs, better trial designs and improved platforms are being brought into the clinic.


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 1998

First Human Trial of a DNA-Based Vaccine for Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection: Safety and Host Response

Rob Roy MacGregor; Jean D. Boyer; Kenneth E. Ugen; Kim Lacy; Stephen J. Gluckman; Mark L. Bagarazzi; Michael A. Chattergoon; Yaela Baine; Terry J. Higgins; Richard B. Ciccarelli; Leslie R. Coney; Richard S. Ginsberg; David B. Weiner

A DNA-based vaccine containing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) env and rev genes was tested for safety and host immune response in 15 asymptomatic HIV-infected patients who were not using antiviral drugs and who had CD4+ lymphocyte counts of > or = 500 per microliter of blood. Successive groups received three doses of vaccine (30, 100, or 300 microg) at 10-week intervals in a dose-escalation trial. Vaccine administration induced no local or systemic reactions, and no laboratory abnormalities were detected. Specifically, no patient developed anti-DNA antibody or muscle enzyme elevations. No consistent change occurred in CD4 or CD8 lymphocyte counts or in plasma HIV concentration. Antibody against gp120 increased in individual patients in the 100- and 300-/microg groups. Some increases were noted in cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity against gp160-bearing targets and in lymphocyte proliferative activity. The safety and potential immunogenicity of an HIV-directed DNA-based vaccine was demonstrated, a finding that should encourage further studies.


Science | 2012

Innate Lymphoid Cells Promote Anatomical Containment of Lymphoid-Resident Commensal Bacteria

Gregory F. Sonnenberg; Laurel A. Monticelli; Theresa Alenghat; Thomas C. Fung; Natalie A. Hutnick; Jun Kunisawa; Naoko Shibata; Stephanie Grunberg; Rohini Sinha; Adam M. Zahm; Mélanie R. Tardif; Taheri Sathaliyawala; Masaru Kubota; Donna L. Farber; Ronald G. Collman; Abraham Shaked; Lynette A. Fouser; David B. Weiner; Philippe A. Tessier; Joshua R. Friedman; Hiroshi Kiyono; Frederic D. Bushman; Kyong-Mi Chang; David Artis

Protecting Against a Barrier Breach In order to coexist peacefully, a “firewall” exists that keeps the commensal bacteria that reside in our intestines and associated lymphoid tissue contained. Several diseases and infections, however, lead to a breach in this barrier, which leads to chronic inflammation and pathology. Sonnenberg et al. (p. 1321) found that in mice, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are critically important for the anatomical containment of commensal bacteria in an interleukin-22 (IL-22)–dependent manner. ILC depletion or blockade of IL-22 led to loss of bacterial containment and systemic inflammation. Lymphocytes prevent bacteria from spreading beyond gut-associated lymphoid tissues and causing systemic inflammation. The mammalian intestinal tract is colonized by trillions of beneficial commensal bacteria that are anatomically restricted to specific niches. However, the mechanisms that regulate anatomical containment remain unclear. Here, we show that interleukin-22 (IL-22)–producing innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are present in intestinal tissues of healthy mammals. Depletion of ILCs resulted in peripheral dissemination of commensal bacteria and systemic inflammation, which was prevented by administration of IL-22. Disseminating bacteria were identified as Alcaligenes species originating from host lymphoid tissues. Alcaligenes was sufficient to promote systemic inflammation after ILC depletion in mice, and Alcaligenes-specific systemic immune responses were associated with Crohn’s disease and progressive hepatitis C virus infection in patients. Collectively, these data indicate that ILCs regulate selective containment of lymphoid-resident bacteria to prevent systemic inflammation associated with chronic diseases.


European Journal of Immunology | 1998

Modulation of amplitude and direction of in vivo immune responses by co-administration of cytokine gene expression cassettes with DNA immunogens

Jong J. Kim; Neil N. Trivedi; Liesl K. Nottingham; Lake Morrison; Anthony Tsai; Yin Hu; Sundarasamy Mahalingam; Kesen Dang; Lois Ahn; Nicole K. Doyle; Darren M. Wilson; Michael A. Chattergoon; Ara A. Chalian; Jean D. Boyer; Michael G. Agadjanyan; David B. Weiner

Immunization with nucleic acids has been shown to induce both antigen‐specific cellular and humoral immune responses in vivo. We hypothesize that immunization with DNA could be enhanced by directing specific immune responses induced by the vaccine based on the differential correlates of protection known for a particular pathogen. Recently we and others reported that specific immune responses generated by DNA vaccine could be modulated by co‐delivery of gene expression cassettes encoding for IL‐12, granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor and the co‐stimulatory molecule CD86. To further engineer the immune response in vivo, we investigated the induction and regulation of immune responses following the co‐delivery of pro‐inflammatory cytokine (IL‐1α, TNF‐α, and TNF‐β), Th1 cytokine (IL‐2, IL‐12, IL‐15, and IL‐18), and Th2 cytokine (IL‐4, IL‐5 and IL‐10) genes. We observed enhancement of antigen‐specific humoral response with the co‐delivery of Th2 cytokine genes IL‐4, IL‐5, and IL‐10 as well as those of IL‐2 and IL‐18. A dramatic increase in antigen‐specific T helper cell proliferation was seen with IL‐2 and TNF‐α gene co‐injections. In addition, we observed a significant enhancement of the cytotoxic response with the co‐administration of TNF‐α and IL‐15 genes with HIV‐1 DNA immunogens. These increases in CTL response were both MHC class I restricted and CD8+ T cell dependent. Together with earlier reports on the utility of co‐immunizing using immunologically important molecules together with DNA immunogens, we demonstrate the potential of this strategy as an important tool for the development of more rationally designed vaccines.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2011

Clinical Applications of DNA Vaccines: Current Progress

Bernadette Ferraro; Matthew P. Morrow; Natalie A. Hutnick; Thomas Shin; Colleen E. Lucke; David B. Weiner

It was discovered almost 20 years ago that plasmid DNA, when injected into the skin or muscle of mice, could induce immune responses to encoded antigens. Since that time, there has since been much progress in understanding the basic biology behind this deceptively simple vaccine platform and much technological advancement to enhance immune potency. Among these advancements are improved formulations and improved physical methods of delivery, which increase the uptake of vaccine plasmids by cells; optimization of vaccine vectors and encoded antigens; and the development of novel formulations and adjuvants to augment and direct the host immune response. The ability of the current, or second-generation, DNA vaccines to induce more-potent cellular and humoral responses opens up this platform to be examined in both preventative and therapeutic arenas. This review focuses on these advances and discusses both preventive and immunotherapeutic clinical applications.


Journal of Leukocyte Biology | 2000

DNA vaccination: antigen presentation and the induction of immunity

Devon J. Shedlock; David B. Weiner

DNA vaccination, or genetic immunization, is a novel vaccine technology that has great potential for reducing infectious disease and cancer‐induced morbidity and mortality worldwide. Since their inception, DNA vaccines have been used to stimulate protective immunity against many infectious pathogens, malignancies, and autoimmune disorders in animal models. Plasmid DNA encoding a polypeptide protein antigen is introduced into a host where it enters host cells and serves as an epigenetic template for the high‐efficiency translation of its antigen. An immune response, which is mediated by the cellular and/or humoral arms of the immune system and is specific for the plasmid‐encoded antigen, ensues. It is thought that “professional” antigen‐presenting cells play a dominant role in the induction of immunity by presenting vaccine peptides on MHC class I molecules, following direct transfection or “cross”‐presentation, and MHC class II molecules after antigen capture and processing within the endocytic pathway. The correlates of immunity can be manipulated according to many immunization parameters, including the method of vaccine delivery, presence of genetic adjuvants, and vaccine regimen. DNA vaccines first advanced to the clinic five years ago, and the initial picture of their utility in humans is emerging. However, further analysis is required to determine their ultimate efficacy and safety in human beings. This technology has acquired a strong foothold in the field of experimental immunotherapy, and it is hoped that it will eventually represent the next generation of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines.


Journal of Clinical Investigation | 1998

CD8 positive T cells influence antigen-specific immune responses through the expression of chemokines.

Jong J. Kim; Liesl K. Nottingham; Jeong I. Sin; Anthony Tsai; Lake Morrison; Jim Oh; Kesen Dang; Yin Hu; Ken Kazahaya; Mosi Bennett; Tzvete Dentchev; Darren M. Wilson; Ara A. Chalian; Jean D. Boyer; Michael G. Agadjanyan; David B. Weiner

The potential roles of CD8(+) T-cell-induced chemokines in the expansion of immune responses were examined using DNA immunogen constructs as model antigens. We coimmunized cDNA expression cassettes encoding the alpha-chemokines IL-8 and SDF-1alpha and the beta-chemokines MIP-1alpha, RANTES, and MCP-1 along with DNA immunogens and analyzed the resulting antigen-specific immune responses. In a manner more similar to the traditional immune modulatory role of CD4(+) T cells via the expression of Th1 or Th2 cytokines, CD8(+) T cells appeared to play an important role in immune expansion and effector function by producing chemokines. For instance, IL-8 was a strong inducer of CD4(+) T cells, indicated by strong T helper proliferative responses as well as an enhancement of antibody responses. MIP-1alpha had a dramatic effect on antibody responses and modulated the shift of immune responses to a Th2-type response. RANTES coimmunization enhanced the levels of antigen-specific Th1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses. Among the chemokines examined, MCP-1 was the most potent activator of CD8(+) CTL activity. The enhanced CTL results are supported by the increased expression of Th1 cytokines IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha and the reduction of IgG1/IgG2a ratio. Our results support that CD8(+) T cells may expand both humoral and cellular responses in vivo through the elaboration of specific chemokines at the peripheral site of infection during the effector stage of the immune response.


Current Opinion in Immunology | 2011

Electroporation Delivery of DNA Vaccines: Prospects for Success

Niranjan Y. Sardesai; David B. Weiner

A number of noteworthy technology advances in DNA vaccines research and development over the past few years have led to the resurgence of this field as a viable vaccine modality. Notably, these include--optimization of DNA constructs; development of new DNA manufacturing processes and formulations; augmentation of immune responses with novel encoded molecular adjuvants; and the improvement in new in vivo delivery strategies including electroporation (EP). Of these, EP mediated delivery has generated considerable enthusiasm and appears to have had a great impact in vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy by increasing antigen delivery upto a 1000 fold over naked DNA delivery alone. This increased delivery has resulted in an improved in vivo immune response magnitude as well as response rates relative to DNA delivery by direct injection alone. Indeed the immune responses and protection from pathogen challenge observed following DNA administration via EP in many cases are comparable or superior to other well studied vaccine platforms including viral vectors and live/attenuated/inactivated virus vaccines. Significantly, the early promise of EP delivery shown in numerous pre-clinical animal models of many different infectious diseases and cancer are now translating into equally enhanced immune responses in human clinical trials making the prospects for this vaccine approach to impact diverse disease targets tangible.


Cell | 1993

Induction of cell differentiation by human immunodeficiency virus 1 vpr

David N. Levy; Laura S. Fernandes; William V. Williams; David B. Weiner

Cell lines from rhabdomyosarcomas, which are tumors of muscle origin, have been used as models of CD4-independent HIV infection. These cell lines can be induced to differentiate in vitro. We report here that the vpr gene of HIV1 is sufficient for the differentiation of the human rhabdomyosarcoma cell line TE671. Differentiated cells are characterized by great enlargement, altered morphology, lack of replication, and high level expression of the muscle-specific protein myosin. We have also observed the morphological differentiation and inhibition of proliferation of two other transformed cell lines. vpr-transfected cells remain fully viable in culture for extended periods. These observations elucidate a potential role for vpr in the virus life cycle and raise the possibility that some aspects of HIV-induced pathologies may be caused by a disturbance of cells by vpr.

Collaboration


Dive into the David B. Weiner's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jian Yan

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jean D. Boyer

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth E. Ugen

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew P. Morrow

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amir S. Khan

Center for Cell and Gene Therapy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark I. Greene

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark L. Bagarazzi

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge