David Belada

Lenalidomide versus investigator's choice in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL-002; SPRINT): a phase 2, randomised, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND Lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug with antineoplastic and antiproliferative effects, showed activity in many single-group studies in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. The aim of this randomised study was to examine the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide versus best investigators choice of single-agent therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. METHODS The MCL-002 (SPRINT) study was a randomised, phase 2 study of patients with mantle cell lymphoma aged 18 years or older at 67 clinics and academic centres in 12 countries who relapsed one to three times, had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, at least one measurable lesion to be eligible, and who were ineligible for intensive chemotherpy or stem-cell transplantation. Using a centralised interactive voice response system, we randomly assigned (2:1) patients in a permuted block size of six to receive lenalidomide (25 mg orally on days 1-21 every 28 days) until progressive disease or intolerability, or single-agent investigators choice of either rituximab, gemcitabine, fludarabine, chlorambucil, or cytarabine. Randomisation was stratified by time from diagnosis, time from last anti-lymphoma therapy, and previous stem-cell transplantation. Individual treatment assignment between lenalidomide and investigators choice was open label, but investigators had to register their choice of comparator drug before randomly assigning a patient. Patients who progressed on investigators choice could cross over to lenalidomide treatment. We present the prespecified primary analysis results in the intention-to-treat population for the primary endpoint of progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation to progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first. Patient enrolment is complete, although treatment and collection of additional time-to-event data are ongoing. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00875667. FINDINGS Between April 30, 2009, and March 7, 2013, we enrolled 254 patients in the intention-to-treat population (170 [67%] were randomly assigned to receive lenalidomide, 84 [33%] to receive investigators choice monotherapy). Patients had a median age of 68·5 years and received a median of two previous regimens. With a median follow-up of 15·9 months (IQR 7·6-31·7), lenalidomide significantly improved progression-free survival compared with investigators choice (median 8·7 months [95% CI 5·5-12·1] vs 5·2 months [95% CI 3·7-6·9]) with a hazard ratio of 0·61 (95% CI 0·44-0·84; p=0·004). In the 167 patients in the lenalidomide group and 83 patients in the investigators choice group who received at least one dose of treatment the most common grade 3-4 adverse events included neutropenia (73 [44%] of 167 vs 28 [34%] of 83) without increased risk of infection, thrombocytopenia (30 [18%] vs 23 [28%]), leucopenia (13 [8%] vs nine [11%]), and anaemia (14 [8%] vs six [7%]). INTERPRETATION Patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma ineligible for intensive chemotherapy or stem-cell transplantation have longer progression-free survival, with a manageable safety profile when treated with lenalidomide compared with monotherapy investigators choice options. FUNDING Celgene Corporation.

Pre-transplant positron emission tomography in patients with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma

This retrospective study evaluated the secondary clinical risk score at relapse, the prognostic significance of pre-transplant positron emission tomography (PET), and complete remission (CR) assessed by computed tomography (CT) after salvage chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in 76 patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Median follow-up after ASCT was 23 months. Overall 11/20 PET-positive and 14/56 PET-negative patients relapsed after ASCT. In univariate analysis, only PET negativity before ASCT was significantly associated with better 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (72.7 ± 6.3% vs. 36.1 ± 11.6%, p = 0.01) and 2-year overall survival (OS) (90.3 ± 4.1% vs. 61.4 ± 11.6%, p = 0.009). Other factors were not significant. In multivariate analysis, none of the evaluated factors were significant for PFS and OS. However, positive pre-transplant PET identified a population with worse PFS and OS at least in univariate analysis.

Obinutuzumab or rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone in previously untreated diffuse large b-cell lymphoma

Purpose Rituximab (R) plus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy is the standard of care in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Obinutuzumab (G) is a glycoengineered, type II, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. GOYA was a randomized phase III study that compared G-CHOP with R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated advanced-stage DLBCL. Methods Patients (N = 1,418) were randomly assigned to receive eight 21-day cycles of G (n = 706) or R (n = 712), plus six or eight cycles of CHOP. Primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results After median observation of 29 months, the number of investigator-assessed PFS events was similar between G (201; 28.5%) and R (215; 30.2%), stratified hazard ratio was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.76 to 1.11; P = .39), and 3-year PFS rates were 70% and 67%, respectively. Secondary end points of independently reviewed PFS, other time-to-event end points, and tumor response rates were similar between arms. In exploratory subgroup analyses, patients with germinal-center B cell-like subtype had a better PFS than did patients with activated B cell-like subtype, irrespective of treatment. Frequencies of grade 3 to 5 adverse events (AEs; 73.7% v 64.7%, respectively) and serious AEs (42.6% v 37.6%, respectively) were higher with G-CHOP compared with R-CHOP. Fatal AE frequencies were 5.8% for G-CHOP and 4.3% for R-CHOP. The most common AEs were neutropenia (G-CHOP, 48.3%; R-CHOP, 40.7%), infusion-related reactions (G-CHOP, 36.1%; R-CHOP, 23.5%), nausea (G-CHOP, 29.4%; R-CHOP, 28.3%), and constipation (G-CHOP, 23.4%; R-CHOP, 24.5%). Conclusion G-CHOP did not improve PFS compared with R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated DLBCL. AEs reported with G were consistent with the known safety profile. Biomarker analyses may help define a future role for G in DLBCL.

Retrospective analysis of 235 unselected patients with mantle cell lymphoma confirms prognostic relevance of Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index and Ki-67 in the era of rituximab: long-term data from the Czech Lymphoma Project Database

Abstract Although a prognostic model (MIPI, Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index) for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has been established, its clinical significance for daily practice in the rituximab era remains controversial. Data of 235 unselected patients with MCL from the Czech Lymphoma Project Database were analyzed. MIPI, simplified MIPI (s-MIPI) and Ki-67 proliferation index were assessed for all patients and for a subgroup of 155 rituximab-treated (RT) patients. MIPI divided all patients into subgroups of low-risk (22%), intermediate-risk (29%) and high-risk (49%), with median overall survival 105.8 vs. 54.1 vs. 24.6 months, respectively (p < 0.001). s-MIPI revealed similar results. The validity of both indexes was confirmed in RT patients. We confirmed the Ki-67 index to be a powerful single prognostic factor for overall survival (64.4 vs. 20.1 months, p < 0.001) for all patients and for the RT subset. Our results confirm the clinical relevance of MIPI, s-MIPI and Ki-67 for risk stratification in MCL also in the rituximab era.

Rituximab in combination with high-dose dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND High-dose methylprednisolone is active in treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but infectious toxicity is serious. The aim of this project was to retrospectively assess efficacy and safety of high-dose dexamethasone combined with rituximab (R-dex) in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS We treated 54 patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory CLL using R-dex regimen at two tertiary centers. Two schedules of rituximab were used (not randomized - based on the choice of the center): group 1, rituximab 500 mg/m(2)day 1, 8, 15, 22 (375 mg/m(2) in 1st dose) every 4 weeks (n=29); group 2, 500 mg/m(2)day 1 (375 mg/m(2) in 1st cycle) repeated every 3 weeks (n=25). The target dose of dexamethasone was 40 mg on days 1-4 and 10-13 or 15-18. Rai III/IV stages were present in 82%, unmutated IgVH genes in 82%, del 11q in 38% and del 17p in 19% pts; 46% had bulky lymph nodes; 82% were pretreated with fludarabine and 29% with alemtuzumab. RESULTS Overall response rate/complete remissions were 62/21% (Group 1) and 72/4% (Group 2). In three patients, R-dex was successfully used for debulking before nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. R-dex was particularly effective in improvement of anemia and thrombocytopenia (p=0.0055 and p=0.0036); B-symptoms resolved after treatment in 11/17 pts. Hematological toxicity was mild. Serious infections occurred in 32% pts. At the median follow-up of 9 and 10 months, median progression-free survival was 6 months in Group 1 and 6.9 months in Group 2 (p=ns); median overall survival was 14.1 months in Group 1 vs. not reached in Group 2 (p=ns). CONCLUSIONS R-dex appears to be an active and feasible treatment for relapsed/refractory CLL. Infectious toxicity remains an important issue. Further investigation of this regimen in larger studies appears fully warranted.

Dacetuzumab plus rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide as salvage therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma relapsing after rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial

Single-agent dacetuzumab has demonstrated antitumor activity in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Preclinical data demonstrated improved dacetuzumab antitumor activity in combination with rituximab, ± chemotherapy. We designed a phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (R-ICE) + dacetuzumab with R-ICE + placebo in patients with DLBCL who relapsed after rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-CHOP) (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00529503). The primary endpoint was complete response (CR); additional endpoints included failure-free survival and overall survival (OS). Overall, 151 patients were randomized (75 dacetuzumab, 76 placebo). No notable differences between arms in demographics or subsequent treatment parameters were observed. Cytopenias, cough and infection were more frequent with dacetuzumab. Futility analysis failed to demonstrate higher CR rates with dacetuzumab (36% dacetuzumab, 42% placebo); consequently, enrollment was stopped. Unplanned post hoc analysis showed that patients who underwent subsequent autologous stem cell transplant experienced improvement in OS (hazard ratio = 0.195, p = 0.004), which may be explained by potential immunomodulatory effects of dacetuzumab on antigen-presenting cells.

Radiotherapy with rituximab may be better than radiotherapy alone in first-line treatment of early-stage follicular lymphoma: is it time to change the standard strategy?

Early-stage follicular lymphoma (FL) has traditionally been treated with involved-field radiotherapy (RT). Rituximab (R) is a low-toxic, efficient systemic therapy for FL, but there are no data about its clinical impact in early FL. We retrospectively analyzed 93 patients with stage I–II indolent FL treated with RT (n = 65) or RT + R (n = 14) or R alone (n = 14). Median follow-up was 5.0 years for patients with RT, 2.8 years for the RT + R subgroup and 2.5 years for patients treated with R. The complete response rate was 92%, 100% and 86% (not significant) and the median PFS was 3.3 years, not reached and 4.9 years (p = 0.035) for the RT, RT + R and R arms, with no impact on overall survival. R combined with RT seems to give better results in terms of global FL control, but longer follow-up and prospective comparison are needed to verify these results.

A New Prognostic Score for Elderly Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP: The Prognostic Role of Blood Monocyte and Lymphocyte Counts Is Absent

Background Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and absolute monocyte count (AMC) have been documented as independent predictors of survival in patients with newly diagnosed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). Analysis of the prognostic impact of ALC and AMC in the context of International Prognostic Index (IPI) and other significant variables in elderly population treated in the R-CHOP regime has not been carried out yet. Methodology/Principal Findings In this retrospective study, a cohort of 443 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients with age ≥60 was analyzed. All patients were treated with the R-CHOP therapy. An extensive statistical analysis was performed to identify risk factors of 3-year overall survival (OS). In multivariate analysis, only three predictors proved significant: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG), age and bulky disease presence. These predictors were dichotomized (ECOG ≥1, age ≥70, bulk ≥7.5) to create a novel four-level score. This score predicted 3-year OS of 94.0%, 77.4%, 62.7% and 35.4% in the low-, low-intermediate, high-intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively (P<0.001). Further, a three-level score was tested which stratifies the population better (3-year OS: 91.9%, 67.2%, 36.2% in the low, intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively) but is more difficult to interpret. Both the 3- and 4-level scores were compared to standard scoring systems and, in our population, were shown to be superior in terms of patients risk stratification with respect to 3-year OS prediction. The results were successfully validated on an independent cohort of 162 patients of similar group characteristics. Conclusions The prognostic role of baseline ALC, AMC or their ratio (LMR) was not confirmed in the multivariate context in elderly population with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP. The newly proposed age-specific index stratifies the elderly population into risk groups more precisely than the conventional IPI and its existing variants.

Venous thromboembolism in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients (pts) with malignant tumors. Increased risk of VTE is well described in a variety of hematologic malignancies; however, data regarding VTE in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is very limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data of 346 consecutive pts with CLL followed up at 4th Department of Internal Medicine - Hematology, University Hospital, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, diagnosed between 1999 and 2011 (males, 64%; median age, 64 years; low/intermediate/high Rai modified risk in 41/47/12%). RESULTS After a median follow-up of 72 months (range, 26-138), at least one episode of VTE occurred in 38 patients (11%). VTE developed after a median of 34 months from CLL diagnosis. Incidence of VTE was 1.67% per patient year of follow-up. There was a high proportion of unfavourable prognostic factors (advanced Rai stages, unmutated IgVH genes, unfavourable cytogenetics) in pts with VTE. The presence of 0/1/2/3 additional risk factors for VTE was identified in 2/16/14/6 patients. The most common risk factors for VTE besides age (n=24) were corticosteroid therapy (n=13), other malignancies (n=9) and obesity (n=7). Recurrence of VTE was diagnosed in 7 pts. Performance status ≥ 2 and inherited thrombophilia were significant risk factors for VTE development in univariate and multivariate analysis. VTE was not associated with shorter overall survival. CONCLUSION Based on our results, VTE is a relatively frequent complication in patients with CLL. Although most patients had other known risk factors for VTE including CLL treatment, 29% had no risk factors or only age ≥ 60 years. These findings demonstrate the possible role of CLL in the development of VTE.

Role of rituximab in treatment of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: a retrospective analysis of the Czech lymphoma study group registry

Abstract We have investigated whether the addition of rituximab to methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, radiotherapy and cytarabine was associated with improved outcome of primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL). Of 164 patients, 49 received rituximab. Median age was 63 years, median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 60 and median follow-up of living patients was 59.5 months. 1- and 2-year PFS were 49.7 and 37.9%, 1- and 2-year OS were 57.0 and 45.3%. Median progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS) was significantly better for patients treated with rituximab (22.9 vs. 10.9 months, p = 0.037). In multivariate analysis, age ≤70 years and KPS ≥90 were predictive for PFS and OS, rituximab was an independent prognostic factor for PFS only. In landmark analyses, rituximab was not found beneficial for long-term survivors and no group particularly benefited from rituximab. In conclusion, addition of rituximab was associated with improved PFS, but not OS in this unselected cohort of PCNSL patients.