David C. Hile

10% Povidone-Iodine May Be a Practical Field Water Disinfectant

OBJECTIVE A paucity of data exists regarding the use of iodophores such as povidone-iodine (PVI) to disinfect water. We sought to determine a practical minimal disinfecting concentration of 10% PVI over different contact times and temperatures when added to water inoculated with E. coli. METHODS 1:100, 1:1,000, and 1:10,000 dilutions of 10% PVI were created. Escherichia coli was exposed to these dilutions for 5, 15, and 30 minutes at 10, 20, and 30°C. Bactericidal activity was neutralized with 0.5% sodium thiosulfate. Mean viable colony forming units (CFUs) was determined after triplicate plating on Luria-bertani agar and 24 hours of incubation at 37°C. Effective bactericidal activity was defined as a 5-log reduction. RESULTS Of the 200,000 E. coli plated, no CFUs were observed after exposure to the 1:100 dilution. After 5 minutes of contact time with the 1:1,000 dilution, at 10°C CFUs were too numerous to count (TNTC), at 20°C the mean CFU count was 92 (standard error ±11), and at 30°C the mean CFU count was 25 (standard error ±8). No CFUs were observed after 15 minutes of exposure to the 1:1,000 dilution across experimental temperatures. The 1:10,000 dilution always yielded CFU growth that was TNTC. CONCLUSIONS The lowest disinfecting concentration of 10% PVI was the 1:1,000 dilution at 15 minutes of contact time. This supports the use of PVI for water disinfection against E. coli, the organism most commonly responsible for travelers diarrhea. Further studies may assess its effectiveness against more virulent water borne pathogens.

Treatment of Imported Fire Ant Stings With Mitigator Sting and Bite Treatment—A Randomized Control Study

Abstract Objective.—To evaluate the efficacy of the commercially available product Mitigator Sting and Bite Treatment in reducing the pain after imported fire ant stings. Methods.—Twenty-four volunteer subjects were exposed to imported fire ant stings on both forearms. The subjects received Mitigator paste on 1 arm and calamine lotion on the opposite arm, in a blinded manner, from 90 seconds to 10 minutes after exposure. Subjects recorded pain on a 100-mm visual analog scale 60 seconds, 20 minutes, and 3 days after exposure. A 2-tailed paired t test was used to compare the difference in reduction of pain over time between the Mitigator-treated arms and the calamine-treated arms. Results.—At 60 seconds, the mean visual analog scale pain score was 23.9 mm for the Mitigator group and 24.5 mm for the calamine group. At 20 minutes, the mean score was 7.6 mm (Δ = 16.3) for the Mitigator group and 12.7 mm (Δ = 11.8) for the calamine group. At 3 days, the mean score was 2.4 mm (Δ = 21.5) for the Mitigator group and 2.9 mm (Δ = 21.6) for the calamine group. There was no significant difference between groups for change in visual analog scale pain score at 60 seconds, 20 minutes (P = .256), or 3 days (P = .64). Conclusions.—There was no significant difference in pain relief between calamine and Mitigator for imported fire ant stings.