David C. Hohn

Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion

OBJECTIVE In many hospitals, the only sterile precautions used during the insertion of a nontunneled central venous catheter are sterile gloves and small sterile drapes. We investigated whether the use of maximal sterile barrier (consisting of mask, cap, sterile gloves, gown, and large drape) would lower the risk of acquiring catheter-related infections. DESIGN Prospective randomized trial. SETTING A 500-bed cancer referral center. METHODS We randomized patients to have their nontunneled central catheter inserted under maximal sterile barrier precautions or control precautions (sterile gloves and small drape only). All patients were followed for 3 months postinsertion or until the catheter was removed, whichever came first. Catheter-related infections were diagnosed by quantitative catheter cultures and/or simultaneous quantitative blood cultures. RESULTS The 176 patients whose catheters were inserted by using maximal sterile barrier precautions were comparable to the 167 control patients in underlying disease, degree of immuno-suppression, therapeutic interventions, and catheter risk factors for infections (duration and site of catheterization, number of catheter lumen, catheter insertion difficulty, reason for catheter removal). There were a total of four catheter infections in the test group and 12 in the control group (P = 0.03, chi-square test). The catheter-related septicemia rate was 6.3 times higher in the control group (P = 0.06, Fishers exact test). Most (67%) of the catheter infections in the control group occurred during the first 2 months after insertion, whereas 25% of the catheter infections in the maximal sterile precautions group occurred during the same period (P < 0.01, Fishers exact test). Cost-benefit analysis showed the use of such precautions to be highly cost-effective. CONCLUSION Maximal sterile barrier precautions during the insertion of nontunneled catheters reduce the risk of catheter infection. This practice is cost-effective and is consistent with the practice of universal precautions during an invasive procedure.

A randomized trial of continuous intravenous versus hepatic intraarterial floxuridine in patients with colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver: the Northern California Oncology Group trial.

In 1983, the Northern California Oncology Group (NCOG) instituted a randomized trial of intravenous (IV) versus intraarterial (IA) floxuridine (FUDR) administered via an implantable pump for patients with colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver. The study objectives were to compare the hepatic response rate, time to hepatic progression, and toxicity for the two treatment arms. The study design, which allowed patients failing IV FUDR to crossover to the IA arm, prevents a meaningful comparative analysis of survival. Patients with liver-only metastases (N = 143) were randomized, 76 to the IV arm and 67 to the IA arm, and 115 patients (65 IV, 50 IA) were fully evaluable. Of the 65 patients in the IV arm, 28 crossed over to IA treatment after failing IV FUDR. The dose-limiting toxicity of IV FUDR was diarrhea, whereas biliary toxicity limited both the dose and duration of IA FUDR therapy. Of the first 25 patients treated with IA FUDR at a dose of .3 mg/kg/day, 10 developed radiographically evident biliary strictures, and three developed permanent jaundice. With reduction of the initial IA FUDR dose to .2 mg/kg/day, and adoption of a policy of early dosage reduction, treatment interruption, or termination of therapy for persistent elevations in alkaline phosphatase, only two further cases of serious biliary toxicity occurred. However, 26 of the 50 IA FUDR patients ultimately had therapy terminated because of drug toxicity rather than disease progression. When compared with systemic infusion, infusion into the hepatic artery greatly enhanced the antitumor activity of FUDR against colorectal liver metastases. Although biliary toxicity is the most serious limitation of this form of therapy, biliary stricture and jaundice usually can be averted through careful monitoring of liver enzymes and early dosage reduction.

Resectable gastric carcinoma. An evaluation of preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy

Patients with locoregional gastric carcinoma often die because of the low rates of curative resection and frequent appearance of distant metastases (mainly peritoneal and hepatic). To evaluate the feasibility of preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy, 25 consecutive previously untreated patients with potentially resectable locoregional gastric carcinoma received two preoperative and three postoperative courses of etoposide, 5‐fluorouracil, and cisplatin (EFP). Ninety‐eight courses (median, five courses; range, two to five courses) were administered. Six patients had major responses to EFP. Eighteen patients (72%) had curative resections, and three specimens (12%) contained only microscopic carcinoma. At a median follow‐up of 25 months, the median survival of 25 patients was 15 months (range, 4 to 32+ months). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was the most common indication of failure. One patient died of postoperative complications, but there were no deaths due to chemotherapy. EFP‐induced toxic reactions were moderate. Preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy for locoregional gastric carcinoma is feasible, and additional studies to develop regimens that could result in 5% to 10% complete pathologic responses may be warranted.

Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Fifty-one patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were treated with Gelfoam (absorbable gelatin sterile powder; The Upjohn Co, Kalamazoo, MI) chemoembolization. A mixture of Gelfoam powder, contrast media, and three drugs (doxorubicin, mitomycin, and cisplatin) was injected under fluoroscopic guidance via a percutaneous catheter into the hepatic artery until stagnation of blood flow was achieved. Of the 51 patients, 50 are assessable for response, and all are assessable for toxicity and complications. The median percent of liver replacement was 50% (range, 15% to 95%). By conventional response criteria, there were 12 partial responses (PRs) (24%), 13 minor responses (MRs) (26%), 12 stabilization of disease (SD) (24%), and 13 (26%) progressive disease (PD). Tumor liquefaction was noted on computed tomographic (CT) scan in 35 of 50 patients (70%). Of the 34 patients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), 23 (68%) had a greater than 50% reduction following treatment. Responding patients were re-treated at the time of tumor progression if they still met the entry criteria. The median survival of assessable patients from the time of treatment was 207 days and from the diagnosis of the primary was 302 days. Fourteen patients remain alive at 3 months to 3 years following treatment. The vast majority of patients had transient pain, fever, nausea, and elevation in liver enzymes. Ascites developed in 14 patients. There were two treatment-related deaths: one from tumor hemorrhage and one from liver failure. Chemoembolization appears to have significant activity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and is relatively well tolerated.

Adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy after curative resection of colorectal liver metastases

We performed a prospective study of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastases. We placed hepatic arterial infusion ports in 20 consecutive patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal liver metastases. The chemotherapy regimen was a weekly bolus of 5-fluorouracil (15 mg/kg) for 6 months. The median follow-up has been 33 months. Nine of the 18 evaluable patients (50%) have developed recurrent colorectal cancer. The liver was the only site of failure in 3 of 18 patients (17%), and extrahepatic recurrences occurred in 6 of 18 patients (33%). All patients without recurrence are alive. The median survival of the patients without recurrent disease is 39 months, compared with 27 months for those with recurrent metastatic disease (p < 0.01). In patients who received adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy compared with historical controls treated with surgery alone, we have observed a decreased incidence of recurrent disease after liver resection for metastases. We recommend that patients who undergo hepatic resection for colorectal metastases be considered for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy to decrease the likelihood of recurrence and to improve survival.

Improved survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases.

AbstractBackground: The goal of this study was to determine if staging with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS), assessment of porta hepatis lymph nodes, and evaluation of resection margins can improve selection of patients likely to benefit from resection of colorectal liver metastases. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was performed on patients undergoing celiotomy with intent to resect colorectal liver metastases. Patients were considered unresectable if extrahepatic disease was identified by peritoneal exploration or if IOUS demonstated greater than four lesions or the inability to achieve negative margins. Tumor-negative margins were confirmed by pathologic evaluation. Actuarial 5-year survival was calculated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Results: Median follow-up is 25 months. Of the 151 patients undergoing operative exploration, 107 (71.0%) underwent liver resection (all margins tumor negative). Three operative deaths occurred in this group (2.8%). The disease of 30 patients (19.8%) was considered unresectable due to extrahepatic involvement, and that of 14 patients (9.2%) was demonstrated by IOUS to be unresectable. Five-year actuarial survival was 44% for the resected group and 0% for the unresectable patients (p<0.0001). Conclusions: IOUS, portal node assessment, and pathologic margin evaluation improves the selection of patients likely to benefit from resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Hepatic Arterial Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Metastatic to the Liver

Hepatic metastases of colorectal origin are resistant to radiation and immunotherapy. Traditional intravenous chemotherapy produces responses in 10% to 30% of patients, and surgical resection is feasible in approximately 20% of patients who have a solitary or unilobar lesion. Infusion of cytotoxic agents into the hepatic artery, introduced 2 decades ago, is the most promising form of therapy for unresectable hepatic metastases. Fluorouracil, floxuridine, and mitomycin have been most commonly administered by hepatic arterial infusion. The recent development of a totally implantable pump has allowed prolonged ambulatory infusion of chemotherapeutic agents into the hepatic artery. We review the recent data on the pharmacology, therapeutic outcome, administration techniques, and complications of hepatic arterial chemotherapy. Future trials in this area should use uniform stratification variables and standardized criteria for evaluating response, time to progression, and survival.

Infusion therapy team and dressing changes of central venous catheters.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether central venous catheter (CVC) dressing changes could be performed by ward nurses rather than by the infusion therapy team (ITT) nurses without increasing the risk of catheter-related infection. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data. The study extended from January 1995 to June 1996. SETTING The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, a referral cancer center. PATIENTS The study group was a random sample of 483 patients who received CVC dressing changes by ward nurses during the study period. A random sample of 483 patients who received CVC dressing changes by the ITT constituted the control group. RESULTS The risks of catheter-related septicemia were 1.7% among cases and 1.4% among controls (risk ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 0.26-6.42; P=.70). There also were no significant differences between the two groups in the risks of catheter-related site infection (risk ratio, 0.50; CI95, 0.02-4.12; P=.25) or any catheter-related infection (risk ratio=1.00; CI95, 0.27-3.64; P=.59). CONCLUSIONS Provided that aseptic techniques (including maximal barrier precautions during insertion) are maintained, the responsibility of CVC dressing changes could be delegated to the ward nurses without increasing the low risk of CVC-related infection, resulting in an estimated cost saving in excess of

Complete hepatic venous isolation and extracorporeal chemofiltration as treatment for human hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase I study

90,000 per year.

Home support of patients with end-stage malignant bowel obstruction using hydration and venting gastrostomy

AbstractBackground: We performed a phase I study of a novel system of complete hepatic venous isolation and extracorporeal chemofiltration in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to determine (a) whether systemic exposure to doxorubicin could be limited after high-dose hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), and (b) the hepatic maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of doxorubicin. Methods: Ten patients with biopsy-proven HCC were treated with 20-min HAI of doxorubicin (17 total treatments). Two patients were treated with doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, three patients were treated at 90 mg/m2, and five patients received 120 mg/m2. A newly developed dual-balloon vena cava catheter was advanced from the femoral vein, and the balloons were inflated to isolate and capture total hepatic venous outflow. The hepatic venous blood was pumped through extracorporeal carbon chemofilters before return of the blood to the systemic circulation. Results: Peak systemic doxorubicin levels were an average 85.6% lower than were peak prefilter levels (p<0.01). Because all catheters were placed percutaneously and because the chemofiltration markedly limited systemic chemotherapy exposure, patients were discharged 1 day after 16 of the 17 treatments. The hepatic and systemic MTD of doxorubicin in this treatment protocol was 120 mg/m2. Conclusions: This novel system of complete hepatic venous isolation and chemofiltration limits systemic chemotherapy toxicity and will allow use of higher doses of chemotherapeutic agents to treat HCC.