Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David C. Kaslow is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David C. Kaslow.


Vaccine | 2016

WHO consultation on Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine Development Report from a World Health Organization Meeting held on 23–24 March 2015

Birgitte K. Giersing; David C. Kaslow; Peter G. Smith; Vasee S. Moorthy

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a globally prevalent cause of lower respiratory infection in neonates and infants. Despite its disease burden, a safe and effective RSV vaccine has remained elusive. In recent years, improved understanding of RSV biology and innovations in immunogen design has resulted in the advancement of multiple vaccine candidates into the clinical development pipeline. Given the growing number of vaccines in clinical trials, the rapid pace at which they are being tested, and the likelihood that an RSV vaccine will reach the commercial market in the next 5–10 years, consensus and guidance on clinical development pathways and licensure routes are needed now, before large-scale efficacy trials commence. In pursuit of this aim, the World Health Organization convened the first RSV vaccine consultation in 15 years on the 23rd and 24th of March, 2015 in Geneva, Switzerland. The meeting’s primary objective was to provide guidance on clinical endpoints and development pathways for vaccine trials with a focus on considerations of low- and middle-income countries. Meeting participants reached consensus on candidate case definitions for RSV disease, considerations for clinical efficacy endpoints, and the clinical development pathway for active and passive immunization trials in maternal and pediatric populations. The strategic focus of this meeting was on the development of high quality, safe and efficacious RSV preventive interventions for global use and included: (1) maternal/passive immunization to prevent RSV disease in infants less than 6 months; (2) pediatric immunization to prevent RSV disease in infants and young children once protection afforded by maternal immunization wanes.


Vaccine | 2014

Development of a transmission-blocking malaria vaccine: Progress, challenges, and the path forward

Julia K. Nunes; Colleen Woods; Terrell Carter; Theresa Raphael; Merribeth J. Morin; Diadier Diallo; Didier Leboulleux; Sanjay Jain; Christian Loucq; David C. Kaslow; Ashley Birkett

New interventions are needed to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with malaria, as well as to accelerate elimination and eventual eradication. Interventions that can break the cycle of parasite transmission, and prevent its reintroduction, will be of particular importance in achieving the eradication goal. In this regard, vaccines that interrupt malaria transmission (VIMT) have been highlighted as an important intervention, including transmission-blocking vaccines that prevent human-to-mosquito transmission by targeting the sexual, sporogonic, or mosquito stages of the parasite (SSM-VIMT). While the significant potential of this vaccine approach has been appreciated for decades, the development and licensure pathways for vaccines that target transmission and the incidence of infection, as opposed to prevention of clinical malaria disease, remain ill-defined. This article describes the progress made in critical areas since 2010, highlights key challenges that remain, and outlines important next steps to maximize the potential for SSM-VIMTs to contribute to the broader malaria elimination and eradication objectives.


Vaccine | 2016

WHO consultation on group B Streptococcus vaccine development: Report from a meeting held on 27-28 April 2016.

Miwako Kobayashi; Stephanie J. Schrag; Mark Alderson; Shabir A. Madhi; Carol J. Baker; Ajoke Sobanjo-ter Meulen; David C. Kaslow; Peter G. Smith; Vasee S. Moorthy; Johan Vekemans

Globally, group B Streptococcus (GBS) remains a leading cause of sepsis and meningitis in infants in the first 90 days of life. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) for women at increased risk of transmitting GBS to their newborns has been effective in reducing part, but not all, of the GBS disease burden in many high income countries (HICs). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), IAP use is low. Immunization of pregnant women with a GBS vaccine represents an alternative strategy to protecting newborns and young infants, through transplacental antibody transfer and potentially by reducing new vaginal colonization. This vaccination strategy was first suggested in the 1970s and several potential GBS vaccines have completed phase I/II clinical trials. During the 2015 WHO Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee meeting, GBS was identified as a high priority for the development of a vaccine for maternal immunization because of the major public health burden posed by GBS in LMICs, and the high technical feasibility for successful development. Following this meeting, the first WHO technical consultation on GBS vaccines was held on the 27th and 28th of April 2016, to consider development pathways for such vaccines, focused on their potential role in reducing newborn and young infant deaths and possibly stillbirths in LMICs. Discussion topics included: (1) pathophysiology of disease; (2) current gaps in the knowledge of global disease burden and serotype distribution; (3) vaccine candidates under development; (4) design considerations for phase III trials; and (5) pathways to licensure, policy recommendations and use. Efforts to address gaps identified in each of these areas are needed to establish the public health need for, the development and deployment of, efficacious GBS vaccines. In particular, more work is required to understand the global disease burden of GBS-associated stillbirths, and to develop quality-assured standardized antibody assays to identify correlates of protection.


Vaccine | 2016

Report from the World Health Organization's Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee (PDVAC) meeting, Geneva, 7-9th Sep 2015.

Birgitte K. Giersing; Kayvon Modjarrad; David C. Kaslow; Vasee S. Moorthy; Ashish Bavdekar; Klaus Cichutek; Alejandro Cravioto; Bernard Fritzell; Barney S. Graham; Ruth A. Karron; Claudio F. Lanata; Mair Powell; Yiming Shao; Peter G. Smith

n Abstractn n There are more vaccines in development, against a greater number of pathogens, than ever before. A challenge with this exceptional level of activity and investment is how to select and resource the most promising approaches to have the most significant impact on public health. The WHO Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee (PDVAC) was established in 2014 to provide strategic advice and recommendations to WHO for vaccines in clinical development that could have a significant impact on public health in low and middle income countries. On 7–9th September 2015, PDVAC was convened for the second time, when the committee reviewed vaccine developments in 24 disease areas. This report summarises the key recommendations from that consultation.n n


Vaccine | 2016

Meeting Report: WHO consultation on considerations for regulatory expectations of Zika virus vaccines for use during an emergency

Kirsten Vannice; Birgitte K. Giersing; David C. Kaslow; E. Griffiths; Heidi Meyer; Alan D. T. Barrett; Anna P. Durbin; David Wood; Joachim Hombach

On 1 February 2016, in the context of the ongoing Zika virus epidemic, the WHO declared that the recently reported clusters of microcephaly and other neurological disorders constituted a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). In response, WHO in collaboration with UNICEF and a working group of independent subject matter experts developed a Zika virus vaccine Target Product Profile (TPP) for use in an emergency, or in a future outbreak scenario. The drafting process of the Zika virus vaccine TPP included the opportunity for public comment, as well as consultation with epidemiologists, flavivirus vaccine subject matter experts, vaccine developers and global regulators to consider the regulatory expectations and potential emergency use pathways for a vaccine with the characteristics described in the TPP. This report summarizes an expert consultation held 6-7 June 2016 on the regulatory considerations for a Zika vaccine for emergency use.


Vaccine | 2017

Meeting report: WHO consultation on Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine development, Geneva, 25–26 April 2016

Birgitte K. Giersing; Ruth A. Karron; Johan Vekemans; David C. Kaslow; Vasee S. Moorthy

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading viral cause of respiratory morbidity and mortality in infants and young children worldwide. Low and middle income countries (LMICs) account for approximately 99% of the global mortality estimates in this population, with up to 200,000 RSV deaths per year. The vaccine product development pipeline is diverse with the most advanced clinical candidate currently in phase III efficacy testing in pregnant women. In addition, a long-acting RSV-neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) to be administered at birth to prevent serious RSV-related respiratory disease is in late stage clinical development, as are additional conventional mAb for use in high-risk infants. Thus, there is a realistic possibility that an effective new intervention to prevent RSV disease will be available in the next 5-10year horizon. In anticipation of this outcome, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts for Immunization (SAGE), WHOs vaccine policy recommendation body, reviewed the status of RSV vaccine and monoclonal antibody development in April 2016. Although substantial progress towards licensure has broadened the research agenda to consider intervention impact and cost effectiveness, significant gaps remain in the data that will be needed to inform and support a policy recommendation for implementation. These aspects were the focus of WHOs second consultation on RSV vaccines and single dosage extended half-life mAb for prophylaxis.


Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine | 2017

Vaccines to Accelerate Malaria Elimination and Eventual Eradication

Julie Healer; Alan F. Cowman; David C. Kaslow; Ashley J. Birkett

Remarkable progress has been made in coordinated malaria control efforts with substantial reductions in malaria-associated deaths and morbidity achieved through mass administration of drugs and vector control measures including distribution of long-lasting insecticide-impregnated bednets and indoor residual spraying. However, emerging resistance poses a significant threat to the sustainability of these interventions. In this light, the malaria research community has been charged with the development of a highly efficacious vaccine to complement existing malaria elimination measures. As the past 40 years of investment in this goal attests, this is no small feat. The malaria parasite is a highly complex organism, exquisitely adapted for survival under hostile conditions within human and mosquito hosts. Here we review current vaccine strategies to accelerate elimination and the potential for novel and innovative approaches to vaccine design through a better understanding of the host-parasite interaction.


American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene | 2016

Accelerating to Zero: Strategies to Eliminate Malaria in the Peruvian Amazon

Antonio M. Quispe; Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas; Hugo Rodriguez; Martin Clendenes; César Cabezas; Luis M. Leon; Raul Chuquiyauri; Marta Moreno; David C. Kaslow; Max Grogl; Sócrates Herrera; Alan J. Magill; Margaret Kosek; Joseph M. Vinetz; Andres G. Lescano; Eduardo Gotuzzo

In February 2014, the Malaria Elimination Working Group, in partnership with the Peruvian Ministry of Health (MoH), hosted its first international conference on malaria elimination in Iquitos, Peru. The 2-day meeting gathered 85 malaria experts, including 18 international panelists, 23 stakeholders from different malaria-endemic regions of Peru, and 11 MoH authorities. The main outcome was consensus that implementing a malaria elimination project in the Amazon region is achievable, but would require: 1) a comprehensive strategic plan, 2) the altering of current programmatic guidelines from control toward elimination by including symptomatic as well as asymptomatic individuals for antimalarial therapy and transmission-blocking interventions, and 3) the prioritization of community-based active case detection with proper rapid diagnostic tests to interrupt transmission. Elimination efforts must involve key stakeholders and experts at every level of government and include integrated research activities to evaluate, implement, and tailor sustainable interventions appropriate to the region.


Vaccine | 2017

Report from the World Health Organization’s third Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee (PDVAC) meeting, Geneva, 8–10th June 2016

Birgitte K. Giersing; Johan Vekemans; Samantha Nava; David C. Kaslow; Vasee S. Moorthy

n Abstractn n The third meeting of WHO’s Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee (PDVAC) was held in June 2016, with a remit to revisit the pathogen areas for which significant progress has occurred since recommendations from the 2015 meeting, as well as to consider new advances in the development of vaccines against other pathogens. Since the previous meeting, significant progress has been made with regulatory approvals of the first malaria and dengue vaccines, and the first phase III trials of a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine candidate has started in the elderly and pregnant women. In addition, PDVAC has also supported vaccine development efforts against important emerging pathogens, including Middle Eastern Coronavirus (MERS CoV) and Zika virus. Trials of HIV and tuberculosis vaccine candidates are steadily progressing towards pivotal data points, and the leading norovirus vaccine candidate has entered a phase IIb efficacy study. WHO’s Immunization, Vaccine and Biologicals (IVB) department is actively working in several pathogen areas on the recommendation of PDVAC, as well as continuing horizon scanning for advances in the development of vaccines that may benefit low and middle income countries (LMICs), such as the recent licensure of the enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine in China. Following on from discussions with WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization, PDVAC will also look beyond licensure and consider data needs for vaccine recommendation and implementation to reduce the delay between vaccine approval and vaccine impact.n n


Vaccine | 2018

Maternal immunization against Group B streptococcus: World Health Organization research and development technological roadmap and preferred product characteristics

Johan Vekemans; Vasee S. Moorthy; Martin Friede; Mark Alderson; Ajoke Sobanjo-ter Meulen; Carol J. Baker; Paul T. Heath; Shabir A. Madhi; Kirsty Mehring-Le Doare; Samir K. Saha; Stephanie J. Schrag; David C. Kaslow

Group B streptococcus, found in the vagina or lower gastrointestinal tract of about 10–40% of women of reproductive age, is a leading cause of early life invasive bacterial disease, potentially amenable to prevention through maternal immunization during pregnancy. Following a consultation process with global stakeholders, the World Health Organization is herein proposing priority research and development pathways and preferred product characteristics for GBS vaccines, with the aim to facilitate and accelerate vaccine licensure, policy recommendation for wide scale use and implementation.

Collaboration


Dive into the David C. Kaslow's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johan Vekemans

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Friede

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ruth A. Karron

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joachim Hombach

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barney S. Graham

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge