Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David C. Linehan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David C. Linehan.


Journal of Immunology | 2002

Prevalence of Regulatory T Cells Is Increased in Peripheral Blood and Tumor Microenvironment of Patients with Pancreas or Breast Adenocarcinoma

Udaya K. Liyanage; Todd T. Moore; Hong-Gu Joo; Yoshiyuki Tanaka; Virginia M. Herrmann; Gerard M. Doherty; Jeffrey A. Drebin; Steven M. Strasberg; Timothy J. Eberlein; Peter S. Goedegebuure; David C. Linehan

Regulatory T cells (Treg) that prevent autoimmune diseases by suppression of self-reactive T cells may also suppress the immune response against cancer. In mice, depletion of Treg by Ab therapy leads to more efficient tumor rejection. Treg-mediated suppression of antitumor immune responses may partly explain the poor clinical response to vaccine-based immunotherapy for human cancer. In this study, we measured the prevalence of Treg that coexpress CD4 and CD25 in the PBLs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and regional lymph node lymphocytes from 65 patients with either pancreas or breast cancer. In breast cancer patients (n = 35), pancreas cancer patients (n = 30), and normal donors (n = 35), the prevalence of Treg were 16.6% (SE 1.22), 13.2% (SE 1.13), and 8.6% (SE 0.71) of the total CD4+ cells, respectively. The prevalence of Treg were significantly higher in breast cancer patients (p < 0.01) and pancreas cancer patients (p < 0.01) when compared with normal donors. In tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and lymph node lymphocytes, the Treg prevalence were 20.2% (SE 3.93) and 20.1% (SE 4.3), respectively. Treg constitutively coexpressed CTLA-4 and CD45RO markers, and secreted TGF-β and IL-10 but did not secrete IFN-γ. When cocultured with activated CD8+ cells or CD4+25− cells, Treg potently suppressed their proliferation and secretion of IFN-γ. We conclude that the prevalence of Treg is increased in the peripheral blood as well as in the tumor microenvironment of patients with invasive breast or pancreas cancers. These Treg may mitigate the immune response against cancer, and may partly explain the poor immune response against tumor Ags.


Annals of Surgery | 2004

Five-Year Survival After Resection of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer in Patients Screened by Positron Emission Tomography With F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET)

Felix G. Fernandez; Jeffrey A. Drebin; David C. Linehan; Farrokh Dehdashti; Barry A. Siegel; Steven M. Strasberg

Objective:To report the first 5-year overall survival results in patients with colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver who have undergone hepatic resection after staging with [18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Summary Background Data:The 5-year overall survival after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases without preoperative FDG-PET has been established in 19 studies (6070 patients). The median 5-year overall survival rate in these studies is 30% and has not improved over time. FDG-PET detects unsuspected tumor in 25% of patients considered to have resectable hepatic metastasis by conventional staging. Methods:From March 1995 to June 2002, all patients having hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases had preoperative FDG-PET. A prospective database was maintained. Results:One hundred patients (56 men, 44 women) were studied. Metastases were synchronous in 52, single in 63, unilateral in 78, and <5 cm in diameter in 60. Resections were major (>3 segments) in 75 and resection margins were ≥1 cm in 52. Median follow up was 31 months, with 12 actual greater than 5-year survivors. There was 1 postoperative death. The actuarial 5-year overall survival was 58% (95% confidence interval, 46–72%). Primary tumor grade was the only prognostic variable significantly correlated with overall survival. Conclusions:Screening by FDG-PET is associated with excellent postresection 5-year overall survival for patients undergoing resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. FDG-PET appears to define a new cohort of patients in whom tumor grade is a very important prognostic variable.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2009

Pretreatment Assessment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Expert Consensus Statement

Mark P. Callery; Kenneth J. Chang; Elliot K. Fishman; Mark S. Talamonti; L. William Traverso; David C. Linehan

Preoperative Staging and Defining Resectability From a surgical perspective, the first objective in the management of suspected or confirmed pancreatic cancer is to determine the potential for resection. Routine exploratory laparotomy for the purpose of operatively determining resectability has been diminished by modern 3-D radiographic imaging, along with effective and sustainable nonoperative methods of palliation. Careful correlation between preoperative CT findings and surgical results has better-defined CT criteria for resectability. The critical aspects that need be evaluated in a thorough radiographic assessment are the presence or absence of peritoneal or hepatic metastases; the potential involvement of the SMV and portal vein and the relationship of these vessels and their tributaries to the tumor; the relationship of the tumor to the SMA, celiac axis, hepatic artery, and gastroduodenal artery; and the presence of any aberrant vascular anatomy. Unequivocal radiographic findings contraindicating resection include distant metastases, major venous thrombosis of the portal vein or SMV extending for several centimeters, and circumferential encasement of the SMA, celiac axis or proximal hepatic artery. Recent revisions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines were an attempt to distinguish locally advanced unresectable tumors from potentially resectable tumors.22 Ambiguity exists in these guidelines because of the lack of clarity in defining clearly resectable situations from “borderline resectable” tumors and because of the subjective criteria used to define “borderline” tumors relative to locally advanced, unresectable lesions. The NCCN guidelines do offer a definition of what should be considered a radiographically resectable tumor. Patients without distant metastases and no evidence of tumor extension to the SMV and portal vein and clear fat planes around the celiac axis, the hepatic artery, and SMA should be categorized as having localized and resectable cancers. More refined and objective criteria have been proposed by the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Pancreas Cancer Group in an attempt to better define the term “borderline resectable” and to guide treatment decisions regarding the use of neoadjuvant therapy and the high likelihood of vein resection and reconstruction as a means to improve the rate of a complete and margin-negative resection.23 Radiographic findings of tumor abutment on the portal vein or SMV with or without venous deformity, and limited encasement of the mesenteric vein and portal vein (i.e., short segment occlusion with suitable vessel for anastomosis above and below) represent the extent of venous involvement that would categorize a tumor as borderline resectable. Radiographic findings suggesting borderline arterial involvement as defined by M. D. Anderson Cancer Center include encasement of a short segment of the hepatic artery, without evidence of tumor extension to the celiac axis and/or tumor abutment of the SMA involving < 180° of the artery circumference. In patients without clinically important major comorbidities, and in the absence of radiographic findings to suggest metastatic disease or locally advanced unresectable disease as outlined above, surgical resection should be considered feasible and likely to be achievable. Whether these resections would result in a higher-than-expected rate of margin-positive resections, and whether such resections would affect survival would best be determined by careful examination of outcomes relative to extent of vascular involvement using objective criteria to determine categorization of extent of disease. Consensus Statement 1. Tumors considered localized and resectable should demonstrate the following: a. No distant metastases. b. No radiographic evidence of SMV and portal vein abutment, distortion, tumor thrombus, or venous encasement. c. Clear fat planes around the celiac axis, hepatic artery, and SMA. 2. Tumors considered borderline resectable include the following: a. No distant metastases. b. Venous involvement of the SMV/portal vein demonstrating tumor abutment with or without impingement and narrowing of the lumen, encasement of the SMV/portal vein but without encasement of the nearby arteries, or short segment venous occlusion resulting from either tumor thrombus or encasement but with suitable vessel proximal and distal to the area of vessel involvement, allowing for safe resection and reconstruction. c. Gastroduodenal artery encasement up to the hepatic artery with either short segment encasement or direct abutment of the hepatic artery, without extension to the celiac axis. d. Tumor abutment of the SMA not to exceed >180° of the circumference of the vessel wall.


Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2002

Use of a bipolar vessel-sealing device for parenchymal transection during liver surgery

Steven M. Strasberg; Jeffrey A. Drebin; David C. Linehan

Most blood loss during liver resection occurs during parenchymal transection, and multiple approaches have been developed to limit blood loss. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new bipolar vesselsealing device in hepatic surgery, particularly whether the device would permit safe transection without routine inflow occlusion. Twenty-seven hepatic procedures were performed using the device after preliminary studies to adapt its use to the liver. Inflow occlusion was used when necessary to control blood loss but not as a routine. The device worked well for transection through normal liver during common liver operations such as right hepatectomy. It worked less well for enucleations. Inflow occlusion was used in approximately 10% of resections, exclusive of enucleations, and about 25% of these patients were transfused during surgery or in the postoperative period. We conclude that the device is a useful tool in standard liver resections.


Annals of Surgery | 1998

Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: a critical and improvable determinant of outcome.

Blake Cady; Roger L. Jenkins; Glenn Steele; Lewis Wd; Michael D. Stone; William V. McDermott; John M. Jessup; Albert Bothe; P Lalor; E. J. Lovett; Philip T. Lavin; David C. Linehan

OBJECTIVE To update the analysis of technical and biologic factors related to hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis in a large single-institution series to identify important prognostic indicators and patterns of failure. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Surgical therapy for colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver is the only potentially curable treatment. Careful patient selection of those with resectable liver-only metastatic disease is crucial to the success of surgical therapy. METHODS Two hundred forty-four consecutive patients undergoing curative hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma were analyzed retrospectively. Variables examined included sex, stage of primary lesion, size of liver lesion(s), number of lesions, disease-free interval, ploidy, differentiation, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, and operative factors such as resection margin, use of cryotherapy, intraoperative ultrasound, and blood loss. RESULTS Surgical margin, number of lesions, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels significantly control prognosis. Patients with only one or two liver lesions, a 1-cm surgical margin, and low CEA levels have a 5-year disease-free survival rate of more than 30%. Disease-free interval, original stage, bilobar involvement, size of metastasis, differentiation, and ploidy were not significant predictors of recurrence. The pattern of failure correlates with surgical margin. Routine use of intraoperative ultrasound resulted in an increased incidence of negative surgical margin during the period examined. CONCLUSIONS Surgical resection or cryotherapy of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer is safe and curable in appropriately selected patients. Biologic factors, such as number of lesions and carcinoembryonic antigen levels, determine potential curability, and surgical margin governs the patterns of failure and outcome in potentially curable patients. Optimization of selection criteria and surgical resection margins will improve outcome.


Annals of Surgery | 2009

The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications.

Steven M. Strasberg; David C. Linehan; William G. Hawkins

Background:A severity grading system is essential to reporting surgical complications. In 1992, we presented such a system (T92). Its use and that of systems derived from it have increased exponentially. Our purpose was to determine how well T92 and its modifications have functioned as a severity grading system and to develop an improved system for reporting complications. Methods:129 articles were studied in detail. Twenty variables were searched for in each article with particular emphasis on type of study, substitution of qualitative terms for grades, grade compression, and cut-points if grade compression was used. We also determined relative distribution of complications and manner of presentation of complications. Results:T92 and derivative classifications have received wide use in surgical studies ranging from small studies with few complications to large studies of complex operations that describe many complications. There is a strong tendency to contract classifications and to substitute terms with self evident meaning for the numerical grades. Complications are presented in a large variety of tabular forms some of which are much easier to follow than others. Conclusions:Current methods for reporting the severity of complications incompletely fulfill the needs of authors of surgical studies. A new system—the Accordion Severity Grading System—is presented. The Accordion system can be used more readily for small as well as large studies. It introduces standard definition of simple quantitative terms and presents a standard tabular reporting system. This system should bring the field closer to a common severity grading method for surgical complications.


Cancer Research | 2013

Targeting Tumor-Infiltrating Macrophages Decreases Tumor-Initiating Cells, Relieves Immunosuppression, and Improves Chemotherapeutic Responses

Jonathan B. Mitchem; Donal J. Brennan; Brett L. Knolhoff; Brian Belt; Yu Zhu; Dominic E. Sanford; Larisa Belaygorod; Danielle Carpenter; Lynne Collins; David Piwnica-Worms; Stephen M. Hewitt; Girish Mallya Udupi; William M. Gallagher; Craig D. Wegner; Brian L. West; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Peter S. Goedegebuure; David C. Linehan; David G. DeNardo

Tumor-infiltrating immune cells can promote chemoresistance and metastatic spread in aggressive tumors. Consequently, the type and quality of immune responses present in the neoplastic stroma are highly predictive of patient outcome in several cancer types. In addition to host immune responses, intrinsic tumor cell activities that mimic stem cell properties have been linked to chemoresistance, metastatic dissemination, and the induction of immune suppression. Cancer stem cells are far from a static cell population; rather, their presence seems to be controlled by highly dynamic processes that are dependent on cues from the tumor stroma. However, the impact immune responses have on tumor stem cell differentiation or expansion is not well understood. In this study, we show that targeting tumor-infiltrating macrophages (TAM) and inflammatory monocytes by inhibiting either the myeloid cell receptors colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF1R) or chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2 (CCR2) decreases the number of tumor-initiating cells (TIC) in pancreatic tumors. Targeting CCR2 or CSF1R improves chemotherapeutic efficacy, inhibits metastasis, and increases antitumor T-cell responses. Tumor-educated macrophages also directly enhanced the tumor-initiating capacity of pancreatic tumor cells by activating the transcription factor STAT3, thereby facilitating macrophage-mediated suppression of CD8(+) T lymphocytes. Together, our findings show how targeting TAMs can effectively overcome therapeutic resistance mediated by TICs.


Cancer Research | 2014

CSF1/CSF1R Blockade Reprograms Tumor-Infiltrating Macrophages and Improves Response to T Cell Checkpoint Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer Models.

Yu Zhu; Brett L. Knolhoff; Melissa A Meyer; Timothy M. Nywening; Brian L. West; Jianyang Luo; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Simon Peter Goedegebuure; David C. Linehan; David G. DeNardo

Cancer immunotherapy generally offers limited clinical benefit without coordinated strategies to mitigate the immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment. Critical drivers of immune escape in the tumor microenvironment include tumor-associated macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, which not only mediate immune suppression, but also promote metastatic dissemination and impart resistance to cytotoxic therapies. Thus, strategies to ablate the effects of these myeloid cell populations may offer great therapeutic potential. In this report, we demonstrate in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that inhibiting signaling by the myeloid growth factor receptor CSF1R can functionally reprogram macrophage responses that enhance antigen presentation and productive antitumor T-cell responses. Investigations of this response revealed that CSF1R blockade also upregulated T-cell checkpoint molecules, including PDL1 and CTLA4, thereby restraining beneficial therapeutic effects. We found that PD1 and CTLA4 antagonists showed limited efficacy as single agents to restrain PDAC growth, but that combining these agents with CSF1R blockade potently elicited tumor regressions, even in larger established tumors. Taken together, our findings provide a rationale to reprogram immunosuppressive myeloid cell populations in the tumor microenvironment under conditions that can significantly empower the therapeutic effects of checkpoint-based immunotherapeutics.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 1999

Intradermal radiocolloid and intraparenchymal blue dye injection optimize sentinel node identification in breast cancer patients.

David C. Linehan; Arnold Dk Hill; Timothy Akhurst; Henry Yeung; Samuel D.J Yeh; Katherine N. Tran; Patrick I. Borgen; Hiram S. CodyIII

Background: Radiotracer and blue dye mapping of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) have been advocated as accurate methods to stage the clinically negative axilla in breast cancer patients. The technical aspects of SLN biopsy are not fully characterized. In this study we compare the results of intraparenchymal (IP) and intradermal (ID) injection of Tc-99m sulfur colloid, to establish an optimal method for SLN localization.Methods: 200 consecutive patients had SLN biopsy performed by a single surgeon. Of these, 100 (Group I) had IP injection and 100 (Group II) had ID injection of Tc-99m sulfur colloid. All patients had IP injection of blue dye as well. Endpoints included (1) successful SLN localization by lymphoscintigraphy, (2) successful SLN localization at surgery, and (3) blue dye–isotope concordance (uptake of dye and isotope by the same SLN).Results: Isotope SLN localization was successful in 78% of Group I and 97% of group II patients (P < .001). When isotope was combined with blue dye, SLN were found in 92% of group I and 100% of Group II (P < .01). In cases where both dye and isotope were found in the axilla, dye mapped the same SLN as radiotracer in 97% of Group I and 95% of Group II patients.Conclusions: The dermal and parenchymal lymphatics of the breast drain to the same SLN in most patients. Because ID injection is easier to perform and more effective, this technique may simplify and optimize SLN localization.


Journal of Immunology | 2009

Disruption of CCR5-Dependent Homing of Regulatory T Cells Inhibits Tumor Growth in a Murine Model of Pancreatic Cancer

Marcus C.B. Tan; Peter S. Goedegebuure; Brian Belt; Brian Flaherty; Narendra V. Sankpal; William E. Gillanders; Timothy J. Eberlein; Chyi-Song Hsieh; David C. Linehan

Tumors evade immune destruction by actively inducing immune tolerance through the recruitment of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg). We have previously described increased prevalence of these cells in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but it remains unclear what mechanisms are involved in recruiting Tregs into the tumor microenvironment. Here, we postulated that chemokines might direct Treg homing to tumor. We show, in both human pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a murine pancreatic tumor model (Pan02), that tumor cells produce increased levels of ligands for the CCR5 chemokine receptor and, reciprocally, that CD4+ Foxp3+ Tregs, compared with CD4+ Foxp3− effector T cells, preferentially express CCR5. When CCR5/CCL5 signaling is disrupted, either by reducing CCL5 production by tumor cells or by systemic administration of a CCR5 inhibitor (N,N-dimethyl-N-{{4-{[2-(4-methylphenyl)-6,7-dihydro-5H-benzocyclohepten-8-yl]carbonyl}amino}}benzyl]-N,N-dimethyl-N- {{{4-{{{[2-(4-methylphenyl)-6,7-dihydro-5H-benzocycloheptan-8-yl]carbonyl}amino}}benzyl}}}tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-aminiumchloride; TAK-779), Treg migration to tumors is reduced and tumors are smaller than in control mice. Thus, this study demonstrates the importance of Tregs in immune evasion by tumors, how blockade of Treg migration might inhibit tumor growth, and, specifically in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the role of CCR5 in the homing of tumor-associated Tregs. Selective targeting of CCR5/CCL5 signaling may represent a novel immunomodulatory strategy for the treatment of cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the David C. Linehan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William G. Hawkins

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven M. Strasberg

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter S. Goedegebuure

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ryan C. Fields

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrea Wang-Gillam

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian Belt

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy J. Eberlein

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dominic E. Sanford

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David G. DeNardo

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey A. Drebin

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge