David E. Schindel
National Museum of Natural History
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David E. Schindel.
PLOS Biology | 2012
Jan Pawlowski; Stéphane Audic; Sina Adl; David Bass; Lassaâd Belbahri; Cédric Berney; Samuel S. Bowser; Ivan Čepička; Johan Decelle; Micah Dunthorn; Anna Maria Fiore-Donno; Gillian H. Gile; Maria Holzmann; Regine Jahn; Miloslav Jirků; Patrick J. Keeling; Martin Kostka; Alexander Kudryavtsev; Enrique Lara; Julius Lukeš; David G. Mann; Edward A. D. Mitchell; Frank Nitsche; Maria Romeralo; Gary W. Saunders; Alastair G. B. Simpson; Alexey V. Smirnov; John L. Spouge; Rowena Stern; Thorsten Stoeck
A group of protist experts proposes a two-step DNA barcoding approach, comprising a universal eukaryotic pre-barcode followed by group-specific barcodes, to unveil the hidden biodiversity of microbial eukaryotes.
PLOS Biology | 2010
Ronnie Vernooy; E. Haribabu; Manuel Ruiz Muller; Joseph Henry Vogel; Paul D. N. Hebert; David E. Schindel; Junko Shimura; Gregory A. C. Singer
Barcoding scientists aspire to adhere to the objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity by promoting conservation, sustainability, and the equitable sharing of benefits arising from use of genetic resources. (Image: Juan Manuel Escalante, wwww.realitat.com)
Nucleic Acids Research | 2014
Gabriele Droege; Katharine Barker; Jonas J. Astrin; Paul Bartels; Carol Butler; David Cantrill; Jonathan A. Coddington; Fé Forest; Birgit Gemeinholzer; Donald Hobern; Jacqueline Mackenzie-Dodds; Éamonn Ó Tuama; Gitte Petersen; Oris I. Sanjur; David E. Schindel; Ole Seberg
The Global Genome Biodiversity Network (GGBN) was formed in 2011 with the principal aim of making high-quality well-documented and vouchered collections that store DNA or tissue samples of biodiversity, discoverable for research through a networked community of biodiversity repositories. This is achieved through the GGBN Data Portal (http://data.ggbn.org), which links globally distributed databases and bridges the gap between biodiversity repositories, sequence databases and research results. Advances in DNA extraction techniques combined with next-generation sequencing technologies provide new tools for genome sequencing. Many ambitious genome sequencing projects with the potential to revolutionize biodiversity research consider access to adequate samples to be a major bottleneck in their workflow. This is linked not only to accelerating biodiversity loss and demands to improve conservation efforts but also to a lack of standardized methods for providing access to genomic samples. Biodiversity biobank-holding institutions urgently need to set a standard of collaboration towards excellence in collections stewardship, information access and sharing and responsible and ethical use of such collections. GGBN meets these needs by enabling and supporting accessibility and the efficient coordinated expansion of biodiversity biobanks worldwide.
Nature | 2010
David E. Schindel
Fundamental research must not be hampered by an international agreement on sharing the benefits from national biodiversity, says David Schindel.
Standards in Genomic Sciences | 2012
Robert J. Robbins; Linda A. Amaral-Zettler; Holly M. Bik; Stan Blum; James Edwards; Dawn Field; George M Garrity; Jack A. Gilbert; Renzo Kottmann; Leonard Krishtalka; Hilmar Lapp; Carolyn J. Lawrence; Norman Morrison; Éamonn Ó Tuama; Cynthia Sims Parr; Inigo San Gil; David E. Schindel; Lynn M. Schriml; David Vieglas; John Wooley
Building on the planning efforts of the RCN4GSC project, a workshop was convened in San Diego to bring together experts from genomics and metagenomics, biodiversity, ecology, and bioinformatics with the charge to identify potential for positive interactions and progress, especially building on successes at establishing data standards by the GSC and by the biodiversity and ecological communities. Until recently, the contribution of microbial life to the biomass and biodiversity of the biosphere was largely overlooked (because it was resistant to systematic study). Now, emerging genomic and metagenomic tools are making investigation possible. Initial research findings suggest that major advances are in the offing. Although different research communities share some overlapping concepts and traditions, they differ significantly in sampling approaches, vocabularies and workflows. Likewise, their definitions of ‘fitness for use’ for data differ significantly, as this concept stems from the specific research questions of most importance in the different fields. Nevertheless, there is little doubt that there is much to be gained from greater coordination and integration. As a first step toward interoperability of the information systems used by the different communities, participants agreed to conduct a case study on two of the leading data standards from the two formerly disparate fields: (a) GSC’s standard checklists for genomics and metagenomics and (b) TDWG’s Darwin Core standard, used primarily in taxonomy and systematic biology.
Biodiversity Data Journal | 2016
David E. Schindel; Scott E. Miller; Michael Trizna; Eileen Graham; Adele E. Crane
Abstract The Global Registry of Biodiversity Repositories is an online metadata resource for biodiversity collections, the institutions that contain them, and associated staff members. The registry provides contact and address information, characteristics of the institutions and collections using controlled vocabularies and free-text descripitons, links to related websites, unique identifiers for each institution and collection record, text fields for loan and use policies, and a variety of other descriptors. Each institution record includes an institutionCode that must be unique, and each collection record must have a collectionCode that is unique within that institution. The registry is populated with records imported from the largest similar registries and more can be harmonized and added. Doing so will require community input and curation and would produce a truly comprehensive and unifying information resource.
Nature | 2005
David E. Schindel; Scott E. Miller
Archive | 2010
David E. Schindel; Scott E. Miller
Nature | 1982
David E. Schindel
Nature | 2014
David E. Schindel; Pierre du Plessis