Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David Findlay is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David Findlay.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012

Donepezil and Memantine for Moderate-to-Severe Alzheimer's Disease

Robert Howard; Rupert McShane; James Lindesay; Craig Ritchie; Ashley Baldwin; Robert Barber; Alistair Burns; Tom Dening; David Findlay; Clive Holmes; Alan Hughes; Robin Jacoby; Robert G. Jones; Roy B. Jones; Ian G. McKeith; Ajay Macharouthu; John T. O'Brien; Peter Passmore; Bart Sheehan; Edmund Juszczak; Cornelius Katona; Robert Kerrin Hills; Martin Knapp; Clive Ballard; Richard G. Brown; Sube Banerjee; Caroline Onions; Mary Griffin; Jessica Adams; Richard Gray

BACKGROUND Clinical trials have shown the benefits of cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimers disease. It is not known whether treatment benefits continue after the progression to moderate-to-severe disease. METHODS We assigned 295 community-dwelling patients who had been treated with donepezil for at least 3 months and who had moderate or severe Alzheimers disease (a score of 5 to 13 on the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination [SMMSE, on which scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function]) to continue donepezil, discontinue donepezil, discontinue donepezil and start memantine, or continue donepezil and start memantine. Patients received the study treatment for 52 weeks. The coprimary outcomes were scores on the SMMSE and on the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS, on which scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater impairment). The minimum clinically important differences were 1.4 points on the SMMSE and 3.5 points on the BADLS. RESULTS Patients assigned to continue donepezil, as compared with those assigned to discontinue donepezil, had a score on the SMMSE that was higher by an average of 1.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 2.5) and a score on the BADLS that was lower (indicating less impairment) by 3.0 points (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.3) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Patients assigned to receive memantine, as compared with those assigned to receive memantine placebo, had a score on the SMMSE that was an average of 1.2 points higher (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.8; P<0.001) and a score on the BADLS that was 1.5 points lower (95% CI, 0.3 to 2.8; P=0.02). The efficacy of donepezil and of memantine did not differ significantly in the presence or absence of the other. There were no significant benefits of the combination of donepezil and memantine over donepezil alone. CONCLUSIONS In patients with moderate or severe Alzheimers disease, continued treatment with donepezil was associated with cognitive benefits that exceeded the minimum clinically important difference and with significant functional benefits over the course of 12 months. (Funded by the U.K. Medical Research Council and the U.K. Alzheimers Society; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN49545035.).


International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2011

Determining the minimum clinically important differences for outcomes in the DOMINO trial

Robert Howard; Patrick P. J. Phillips; Tony Johnson; John T. O'Brien; Bart Sheehan; James Lindesay; Peter Bentham; Alistair Burns; Clive Ballard; Clive Holmes; Ian G. McKeith; Robert Barber; Tom Dening; Craig Ritchie; Robert Jones; Ashley Baldwin; Peter Passmore; David Findlay; Alan Hughes; Ajay Macharouthu; Sube Banerjee; Roy W. Jones; Martin Knapp; Richard G. Brown; Robin Jacoby; Jessica Adams; Mary Griffin; Richard Gray

Although less likely to be reported in clinical trials than expressions of the statistical significance of differences in outcomes, whether or not a treatment has delivered a specified minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is also relevant to patients and their caregivers and doctors. Many dementia treatment randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have not reported MCIDs and, where they have been done, observed differences have not reached these.


Lancet Neurology | 2015

Nursing home placement in the Donepezil and Memantine in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease (DOMINO-AD) trial: secondary and post-hoc analyses

Robert Howard; Rupert McShane; James Lindesay; Craig W. Ritchie; Ashley Baldwin; Robert Barber; Alistair Burns; Tom Dening; David Findlay; Clive Holmes; Robert G. Jones; Roy B. Jones; Ian G. McKeith; Ajay Macharouthu; John T. O'Brien; Bart Sheehan; Edmund Juszczak; Cornelius Katona; Robert Kerrin Hills; Martin Knapp; Clive Ballard; Richard G. Brown; Sube Banerjee; Jessica Adams; Tony Johnson; Peter Bentham; Patrick P. J. Phillips

BACKGROUND Findings from observational studies have suggested a delay in nursing home placement with dementia drug treatment, but findings from a previous randomised trial of patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimers disease showed no effect. We investigated the effects of continuation or discontinuation of donepezil and starting of memantine on subsequent nursing home placement in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimers disease. METHODS In the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Donepezil and Memantine in Moderate to Severe Alzheimers Disease (DOMINO-AD) trial, community-living patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimers disease (who had been prescribed donepezil continuously for at least 3 months at a dose of 10 mg for at least the previous 6 weeks and had a score of between 5 and 13 on the Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination) were recruited from 15 secondary care memory centres in England and Scotland and randomly allocated to continue donepezil 10 mg per day without memantine, discontinue donepezil without memantine, discontinue donepezil and start memantine 20 mg per day, or continue donepezil 10 mg per day and start memantine 20 mg per day, for 52 weeks. After 52 weeks, choice of treatment was left to participants and their physicians. Place of residence was recorded during the first 52 weeks of the trial and then every 26 weeks for a further 3 years. A secondary outcome of the trial, reported in this study, was nursing home placement: an irreversible move from independent accommodation to a residential caring facility. Analyses restricted to risk of placement in the first year of follow-up after the patients had completed the double-blind phase of the trial were post-hoc. The DOMINO-AD trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, number ISRCTN49545035. FINDINGS Between Feb 11, 2008, and March 5, 2010, 73 (25%) patients were randomly assigned to continue donepezil without memantine, 73 (25%) to discontinue donepezil without memantine, 76 (26%) to discontinue donepezil and start memantine, and 73 (25%) to continue donepezil and start memantine. 162 (55%) patients underwent nursing home placement within 4 years of randomisation, with similar numbers for all groups (36 [49%] in patients who continued donepezil without memantine, 42 [58%] who discontinued donepezil without memantine, 41 [54%] who discontinued donepezil and started memantine, and 43 [59%] who continued donepezil and started memantine). We noted significant (p=0·010) heterogeneity of treatment effect over time, with significantly more nursing home placements in the combined donepezil discontinuation groups during the first year (hazard ratio 2·09 [95% CI 1·29-3·39]) than in the combined donepezil continuation groups, and no difference during the next 3 years (0·89 [0·58-1·35]). We noted no effect of patients starting memantine compared with not starting memantine during the first year (0·92 [0·58-1·45]) or the next 3 years (1·23 [0·81-1·87]). INTERPRETATION Withdrawal of donepezil in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimers disease increased the risk of nursing home placement during 12 months of treatment, but made no difference during the following 3 years of follow-up. Decisions to stop or continue donepezil treatment should be informed by potential risks of withdrawal, even if the perceived benefits of continued treatment are not clear. FUNDING Medical Research Council and UK Alzheimers Society.


Trials | 2009

DOMINO-AD protocol: donepezil and memantine in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease - a multicentre RCT.

Robert G. Jones; Bart Sheehan; Patrick P. J. Phillips; Ed Juszczak; Jessica Adams; Ashley Baldwin; Clive Ballard; Subrata Banerjee; Bob Barber; Peter Bentham; Richard G. Brown; Alistair Burns; Tom Dening; David Findlay; Richard Gray; Mary Griffin; Clive Holmes; Alan Hughes; Robin Jacoby; Tony Johnson; Roy W. Jones; Martin Knapp; James Lindesay; Ian G. McKeith; Rupert McShane; Ajay Macharouthu; John T. O'Brien; Caroline Onions; Peter Passmore; James Raftery

BackgroundAlzheimers disease (AD) is the commonest cause of dementia. Cholinesterase inhibitors, such as donepezil, are the drug class with the best evidence of efficacy, licensed for mild to moderate AD, while the glutamate antagonist memantine has been widely prescribed, often in the later stages of AD. Memantine is licensed for moderate to severe dementia in AD but is not recommended by the England and Wales National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. However, there is little evidence to guide clinicians as to what to prescribe as AD advances; in particular, what to do as the condition progresses from moderate to severe. Options include continuing cholinesterase inhibitors irrespective of decline, adding memantine to cholinesterase inhibitors, or prescribing memantine instead of cholinesterase inhibitors. The aim of this trial is to establish the most effective drug option for people with AD who are progressing from moderate to severe dementia despite treatment with donepezil.MethodDOMINO-AD is a pragmatic, 15 centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. Patients with AD, currently living at home, receiving donepezil 10 mg daily, and with Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) scores between 5 and 13 are being recruited. Each is randomized to one of four treatment options: continuation of donepezil with memantine placebo added; switch to memantine with donepezil placebo added; donepezil and memantine together; or donepezil placebo with memantine placebo. 800 participants are being recruited and treatment continues for one year. Primary outcome measures are cognition (SMMSE) and activities of daily living (Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale). Secondary outcomes are non-cognitive dementia symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory), health related quality of life (EQ-5D and DEMQOL-proxy), carer burden (General Health Questionnaire-12), cost effectiveness (using Client Service Receipt Inventory) and institutionalization. These outcomes are assessed at baseline, 6, 18, 30 and 52 weeks. All participants will be subsequently followed for 3 years by telephone interview to record institutionalization.DiscussionThere is considerable debate about the clinical and cost effectiveness of anti-dementia drugs. DOMINO-AD seeks to provide clear evidence on the best treatment strategies for those managing patients at a particularly important clinical transition point.Trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN49545035


International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2017

Cost-effectiveness of donepezil and memantine in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease (the DOMINO-AD trial)

Martin Knapp; Derek King; Renee Romeo; Jessica Adams; Ashley Baldwin; Clive Ballard; Sube Banerjee; Robert Barber; Peter Bentham; Richard G. Brown; Alistair Burns; Tom Dening; David Findlay; Clive Holmes; Tony Johnson; Robert G. Jones; Cornelius Katona; James Lindesay; Ajay Macharouthu; Ian G. McKeith; Rupert McShane; John T. O'Brien; Patrick P. J. Phillips; Bart Sheehan; Robert Howard

Most investigations of pharmacotherapy for treating Alzheimers disease focus on patients with mild‐to‐moderate symptoms, with little evidence to guide clinical decisions when symptoms become severe. We examined whether continuing donepezil, or commencing memantine, is cost‐effective for community‐dwelling, moderate‐to‐severe Alzheimers disease patients.


International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2005

The management of inappropriate vocalisation in dementia: a hierarchical approach.

Sue Barton; David Findlay; Roger A. Blake


International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 1992

Prolactin response to withdrawal of thioridazine in dementia

J. McLennan; David Findlay; J. Sharma; J. McEwen; Brian R. Ballinger; W. J. Maclennan; A. M. McHarg


Medical Teacher | 1988

How to Do it-Strategy and tactics in curricular innovation

David Findlay


International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2003

Assertive Outreach in Mental Health: A Manual for Practitioners. T. Burns and M. Firn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002. Pagess: 345. Prices: £24.50

David Findlay


International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 1990

Changes in erythrocyte ouabain binding with age in down's syndrome and in controls

G. J. Naylor; B. Shepherd; David Findlay; S. Young; D. McRae

Collaboration


Dive into the David Findlay's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alistair Burns

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bart Sheehan

John Radcliffe Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clive Holmes

University of Southampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Knapp

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tom Dening

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge