David G. Chapman

Increased airway closure is a determinant of airway hyperresponsiveness

In order to investigate whether increased airway closure is a component of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), airway closure was compared during induced bronchoconstriction in 62 asthmatic, 41 nonasthmatic nonobese (control) and 20 nonasthmatic obese (obese) subjects. Airway closure and airway narrowing were measured by spirometry as percentage change in forced vital capacity (%ΔFVC) and change in forced expiratory ratio (ΔFER), respectively. Multiple regression analyses were used to assess the determinants of AHR, assessed by the dose response slope (DRS). The DRS was significantly increased in asthmatics compared with controls but did not differ between obese and controls. The spirometric predictors of logDRS were baseline FER, ΔFER, body mass index (BMI) and %ΔFVC. There was a negative relationship between BMI and logDRS in the regression, suggesting a protective effect. The present findings suggest that the extent of airway closure during induced bronchoconstriction is a determinant of airway hyperresponsiveness, independent of the level of airway narrowing. However, after adjusting for airway closure, obesity appears to protect against airway hyperresponsiveness.

The Nonallergic Asthma of Obesity. A Matter of Distal Lung Compliance

RATIONALE The pathogenesis of asthma in obesity is poorly understood, but may be related to breathing at low lung volumes. OBJECTIVES To determine if lung function in obese patients with asthma and control subjects would respond differently to weight loss. METHODS Lung function was evaluated by conventional clinical tests and by impulse oscillometry in female late-onset, nonallergic patients with asthma and control subjects before, and 12 months after, bariatric surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Patients with asthma (n = 10) had significantly lower FEV1 (79.8 ± 10.6 vs. 95.5 ± 7.0%) and FVC (82.4 ± 13.2 vs. 93.7 ± 8.9%) compared with control subjects (n = 13). There were no significant differences in FRC or TLC at baseline. Twelve months after surgery, control subjects had significant increases in FEV1 (95.5 ± 7.0 to 100.7 ± 5.9), FVC (93.6 ± 8.9 to 98.6 ± 8.3%), FRC (45.4 ± 18.5 to 62.1 ± 15.3%), and TLC (84.8 ± 15.0 to 103.1 ± 15.3%), whereas patients with asthma had improvement only in FEV1 (79.8 ± 10.6 to 87.2 ± 11.5). Control subjects and patients with asthma had a significantly different change in respiratory system resistance with weight loss: control subjects exhibited a uniform decrease in respiratory system resistance at all frequencies, whereas patients with asthma exhibited a decrease in frequency dependence of resistance. Fits of a mathematical model of lung mechanics to these impedance spectra suggest that the lung periphery was more collapsed by obesity in patients with asthma compared with control subjects. CONCLUSIONS Weight loss decompresses the lung in both obese control subjects and patients with asthma, but the more pronounced effects of weight loss on lung elastance suggest that the distal lung is inherently more collapsible in people with asthma.

Deep inspirations protect against airway closure in nonasthmatic subjects

The mechanism by which deep inspirations protect against increased airway responsiveness in nonasthmatic subjects is not known. The aim was to investigate the role of airway closure and airway narrowing in deep inspiration bronchoprotection. Twelve nonasthmatic and nine asthmatic subjects avoided deep inspirations (DI) for 20 min, then took five DI expired to functional residual capaciy (DI-FRC) or, on a separate day, no DI (no DI) before inhaling a single dose of methacholine. On another day, eight nonasthmatic subjects took five DI expired to residual volume (DI-RV). Peripheral airway function was measured by respiratory system reactance (Xrs), using the forced oscillation technique, and by forced vital capacity (FVC) as an index of airway closure. Respiratory system resistance (Rrs) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/FVC were measured as indexes of airway narrowing. In nonasthmatic subjects, DI-FRC reduced the response measured by FEV1 (P=0.019), Xrs (P=0.02), and FVC (P=0.0005) but not by Rrs (P=0.15) or FEV1/FVC (P=0.52) compared with no DI. DI-RV had a less protective effect than DI-FRC on response measured by FEV1 (P=0.04) and FVC (P=0.016). There was no difference between all protocols when the response was measured by Xrs (P=0.20), Rrs (P=0.88), or FEV1/FVC (P=0.88). DI had no effect on methacholine response in asthmatic subjects. DI protect against airway responsiveness through an effect on peripheral airways involving reduced airway closure. The protective effect of DI on FEV1 and FVC was abolished by expiration to residual volume. We speculate that the reduced airway closure is due to reduced baseline ventilation heterogeneity and/or reduced airway surface tension.

Influence of distinct asthma phenotypes on lung function following weight loss in the obese

There appears to be two distinct clinical phenotypes of obese patients with asthma—those with early‐onset asthma and high serum IgE (TH2‐high), and those with late‐onset asthma and low serum IgE (TH2‐low). The aim of the present study was to determine in the two phenotypes of obese asthma the effect of weight loss on small airway function.

Avoiding deep inspirations increases the maximal response to methacholine without altering sensitivity in non-asthmatics.

Airway hyperresponsiveness is characterised by a leftward shift of the dose-response curve (DRC) and an increase in the maximal response. Deep inspiration (DI) avoidance increases responsiveness in non-asthmatic, but not asthmatic, subjects. The aim was to determine the effect of DI avoidance on the sensitivity and maximal response of the FEV(1) DRC to methacholine. Thirteen non-asthmatic and ten asthmatic subjects underwent a standard cumulative high-dose methacholine challenge (0.1-200μmol). Subsequently, on separate days, increasing single doses of methacholine were administered after 10min of DI avoidance. A sigmoidal equation was fitted to the data to obtain values for α, the position constant, as a measure of sensitivity. The fall in FEV(1) at the highest common dose was used as a measure of the maximal response. The change in flow at 40% control vital capacity on the maximal (V˙40m) and partial (V˙40p) curves were calculated from the first manoeuvre after methacholine and the ratio of the values for V˙40m and V˙40p was calculated as a measure of the bronchodilator effect of DI (BD(DI)). In non-asthmatic subjects, avoiding DI increased the maximum fall in FEV(1) at the highest common dose (p=0.0001) but did not alter α (p=0.75). Avoiding DI before challenge did not alter BD(DI) (p=0.13). DI avoidance had no effect on airway responsiveness in asthmatic subjects. In non-asthmatic subjects, DI avoidance increases airway responsiveness by increasing the maximal response, but does not alter the sensitivity, suggesting that the loss of the effect of DI in asthma contributes to excessive bronchoconstriction.

Animal Models of Allergic Airways Disease: Where Are We and Where to Next?

In a complex inflammatory airways disease such as asthma, abnormalities in a plethora of molecular and cellular pathways ultimately culminate in characteristic impairments in respiratory function. The ability to study disease pathophysiology in the setting of a functioning immune and respiratory system therefore makes mouse models an invaluable tool in translational research. Despite the vast understanding of inflammatory airways diseases gained from mouse models to date, concern over the validity of mouse models continues to grow. Therefore the aim of this review is twofold; firstly, to evaluate mouse models of asthma in light of current clinical definitions, and secondly, to provide a framework by which mouse models can be continually refined so that they continue to stand at the forefront of translational science. Indeed, it is in viewing mouse models as a continual work in progress that we will be able to target our research to those patient populations in whom current therapies are insufficient. J. Cell. Biochem. 115: 2055–2064, 2014.

Emerging mechanisms of glutathione-dependent chemistry in biology and disease

Glutathione has traditionally been considered as an antioxidant that protects cells against oxidative stress. Hence, the loss of reduced glutathione and formation of glutathione disulfide is considered a classical parameter of oxidative stress that is increased in diseases. Recent studies have emerged that demonstrate that glutathione plays a more direct role in biological and pathophysiological processes through covalent modification to reactive cysteines within proteins, a process known as S‐glutathionylation. The formation of an S‐glutathionylated moiety within the protein can lead to structural and functional modifications. Activation, inactivation, loss of function, and gain of function have all been attributed to S‐glutathionylation. In pathophysiological settings, S‐glutathionylation is tightly regulated. This perspective offers a concise overview of the emerging field of protein thiol redox modifications. We will also cover newly developed methodology to detect S‐glutathionylation in situ, which will enable further discovery into the role of S‐glutathionylation in biology and disease. J. Cell. Biochem. 114: 1962–1968, 2013.

Effect of deep inspiration avoidance on ventilation heterogeneity and airway responsiveness in healthy adults

The mechanisms by which deep inspiration (DI) avoidance increases airway responsiveness in healthy subjects are not known. DI avoidance does not alter respiratory mechanics directly; however, computational modeling has predicted that DI avoidance would increase baseline ventilation heterogeneity. The aim was to determine if DI avoidance increased baseline ventilation heterogeneity and whether this correlated with the increase in airway responsiveness. Twelve healthy subjects had ventilation heterogeneity measured by multiple-breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) before and after 20 min of DI avoidance. This was followed by another 20-min period of DI avoidance before the inhalation of a single methacholine dose. The protocol was repeated on a separate day with the addition of five DIs at the end of each of the two periods of DI avoidance. Baseline ventilation heterogeneity in convection-dependent and diffusion-convection-dependent airways was calculated from MBNW. The response to methacholine was measured by the percent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FVC) (airway narrowing) and percent fall in FVC (airway closure). DI avoidance increased baseline diffusion-convection-dependent airways (P = 0.02) but did not affect convection-dependent airways (P = 0.9). DI avoidance increased both airway closure (P = 0.002) and airway narrowing (P = 0.02) during bronchial challenge. The increase in diffusion-convection-dependent airways due to DI avoidance did not correlate with the increase in either airway narrowing (r(s) = 0.14) or airway closure (r(s) = 0.12). These findings suggest that DI avoidance increases diffusion-convection-dependent ventilation heterogeneity that is not associated with the increase in airway responsiveness. We speculate that DI avoidance reduces surfactant release, which increases peripheral ventilation heterogeneity and also predisposes to peripheral airway closure.

Absence of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase 1 protects against house dust mite-induced pulmonary remodeling but not airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation

Chronic allergic asthma leads to airway remodeling and subepithelial fibrosis via mechanisms not fully understood. Airway remodeling is amplified by profibrotic mediators, such as transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), which plays a cardinal role in various models of fibrosis. We recently have identified a critical role for c-Jun-NH2-terminal-kinase (JNK) 1 in augmenting the profibrotic effects of TGF-β1, linked to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of airway epithelial cells. To examine the role of JNK1 in house dust mite (HDM)-induced airway remodeling, we induced allergic airway inflammation in wild-type (WT) and JNK1-/- mice by intranasal administration of HDM extract. WT and JNK1-/- mice were sensitized with intranasal aspirations of HDM extract for 15 days over 3 wk. HDM caused similar increases in airway hyperresponsiveness, mucus metaplasia, and airway inflammation in WT and JNK1-/- mice. In addition, the profibrotic cytokine TGF-β1 and phosphorylation of Smad3 were equally increased in WT and JNK1-/- mice. In contrast, increases in collagen content in lung tissue induced by HDM were significantly attenuated in JNK1-/- mice compared with WT controls. Furthermore HDM-induced increases of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) protein and mRNA expression as well as the mesenchymal markers high-mobility group AT-hook 2 and collagen1A1 in WT mice were attenuated in JNK1-/- mice. The let-7 family of microRNAs has previously been linked to fibrosis. HDM exposure in WT mice and primary lung epithelial cells resulted in striking decreases in let-7g miRNA that were not observed in mice or primary lung epithelial cells lacking JNK1-/- mice. Overexpression of let-7g in lung epithelial cells reversed the HDM-induced increases in α-SMA. Collectively, these findings demonstrate an important requirement for JNK1 in promoting HDM-induced fibrotic airway remodeling.

Mechanisms of airway hyper-responsiveness in asthma: the past, present and yet to come.

Airway hyper‐responsiveness (AHR) has long been considered a cardinal feature of asthma. The development of the measurement of AHR 40 years ago initiated many important contributions to our understanding of asthma and other airway diseases. However, our understanding of AHR in asthma remains complicated by the multitude of potential underlying mechanisms which in reality are likely to have different contributions amongst individual patients. Therefore, the present review will discuss the current state of understanding of the major mechanisms proposed to contribute to AHR and highlight the way in which AHR testing is beginning to highlight distinct abnormalities associated with clinically relevant patient populations. In doing so we aim to provide a foundation by which future research can begin to ascribe certain mechanisms to specific patterns of bronchoconstriction and subsequently match phenotypes of bronchoconstriction with clinical phenotypes. We believe that this approach is not only within our grasp but will lead to improved mechanistic understanding of asthma phenotypes and we hoped to better inform the development of phenotype‐targeted therapy.