David G. Kerns

A Comparative Study of Root Coverage Using Two Different Acellular Dermal Matrix Products

BACKGROUND Gingival recession remains an important problem in dental esthetics. A new dermal matrix material has been introduced, but its effectiveness has not been studied and compared to current dermal matrix material. The aim of this study is to compare the healing associated with a coronally advanced flap for root coverage in areas of localized tissue recession when using Alloderm (ADM) and Puros Dermis (PDM). METHODS A split-mouth design was used for this study, with 52 contralateral sites in 14 patients with Miller Class I or III facial tissue recession. Twenty-six sites were treated with coronally advanced flap using PDM, and 26 sites were treated with coronally advanced flap using ADM, all followed for 6 months. Clinical measurements of vertical recession, keratinized tissue, probing depths, and attachment levels were made initially, at 3 months, and at 6 months. RESULTS Both groups had significant improvement in the amount of recession coverage with means of 2.83 mm for the PDM and 3.13 mm for the ADM. The percentage of root coverage was 81.4% for the PDM and 83.4% for the ADM; differences between the materials were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of this study, there was no statistical or clinical difference in the amount of root coverage, probing depth, or keratinized tissue in coronally advanced flaps for root coverage with either of the two acellular dermal matrix materials. Both materials were successful in achieving root coverage.

A comparative study of root defect coverage using an acellular dermal matrix with and without a recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor.

BACKGROUND The objective of this case series is to compare root defect coverage results and healing responses of bilateral recession defects treated with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) with and without recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF). METHODS Seventeen patients with 40 bilateral gingival recession defects were compared. Each defect was ≥2 mm and treated with ADM and a coronally advanced flap. Using split-mouth design, the control-side ADM was hydrated in sterile saline, whereas the test-side ADM was hydrated in rhPDGF. The patients were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Standardized measurements were taken preoperatively at 3 and 6 months. Healing was clinically assessed at 1 week and 1 month post-surgically. RESULTS Both test and control groups showed significant gain in root defect coverage over the 6-month period for all individuals, with the test group showing a 69.0% gain and the control group showing a 76.7% gain. Patients divided into Miller Class I and Class III defects were also found to have a significant gain in root defect coverage over 6 months. The test group showed 84.1% gain, and the control group showed 84.7% gain for Miller Class I defects. For Miller Class III defects, the test group showed 51.5% gain, and the control group showed a 60.8% gain. One week after surgery, 35% of the test group showed better healing, whereas 15% of the control group showed better healing. One month after surgery, 20% of the test group showed better healing, whereas 15% of the control group showed better healing. CONCLUSION Based on the results of this case series, there were no statistically or clinically significant differences in root defect coverage, keratinized tissue, clinical attachment level, or clinical healing for treatment of root recession with a coronally advanced flap and ADM with and without rhPDGF.

Anti-Inflammatory Protein Tumor Necrosis Factor-α–Stimulated Protein 6 (TSG-6) Promotes Early Gingival Wound Healing: An In Vivo Study

BACKGROUND Human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) produce tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α-stimulated protein 6 (TSG-6). TSG-6 modulates proinflammatory cytokine cascades and enhances tissue repair. This study tests the effects of recombinant human TSG-6 (rhTSG-6) on gingival wound healing within the first 2 days post-surgery. METHODS After gingival resection in 120 Sprague-Dawley rats, 2 µg rhTSG-6 in 5-µL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or the same volume of only PBS solution was injected into gingival tissue approximating the surgical wound. Control animals did not receive injections. Tissue biopsies and blood were collected at 1 to 2, 6 to 8, 24, and 48 hours post-surgery (n = 10 per group). Specimens were analyzed via histologic analysis and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for quantification and comparison of inflammatory markers interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and myeloperoxidase (MPO). Wound photographs were taken for a double-masked clinical assessment at each time period. Weights were recorded for all animals pre- and post-surgery. RESULTS Animals injected with rhTSG-6 had significantly less severe clinical inflammation at 6 to 8 (P = 0.01228), 24 (P = 0.01675), and 48 (P = 0.0186) hours. Sham and control animals had more weight loss at 24 and 48 hours. Sham and control animals had more pronounced cellular infiltrate. rhTSG-6-treated animals had significantly less MPO (P = 0.027) at 24 hours and IL-1β (P = 0.027) at 24 and 48 hours. IL-6 showed a marginal significant difference at 6 to 8 hours, but there was no significant difference for TNF-α. CONCLUSION rhTSG-6 reduced postoperative gingival inflammation by reducing levels of proinflammatory cytokines and cellular infiltrate and may offer significant promise as an anti-inflammatory agent for gingival surgery.

The Role of Occlusion in the Dental Implant and Peri-implant Condition: A Review

Dental implants have become a widely used dental treatment approach. It is important to identify factors that can be detrimental to dental implants and the peri-implant complex. There is controversy regarding whether occlusion plays a role in the implant and peri-implant condition. The present study aims to review the scientific literature regarding this topic. Animal and human studies, and previous reviews on the topic are included and presented. There is a wide heterogeneity among study designs. Several articles demonstrated that occlusion and occlusion overload could detrimentally affect the peri-implant condition, while other articles did not support these results. More studies are needed to help understand the mechanisms by which occlusion might play a role in the peri-implant condition.

Laser assisted non-surgical periodontal therapy: A double blind, randomized clinical trial

The objective of this study was to examine potential benefits of using laser therapy for secular decontamination in conjunction with scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. The study was performed on 173 teeth in 14 patients in a split-mouth design, one side received scaling and root planing followed by laser therapy using a carbon dioxide (CO2) laser with an ablative handpiece (test group); the contralateral side received scaling and root planing without laser (control group). Clinical and laboratory parameters were evaluated prior to treatment and at 3 and 6 months following therapy; clinical measurements were performed by two blinded examiners. The clinical parameters included measurement of gingival recession (REC), bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment level (CAL), pocket depth (PD), furcation involvement (FUR), and tooth mobility (MOB). Laboratory testing to determine the levels of periodontal pathogens was performed using PCR techniques. The results of the study revealed statistically significant differences in clinical and laboratory parameters at 3 and 6 months after therapy for both test and control groups, but no significant difference was observed between the two groups. However, sites receiving laser therapy tended to show a greater decrease in probing depths, gain in clinical attachment level, and reduced bacterial levels. In conclusion, the overall results of the study suggest a potential benefit of using laser therapy in conjunction with scaling and root planing for the treatment of chronic periodontitis.