David G. Sherman

Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association

Stroke ranks as the third leading cause of death in the United States. It is now estimated that there are more than 700 000 incident strokes annually and 4.4 million stroke survivors.1 2 The economic burden of stroke was estimated by the American Heart Association to be

Myocardial Injury and Left Ventricular Performance After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

51 billion (direct and indirect costs) in 1999.3 Despite the advent of treatment of selected patients with acute ischemic stroke with tissue plasminogen activator and the promise of other experimental therapies, the best approach to reducing the burden of stroke remains prevention.4 5 High-risk or stroke-prone individuals can be identified and targeted for specific interventions.6 This is important because epidemiological data suggest a substantial leveling off of prior declines in stroke-related mortality and a possible increase in stroke incidence.7 8 The Stroke Council of the American Heart Association formed an ad hoc writing group to provide a clear and concise overview of the evidence regarding various established and potential stroke risk factors. The writing group was chosen based on expertise in specific subject areas, and it used literature review, reference to previously published guidelines, and expert opinion to summarize existing evidence and formulate recommendations (Table 1⇓). View this table: Table 1. Levels of Evidence and Grading of Recommendations As given in Tables 2 through 4⇓⇓⇓, risk factors or risk markers for a first stroke were classified according to potential for modification (nonmodifiable, modifiable, or potentially modifiable) and strength of evidence (well documented, less well documented).5 The tables give the estimated prevalence, population attributable risk, relative risk, and risk reduction with treatment for each factor when known. Population attributable risk reflects the proportion of ischemic strokes in the population that can be attributed to a particular risk factor and is given by the formula 100×[prevalence(relative risk−1)/prevalence(relative risk−1)+1]). …

The efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after acute ischaemic stroke (PREVAIL Study): an open-label randomised comparison

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Electrocardiographic abnormalities and elevations of the creatine kinase myocardial isoenzyme (CK-MB) occur frequently after subarachnoid hemorrhage. In some patients, a reversible and presumably neurogenic form of left ventricular dysfunction is demonstrated by echocardiography. It is not known whether cardiac injury of this type adversely affects cardiovascular hemodynamic performance. METHODS We retrospectively studied 72 patients admitted to our neuro-ICU for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage over a 2.5-year period. We selected patients who met the following criteria: (1) CK-MB levels measured within 3 days of onset, (2) pulmonary artery catheter placed, (3) echocardiogram performed, and (4) no history of preexisting cardiac disease. Hemodynamic profiles were recorded on the day after surgery (n=67) or on the day of echocardiography (n=5) if surgery was not performed (mean, 3. 3+/-1.7 days after onset). The severity of cardiac injury was classified as none (peak CK-MB <1%, n=36), mild (peak CK-MB 1% to 2%, n=21), moderate (peak CK-MB >2%, n=6), or severe (abnormal left ventricular wall motion, n=9). RESULTS Abnormal left ventricular wall motion occurred exclusively in patients with peak CK-MB levels >2% (P<0.0001), poor neurological grade (P=0.002), and female sex (P=0.02). Left ventricular stroke volume index and stroke work index were elevated above the normal range in patients with peak CK-MB levels <1% and fell progressively as the severity of cardiac injury increased, with mean values for patients with abnormal wall motion below normal (both P<0.0001 by ANOVA). Cardiac index followed a similar trend, but the effect was less pronounced (P<0.0001). Using forward stepwise multiple logistic regression, we found that thick subarachnoid clot on the admission CT scan (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.0 to 3.4; P=0.04) and depressed cardiac index (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.1; P=0.04) were independent predictors of symptomatic vasospasm. CONCLUSIONS Myocardial enzyme release and echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities are associated with impaired left ventricular performance after subarachnoid hemorrhage. In severely affected patients, reduction of cardiac output from normally elevated levels may increase the risk of cerebral ischemia related to vasospasm.

Antiphospholipid antibodies and cerebral ischemia in young people.

BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin is recommended in acute ischaemic stroke, but which regimen provides optimum treatment is uncertain. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin with that of unfractionated heparin for patients with stroke. METHODS 1762 patients with acute ischaemic stroke who were unable to walk unassisted were randomly assigned within 48 h of symptoms to receive either enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily or unfractionated heparin 5000 U subcutaneously every 12 h for 10 days (range 6-14). Patients were stratified by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (severe stroke > or =14, less severe stroke <14). The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of symptomatic or asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, or fatal pulmonary embolism. Primary safety endpoints were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, major extracranial haemorrhage, and all-cause mortality. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00077805. FINDINGS In the efficacy population (ie, one or more dose received, presence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or assessment for venous thromboembolism), enoxaparin (n=666) and unfractionated heparin (669) were given for 10.5 days (SD 3.2). Enoxaparin reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism by 43% compared with unfractionated heparin (68 [10%] vs 121 [18%]; relative risk 0.57, 95% CI 0.44-0.76, p=0.0001; difference -7.9%, -11.6 to -4.2); this reduction was consistent for patients with an NIHSS score of 14 or more (26 [16%] vs 52 [30%]; p=0.0036) or less than 14 (42 [8%] vs 69 [14%]; p=0.0044). The occurrence of any bleeding was similar with enoxaparin (69 [8%]) or unfractionated heparin (71 [8%]; p=0.83). The frequency of the composite of symptomatic intracranial and major extracranial haemorrhage was small and closely similar between groups (enoxaparin 11 [1%] vs unfractionated heparin 6 [1%]; p=0.23). We noted no difference for symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage between groups (4 [1%] vs 6 [1%], respectively; p=0.55); the rate of major extracranial bleeding was higher with enoxaparin than with unfractionated heparin (7 [1%] vs 0; p=0.015). INTERPRETATION Our results suggest that for patients with acute ischaemic stroke, enoxaparin is preferable to unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in view of its better clinical benefits to risk ratio and convenience of once daily administration.

Immediate anticoagulation of embolic stroke: brain hemorrhage and management options

The importance of a prothrombotic state as a cause of ischemic stroke in young adults is ill defined. We examined 46 unselected patients under age 50 years with cerebral ischemia for anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) and lupus anticoagulants (LA), over a 3-year period. Age- and sex-matched patients with other neurologic diseases served as a noncerebral ischemia comparison group to test whether (1) stroke/transient ischemic attacks (TIA) in young people is associated with aCL and/or LA, and (2) their presence is specific to cerebral ischemia. In the stroke/TIA group, 21 patients had aCL or LA and 25 had neither, whereas in the control group, 2 patients had aCL and 24 had neither. Equal numbers of stroke/TIA patients with and without antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) had other stroke risk factors. Patients with aPL and cerebral ischemia, however, had a more frequent history of multiple events than those without them. These antibodies occur with undue frequency in young patients with stroke/TIA and are not associated with a concurrent diagnosis of systemic lupus in most cases. A coexistent aPL-associated prothrombotic state may be a key determinant of whether patients with atherosclerosis, mitral valve prolapse, or other structural lesions experience recurrent ischemia.

Oral citicoline in acute ischemic stroke: an individual patient data pooling analysis of clinical trials.

The clinical implications of hemorrhagic transformation of embolic brain infarction were explored by studying 30 patients with cardiogenic brain embolism and either hemorrhagic infarct (HI) or intracerebral hematoma (ICH) on CT. At the time of identification of hemorrhage, 19 patients were receiving anticoagulants and 11 were not. Eight anticoagulated patients and three nonanticoagulated patients developed late HI without attendant worsening after an initial CT was nonhemorrhagic. Hemorrhagic transformation without worsening most often occurred after 12 hours but before 48 hours following stroke onset and was associated with large infarcts (82%) but not with age, blood pressure or embolic source. Seven anticoagulated patients, six with large infarcts, and one nonanticoagulated patient with a small infarct abruptly worsened from eight hours to 11 days after stroke, with CT revealing ICH or severe HI. Excessive anticoagulation or acute hypertension potentially contributed to hemorrhagic transformation in four of five patients who were receiving heparin. Brain hemorrhage in embolic strokes most often occurs with large infarcts. Early CT may not allow the identification of large embolic infarcts that are destined to later undergo spontaneous hemorrhagic transformation. For large embolic infarcts, a delay of several days before anticoagulation and special efforts to avoid excessive anticoagulation and hypertension may be prudent. The initial administration of large, bolus doses of heparin should perhaps be avoided.

Abrupt change in head position and cerebral infarction.

Background and Purpose— No single neuroprotective agent has been shown to influence outcome after acute stroke. Citicoline has been studied worldwide in many clinical trials with positive findings, but only 1 trial has obtained significant results in the primary efficacy variables. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of oral citicoline in patients with acute ischemic stroke by a data pooling analysis of clinical trials. The primary efficacy end point chosen was the common evaluation of recovery, combining National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≤1, modified Rankin Scale score ≤1, and Barthel Index ≥95 at 3 months using the generalized estimating equations analysis. Methods— A systematic search of all prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials with oral citicoline (MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Ferrer Group bibliographic databases) was undertaken. Individual patient data were extracted from each study and pooled in a single data file. The main inclusion criteria included compatible neuroimaging with ischemic stroke, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥8, and prior modified Rankin Scale score ≤1. Four clinical trials using various doses of oral citicoline (500, 1000, and 2000 mg) were identified. Results— Of 1652 randomized patients, 1372 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (583 received placebo, 789 received citicoline). Recovery at 3 months was 25.2% in citicoline-treated patients and 20.2% in placebo-treated patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.62;P =0.0034). The dose showing the largest difference with placebo was 2000 mg, with 27.9% of patients achieving recovery (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.72;P =0.0043). The overall safety of citicoline was similar to placebo. Conclusions— Treatment with oral citicoline within the first 24 hours after onset in patients with moderate to severe stroke increases the probability of complete recovery at 3 months.

Cardiac injury associated with neurogenic pulmonary edema following subarachnoid hemorrhage

Eight patients are described who developed infarctions in the rertebral-basilar artery distribution following chiropractic neck manipulation or spontaneous head turning. The angiographic and autopsy findings indicate that injury to the intima of the vertebral artery at the atlantoaxiaJ joint forms a nidus for thrombus formation which may propogate or embolize to involve other vessels in the vertebral-basilar system and result in progressive brainstem infarction. The role of anticoagulation in these patients is discussed.

Prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Objective: To describe the clinical features of cardiac injury associated with neurogenic pulmonary edema (NPE) in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Background: NPE is generally viewed as a form of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema related to massive sympathetic discharge. Methods: Case series. Results: We found echocardiography evidence of reduced global and segmental left ventricular (LV) systolic function in five women (mean age, 44; range, 36 to 57) with SAH and NPE. None had a history of heart disease. Four patients were Hunt/Hess grade III and one was grade IV. All five patients experienced (1) sudden hypotension (systolic blood pressure <110 mm Hg) following initially elevated blood pressures, (2) transient lactic acidosis, (3) borderline (2 to 4%) creatine kinase MB elevations, and (4) varied acute (< 24 hours) electrocardiographic changes followed by widespread and persistent T wave inversions. Pulmonary artery wedge pressures were normal in 3/3 patients at the onset of pulmonary edema but reached high levels (>16 mm Hg) in all four patients studied beyond this period. Reduced cardiac output and LV stroke volume were identified in three patients; the fourth patient demonstrated normal values on high doses of intravenous pressors. Cerebral infarction due to vasospasm occurred in four patients and resulted in two deaths. Follow-up echocardiography performed 2 to 6 weeks after SAH revealed normal LV function in all three survivors. Conclusions: A reversible form of cardiac injury may occur in patients with NPE following SAH and is associated with characteristic clinical findings. Impaired LV hemodynamic performance in this setting may contribute to cardiovascular instability, pulmonary edema formation, and complications from cerebral ischemia.

Stroke Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Objective: To review the risk and pathogenesis of stroke associated with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and the efficacies and risks of stroke prevention strategies. Background: About 16% of ischemic strokes are associated with AF; AF is an independent risk factor for stroke. Methods: Review of the literature, focusing on 13 randomized trials of antithrombotic therapy. Results: The overall risk of stroke in AF patients averages about 5%/y, but with wide variation depending on the presence of coexistent thromboembolic risk factors. AF patients with low (about 1% per year), moderate (about 3% per year), and high (about 6% per year) stroke risks have been identified, but the generalizability of risk stratification schemes to clinical practice has not been fully assessed. AF patients with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, even if remote, are at highest risk (about 12% per year). Adjusted-dose warfarin (target International Normalized Ratio [INR] 2-3) is highly efficacious for preventing stroke in AF patients (about 70% risk reduction) and is safe for selected patients, if carefully monitored. Aspirin has a modest effect on reducing stroke (about 20% risk reduction). The numbers of AF patients that would need to be treated with warfarin instead of aspirin for 1 year to prevent one ischemic stroke are about 200, 70, and 20 for those with low, moderate and high risk, respectively. Conclusions: Many patients with nonvalvular AF have substantial rates of ischemic stroke. Stratification of stroke risk identifies AF patients who benefit most and least from lifelong anticoagulation. Warfarin is recommended for high-risk AF patients who can safely receive it. Aspirin may be indicated for those with a low stroke risk and for those who cannot receive warfarin. For AF patients considered to have a moderate risk of stroke, individual bleeding risk during anticoagulation and patient preference should particularly influence the choice of antithrombotic prophylaxis.