Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David H. Lawson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David H. Lawson.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2001

Paroxetine for the Prevention of Depression Induced by High-Dose Interferon Alfa

David H. Lawson; Jane F. Gumnick; Amita K. Manatunga; Suzanne Penna; Rebecca S. Goodkin; Kristen Greiner; Charles B. Nemeroff; Andrew H. Miller

BACKGROUND Depression commonly complicates treatment with the cytokine interferon alfa-2b. Laboratory animals pretreated with antidepressants have less severe depression-like symptoms after the administration of a cytokine. We sought to determine whether a similar strategy would be effective in humans. METHODS In a double-blind study of 40 patients with malignant melanoma who were eligible for high-dose interferon alfa therapy, we randomly assigned 20 patients to receive the antidepressant paroxetine and 20 to receive placebo. The treatment was begun 2 weeks before the initiation of interferon alfa and continued for the first 12 weeks of interferon alfa therapy. RESULTS During the first 12 weeks of interferon alfa therapy, symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of major depression developed in 2 of 18 patients in the paroxetine group (11 percent) and 9 of 20 patients in the placebo group (45 percent) (relative risk, 0.24; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.08 to 0.93). Severe depression necessitated the discontinuation of interferon alfa before 12 weeks in 1 of the 20 patients in the paroxetine group (5 percent), as compared with 7 patients in the placebo group (35 percent) (relative risk, 0.14; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.85). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS In patients with malignant melanoma, pretreatment with paroxetine appears to be an effective strategy for minimizing depression induced by interferon alfa.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2011

gp100 Peptide Vaccine and Interleukin-2 in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Douglas J. Schwartzentruber; David H. Lawson; Jon Richards; Robert M. Conry; Donald M. Miller; Jonathan Treisman; Fawaz Gailani; Lee B. Riley; Kevin C. Conlon; Barbara A. Pockaj; Kari Kendra; Richard L. White; Rene Gonzalez; Timothy M. Kuzel; Brendan D. Curti; Phillip D. Leming; Eric D. Whitman; Jai Balkissoon; Douglas S. Reintgen; Howard L. Kaufman; Francesco M. Marincola; Maria J. Merino; Steven A. Rosenberg; Peter L. Choyke; Don Vena; Patrick Hwu

BACKGROUND Stimulating an immune response against cancer with the use of vaccines remains a challenge. We hypothesized that combining a melanoma vaccine with interleukin-2, an immune activating agent, could improve outcomes. In a previous phase 2 study, patients with metastatic melanoma receiving high-dose interleukin-2 plus the gp100:209-217(210M) peptide vaccine had a higher rate of response than the rate that is expected among patients who are treated with interleukin-2 alone. METHODS We conducted a randomized, phase 3 trial involving 185 patients at 21 centers. Eligibility criteria included stage IV or locally advanced stage III cutaneous melanoma, expression of HLA*A0201, an absence of brain metastases, and suitability for high-dose interleukin-2 therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive interleukin-2 alone (720,000 IU per kilogram of body weight per dose) or gp100:209-217(210M) plus incomplete Freunds adjuvant (Montanide ISA-51) once per cycle, followed by interleukin-2. The primary end point was clinical response. Secondary end points included toxic effects and progression-free survival. RESULTS The treatment groups were well balanced with respect to baseline characteristics and received a similar amount of interleukin-2 per cycle. The toxic effects were consistent with those expected with interleukin-2 therapy. The vaccine-interleukin-2 group, as compared with the interleukin-2-only group, had a significant improvement in centrally verified overall clinical response (16% vs. 6%, P=0.03), as well as longer progression-free survival (2.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 3.9 vs. 1.6 months; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.8; P=0.008). The median overall survival was also longer in the vaccine-interleukin-2 group than in the interleukin-2-only group (17.8 months; 95% CI, 11.9 to 25.8 vs. 11.1 months; 95% CI, 8.7 to 16.3; P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS In patients with advanced melanoma, the response rate was higher and progression-free survival longer with vaccine and interleukin-2 than with interleukin-2 alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00019682.).


Neuropsychopharmacology | 2002

Neurobehavioral effects of interferon-α in cancer patients: Phenomenology and paroxetine responsiveness of symptom dimensions.

Lucile Capuron; Jane F. Gumnick; David H. Lawson; Andrea Reemsnyder; Charles B. Nemeroff; Andrew H. Miller

We have previously shown that the risk of major depression in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing interferon-α (IFN-α) therapy can be reduced by pretreatment with the antidepressant, paroxetine. Using dimensional analyses, the present study assessed the expression and treatment responsiveness of specific clusters of neuropsychiatric symptoms over the first three months of IFN-α therapy.Forty patients with malignant melanoma eligible for IFN-α treatment were randomly assigned to receive either paroxetine or placebo in a double-blind design. Neuropsychiatric assessments were conducted at regular intervals during the first twelve weeks of IFN-α therapy and included the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and the Neurotoxicity Rating Scale.Neurovegetative and somatic symptoms including anorexia, fatigue and pain appeared within two weeks of IFN-α therapy in a large proportion of patients. In contrast, symptoms of depressed mood, anxiety and cognitive dysfunction appeared later during IFN-α treatment and more specifically in patients who met DSM-IV criteria for major depression. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, cognitive dysfunction and pain were more responsive, whereas symptoms of fatigue and anorexia were less responsive, to paroxetine treatment. These data demonstrate distinct phenomenology and treatment responsiveness of symptom dimensions induced by IFN-α, and suggest that different mechanisms mediate the various behavioral manifestations of cytokine-induced “sickness behavior.”


Biological Psychiatry | 2003

Interferon-alpha–induced changes in tryptophan metabolism: relationship to depression and paroxetine treatment

Lucile Capuron; Gabriele Neurauter; David H. Lawson; Charles B. Nemeroff; Dietmar Fuchs; Andrew H. Miller

BACKGROUND Tryptophan (TRP) degradation into kynurenine (KYN) by the enzyme, indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase, during immune activation may contribute to development of depressive symptoms during interferon (IFN)-alpha therapy. METHODS Twenty-six patients with malignant melanoma were randomly assigned in double-blind fashion to receive either placebo or paroxetine, beginning 2 weeks before IFN-alpha treatment and continuing for the first 12 weeks of IFN-alpha therapy. At treatment initiation and at 2, 4, and 12 weeks of IFN-alpha treatment, measurements of TRP, KYN, and neopterin (a marker of immune activation), were obtained, along with structured assessments of depression, anxiety, and neurotoxicity. RESULTS Regardless of antidepressant treatment status, all patients exhibited significant increases in KYN, neopterin, and the KYN/TRP ratio during IFN-alpha therapy. Among antidepressant-free patients, patients who developed major depression exhibited significantly greater increases in KYN and neopterin concentrations and more prolonged decreases in TRP concentrations than did nondepressed, antidepressant-free patients. Moreover, in antidepressant-free patients, decreases in TRP correlated with depressive, anxious, and cognitive symptoms, but not neurovegetative or somatic symptoms. No correlations were found between clinical and biological variables in antidepressant-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that reduced TRP availability plays a role in IFN-alpha-induced depressive symptoms, and paroxetine, although not altering the KYN or neopterin response to IFN-alpha, attenuates the behavioral consequences of IFN-alpha-mediated TRP depletion.


The American Journal of Medicine | 1980

Protein-calorie undernutrition in hospitalized cancer patients.

Daniel W. Nixon; Steven B. Heymsfield; Alice E. Cohen; Michael Kutner; Joseph D. Ansley; David H. Lawson; Daniel Rudman

Abstract A survey of the nutritional status of hospitalized cancer patients was conducted in two phases. In phase 1, protein-calorie nutrition was evaluated in 54 ward patients by anthropometries, creatinine excretion and serum albumin. In phase two, 30 cancer patients with protein-calorie undernutrition were transferred to the Clinical Research Unit for study of the underlying mechanisms. Evaluation in this group included anthropometries, serum albumin, creatinine excretion, vitamin levels, caloric intake, basal metabolic rate and stool fat content. Duration of survival from study was recorded in both phases. We found a nearly universal prevalence of protein-calorie undernutrition in advanced cancer, with loss of adipose tissue, visceral protein and skeletal muscle varying unpredictably from patient to patient. The creatinine to height ratio was the most sensitive indicator of protein-calorie undernutrition; 88 per cent of the patients in both phases had a creatinine to height ratio less than 80 per cent of standard, whereas only 42 per cent and 23 per cent of these patients had values less than 80 per cent of standard for triceps skin fold and mid-arm muscle area, respectively. In phase 2, plasma folate, ascorbic acid and vitamin A levels were low in 20 to 45 per cent. Steatorrhea was rare. Neither the basal metabolic rate nor caloric intake differed from expected values for normal sedentary subjects of comparable size. The degree of malnutrition significantly correlated with survival. Patients who died within 70 days of study generally had a creatinine to height ratio We conclude that protein-calorie undernutrition is present in most hospitalized cancer patients but that it varies widely in degree between subjects and is often obscured at the bedside by residual obesity. The creatinine to height ratio, however, is a sensitive quantitative indicator of this condition. There appear to be nutritional thresholds below which survival is decreased. Survival might be enhanced if nutrition could be maintained above these critical levels.


JAMA | 2014

Effect of Selumetinib vs Chemotherapy on Progression-Free Survival in Uveal Melanoma A Randomized Clinical Trial

Richard D. Carvajal; Jeffrey A. Sosman; Jorge Fernando Quevedo; Mohammed M. Milhem; Anthony M. Joshua; Ragini R. Kudchadkar; Gerald P. Linette; Thomas F. Gajewski; Jose Lutzky; David H. Lawson; Christopher D. Lao; Patrick J. Flynn; Mark R. Albertini; Takami Sato; Karl D. Lewis; Austin Doyle; Kristin K. Ancell; Katherine S. Panageas; Mark J. Bluth; Cyrus V. Hedvat; Joseph P. Erinjeri; Grazia Ambrosini; Brian P. Marr; David H. Abramson; Mark A. Dickson; Jedd D. Wolchok; Paul B. Chapman; Gary K. Schwartz

IMPORTANCE Uveal melanoma is characterized by mutations in GNAQ and GNA11, resulting in mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of selumetinib, a selective, non-adenosine triphosphate competitive inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2, in uveal melanoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial comparing selumetinib vs chemotherapy conducted from August 2010 through December 2013 among 120 patients with metastatic uveal melanoma at 15 academic oncology centers in the United States and Canada. INTERVENTIONS One hundred one patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive selumetinib, 75 mg orally twice daily on a continual basis (n = 50), or chemotherapy (temozolomide, 150 mg/m2 orally daily for 5 of every 28 days, or dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m2 intravenously every 21 days [investigator choice]; n = 51) until disease progression, death, intolerable adverse effects, or withdrawal of consent. After primary outcome analysis, 19 patients were registered and 18 treated with selumetinib without randomization to complete the planned 120-patient enrollment. Patients in the chemotherapy group could receive selumetinib at the time of radiographic progression. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Progression-free survival, the primary end point, was assessed as of April 22, 2013. Additional end points, including overall survival, response rate, and safety/toxicity, were assessed as of December 31, 2013. RESULTS Median progression-free survival among patients randomized to chemotherapy was 7 weeks (95% CI, 4.3-8.4 weeks; median treatment duration, 8 weeks; interquartile range [IQR], 4.3-16 weeks) and among those randomized to selumetinib was 15.9 weeks (95% CI, 8.4-21.1 weeks; median treatment duration, 16.1 weeks; IQR, 8.1-25.3 weeks) (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.71; P < .001). Median overall survival time was 9.1 months (95% CI, 6.1-11.1 months) with chemotherapy and 11.8 months (95% CI, 9.8-15.7 months) with selumetinib (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.41-1.06; P = .09). No objective responses were observed with chemotherapy. Forty-nine percent of patients treated with selumetinib achieved tumor regression, with 14% achieving an objective radiographic response to therapy. Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 97% of patients treated with selumetinib, with 37% requiring at least 1 dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this hypothesis-generating study of patients with advanced uveal melanoma, selumetinib compared with chemotherapy resulted in a modestly improved progression-free survival and response rate; however, no improvement in overall survival was observed. Improvement in clinical outcomes was accompanied by a high rate of adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01143402.


Neuropsychopharmacology | 2007

Basal Ganglia Hypermetabolism and Symptoms of Fatigue during Interferon- α Therapy

Lucile Capuron; Giuseppe Pagnoni; Marina F Demetrashvili; David H. Lawson; Fiona B. Fornwalt; Bobbi J. Woolwine; Gregory S. Berns; Charles B. Nemeroff; Andrew H. Miller

Interferon (IFN)-α is a cytokine of the innate immune response that is well known for inducing behavioral alterations and has been used to study effects of cytokines on the nervous system. Limited data, however, are available on the sites of action of IFN-α within the brain and their relationship with specific IFN-α-induced symptoms. Using a longitudinal design, whole-brain metabolic activity as assessed by fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and positron emission tomography was examined before and 4 weeks after IFN-α administration in patients with malignant melanoma. Changes in metabolic activity in relevant brain regions were then correlated with IFN-α-induced behavioral changes. IFN-α administration was associated with widespread bilateral increases in glucose metabolism in subcortical regions including the basal ganglia and cerebellum. Decreases in dorsal prefrontal cortex glucose metabolism were also observed. Prominent IFN-α-induced behavioral changes included lassitude, inability to feel, and fatigue. Correlational analyses revealed that self-reported fatigue (specifically as assessed by the ‘energy’ subscale of the Visual Analog Scale of Fatigue) was associated with increased glucose metabolism in the left nucleus accumbens and putamen. These data indicate that IFN-α as well as other cytokines of the innate immune response may target basal ganglia nuclei, thereby contributing to fatigue-related symptoms in medically ill patients.


Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology | 2013

The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on tumour immunotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma

Howard L. Kaufman; John M. Kirkwood; F. Stephen Hodi; Sanjiv S. Agarwala; Thomas Amatruda; Steven D. Bines; Joseph I. Clark; Brendan D. Curti; Marc S. Ernstoff; Thomas F. Gajewski; Rene Gonzalez; Laura Jane Hyde; David H. Lawson; Michael T. Lotze; Jose Lutzky; Kim Margolin; David F. McDermott; Donald L. Morton; Anna C. Pavlick; Jon Richards; William H. Sharfman; Vernon K. Sondak; Jeffrey A. Sosman; Susan Steel; Ahmad A. Tarhini; John A. Thompson; Jill Titze; Walter J. Urba; Richard L. White; Michael B. Atkins

Immunotherapy is associated with durable clinical benefit in patients with melanoma. The goal of this article is to provide evidence-based consensus recommendations for the use of immunotherapy in the clinical management of patients with high-risk and advanced-stage melanoma in the USA. To achieve this goal, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer sponsored a panel of melanoma experts—including physicians, nurses, and patient advocates—to develop a consensus for the clinical application of tumour immunotherapy for patients with melanoma. The Institute of Medicine clinical practice guidelines were used as a basis for this consensus development. A systematic literature search was performed for high-impact studies in English between 1992 and 2012 and was supplemented as appropriate by the panel. This consensus report focuses on issues related to patient selection, toxicity management, clinical end points and sequencing or combination of therapy. The literature review and consensus panel voting and discussion were used to generate recommendations for the use of immunotherapy in patients with melanoma, and to assess and rate the strength of the supporting evidence. From the peer-reviewed literature the consensus panel identified a role for interferon-α2b, pegylated-interferon-α2b, interleukin-2 (IL-2) and ipilimumab in the clinical management of melanoma. Expert recommendations for how to incorporate these agents into the therapeutic approach to melanoma are provided in this consensus statement. Tumour immunotherapy is a useful therapeutic strategy in the management of patients with melanoma and evidence-based consensus recommendations for clinical integration are provided and will be updated as warranted.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009

A phase III multi-institutional randomized study of immunization with the gp100: 209–217(210M) peptide followed by high-dose IL-2 compared with high-dose IL-2 alone in patients with metastatic melanoma

Douglas J. Schwartzentruber; David H. Lawson; Jon Richards; Robert M. Conry; Donald M. Miller; J. Triesman; F. Gailani; L. B. Riley; D. Vena; Patrick Hwu

CRA9011 Background: In a phase II study, 13 (42%) of 31 patients with metastatic melanoma receiving high-dose (HD) IL-2 plus gp100:209-217(210M) peptide experienced objective responses (S.A. Rosenberg, et al, Nature Medicine 4: 321-327, 1998). Other studies showed a lower response rate (RR) but no randomized studies have been done. METHODS A prospective randomized phase III trial was conducted at 21 centers with 185 patients. Eligibility: stage IV or locally advanced stage III cutaneous melanoma, HLA A0201, no brain metastases, eligible for HD IL-2, and no previous HD IL-2 or gp100:209-217(210M). Arm 1 received HD IL-2 alone (720,000 IU/kg/dose) and Arm 2 gp100:209-217(210M) peptide + Montanide ISA followed by HD IL-2. The primary objective was clinical response. Secondary objectives were toxicity, disease free/progression free survival, immunologic response and quality of life. Central HLA typing, pathology review, and blinded response assessment were done at the NIH. Central data monitoring was done by The EMMES Corp. and a Data Safety Monitoring Board. RESULTS Numbers of patients enrolled, treated, and evaluable for response in Arm 1 were 94, 93, and 93 respectively; in Arm 2 91, 86, and 86. Toxicities were consistent with HD IL-2 ± vaccine. Investigator assessed RR showed significant improvement in overall RR for Arm 2=22.1% vs 9.7% (P=0.0223, Chi-Square) and progression free survival (PFS) in favor of Arm 2=2.9 months (1.7-4.5) vs 1.6 (1.5-1.8) (P=0.0101). Median overall survival favors Arm 2=17.6 months (11.8-26.6) vs 12.8 (8.7-16.3) (P=0.0964). Blinded response review is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS RR and PFS were superior with peptide vaccine and HD IL-2 compared to HD IL-2 alone. This represents the first evidence of clinical benefit of vaccination in patients with melanoma. [Table: see text].


Cancer | 2008

Temozolomide, thalidomide, and whole brain radiation therapy for patients with brain metastasis from metastatic melanoma: a phase II Cytokine Working Group study.

Michael B. Atkins; Jeffrey A. Sosman; Sanjiv S. Agarwala; Theodore F. Logan; Joseph I. Clark; Marc S. Ernstoff; David H. Lawson; Janice P. Dutcher; Geoffrey R. Weiss; Brendan D. Curti; Kim Margolin

The combination of temozolomide (TMZ) and thalidomide was reported to produce a high response rate, including shrinkage of brain metastases, in patients with metastatic melanoma. The authors tested the efficacy of a regimen including TMZ, thalidomide, and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in patients with brain (CNS) metastases from melanoma.

Collaboration


Dive into the David H. Lawson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rene Gonzalez

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge