David H. Perrott

A PROTOCOL FOR MANAGEMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT ANKYLOSIS

A management protocol for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis consisting of 1) aggressive resection, 2) ipsilateral coronoidectomy, 3) contralateral coronoidectomy when necessary, 4) lining of the TMJ with temporalis fascia or cartilage, 5) reconstruction of the ramus with a costochondral graft, 6) rigid fixation, and 7) early mobilization and aggressive physiotherapy is presented. The protocol was retrospectively evaluated in the first 14 patients (18 involved TMJs) treated and followed postoperatively for at least 1 year. The facial asymmetries present in all unilateral cases remained corrected. The mean maximum postoperative interincisal opening at 1 year was 37.5 mm (292.36% mean increase), lateral excursions were present in 16 of 18 joints (vs 0 of 18 joints preoperatively), and pain was present in 2 of 18 joints (vs 13 of 18 preoperatively). The results of this study indicate that this protocol is effective for treatment of TMJ ankylosis.

Costochondral graft construction/reconstruction of the ramus/condyle unit : long-term follow-up

This is a retrospective study of 26 patients (seven growing and 19 non-growing) who received costochondral grafts (n = 33) for construction or reconstruction of the ramus/condyle unit (RCU). Facial appearance, jaw motion, occlusion, contour, and linear growth changes were documented preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and long-term (> 1 year). Average follow-up was 48.6 months for growing and 46.4 months for nongrowing patients. Facial asymmetry and malocclusion were successfully corrected in all patients except for those with hemifacial microsomia, where partial correction was most common. For the growing patients mean change in RCU length (n = 8) during the observation period was +3.1 mm on the constructed/reconstructed side and +3.2 mm on the unoperated side. For nongrowing patients, mean change in the RCU length (n = 25) was -5.7 mm for the reconstructed side. Three patients developed lateral contour overgrowth of the articulating surface; no patients developed clinically significant linear overgrowth with malocclusion. The results of this study indicate that a costochondral graft may be used successfully to construct/reconstruct the RCU and that linear overgrowth of the graft does not appear to be a clinical problem with the method described in this paper.

Office-based ambulatory anesthesia: outcomes of clinical practice of oral and maxillofacial surgeons

PURPOSE The delivery of office-based ambulatory anesthesia services is an integral component of the daily practice of oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs). The purpose of this report was to provide an overview of current anesthetic practices of OMSs in the office-based ambulatory setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS To address the research purpose, we used a prospective cohort study design and a sample composed of patients undergoing procedures in the office-based ambulatory setting of OMSs practicing in the United States who received local anesthesia (LA), conscious sedation (CS), or deep sedation/general anesthesia (DS/GA). The predictor variables were categorized as demographic, anesthetic technique, staffing, adverse events, and patient-oriented outcomes. Appropriate descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed as indicated. Statistical significance was set at < or =.05. RESULTS The sample was composed of 34,191 patients, of whom 71.9% received DS/GA, 15.5% received CS, and 12.6% received LA. The complication rate was 1.3 per 100 cases, and the complications were minor and self-limiting. Two patients had complications requiring hospitalization. Most patients (80.3%) reported some degree of anxiety before the procedure. After the procedure, 61.2% of patients reported having no anxiety about future operations. Overall, 94.3% of patients reported satisfaction with the anesthetic, and more than 94.7% of all patients would recommend the anesthetic technique to a loved one. CONCLUSION The findings of this study show that the office-based administration of LA, CS, or DS/GA delivered via OMS anesthesia teams was safe and associated with a high level of patient satisfaction.

Placement of endosseous implants in children and adolescents with hereditary ectodermal dysplasia

OBJECTIVE The purposes of this investigation were to study the feasibility of placing endosseous implants in children and adolescents with ectodermal dysplasia and to assess the position and stability of such implants during growth. This article reports on 6 subjects with long-term follow-up. Study design. A prospective study was commenced in 1991. Patients with hereditary ectodermal dysplasia who were over the age of 5 years and who presented to the University of California San Francisco Ectodermal Dysplasia Clinic for dental treatment were included and maintained in the study. In each case, clinical and radiographic records were obtained before treatment, immediately after implant placement, at delivery of the prosthesis, and subsequently at yearly intervals. Six subjects are reported, 4 as members of the prospective study group and 2 who had been treated before the study began. RESULTS A total of 41 implants (19 maxillary, 22 mandibular) were placed. The average follow-up after implant placement was 7.8 years (range, 6-11 years), and the average time since restoration was 6 years (range, 5-10 years). Forty implants successfully integrated and have been restored. There was no evidence that implant placement or prosthetic rehabilitation resulted in restriction of transverse or sagittal growth. One mandibular implant, placed in a partially dentate 5-year-old, became submerged because of adjacent alveolar development and required placement of a longer abutment. Four maxillary implants placed in a partially dentate 7-year-old also became submerged and required prosthetic revision and the placement of longer abutments. CONCLUSIONS This preliminary report suggests that endosseous implants can be successfully placed and can provide support for prosthetic restoration in patients with hereditary ectodermal dysplasia. However, vertical dentoalveolar growth results in submergence of the implant relative to the adjacent natural dentition when implants are placed adjacent to erupting permanent teeth.

Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model.

PURPOSE Long treatment protocols currently limit the application of distraction osteogenesis (DO). The purpose of this study was to develop a porcine model for DO and to define the effects of latency and distraction rate on bone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Distractors were placed through submandibular incisions. For analysis of latency, mandibular osteotomies were distracted after 0 (n = 3) or 4 (n = 2) days at a rate of 1 mm/d (7 days) with 14 days fixation. For analysis of rate, osteotomies were distracted at 1 mm (n = 4), 2 mm (n = 4), or 4 mm (n = 4) per day to produce a 12-mm gap with 24 days fixation. DO wounds were assessed in vivo with bimanual palpation to detect mobility across the gap. Harvested specimens were evaluated by gross appearance and bimanual palpation. Standardized radiographic techniques were used to estimate bone density. RESULTS During DO, animals showed normal activity. There were no infections, and no distractors were removed prematurely. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the groups that underwent distraction after 0- or 4-day latency showed equivalent healing. In the comparison of distraction rates, stability was greatest in the group distracted at 1 mm/d. CONCLUSIONS A porcine model for mandibular DO has been developed in which mandibular lengthening was successfully performed without latency and at a rate of 1 mm/d. The relationships among latency, gap size, rate, and duration of fixation are poorly understood and can be defined with relevant animal models.

Fixation of mandibular fractures: A comparative analysis of rigid internal fixation and standard fixation techniques

This study used a prospective design to compare standard therapy (closed or open reduction with 4 weeks of maxillomandibular fixation) to rigid internal fixation (RIF) for the treatment of mandibular fractures. Ninety-two patients with 143 fractures were evaluated and treated. There was no statistically significant difference in the treatment results between the two groups, despite a bias in the distribution of study variables that favored the standard therapy.

Placement of endosseous implants in grafted alveolar clefts.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal timing for placement and to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of endosseous implants in bone-grafted alveolar clefts. DESIGN Fourteen patients who underwent alveolar cleft bone grafting (ACBG) and closure of an oronasal fistula followed by restoration of the missing lateral incisor tooth using endosseous implants (EI) were studied. The oronasal fistulae were closed using local flaps, and the alveolus was grafted with fresh autogenous iliac marrow. Endosseous implants were placed a minimum of 4 months following ACBG. The average age at ACBG was 20.35 years (range, 12-65 yr), and at implant placement 22.2 years (range, 15-66 yr). It was necessary to regraft the alveolar cleft region in six patients to provide adequate bone volume for implant placement. Those who required alveolar regrafting had an increased mean interval between the initial ACBG and planned implant placement compared to the patients with adequate bone available for implant placement 26.4 months (range, 4-46 mo) versus 15.75 months (range, 4-36 mo). RESULTS Twenty-nine implants were placed in 14 patients, 9 outside of the cleft region and 20 in grafted alveolar clefts. Eighteen of 20 (90%) implants in the bone-grafted alveolar clefts have been successfully restored. The mean follow-up after implant placement was 39.1 months (range, 1-54 mo), and after restoration 28.5 months (range, 1-47 mo). CONCLUSIONS Endosseous implants can be placed in bone-grafted alveolar clefts. Consideration should be given to the adequacy of graft volume and ridge morphology at the time of ACBG. The interval between ACBG and implant placement is important. The greater the interval beyond 4 months, the more likely there will be inadequate bone volume to accept an implant.

The removal of plates and screws after Le Fort I osteotomy

PURPOSE This study is a retrospective chart review designed to evaluate the incidence and reasons for removal of plates and screws after Le Fort I osteotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study sample consisted of patients who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy at the University of California, San Francisco, and Northwestern University in Chicago between December 1985 and December 1994. All patients in the study were treated with internal fixation using 2.0-mm plates and screws. All data were obtained from medical records and operative reports. The following intraoperative variables were evaluated: hardware material, plate size and shape, plate location, screw size, graft material, and intraoperative complications. For patients requiring removal of hardware, the number, location and type of plates and screws removed were recorded, as well as the reasons for removal. RESULTS A total of 738 plates were placed in 190 patients. Twenty-one of the 190 patients (11.1%) had at least a portion of the hardware removed because they either requested removal or required removal secondary to complications related to the plate or screw. This represented 70 of 738 plates (9.5%). The percentage of titanium plates removed was greater than the percentage of Vitallium plates removed. The reasons for removal included pain, palpation by the patient, sinusitis, temperature sensitivity, infection, and patient request. CONCLUSION Only a small number of patients (10.6%) develop complications from plates or screws that required their removal. In each case, prompt removal constituted adequate management.

The use of fresh frozen allogeneic bone for maxillary and mandibular reconstruction

The use of fresh frozen bone (FFB) alone, or in combination with autogenous bone (AB), for bony augmentation of the maxilla and mandible in preparation for dental reconstruction with endosseous implants has been studied. Ten patients received FFB +/- AB for augmentation of a severely atrophic mandible (n = 6) or for reconstruction of a jaw defect secondary to trauma or tumor resection (n = 4). Average follow-up was 26.3 +/- 5.4 months. At the time of implant placement, the bone grafts were found to be firm in consistency, well incorporated, and well vascularized in all 10 patients. Twenty-nine endosseous implants were placed an average of 8.3 +/- 3.1 months following bone grafting. One implant failed and was replaced, and one implant remains buried as a nonfunctional unit. All patients have been restored prosthetically by means of 28 of the 29 implants. This preliminary study indicates that FFB may be used alone or in combination with autogenous bone for augmentation or reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla and mandible. The resultant ridge is adequate to support loaded endosseous implants. A potential disadvantage is the minimal risk of disease transmission.

Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone.

Distraction osteogenesis is a technique for skeletal lengthening that exploits the body’s innate capacity for bone formation in response to tension forces on the repair callus. The authors developed a distraction osteogenesis model with a semiburied device in the Yucatan minipig mandible because of similarities between human and porcine mandibular anatomy, temporomandibular function, chewing patterns, and bone turnover rates. The purpose of this study was to measure histomorphometric bone fill after different latency periods, rates of distraction, and duration of neutral fixation in the minipig mandible. In addition, the relationship between histomorphometric bone fill and clinical stability was investigated. Mandibular osteotomies in 20 female Yucatan minipigs weighing 25 to 30 kg were distracted with modified semiburied distraction devices. Variables included 0-day or 4-day latency; 1-mm, 2-mm, or 4-mm daily distraction rates; gap size of 7 or 12 mm; and evaluation after neutral fixation for various lengths of time. Specimens were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, pH 7.4, before being embedded in methylmethacrylate. Sections were prepared from the region just below the inferior alveolar canal. The area of new bone formation within the gap was measured and expressed as a percentage of the total area of the distraction gap. Bone fill ranged from 0 to 100 percent. A pilot study with 7-mm advancements showed similar bone fill with 0-day or 4-day latency, but with poor reproducibility. Mandibles that were distracted to 12 mm at 1 mm per day exhibited nearly complete bone fill, either with 0-day latency (average, 93 percent) or 4-day latency (average, 100 percent). Mandibles that had been distracted for 3 days at 4 mm per day showed moderate osteogenesis and clinical stability with increasing time of neutral fixation. Bone fill was significantly correlated with clinical stability (Spearman r = 0.801, p = 0.001). Histological examination showed exuberant periosteal osteogenesis in distracted mandibles, even in those that showed poor bone fill and clinical stability. Thus, the periosteum appears to be a major source of new bone formation. These results show that osteogenesis was nearly complete with 1 mm per day and 0-day or 4-day latency. These results are consistent with the authors’ previously reported clinical and radiographic observations that a latency period is not necessary for successful healing of the mandibular distraction osteogenesis wound.