David H. Peters

Metformin : a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

The biguanide metformin (dimethylbiguanide) is an oral antihyperglycaemic agent used in the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). It reduces blood glucose levels, predominantly by improving hepatic and peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin without affecting the secretion of this hormone. Metformin also appears to have potentially beneficial effects on serum lipid levels and fibrinolytic activity, although the long term clinical implications of these effects are unclear. Metformin possesses similar antihyperglycaemic efficacy to sulphonylureas in obese and nonobese patients with NIDDM. Additionally, interim data from the large multicentre United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) indicated similar antihyperglycaemic efficacy for metformin and insulin in newly diagnosed patients with NIDDM. Unlike the sulphonylureas and insulin, however, metformin treatment is not associated with increased bodyweight. Addition of metformin to existing antidiabetic therapy confers enhanced antihyperglycaemic efficacy. This may be of particular use in improving glycaemic control in patients with NIDDM not adequately controlled with sulphonylurea monotherapy, and may serve to reduce or eliminate the need for daily insulin injections in patients with NIDDM who require this therapy. The acute, reversible gastrointestinal adverse effects seen with metformin may be minimised by administration with or after food, and by using lower dosages, increased slowly where necessary. Lactic acidosis due to metformin is rare, and the risk of this complication may be minimised by observance of prescribing precautions and contraindications intended to avoid accumulation of the drug or lactate in the body. Unlike the sulphonylureas, metformin does not cause hypoglycaemia. Thus, metformin is an effective antihyperglycaemic agent which appears to improve aberrant plasma lipid and fibrinolytic profiles associated with NIDDM. Possible long term clinical benefits of this drug with regard to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity are not yet established but are being assessed in a major ongoing study. Since metformin does not promote weight gain or hypoglycaemia it should be considered first-line pharmacotherapy in obese patients with NIDDM inadequately controlled by nonpharmacological measures. Metformin appears similarly effective for the pharmacological management of NIDDM in nonobese patients.

Tacrolimus : a review of its pharmacology, and therapeutic potential in hepatic and renal transplantation

Tacrolimus (FK 506) is a macrolide immunosuppressant which possesses similar but more potent immunosuppressant properties compared with cyclosporin, inhibiting cell-mediated and humoral immune responses. Like cyclosporin, tacrolimus demonstrates considerable interindividual variation in its pharmacokinetic profile. This has caused difficulty in defining the optimum dosage regimen and has highlighted the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring. Most clinical studies with tacrolimus have neither been published in their entirety nor subjected to extensive peer review; there is also a paucity of published randomised investigations of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin, particularly in renal transplantation. Despite these drawbacks, tacrolimus has shown notable efficacy as a rescue or primary immunosuppressant therapy when combined with corticosteroids in adult and paediatric recipients following liver or kidney transplantation. Indeed, graft salvage rates in patients experiencing rejection or drug-related toxicity were > or = 50%, although data in renal transplantation are limited. Compared with cyclosporin as a primary immunosuppressant, tacrolimus showed comparable or greater patient/graft survival rates in liver allograft recipients (where cost savings associated with reduced hospitalisation costs were evident in one study), and comparable patient/graft survival in patients following kidney transplantation. Worthy of note was the efficacy of tacrolimus as a primary immunosuppressant in patients who received en bloc kidney allografts. The incidence of rejection was largely reduced following rescue therapy with tacrolimus and was generally lower (notably for refractory rejection) than that observed for cyclosporin, at least in liver allograft recipients. This was reflected in less need for adjunct immunotherapy including antilymphocyte preparations for the treatment of rejection episodes. The potential for reduction or withdrawal of corticosteroid therapy with tacrolimus appears to be a distinct advantage compared with cyclosporin, and this may be enhanced by the reduced incidence of infectious complications and of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia reported by some investigators. In other respects, however, the tolerability profile of tacrolimus appears to be broadly similar to that of cyclosporin. Against this background, preliminary data indicate that tacrolimus provides a valuable therapeutic alternative to retransplantation in patients experiencing liver or kidney graft rejection or drug-related toxicity. Pending confirmation of initial randomised studies and preliminary results from large randomised investigations, tacrolimus may well be considered as an alternative primary immunosuppressant to cyclosporin in hepatic (particularly) and renal transplantation. Furthermore, the steroid-sparing effects of tacrolimus, although of benefit to all patient groups, may prove to be of particular worth in children and in en bloc kidney recipients. In these patients tacrolimus may well emerge as the drug of choice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Valproic acid : a reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in epilepsy

Valproic acid is a branched-chained fatty acid, structurally unrelated to any other antiepileptic drug. Since publication of the original review in the Journal in 1977, several clinical trials have documented its efficacy and safety in adults and children for the treatment of generalised seizures (absence, tonic-clonic, myoclonic), partial seizures (simple, complex, secondarily generalised) and compound/combination seizures (including those refractory to treatment with other antiepileptic drugs). Valproic acid monotherapy has demonstrated efficacy equivalent to that of carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital in the treatment of both generalised and partial seizures and ethosuximide in the treatment of absence seizures. Adverse effects associated with the drug are primarily gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia) in nature, although the use of enteric-coated formulations has reduced the incidence of abdominal discomfort. Weight gain, tremor and transient hair loss are commonly reported. Importantly, valproic acid has minimal neurological adverse effects (sedation, ataxia, impairment of cognitive function) compared with other antiepileptic drugs, a finding that may be of particular relevance in many patients with epilepsy. The incidence of rare, fatal liver failure has been greatly reduced by identifying and avoiding administration of valproic acid to high risk patient populations. An estimated risk of 1 to 2% for neural tube defects, predominantly spina bifida aperta, with maternal use of valproic acid therapy has been reported. Valproic acid inhibits hepatic drug metabolism and displaces other highly bound drugs from their plasma protein binding sites. Therefore, coadministered drugs which are highly protein bound or hepatically metabolised may require dosage adjustment. Enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs may increase valproic acid metabolism and necessitate increasing its dosage. Thus, comparative trials and extensive clinical experience have demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of valproic acid and support its role as a valuable and well established first-line treatment for patients with a broad range of seizure types.

Clarithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.

Clarithromycin is an acid-stable orally administered macrolide antimicrobial drug, structurally related to erythromycin. It has a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, similar to that of erythromycin and inhibits a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, atypical pathogens and some anaerobes. Significantly, clarithromycin demonstrates greater in vitro activity than erythromycin against certain pathogens including Bacteroides melaninogenicus, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycobacterium chelonae subspecies--chelonae and--abscessus, Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium marinum, Mycobacterium avium complex, Legionella spp. and, when combined with its 14-hydroxy metabolite, against Haemophilus influenzae. However, bacterial strains resistant to erythromycin are also generally resistant to clarithromycin. The antimicrobial activity of clarithromycin appears to be enhanced by the formation in vivo of the microbiologically active 14-hydroxy metabolite. In combination, additive or synergistic activity against a variety of pathogens including Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Legionella species (principally Legionella pneumophila) and various staphylococci and streptococci has been demonstrated. Clarithromycin has a superior pharmacokinetic profile to that of erythromycin, allowing the benefits of twice daily administration with the potential for increased compliance among outpatients where a more frequent regimen for erythromycin might otherwise be indicated. The clinical efficacy of clarithromycin has been confirmed in the treatment of infections of the lower and upper respiratory tracts (including those associated with atypical pathogens), skin/soft tissues, and in paediatrics. Clarithromycin was as effective as erythromycin and other appropriate drugs including beta-lactams (penicillins and cephalosporins) in some of the above infections. A most promising indication for clarithromycin appears to be in the treatment of immunocompromised patients infected with M. avium complex, M. chelonae sp. and Toxoplasma sp. Small initial trials in this setting reveal clarithromycin alone or in combination with other antimicrobials to be effective in the eradication or amelioration of these infections. Noncomparative studies have provided preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of clarithromycin in the treatment of infections of the urogenital tract, oromaxillofacial and ophthalmic areas. However, the promising in vitro and preliminary in vivo activity of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium leprae and Helicobacter pylori warrant further clinical trials to assess its efficacy in patients with these infections. Despite the improved pharmacokinetic profile and in vitro antimicrobial activity of clarithromycin over erythromycin, comparative studies of patients with community-acquired infections reveal the 2 drugs to be of equivalent efficacy. However, clarithromycin demonstrates greater tolerability, principally by inducing fewer gastrointestinal disturbances.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Azithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Azithromycin is an acid stable orally administered macrolide antimicrobial drug, structurally related to erythromycin, with a similar spectrum of antimicrobial activity. Azithromycin is marginally less active than erythromycin in vitro against Gram-positive organisms, although this is of doubtful clinical significance as susceptibility concentrations fall within the range of achievable tissue azithromycin concentrations. In contrast, azithromycin appears to be more active than erythromycin against many Gram-negative pathogens and several other pathogens, notably Haemophilus influenzae, H. parainfluenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Urea-plasma urealyticum and Borrelia burgdorferi. Like erythromycin and other macrolides, the activity of azithromycin is unaffected by the production of beta-lactamase. However, erythromycin-resistant organisms are also resistant to azithromycin. Following oral administration, serum concentrations of azithromycin are lower than those of erythromycin, but this reflects the rapid and extensive movement of the drug from the circulation into intracellular compartments resulting in tissue concentrations exceeding those commonly seen with erythromycin. Azithromycin is subsequently slowly released, reflecting its long terminal phase elimination half-life relative to that of erythromycin. These factors allow for a single dose or single daily dose regimen in most infections, with the potential for increased compliance among outpatients where a more frequent antimicrobial regimen might traditionally be indicated. The potential disadvantage of low azithromycin serum concentrations, however, is that breakthrough bacteraemia may occur in patients who are severely ill; nevertheless, animal studies suggest that tissue concentrations of azithromycin are more important than those in serum when treating respiratory and other infections. The clinical efficacy of azithromycin has been confirmed in the treatment of infections of the lower and upper respiratory tracts (the latter including paediatric patients), skin and soft tissues (again including paediatric patients), in uncomplicated urethritis/cervicitis associated with N. gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis or U. urealyticum and in the treatment of early Lyme disease. Azithromycin was as effective as erythromycin and other commonly used drugs including clarithromycin, beta-lactams (penicillins and cephalosporins), and quinolone and tetracycline antibiotics in some of the above infections. Some patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis due to H. influenzae may be refractory to therapy with azithromycin (as is the case with erythromycin) indicating the need for physician vigilance, although it should be noted that azithromycin is of equivalent efficacy to amoxicillin in the treatment of such patients. In the therapy of urethritis/cervicitis associated with C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoea or U. urealyticum, a single dose azithromycin regimen offers a distinct advantage over currently available pharmacological options, while providing effective therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Cetirizine : a reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in selected allergic disorders

SYNOPSIS Cetirizine, the carboxylated metabolite of hydroxyzine, is a specific and long-acting histamine H1-receptor antagonist. It has marked antiallergic properties and inhibits eosinophil chemotaxis during the allergic response. Clinical trial results indicate that cetirizine is an effective and well tolerated treatment for seasonal/perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria in adults, and for seasonal/perennial allergic rhinitis in children. Cetirizine 10 mg/day appears to be as effective as conventional dosages of other established antihistamines such as astemizole, hydroxyzine, ketotifen, loratadine or terfenadine in relieving symptoms of these disorders, and is associated with a significantly lower incidence of sedation than hydroxyzine. However, when sedation was subjectively assessed, cetirizine appeared to be more sedating than placebo, loratadine or terfenadine in some clinical trials. This difference was not observed in several other double-blind studies. In contrast, when assessed objectively in pharmacodynamic comparisons, cetirizine was rarely more sedating than placebo or other second generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists. Cetirizine may also have a role in the treatment of certain forms of physical urticaria, atopic dermatitis and reactions to mosquito bites. In addition, it is being studied for the treatment of allergic asthma in adults and children. The pharmacokinetic profile and predominantly renal excretion of cetirizine suggest that this agent may have a reduced potential for adverse drug interactions involving hepatic enzyme systems compared with other histamine H1-receptor antagonists which are extensively metabolised. Thus, cetirizine, with its rapid onset and long duration of action, appears to provide a useful alternative to the antihistamine agents in clinical use. OVERVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY Cetirizine is a specific histamine H1-receptor antagonist which has greater antihistaminic activity than clemastine, hydroxyzine, mepyramine and terfenadine in animal models. In atopic and nonatopic volunteers, cetirizine 10mg, administered as a single dose or daily for 2 to 28 days, significantly suppressed histamine-, allergen- and antigen-induced weal and flare response compared with placebo. Following histamine challenge, this effect peaked 4 to 8 hours after administration of cetirizine and lasted up to 24 hours after a single dose. Against histamine-induced weal and flare, cetirizine 10mg had similar activity to diphenhydramine 50mg or hydroxyzine 25mg, and was at least as effective as standard doses of astemizole, azelastine, brompheniramine, chlorphenamine (chlorpheniramine), clemastine, cyproheptadine, ebastine, ketotifen, loratadine, mequitazine, oxatomide or terfenadine. In addition, it had a significantly more rapid onset of action than astemizole 10mg against histamine-induced weal and flare. In antiallergic assessments of weal and flare response, cetirizine 10mg was as active as astemizole 10mg, ketotifen 1mg or terfenadine 120mg, and was significantly more active than chlorphenamine 8mg or loratadine 10mg. A 20mg dose of cetirizine was also superior to clemastine 2mg in antiallergic studies. Cetirizine 5 to 20mg provided dose-dependent protection against inhaled histamine-induced bronchospasm in patients with asthma, and protected some patients from allergen-induced bron-chospasm. The immediate and late responses to allergen challenge in patients with allergic rhinitis were also attenuated by cetirizine 10 mg/day. The effect of cetirizine 10mg on histamine-induced bronchial response was significantly greater than that of astemizole 10mg, brompheniramine 4mg, chlorphenamine 4mg, clemastine lmg, cyproheptadine 4mg or terfenadine 60mg, while cetirizine 20mg was superior to hydroxyzine 25mg. Most in vitro investigations and studies in atopic or healthy volunteers showed that cetirizine had no effect on mast cells, but inhibited neutrophil and platelet responses following allergen challenge. Eosinophil chemotaxis following challenge with allergen, platelet activating factor or compound 48/80, but not histamine, was inhibited by cetirizine in a dose-dependent fashion. In addition, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression on epithelial cells was inhibited by cetirizine in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that cetirizine also has activity other than antagonism of histamine H1-receptors. In pharmacodynamic studies, subjective and objective measurements of drowsiness and cognitive performance were not usually significantly altered by cetirizine in single doses of ≤ 20mg. The incidence of sedation with cetirizine 10mg was similar to that of placebo, loratadine 10mg, or terfenadine 120mg, but was significantly less than that of oxatomide 30mg or ketotifen 1mg in pharmacodynamic studies conducted in nonatopic volunteers. In most assessments of psychomotor performance, cetirizine 5 to 20mg in single or repeated doses caused no impairment, whereas a single 10mg dose caused significant impairment of driving performance in 1 trial. Mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 257 and 580 μg/L were reached within 1 hour of the oral administration of cetirizine 10 and 20mg, respectively, to healthy adult volunteers. Food may delay the rate, but does not affect the extent, of cetirizine absorption. In adults, the terminal elimination half-life (t½β) is 6.5 to 10 hours. Over a 5-day period, about 70% of cetirizine 10mg is excreted in the urine (60% over 24 hours), predominantly as unchanged drug, and about 10% is excreted in the faeces. Cmax and t½β of cetirizine on a mg/kg basis are lower in very young children with symptoms of allergy than in adults, suggesting more rapid elimination in the former. In patients with renal impairment, the t½β of cetirizine is increased reflecting a reduction in renal and total body clearance. These parameters are similarly altered in the elderly, an effect that appears to be dependent on renal function rather than age per se. THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY The efficacy of cetirizine 5 to 20 mg/day in the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis, and chronic idiopathic urticaria has been established in a number of randomised blinded clinical studies. In addition, higher dosages of cetirizine tended to reduce some symptoms of mild allergic asthma (10 to 30 mg/day), were effective in the treatment of some physical urticarias (10 to 30 mg/day), and reduced symptoms in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (10 to 40 mg/day). Local reactions to mosquito bites have also been attenuated by treatment with cetirizine 10 mg/day. In comparisons with other antihistamines, cetirizine 5, 10 or 20 mg/day produced at least similar symptomatic control to astemizole 10 mg/day, loratadine 10 mg/day, or terfenadine 60mg twice daily or 120 mg/day in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis; astemizole 10 mg/day, ketotifen 2 mg/day or terfenadine 120 mg/day in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis; astemizole 10 mg/day, hydroxyzine 25 to 75 mg/day or terfenadine 120 mg/day in those with chronic idiopathic urticaria; and terfenadine 60mg twice daily in patients with mild allergic asthma or atopic dermatitis. Cetirizine 5 or 10 mg/day was also effective in children (aged ≤ 12 years) with seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis, while dosages of 5 to 15mg twice daily reduced the incidence of mild asthma in children and adolescents. TOLERABILITY In a summary of placebo-controlled clinical trials, the most commonly reported adverse effects during cetirizine therapy were sedation, headache, dry mouth, fatigue and nausea. Comparative trials which included small numbers of patients and the results of earlier trials suggested that the incidence of sedation seen with cetirizine was similar to that of placebo, astemizole, loratadine or terfenadine. However, in some more recent comparisons cetirizine 10 mg/day tended to produce more sedation than loratadine 10 mg/day, terfenadine 120 mg/day or placebo. In contrast, cetirizine 5 to 20 mg/day produced significantly less sedation than hydroxyzine 25 to 75 mg/day. Spontaneously resolving liver function test abnormalities have been infrequently reported during cetirizine therapy. DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION In adults and children aged > 12 years, the recommended initial cetirizine dosage is 10 mg/day (Europe) or 5 to 10 mg/day, up to a maximum of 20 mg/day (US and Canada). The recommended dosage for children aged 2 to 6 years is 5 mg/day, and for those aged up to 11 years it is 10 mg/day. In patients with moderate or severe renal impairment, the dosage of cetirizine should be reduced.

Loratadine : a reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in allergic disorders

Loratadine is a long-acting antihistamine agent, exhibiting partial selectivity for peripheral histamine H1-receptors. To date, loratadine has been evaluated in allergic rhinitis, urticaria and, to a limited extent, in asthma. In several large controlled comparative clinical studies, loratadine was superior to placebo, faster acting than astemizole and as effective as azatadine, cetirizine, chlorpheniramine (chlorphenamine), clemastine, hydroxyzine, mequitazine and terfenadine in patients with allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria. The clinical effectiveness of loratadine in asthma is at present unclear. Loratadine is well tolerated. At dosages of 10 mg daily, commonly reported adverse events were somnolence, fatigue and headache. Sedation occurred less frequently with loratadine than with azatadine, cetirizine, chlorpheniramine, clemastine and mequitazine. Serious ventricular arrhythmias, as reported with some other second generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists, have not been observed with loratadine to date. Thus, loratadine, with its attributes of once daily administration, fast onset of action and essentially nonsedating properties, would appear to be an appropriate first-line agent for the treatment of allergic rhinitis or urticaria.

Zonisamide : a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in epilepsy

Zonisamide is a 1,2 benzisoxazole derivative and the first agent of this chemical class to be developed as an antiepileptic drug. It has shown activity in various animal models of epilepsy, and although a detailed mode of action awaits clarification it appears to block the propagation/spread of seizure discharges and to suppress the epileptogenic focus. Clinical experience with zonisamide in Japan has documented its efficacy in the treatment of partial seizures (partial-onset generalised tonic-clonic, simple partial and/or complex partial seizures), and to a more variable extent, generalised tonic-clonic, generalised tonic (mainly seen in symptomatic generalised epilepsies including Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome) and compound/combination seizures (including those refractory to treatment with other antiepileptic drugs). Other generalised seizure types have also responded to therapy with zonisamide, although only small patient numbers were studied. Zonisamide has demonstrated efficacy equivalent to that of carbamazepine in patients with (mainly) partial seizures, and to that of valproic acid in a small study of children (n = 32) with generalised seizures. Animal studies suggest that zonisamide possesses a more favourable therapeutic index than most other antiepileptic drugs. However, clinical trials conducted to date, have not confirmed any overt tolerability advantage. Indeed, whereas the recommended therapeutic plasma zonisamide concentration is 20 mg/L, clinical investigations have associated adverse events with plasma zonisamide concentrations of > 30 mg/L, suggesting the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring. Moreover, although plasma concentrations of zonisamide are empirically regarded to be proportional to therapeutic doses in patients in Japan, nonlinear pharmacokinetics have been reported for this drug in patients in the US and may further complicate its use in this patient population. Additional pharmacokinetic studies will help to establish the change in pharmacokinetic profile that occurs with dosage titration in patients outside Japan. Among 700 patients treated with zonisamide in Europe/US, a high incidence of renal calculi (1.9%) has been noted, however, the causal relationship to zonisamide is disputed. Indeed, although urinary lithiasis has also been recorded for patients in Japan, the aetiology, incidence and spontaneous regression of this condition suggest that it is not a serious problem for this patient population. Until this difference is clarified, it is likely that zonisamide will find its greatest use in the treatment of patients in Japan. Like many other established antiepileptic drugs, available data suggest the propensity for zonisamide to alter the pharmacokinetic profile of other anticonvulsant agents, although severe interactions appear to be unlikely.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Fludarabine. An update of its pharmacology and use in the treatment of haematological malignancies.

Fludarabine is an antineoplastic agent which has been studied in patients with a variety of lymphoproliferative malignancies. Clinical evidence from comparative studies in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) suggests that fludarabine is at least as effective as CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone) or CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone) in previously treated or chemotherapy-naive patients and significantly more effective than chlorambucil in terms of response rate and duration and survival in chemotherapy-naive patients. Promising results have also been reported with fludarabine-based combination therapy in the treatment of patients with CLL. In addition, sequential therapy with fludarabine and cytarabine has demonstrated good efficacy in the treatment of acute leukaemias, as has fludarabine monotherapy and combination therapy in low grade non-Hodgkins lymphoma. A favourable cytoreductive response has been reported in patients with lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma and in a smaller number of patients with cutaneous T cell lymphomas, CLL of T cell origin or prolymphocytic leukaemia. Recent data also support the use of fludarabine, either as a component of a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen or in the attainment of minimal residual disease, in patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplantation. The tolerability profile of fludarabine is similar to that of CAP, with the most common adverse events being granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and infection. Alopecia and nausea/vomiting appear to be less frequent with fludarabine therapy than with CAP although the development of immune cytopenias is more frequent with fludarabine. Severe neurotoxicity has been reported with fludarabine but this is mostly confined to the use of high doses. Clinical experience therefore indicates that fludarabine is an effective and generally well-tolerated antineoplastic agent for the second-line treatment of advanced CLL. Recent data from comparative studies also support the earlier use of fludarabine in the treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with CLL. Furthermore, results of available studies are increasingly highlighting an important future role for fludarabine in the treatment of acute leukaemias and low grade NHL and possibly other lymphoproliferative disorders, particularly when used as a component of combination chemotherapy.

Erratum to: Teicoplanin: a reappraisal of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy

87. Friedel HA, Langtry HD, Buckley MM. Nabumetone: a reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases. Drugs 1993; 45: 131-56 88. Balfour JA, Buckley MM-T. Etodolac: a reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and pain states. Drugs 1991; 42: 274-99 89. Lanza FL. Gastrointestinal toxicity of newer NSAIDs. Am J Gastroenterol1993; 88: 1318-23 90. Skeith KJ, Wright M, Davis P. Differences in NSAID tolerability profiles: fact or fiction? Drug Saf 1994; 10: 183-95