Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David J. Daegling is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David J. Daegling.


International Journal of Primatology | 1992

Mandibular morphology and diet in the genusCebus

David J. Daegling

The influence of hard-object feeding on the size and shape of the mandibular corpus was investigated through a comparative biomechanical analysis of the jaws of adult femaleCebus apella andCebus capucinus. Computed tomography (CT) was used to discern the amount and distribution of cortical bone at M2 and symphyseal cross sections. From these data, the biomechanical properties of the mandibular corpus were determined to assess the structural rigidity of the jaw with respect to the bending, torsional, and shear stresses that occur during mastication and incision. The mandibles ofC. apella are demonstrably more robust than those ofC. capucinus in terms of biomechanical rigidity; differences in corporeal size rather than shape largely account for the enhanced robusticity in the sample ofC. apella. The differences that separate the two taxa probably represent a structural response to the mechanical demands of durophagy inC. apella. These observations suggest that specialization on a diet of hard objects may be expected to result in an overall hypertrophy of bony contours throughout the mandibular corpus.


American Journal of Physical Anthropology | 2000

Experimental observation, theoretical models, and biomechanical inference in the study of mandibular form

David J. Daegling; William L. Hylander

Experimental studies and mathematical models are disparate approaches for inferring the stress and strain environment in mammalian jaws. Experimental designs offer accurate, although limited, characterization of biomechanical behavior, while mathematical approaches (finite element modeling in particular) offer unparalleled precision in depiction of strain magnitudes, directions, and gradients throughout the mandible. Because the empirical (experimental) and theoretical (mathematical) perspectives differ in their initial assumptions and their proximate goals, the two methods can yield divergent conclusions about how masticatory stresses are distributed in the dentary. These different sources of inference may, therefore, tangibly influence subsequent biological interpretation. In vitro observation of bone strain in primate mandibles under controlled loading conditions offers a test of finite element model predictions. Two issues which have been addressed by both finite element models and experimental approaches are: (1) the distribution of torsional shear strains in anthropoid jaws and (2) the dissipation of bite forces in the human alveolar process. Not surprisingly, the experimental data and mathematical models agree on some issues, but on others exhibit discordance. Achieving congruence between these methods is critical if the nature of the relationship of masticatory stress to mandibular form is to be intelligently assessed. A case study of functional/mechanical significance of gnathic morphology in the hominid genus Paranthropus offers insight into the potential benefit of combining theoretical and experimental approaches. Certain finite element analyses claim to have identified a biomechanical problem unrecognized in previous comparative work, which, in essence, is that the enlarged transverse dimensions of the postcanine corpus may have a less important role in resisting torsional stresses than previously thought. Experimental data have identified subperiosteal cortical thinning as a culprit in diminishing the role of cross-sectional geometry in conditioning the strain environment. These observations raise questions concerning the biomechanical significance of mandibular form in early hominids, fueling persistent arguments over whether gnathic morphology can be related to dietary specialization in the robust australopithecines. Nonmechanical explanations (e.g., tooth size or body size) for Paranthropus mandibular dimensions, however, are not compelling as competing hypotheses. Both theoretical and experimental models are in need of refinement before it is possible to conclude that the jaws of the robust australopithecines are not functionally linked to elevated masticatory loads.


Primates | 1999

Terrestrial foraging and dental microwear inPapio ursinus

David J. Daegling; Frederick E. Grine

Dental microwear of ten wild-shot chacma baboons (Papio urinus) form Northwest and Northern Privinces, South Africa was examined by scanning electron microscopy. All specimens were collected during the dry season, during which these primates exploit hypogeous (underground) food items, including tubers and corms. The microwear fabric of thisP. ursinus sample is characterized by high pitting frequencies and large microwear features. It differs significantly from those displayed by other terrestrially foraging papionins of the genusTheropithecus. Exogenous grit is hypothesized to be largely responsible for the observedP. ursinus wear pattern, which resembles the microwear profiles of durophagous primates. It is suggested that large microwear features and a high incidence of enamel pitting, which are generally held to represent a microwear “signature” of durophagy, may not always be indicative of hard-object feeding in anthropoid primates.


American Journal of Physical Anthropology | 1998

BIOMECHANICS OF TORSION IN THE HUMAN MANDIBLE

David J. Daegling; William L. Hylander

Comparative investigations of mandibular function among primates have relied upon elementary structural models to estimate states of masticatory stress and strain. In these studies, mandibular corpus morphology is idealized as a homogeneous, isotropic symmetrical body of invariant geometry, and this morphological abstraction is used to infer relative levels of stress and strain in the jaw. In reality, none of the limiting conditions assumed by these models is satisfied; consequently, it is prudent to ask whether this textbook engineering approach is valid for the inference of biomechanical behavior. In this study, the predictions of various geometric representations of the mandibular corpus are evaluated against strains recorded in a sample of human jaws loaded in torsion. Symmetrical geometrical models (including various robusticity shape indices), although convenient, are probably not consistently reliable for predicting the distribution of strains in the corpus. The experimental data suggest that variations in cortical thickness within sections play a significant role in determining the profile of relative strains. For comparative applications, characterization of the corpus as an asymmetrical hollow ellipse (i.e., with differing thickness of medial and lateral cortical plates) may provide a reasonable portrayal of relative strains.


American Journal of Physical Anthropology | 1991

Compact bone distribution and biomechanics of early hominid mandibles.

David J. Daegling; Frederick E. Grine


Journal of Human Evolution | 1993

The relationship of in vivo bone strain to mandibular corpus morphology in Macaca fascicularis

David J. Daegling


Evolutionary Anthropology | 2005

Functional morphology of the human chin

David J. Daegling


Journal of Human Evolution | 1997

Occlusal forces and mandibular bone strain: is the primate jaw "overdesigned"?

David J. Daegling; William L. Hylander


American Journal of Physical Anthropology | 1992

Influence of teeth, alveoli, and periodontal ligaments on torsional rigidity in human mandibles

David J. Daegling; Matthew J. Ravosa; Kirk R. Johnson; William L. Hylander


Journal of Human Evolution | 1996

Growth in the mandibles of African apes

David J. Daegling

Collaboration


Dive into the David J. Daegling's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge