David J. McCarthy
University of Miami
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David J. McCarthy.
Neurosurgery | 2018
David J. McCarthy; Robert M. Starke; Ricardo J. Komotar; E. Sander Connolly
Every year an estimated 800 000 Americans suffer a stroke. Due to advances in management and awareness, stroke mortality decreased 22% in the past 10 yr. However, it remains a leading cause of long-term disability, reducing mobility in half of stroke survivors over the of age 65.1 While serotonergic and dopaminergic pharmaceuticals have demonstrated some promise for post-stroke motor recovery, there is still no therapeutic that is FDA approved for post-stroke motor recovery.2 It has been demonstrated that motor recovery following brain damage is a result of compensatory neural plasticity in intact cortical areas.3 Separately, experience dependent synaptic AMPAR receptor delivery (α-amino-hydroxyl-5-methyl4-isoxazole-propionic-acid) facilitates learning-based neural plasticity and cortical reorganization following sensory deprevation.4,5 Abe et al6 hypothesized that similar AMPAR activity may facilitate the neural plasticity responsible for motor recovery following brain injury; furthermore, a drug that increases AMPAR delivery may enhance motor recovery.7 They investigated the compound Edonerpic maleate (T-817MA), or EM, based on previous literature that demonstrated the neuroprotective and neurotrophic effects of the compound.8-10 Initially, Abe et al6 found that EMtreated mice had increased AMPAR receptor delivery in the whisker-cortex region compared to vehicle-treated mice. This AMPAR increase was not observed in EM-treated mice when whiskers were removed, indicating that the EM facilitated AMPAR delivery was experience driven. To determine the mechanism behind EM promoted AMPAR delivery, researchers ran neuronal protein lysate through an affinity chromatography comprised of Edonerpic resin, detecting a protein band at 60 kDa. Mass spectrometry unveiled this protein as CRMP2, which was further validated when CRMP2knockout mice treated with EM failed to express AMPAR receptor delivery. It has been shown that actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin mediates AMPAR delivery during neuronal plasticity.11 Through the investigation of Edonerpictreated long-term-potentiated cortical slices and CRMP2-knockout mice, Abe et al6 demonstrated that EM reacts with CRMP2 to induce ADF/coflin-mediated AMPAR receptor delivery. After unveiling the EM-AMPAR-CRMP2-ADF/coflinAMPAR mechanism, researchers focused on practical applications of EM. Following confirmation that training mice to reach for food pellets required synaptic AMPAR delivery, investigators induced cortical cryoinjury and administered oral EM (30 mg/kg) or vehicle to mice. After 3 wk from injury, both vehicle and Edonerpic-treated mice were subsequently split again and treated with or without training for the reach task. Mice that received both training and EM performed significantly better than the other 3 groups. There was no significant recovery observed in the other groups. The EM to CRMP-2 mechanism was further validated when treated CRMP-2 knockout mice failed to improve after injury and subsequent training. Investigators reproduced the cryoinjury study above; however, a week after EM mice recovered motor function a second cryoinjury was introduced adjacent to the primary injury. Mice with a second injury lost the once recovered motor function, showing that the EMmediated motor recovery was a result of peri-injury cortical reorganization. Since past therapeutics have shown promising results in rodents but failed in primates, Abe et al6 studied the effect of EM in macaque monkeys. The monkeys were trained in simple reach-grasp and the vertical-slit maneuvers, assessing gross and fine motor dexterity, respectively. Internal capsule hemorrhage (ICH) was induced in monkeys via stereotaxic elastase injection. After monkeys demonstrated that they could perform 1 post-injury reach, training with or without EM was initiated. The reach-grasp maneuver was assessed in 2 positions: a near reach and a more difficult far reach. EM-treated monkeys recovered significantly faster for both reach locations when compared to vehicletreated monkeys (P < .001). Performance differences were only significant for the far reach-grasp position at the long-time phase (P < .001). For the vertical-slit fine motor test, EM-treated monkeys recovered significantly faster and demonstrated a more wholesome recovery, with impressive improvements in precision grip and finger-oriented maneuvers (P < .001). In their prior investigations, the Takahashi lab demonstrated that sensory deprivation led to cortical reorganization via synaptic AMPAR receptor delivery.5 Here they demonstrated that the same receptor plays a key role in rehabilitationdriven cortical reorganization following brain injury and identified the novel pharmaceutical drug target CRMP-2. Furthermore, EM significantly enhanced post-injury AMPAR delivery and rehabilitative functional recovery in mice and primates. Through mass spectrometry, protein affinity chromatography, and studies of potentiated brain slices, Abe et al. determined the mechanism behind EM enhanced AMPAR delivery. However, further investigation of EMs effect on serotonergic and dopaminergic pathways and on injury-driven neuroregeneration is warranted. Additionally, animal models testing its efficacy in traumatic brain injury should be conducted. EMs efficacy in various postbrain injury disabilities, such as speech and cognition, should be investigated. Edonerpic maleate has primarily been studied for its potential applications in
Archive | 2017
Ken Hsuan-kan Chang; David J. McCarthy; Michael Y. Wang
In the last two decades, percutaneous fixation techniques have evolved due to the utilization of image guidance and advanced spinal instrumentation. With this new technology, spine surgeons are able to perform percutaneous pedicle screw, iliac screw, and facet screw placement as effectively as open surgery. These techniques also allow for significantly less muscular injury and greatly diminish the approach-related morbidity compared to open procedures. This chapter will provide a comprehensive description of the percutaneous spinal fixation techniques and their surgical considerations.
World Neurosurgery | 2018
Dallas Sheinberg; David J. McCarthy; Eric C. Peterson; Robert M. Starke
Neurosurgery | 2017
David J. McCarthy; Ricardo J. Komotar; Robert M. Starke; E. Sander Connolly
World Neurosurgery | 2018
David J. McCarthy; Dallas Sheinberg; Ricardo J. Komotar; Robert M. Starke
World Neurosurgery | 2018
Brian Snelling; Samir Sur; Sumedh S. Shah; Stephanie Chen; Simon A. Menaker; David J. McCarthy; Dileep R. Yavagal; Eric C. Peterson; Robert M. Starke
World Neurosurgery | 2018
Sumedh S. Shah; Brian M. Snelling; Marie Christine Brunet; Samir Sur; David J. McCarthy; Alan Stein; Priyank Khandelwal; Robert M. Starke; Eric C. Peterson
Stroke | 2018
David J. McCarthy; Samir Sur; Brian Snelling; Adisson Fortunel; Dileeep Yavagal; Eric D. Peterson; Robert M. Starke
Neurosurgery | 2018
Robert M. Starke; David J. McCarthy; Ricardo J. Komotar; E. Sander Connolly
Neurosurgery | 2018
Robert M. Starke; David J. McCarthy; Ricardo J. Komotar; E. Sander Connolly