David Jayne

2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides

2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides J. Jennette;R. Falk;P. Bacon;N. Basu;M. Cid;F. Ferrario;L. Flores-Suarez;W. Gross;L. Guillevin;E. Hagen;G. Hoffman;D. Jayne;C. Kallenberg;P. Lamprecht;C. Langford;R. Luqmani;A. Mahr;E. Matteson;P. Merkel;S. Ozen;C. Pusey;N. Rasmussen;A. Rees;D. Scott;U. Specks;J. Stone;K. Takahashi;R. Watts; Arthritis & Rheumatism

Rituximab versus Cyclophosphamide in ANCA-Associated Renal Vasculitis

BACKGROUND Cyclophosphamide induction regimens for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis are effective in 70 to 90% of patients, but they are associated with high rates of death and adverse events. Treatment with rituximab has led to remission rates of 80 to 90% among patients with refractory ANCA-associated vasculitis and may be safer than cyclophosphamide regimens. METHODS We compared rituximab with cyclophosphamide as induction therapy in ANCA-associated vasculitis. We randomly assigned, in a 3:1 ratio, 44 patients with newly diagnosed ANCA-associated vasculitis and renal involvement to a standard glucocorticoid regimen plus either rituximab at a dose of 375 mg per square meter of body-surface area per week for 4 weeks, with two intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses (33 patients, the rituximab group), or intravenous cyclophosphamide for 3 to 6 months followed by azathioprine (11 patients, the control group). Primary end points were sustained remission rates at 12 months and severe adverse events. RESULTS The median age was 68 years, and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 18 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area. A total of 25 patients in the rituximab group (76%) and 9 patients in the control group (82%) had a sustained remission (P=0.68). Severe adverse events occurred in 14 patients in the rituximab group (42%) and 4 patients in the control group (36%) (P=0.77). Six of the 33 patients in the rituximab group (18%) and 2 of the 11 patients in the control group (18%) died (P=1.00). The median increase in the GFR between 0 and 12 months was 19 ml per minute in the rituximab group and 15 ml per minute in the control group (P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS A rituximab-based regimen was not superior to standard intravenous cyclophosphamide for severe ANCA-associated vasculitis. Sustained-remission rates were high in both groups, and the rituximab-based regimen was not associated with reductions in early severe adverse events. (Funded by Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust and F. Hoffmann-La Roche; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN28528813.)

Randomized Trial of Plasma Exchange or High-Dosage Methylprednisolone as Adjunctive Therapy for Severe Renal Vasculitis

Systemic vasculitis associated with autoantibodies to neutrophil cytoplasmic antigens (ANCA) is the most frequent cause of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. Renal failure at presentation carries an increased risk for ESRD and death despite immunosuppressive therapy. This study investigated whether the addition of plasma exchange was more effective than intravenous methylprednisolone in the achievement of renal recovery in those who presented with a serum creatinine >500 micromol/L (5.8 mg/dl). A total of 137 patients with a new diagnosis of ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis confirmed by renal biopsy and serum creatinine >500 micromol/L (5.8 mg/dl) were randomly assigned to receive seven plasma exchanges (n = 70) or 3000 mg of intravenous methylprednisolone (n = 67). Both groups received oral cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone. The primary end point was dialysis independence at 3 mo. Secondary end points included renal and patient survival at 1 yr and severe adverse event rates. At 3 mo, 33 (49%) of 67 after intravenous methylprednisolone compared with 48 (69%) or 70 after plasma exchange were alive and independent of dialysis (95% confidence interval for the difference 18 to 35%; P = 0.02). As compared with intravenous methylprednisolone, plasma exchange was associated with a reduction in risk for progression to ESRD of 24% (95% confidence interval 6.1 to 41%), from 43 to 19%, at 12 mo. Patient survival and severe adverse event rates at 1 yr were 51 (76%) of 67 and 32 of 67 (48%) in the intravenous methylprednisolone group and 51 (73%) of 70 and 35 of (50%) 70 in the plasma exchange group, respectively. Plasma exchange increased the rate of renal recovery in ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis that presented with renal failure when compared with intravenous methylprednisolone. Patient survival and severe adverse event rates were similar in both groups.

EULAR recommendations for the management of primary small and medium vessel vasculitis

Objectives: To develop European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of small and medium vessel vasculitis. Methods: An expert group (consisting of 10 rheumatologists, 3 nephrologists, 2 immunologists, 2 internists representing 8 European countries and the USA, a clinical epidemiologist and a representative from a drug regulatory agency) identified 10 topics for a systematic literature search using a modified Delphi technique. In accordance with standardised EULAR operating procedures, recommendations were derived for the management of small and medium vessel vasculitis. In the absence of evidence, recommendations were formulated on the basis of a consensus opinion. Results: In all, 15 recommendations were made for the management of small and medium vessel vasculitis. The strength of recommendations was restricted by low quality of evidence and by EULAR standardised operating procedures. Conclusions: On the basis of evidence and expert consensus, recommendations have been made for the evaluation, investigation, treatment and monitoring of patients with small and medium vessel vasculitis for use in everyday clinical practice.

Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Cyclophosphamide for Induction Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

Recent studies have suggested that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may offer advantages over intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) for the treatment of lupus nephritis, but these therapies have not been compared in an international randomized, controlled trial. Here, we report the comparison of MMF and IVC as induction treatment for active lupus nephritis in a multinational, two-phase (induction and maintenance) study. We randomly assigned 370 patients with classes III through V lupus nephritis to open-label MMF (target dosage 3 g/d) or IVC (0.5 to 1.0 g/m(2) in monthly pulses) in a 24-wk induction study. Both groups received prednisone, tapered from a maximum starting dosage of 60 mg/d. The primary end point was a prespecified decrease in urine protein/creatinine ratio and stabilization or improvement in serum creatinine. Secondary end points included complete renal remission, systemic disease activity and damage, and safety. Overall, we did not detect a significantly different response rate between the two groups: 104 (56.2%) of 185 patients responded to MMF compared with 98 (53.0%) of 185 to IVC. Secondary end points were also similar between treatment groups. There were nine deaths in the MMF group and five in the IVC group. We did not detect significant differences between the MMF and IVC groups with regard to rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, or infections. Although most patients in both treatment groups experienced clinical improvement, the study did not meet its primary objective of showing that MMF was superior to IVC as induction treatment for lupus nephritis.

Pulse Versus Daily Oral Cyclophosphamide for Induction of Remission in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis A Randomized Trial

Context Because cyclophosphamide has many adverse effects, dosing regimens that maintain efficacy but improve safety would be welcome. Contribution In this randomized comparison of pulse and daily oral cyclophosphamide regimens for treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis, equal proportions of patients had remissions, but the pulse regimen seemed safer, mainly because it caused less leukopenia. Caution Patients and providers were not blinded to the intervention, and the study was not powered to detect differences in relapse rate. Implication The efficacy of pulse cyclophosphamide for treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis seems no different from that of daily oral treatment and may be safer. The Editors Wegener granulomatosis, microscopic polyangiitis, and the renal-limited variant of microscopic polyangiitis are all associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) and are therefore referred to collectively as ANCA-associated vasculitis. The justification for grouping these diseases together as a single clinical entity goes beyond ANCA seropositivity; they cause similar histologic changes in the kidney, are associated with similar pathogenic autoantibodies, and respond similarly to induction immunosuppressive treatment. However, they also differ in important respects; for example, granuloma formation and relapse after treatment are more common in Wegener granulomatosis (1, 2). Outcomes for these previously fatal diseases improved dramatically with the introduction of daily oral cyclophosphamide therapy (3, 4). However, cyclophosphamide has significant adverse effects that influence long-term morbidity and mortality (5, 6). Strategies to reduce these adverse effects include reducing the duration of cyclophosphamide use to 3 to 6 months (maximum, 9 months) (2) and switching to an alternative immunosuppressive regimen after induction of remission and using methotrexate instead of cyclophosphamide in patients without generalized disease and significantly impaired renal function (7). For many patients, however, cyclophosphamide remains the mainstay of therapy for inducing remission and treating relapse, so regimens that maintain efficacy while minimizing cyclophosphamide dose and maximizing safety would be welcome. Previous studies (8) suggest that pulse cyclophosphamide regimens are safe and provide less cumulative cyclophosphamide exposure than daily oral cyclophosphamide regimens. However, small study sizes and variations in treatment regimens, including the use of treatments alongside cyclophosphamide, make the findings preliminary. We designed this trial to test the hypothesis that a regimen of pulsed intermittent cyclophosphamide would be as effective but less toxic than daily oral cyclophosphamide for inducing remission in patients with generalized ANCA-associated vasculitis with active glomerulonephritis. Methods Trial Design and Participants Our trial was an open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial conducted over 18 months. Patients, providers, and the investigators who assessed trial outcomes were not blinded to treatment assignment. Our inclusion criteria were newly diagnosed Wegener granulomatosis, microscopic polyangiitis, or renal-limited microscopic polyangiitis (diagnostic criteria adapted from the 1992 Chapel Hill consensus conference [9] and our groups previous studies [2, 7, 1012]); renal involvement attributable to active vasculitis (as defined by at least 1 of the following: serum creatinine level >150 mol/L [>1.7 mg/dL] and 500 mol/L [5.7 mg/dL], biopsy demonstrating necrotizing glomerulonephritis, erythrocyte casts, or hematuria [>30 erythrocytes per high-power field] and proteinuria [>1 g/d]); and confirmatory histology or ANCA positivity. Our exclusion criteria were coexistence of other multisystem autoimmune disease; hepatitis B or C virus or HIV infection; serum creatinine level greater than 500 mol/L (>5.7 mg/dL); previous cancer; pregnancy; or age younger than 18 or older than 80 years. We conducted our study according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from each participant, and each participating center reviewed the trial protocol and granted ethical approval. Random Assignment Random assignments were computer-generated and performed centrally by permuted blocks of 4, stratified by country and disease. Patients were enrolled by their treating physician and registered with the central trial coordinating office by fax submission of a form that contained information on center, date of birth, sex, disease, and creatinine level. We randomly assigned patients on a 1:1 basis to receive pulse or daily oral cyclophosphamide. Data were collected in record books, entered into a central computerized database, and validated against the record books before analysis. Eleven patients withdrew before random assignment; we randomly assigned 149 patients. Interventions We designed the pulse cyclophosphamide regimen by investigator consensus, on the basis of published experience with pulse cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Patients received 3 intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide, 15 mg/kg, given 2 weeks apart, followed by pulses at 3-week intervals (15 mg/kg intravenously or 5 mg/kg orally on 3 consecutive days, at the physicians discretion) until remission, and then for another 3 months. The maximum dose per pulse was 1.2 g. We reduced the cyclophosphamide dose by 2.5 mg/kg per pulse for persons age 60 to 70 years, 5 mg/kg per pulse for persons older than 70 years, and 2.5 mg/kg per pulse for persons with a serum creatinine level of 300 to 500 mol/L (3.4 to 5.7 mg/dL). At minimum, blood counts were checked on day 10 and 14 after each pulse and immediately before the next pulse. We reduced the dose of the subsequent pulse by 20% for patients with a leukocyte nadir of 2 to 3109/L and 40% for those with a nadir of 1 to 2109/L. The daily oral cyclophosphamide group received cyclophosphamide, 2 mg/kg per day, until remission, followed by 1.5 mg/kg per day for another 3 months. The maximum oral dose was 200 mg, and we reduced the dose by 25% for persons older than 60 years and 50% for those older than 70 years. At minimum, blood counts were checked weekly for the first month, twice-weekly for the second month, and monthly thereafter. We withheld cyclophosphamide for persons with a leukocyte count less than 4109/L, then resumed therapy at a dose reduced by 25 mg/d when their count increased to greater than 4109/L. Both groups continued the cyclophosphamide regimens for 3 months after remission, after which all patients received azathioprine, 2 mg/kg per day orally, until month 18 for remission maintenance. The maximum daily oral dose of azathioprine was 200 mg. Both groups also received prednisolone, 1 mg/kg orally, tapered to 12.5 mg at the end of month 3 and to 5 mg at the end of the study (month 18). 2-Mercaptoethanesulfonate sodium was optional in both groups. No patients received plasmapheresis. We recommended prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jiroveci for all patients. Treatment was allowed to follow local practice for patients who did not achieve remission at 9 months. We collected data on these patients but censored them for purposes of this analysis. For more details on the protocol, see Appendix 1. Outcomes and Follow-up We defined outcomes by using the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) index, which measures manifestations of active vasculitis during the 28 days before the date of assessment (13). Our primary outcome was time to remission, defined as the absence of new or worse signs of disease activity on the BVAS and no more than 1 item indicating persistent disease activity (BVAS 1). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who achieved remission at 6 and 9 months and the proportion with major and minor relapses. We defined major relapse as the recurrence or first appearance of at least 1 BVAS item indicating threatened vital organ function attributable to active vasculitis. We defined minor relapse as the recurrence or first appearance of at least 3 other BVAS items related to nonvital organs. An investigator classified patients as achieving remission or having relapse, and an independent observer validated these classifications retrospectively. Additional secondary outcomes were death; change in renal function; adverse events, including leukopenia and infection; and the cumulative dose of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone, which we calculated as the total cumulative drug dose at each time point in the study (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 months) divided by the number of patients in the study at that point. For each time point, we considered only the dose of drug for those patients still in the study. Unless otherwise noted, we assessed these outcomes at baseline; at 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6, 7.5, 9, 12, 15, and 18 months after baseline; and at relapse, on the basis of standard recommendations. Clinical assessments included BVAS measures at every visit and measures of cumulative damage from any cause since disease onset, as scored by the Vasculitis Damage Index (14), at baseline and every 3 months. Laboratory assessments included measures of full blood count, C-reactive protein, alanine transaminase, serum creatinine, and glucose, as well as dipstick urine analysis. We calculated glomerular filtration rate at entry, remission, and study end by using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease method (15). Statistical Analysis We determined the sample size for the trial by clinical rather than statistical considerations. We set a recruitment goal of 160 patients; we considered that number ambitious, given the rarity of these conditions (12 per 1 million persons) and the need to recruit patients and conduct the trial within a period (5 years) that was reasonable for our resources. We performed analyses by intention to treat. To account for censoring, we compared remission and survival by using survival methods instead of relat

Genetically Distinct Subsets within ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

BACKGROUND Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis is a severe condition encompassing two major syndromes: granulomatosis with polyangiitis (formerly known as Wegeners granulomatosis) and microscopic polyangiitis. Its cause is unknown, and there is debate about whether it is a single disease entity and what role ANCA plays in its pathogenesis. We investigated its genetic basis. METHODS A genomewide association study was performed in a discovery cohort of 1233 U.K. patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and 5884 controls and was replicated in 1454 Northern European case patients and 1666 controls. Quality control, population stratification, and statistical analyses were performed according to standard criteria. RESULTS We found both major-histocompatibility-complex (MHC) and non-MHC associations with ANCA-associated vasculitis and also that granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis were genetically distinct. The strongest genetic associations were with the antigenic specificity of ANCA, not with the clinical syndrome. Anti-proteinase 3 ANCA was associated with HLA-DP and the genes encoding α(1)-antitrypsin (SERPINA1) and proteinase 3 (PRTN3) (P=6.2×10(-89), P=5.6×10(-12,) and P=2.6×10(-7), respectively). Anti-myeloperoxidase ANCA was associated with HLA-DQ (P=2.1×10(-8)). CONCLUSIONS This study confirms that the pathogenesis of ANCA-associated vasculitis has a genetic component, shows genetic distinctions between granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis that are associated with ANCA specificity, and suggests that the response against the autoantigen proteinase 3 is a central pathogenic feature of proteinase 3 ANCA-associated vasculitis. These data provide preliminary support for the concept that proteinase 3 ANCA-associated vasculitis and myeloperoxidase ANCA-associated vasculitis are distinct autoimmune syndromes. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation and others.).

Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis

Objectives To develop recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis (LN). Methods The available evidence was systematically reviewed using the PubMed database. A modified Delphi method was used to compile questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. Results Immunosuppressive treatment should be guided by renal biopsy, and aiming for complete renal response (proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h with normal or near-normal renal function). Hydroxychloroquine is recommended for all patients with LN. Because of a more favourable efficacy/toxicity ratio, as initial treatment for patients with class III–IVA or A/C (±V) LN according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society 2003 classification, mycophenolic acid (MPA) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) in combination with glucocorticoids is recommended. In patients with adverse clinical or histological features, CY can be prescribed at higher doses, while azathioprine is an alternative for milder cases. For pure class V LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria, MPA in combination with oral glucocorticoids is recommended as initial treatment. In patients improving after initial treatment, subsequent immunosuppression with MPA or azathioprine is recommended for at least 3 years; in such cases, initial treatment with MPA should be followed by MPA. For MPA or CY failures, switching to the other agent, or to rituximab, is the suggested course of action. In anticipation of pregnancy, patients should be switched to appropriate medications without reducing the intensity of treatment. There is no evidence to suggest that management of LN should differ in children versus adults. Conclusions Recommendations for the management of LN were developed using an evidence-based approach followed by expert consensus.

EULAR recommendations for conducting clinical studies and/or clinical trials in systemic vasculitis: focus on anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis

Objectives: To develop the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for conducting clinical studies and/or clinical trials in systemic vasculitis. Methods: An expert consensus group was formed consisting of rheumatologists, nephrologists and specialists in internal medicine representing five European countries and the USA, a clinical epidemiologist and representatives from regulatory agencies. Using an evidence-based and expert opinion-based approach in accordance with the standardised EULAR operating procedures, the group identified nine topics for a systematic literature search through a modified Delphi technique. On the basis of research questions posed by the group, recommendations were derived for conducting clinical studies and/or clinical trials in systemic vasculitis. Results: Based on the results of the literature research, the expert committee concluded that sufficient evidence to formulate guidelines on conducting clinical trials was available only for anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitides (AAV). It was therefore decided to focus the recommendations on these diseases. Recommendations for conducting clinical trials in AAV were elaborated and are presented in this summary document. It was decided to consider vasculitis-specific issues rather than general issues of trial methodology. The recommendations deal with the following areas related to clinical studies of vasculitis: definitions of disease, activity states, outcome measures, eligibility criteria, trial design including relevant end points, and biomarkers. A number of aspects of trial methodology were deemed important for future research. Conclusions: On the basis of expert opinion, recommendations for conducting clinical trials in AAV were formulated. Furthermore, the expert committee identified a strong need for well-designed research in non-AAV systemic vasculitides.

EULAR Recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis

Objectives: To develop European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Methods: An expert group (10 rheumatologists, 3 nephrologists, 2 immunolgists, 2 internists representing 8 European countries and the USA, a clinical epidemiologist and a representative from a drug regulatory agency) identified 10 topics for a systematic literature search through a modified Delphi technique. In accordance with standardised EULAR operating procedures, recommendations were derived for the management of large vessel vasculitis. In the absence of evidence, recommendations were formulated on the basis of a consensus opinion. Results: Seven recommendations were made relating to the assessment, investigation and treatment of patients with large vessel vasculitis. The strength of recommendations was restricted by the low level of evidence and EULAR standardised operating procedures. Conclusions: On the basis of evidence and expert consensus, management recommendations for large vessel vasculitis have been formulated and are commended for use in everyday clinical practice.