David Klingman
IMS Health
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David Klingman.
Headache | 2009
Julie Munakata; Elisabeth Hazard; Daniel Serrano; David Klingman; Marcia F.T. Rupnow; Jonothan C. Tierce; Michael L. Reed; Richard B. Lipton
Objective.— To evaluate the impact of incident transformed migraine on health care resource utilization, medication use, and productivity loss. In addition, the study estimates the total direct and indirect costs associated with transformed migraine.
Clinical Therapeutics | 2009
Daniel A. Ollendorf; David Klingman; Elisabeth Hazard; Saurabh Ray
BACKGROUND Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are commonly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Differences in the dosage and mode of administration of these agents may result in differential rates of dosage adjustment and costs of care. OBJECTIVE This study compared dosing patterns and annual costs associated with the use of the subcutaneous TNF antagonists adalimumab and etanercept, and the intravenous TNF antagonist infliximab. METHODS A large managed care database (PharMetrics) was used to identify patients with RA who newly initiated TNF-antagonist therapy with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab on or after January 1, 2003, and had at least 6 months of continuous health plan enrollment before initiation of therapy and 12 months of continuous enrollment after initiation. The patients were followed over 12 months of enrollment. Annual pharmacy, inpatient, and outpatient costs were estimated based on plan reimbursements and were compared between cohorts. The average daily dosage (ADD) between prescription refills was used to compare the percentages of patients with greater-than-expected dosing (GTED), defined as 2 consecutive increases in ADD relative to the patients established maintenance dosage. RESULTS A total of 2382 patients (568 adalimumab, 1181 etanercept, 633 infliximab) were included in the analysis. Significantly more patients had GTED with infliximab compared with adalimumab and etanercept (32.1%, 8.5%, and 4.7%, respectively; both comparisons, P < 0.05). For patients with a dosage increase, the mean time to the first GTED was significantly shorter for infliximab compared with adalimu-mab and etanercept (154.5, 173.3, and 167.9 days; both, P < 0.05). The mean annual costs of anti-TNF therapy, adjusted for baseline differences, were significantly greater for infliximab compared with adalimumab and etanercept (
Journal of Asthma | 2010
Richard D. O'Connor; Eugene R. Bleecker; Aidan Long; Donald P. Tashkin; Stephen P. Peters; David Klingman; Benjamin Gutierrez
15,617,
Pharmacotherapy | 2009
Michael H. Kim; David Klingman; Jay Lin; David Battleman
12,200, and
Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2009
Michael H. Kim; David Klingman; Jay Lin; Prathamesh Pathak; David Battleman
12,146; both, P < 0.05). There were also significant differences between infliximab relative to adalimumab and etanercept in total RA-related medication costs (
Value in Health | 2005
Joshua S. Benner; Timothy W. Smith; David Klingman; Jonothan C. Tierce; C. Daniel Mullins; Ned Pethick; John C. O'Donnell
16,280,
American Heart Journal | 2005
David Klingman; Setareh A. Williams; Joshua S. Benner; Timothy W. Smith; Jeonghoon Ahn; John C. O'Donnell
12,989, and
Clinical Therapeutics | 2011
Michael H. Kim; Paula J. Smith; Mehul Jhaveri; Jay Lin; David Klingman
12,794; P < 0.05) and total pharmacy costs (
Journal of The American Society of Hypertension | 2008
Joshua S. Benner; Timothy W. Smith; Allison Petrilla; David Klingman; Sangeeta Goel; Simon Tang; Nathan D. Wong
17,854,
American Journal of Hypertension | 2005
Joshua S. Benner; Timothy W. Smith; Allison Petrilla; David Klingman; Simon Tang
14,805, and