David Krol

Preventive oral health intervention for pediatricians

This policy is a compilation of current concepts and scientific evidence required to understand and implement practice-based preventive oral health programs designed to improve oral health outcomes for all children and especially children at significant risk of dental decay. In addition, it reviews cariology and caries risk assessment and defines, through available evidence, appropriate recommendations for preventive oral health intervention by primary care pediatric practitioners.

Maintaining and Improving the Oral Health of Young Children

Oral health is an integral part of the overall health of children. Dental caries is a common and chronic disease process with significant short- and long-term consequences. The prevalence of dental caries for the youngest of children has not decreased over the past decade, despite improvements for older children. As health care professionals responsible for the overall health of children, pediatricians frequently confront morbidity associated with dental caries. Because the youngest children visit the pediatrician more often than they visit the dentist, it is important that pediatricians be knowledgeable about the disease process of dental caries, prevention of the disease, and interventions available to the pediatrician and the family to maintain and restore health.

Perceptions of Oral Health Training and Attitudes Toward Performing Oral Health Screenings Among Graduating Pediatric Residents

BACKGROUND. There is a lack of access to oral health services for American children. Some propose that pediatricians be trained to deliver preventive screening and education to families until they access a dental home. However, little is known about the current oral health training provided during pediatric residency. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the oral health training that pediatricians receive during residency and their attitudes toward performing basic oral health screenings. METHODS. The American Academy of Pediatrics Survey of Graduating Residents is an annual, randomly sampled national survey of graduating pediatric residents. The 2006 Survey of Graduating Residents surveyed 611 residents and examined their perception of their oral health training and their attitudes about performing oral health screenings. RESULTS. Thirty-five percent of residents received no oral health training during residency. Of those who did, 73% had <3 hours of training, and only 14% had clinical observation time with a dentist. Seventy-one percent felt that they had too little oral health training, and only 21% felt that their residency was very good or excellent in preparing them to perform oral health-risk assessments. Residents felt confident in their ability to offer anticipatory guidance but not to do the more technical oral health screenings. The majority of residents believed that pediatricians should conduct basic oral health screenings. Multiple regression analysis indicated that residents who received ≥3 hours of oral health training, who applied for jobs in the inner city, and whose career goal was to work in primary practice are those most likely to support this idea. CONCLUSIONS. Pediatric residents currently receive little training in oral health, and the majority wish for more. This study shows that oral health training during residency can increase pediatrician confidence in participating in important oral health promotion tasks, including anticipatory guidance, oral screenings, and oral health-risk assessment.

Educating Pediatricians and Family Physicians in Children's Oral Health

Publication of Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General (SGROH) alerted the public and health professionals to the importance of oral health and the vulnerability of poor and underserved children to dental disease. In response, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), and the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) have initiated training programs for residents and practicing physicians, allowing them to conduct oral health screenings, apply preventive strategies, and facilitate appropriate referrals to dentists. Training programs are increasingly available on the Web, but their quality and effectiveness are rarely assessed. To ensure greater inclusion of oral health in graduate medical education, voluntary curricular guidelines have been developed, and education in oral health is mandated in family medicine residency programs. Several initiatives engaging practicing physicians in oral health activities have demonstrated improved access and reduced dental disease in children, but evaluation of all programs is essential to determine cost effectiveness and outcomes. The actions of AAP, AAFP, STFM, and other large-scale initiatives have helped break down the traditional separation between medicine and dentistry. Collaboration between physicians and dentists should be encouraged at all levels of education to ensure improvement of the oral health of Americas children.

Management of Dental Trauma in a Primary Care Setting

The American Academy of Pediatrics and its Section on Oral Health have developed this clinical report for pediatricians and primary care physicians regarding the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of dental trauma in children aged 1 to 21 years. This report was developed through a comprehensive search and analysis of the medical and dental literature and expert consensus. Guidelines published and updated by the International Association of Dental Traumatology (www.dentaltraumaguide.com) are an excellent resource for both dental and nondental health care providers.

A Qualitative Analysis of Medication Use Variance Reports

BACKGROUND This report of a process change utilized a qualitative approach to data analysis to improve medication use safety in a large hospital. The two goals were to design a strategy to analyze the qualitative data and to use that strategy to uncover previously unclassified medication use variance patterns that could be prevented. A multidisciplinary team performed the analysis in an effort to improve the quality and yield of the approach. METHODS All medication use variance, incident, and event reports from Yale-New Haven Hospital during April-June 2000 were collected (N = 264). A 20% random sample of the reports was distributed to a five-member evaluation group (a pharmacist, two nurses, and two physicians) for independent qualitative analysis and coding. An initial coding framework was produced using a consensus process. This coding framework was applied to another sample, and the consensus and coding processes were repeated until no new domains were identified. RESULTS Ten general medication use variance domains were determined. In addition, 21 subdomains among the various general domains were determined. DISCUSSION Utilizing a multidisciplinary team and a qualitative strategy of analysis improved patient safety efforts. This combination led to the discovery of new variance domains, causes, and opportunities to intervene and ultimately prevent medication use variances. This analytic approach is widely applicable, adaptable, and dynamic. The design and results of this report improve on a strictly quantitative approach to medication use variance analysis. The approach employed by this report will be used to improve medication use safety within the Yale-New Haven Health System.