David L. Gummer
Parks Canada
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David L. Gummer.
Journal of Parasitology | 1997
David L. Gummer; Mark R. Forbes; Darren J. Bender; Robert M. R. Barclay
During field study of Ords kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii) at Suffield National Wildlife Area, Alberta, Canada, a high prevalence of parasitism by botfly (Diptera: Oestridae) larvae was observed. Botflies have not previously been documented as parasites of kangaroo rats. Botfly parasitism could have a significant impact on the growth, survival, and reproduction of Ords kangaroo rat, which is considered a vulnerable species in Canada. Therefore, it is important to investigate how botfly parasitism varies with season and with gender or age of host. In 1995, 525 individual kangaroo rats were caught by nightlighting and live trapping for a total of 952 capture records. Upon capture, each kangaroo rat was ear-tagged and thoroughly examined for parasites and wounds. Third-instar botfly (Cuterebra polita) larvae were observed in kangaroo rats between 16 June and 23 August. Prevalence was 34% based on 454 kangaroo rats sampled during that time, whereas the mean intensity was 2.3 larvae per infested host (n = 156, range = 1-11). In contrast to some other studies of botfly parasitism of rodents, there were no gender or age biases in either prevalence or intensity of infestation. The index of dispersion was 2.8, indicating that the parasites were aggregated in hosts. Botfly parasitism could be an important factor affecting northern populations of kangaroo rats; future investigations into the potential effects of botfly larvae on host fitness are warranted.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Robin Steenweg; Mark Hebblewhite; David L. Gummer; Brian Low; Bill Hunt
Interest in bison (Bison bison, B. bonasus) conservation and restoration continues to grow globally. In Canada, plains bison (B. b. bison) are threatened, occupying less than 0.5% of their former range. The largest threat to their recovery is the lack of habitat in which they are considered compatible with current land uses. Fences and direct management make range expansion by most bison impossible. Reintroduction of bison into previously occupied areas that remain suitable, therefore, is critical for bison recovery in North America. Banff National Park is recognized as historical range of plains bison and has been identified as a potential site for reintroduction of a wild population. To evaluate habitat quality and assess if there is sufficient habitat for a breeding population, we developed a Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) model for the proposed reintroduction and surrounding areas in Banff National Park (Banff). We then synthesize previous studies on habitat relationships, forage availability, bison energetics and snowfall scenarios to estimate nutritional carrying capacity. Considering constraints on nutritional carrying capacity, the most realistic scenario that we evaluated resulted in an estimated maximum bison density of 0.48 bison/km2. This corresponds to sufficient habitat to support at least 600 to 1000 plains bison, which could be one of the largest 10 plains bison populations in North America. Within Banff, there is spatial variation in predicted bison habitat suitability and population size that suggests one potential reintroduction site as the most likely to be successful from a habitat perspective. The successful reintroduction of bison into Banff would represent a significant global step towards conserving this iconic species, and our approach provides a useful template for evaluating potential habitat for other endangered species reintroductions into their former range.
Wildlife Monographs | 2014
Bradley C. Fedy; Kevin E. Doherty; Cameron L. Aldridge; Michael S. O'Donnell; Jeffrey L. Beck; Bryan Bedrosian; David L. Gummer; Matthew J. Holloran; Gregory D. Johnson; Nicholas W. Kaczor; Christopher P. Kirol; Cheryl A. Mandich; David Marshall; Gwyn McKee; Chad Olson; Aaron C. Pratt; Christopher C. Swanson; Brett L. Walker
Biological Conservation | 2010
Julie A. Heinrichs; Darren J. Bender; David L. Gummer; Nathan H. Schumaker
Journal for Nature Conservation | 2015
Julie A. Heinrichs; Darren J. Bender; David L. Gummer; Nathan H. Schumaker
Archive | 2003
David L. Gummer; Sandi Robertson; Alberta.
Archive | 2003
David L. Gummer; Sandi Robertson
Biological Conservation | 2018
Julie A. Heinrichs; Cameron L. Aldridge; David L. Gummer; Adrian P. Monroe; Nathan H. Schumaker
Archive | 2007
Darren J. Bender; Randy E. Dzenkiw; David L. Gummer; Alberta.
Global Change Biology | 2018
Tara Stephens; Sian C. Wilson; Ffion Cassidy; Darren J. Bender; David L. Gummer; Des H.V. Smith; Natasha Lloyd; Jana M. McPherson; Axel Moehrenschlager