David L. Shern
Johns Hopkins University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David L. Shern.
Milbank Quarterly | 1994
David L. Shern; Nancy Z. Wilson; Anita Saranga Coen; Diane C. Patrick; Mark Foster; David A. Bartsch; Jean Demmler
The outcomes of a reform of the Denver mental health system, cosponsored by the state and the RWJF, are contrasted with changes in a comparison area of the state. The study examines the structural characteristics of the mental health system, staff attitudes and satisfaction, and client-reported services and outcome. Results indicate that, in Denver, structural changes, the introduction of new services, and an intervening financial crisis increased worker dissatisfaction. Client reports documented parallel changes in the following variables: continuity of care, unmet need for case management services, frequency of symptoms, and satisfaction with services. The reform had no impact, however, on most quality-of-life indicators. The possibly adverse consequences of centralizing the system and the indirect influences of system integration on quality of life are discussed.
American Journal of Public Health | 2000
David L. Shern; Sam Tsemberis; William A. Anthony; Anne M. Lovell; Linda Richmond; Chip J. Felton; Jim Winarski; Mikal Cohen
OBJECTIVES This study tested a psychiatric rehabilitation approach for organizing and delivering services to street-dwelling persons with severe mental illness. METHODS Street-dwelling persons with severe mental illness were randomly assigned to the experimental program (called Choices) or to standard treatment in New York City. We assessed study participants at baseline and at 6-month intervals over 24 months, using measures of service use, quality of life, health, mental health, and social psychological status. The average deviation from baseline summary statistic was employed to assess change. RESULTS Compared with persons in standard treatment (n = 77), members of the experimental group (n = 91) were more likely to attend a day program (53% vs 27%), had less difficulty in meeting their basic needs, spent less time on the streets (55% vs 28% reduction), and spent more time in community housing (21% vs 9% increase). They showed greater improvement in life satisfaction and experienced a greater reduction in psychiatric symptoms. CONCLUSIONS With an appropriate service model, it is possible to engage disaffiliated populations, expand their use of human services, and improve their housing conditions, quality of life, and mental health status.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry | 2016
David L. Shern; Andrea K. Blanch; Sarah M. Steverman
Before the development of the germ theory in the late 19th century, infectious illnesses were largely uncontrollable and caused significant mortality. Implementing public hygiene, preventive, and treatment interventions created remarkable improvements in population health. Todays U.S. public health crises involve threats to health and human capital evidenced by multiple indicators of deteriorating wellbeing. These problems result from the interaction of risk and protective factors. Specifically, we argue that the interaction of genetic vulnerability and toxic stress are antecedents to a developmental cascade that undermines healthy development and human capital. We review relevant literature, summarize effective strategies to prevent or ameliorate this deterioration, and outline a theory of the mechanisms currently undermining our health. A series of strategies that we believe will constitute the next major era in public health are discussed, involving actions at the individual/family, community and societal level to reduce risk and strengthen protective factors. (PsycINFO Database Record
Psychiatric Services | 2009
David L. Shern; Hazel Moran
Practical clinical trials, such as STAR*D (Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression), extend the traditional randomized controlled trial to real-world settings. Consumers and clinicians should be encouraged by STAR*Ds 70% remission rate and should realize that for many participants remission required medication switching and augmentation. Policy makers should recognize the importance of easy access to a full range of treatments. Researchers should be sobered by the high attrition rate and the 30% of participants who did not achieve remission. Although more such practical trials are needed, future work must more meaningfully involve consumers in design, analysis, and interpretation.
Health Affairs | 2013
David L. Shern; Wayne Lindstrom
In the wake of the latest mass shooting, there are calls to marshal the evidence and take steps to identify and treat mental illness early in life.
Health Affairs | 2010
David L. Shern; Kirsten K. Beronio; Chin Chin I Minniear; Sarah M. Steverman
Comparative effectiveness research holds great promise for improving the care of people with mental health conditions and disorders related to substance abuse. But inappropriate application of such research can threaten the quality of that care. We examine the controversy surrounding a large real-world trial of schizophrenia treatments and conclude that the initial presentation of results led to overly simplistic policy suggestions that had the potential to harm patients. Patient advocacy groups helped illuminate these consequences and helped stimulate further discussion and analysis. Researchers must engage stakeholders, especially patients, in all aspects of comparative effectiveness research and translate the findings into sound mental health policy and practice.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 2018
Ron Z Goetzel; Enid Chung Roemer; Calliope Holingue; M Daniele Fallin; Katherine McCleary; William W. Eaton; Jacqueline Agnew; Francisca Azocar; David W. Ballard; John Bartlett; Michael Braga; Heidi Conway; K. Andrew Crighton; Richard G. Frank; Kim Jinnett; Debra Keller-Greene; Sara Martin Rauch; Richard Safeer; Dick Saporito; Anita L. Schill; David L. Shern; Victor J. Strecher; Peter Wald; Philip S. Wang; C. Richard Mattingly
Objective: The aim of the study was to declare a call to action to improve mental health in the workplace. Methods: We convened a public health summit and assembled an Advisory Council consisting of experts in the field of occupational health and safety, workplace wellness, and public policy to offer recommendations for action steps to improve health and well-being of workers. Results: The Advisory Council narrowed the list of ideas to four priority projects. Conclusions: The recommendations for action include developing a mental health in the workplace (1) “how to” guide, (2) scorecard, (3) recognition program, and (4) executive training.
Psychiatric Services | 1995
Felton Cj; Stastny P; David L. Shern; Blanch A; Donahue Sa; Knight E; Brown C
American Journal of Community Psychology | 2003
Sam Tsemberis; Linda Moran; Marybeth Shinn; Sara M. Asmussen; David L. Shern
Psychiatric Services | 1997
David L. Shern; Chip J. Felton; Richard L. Hough; Anthony F. Lehman; Stephen M. Goldfinger; Elie Valencia; Deborah Dennis; Roger Straw; Patricia A. Wood