Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David L. Sutcliffe is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David L. Sutcliffe.


PLOS ONE | 2010

Conditional HIF-1α Expression Produces a Reversible Cardiomyopathy

Raffi Bekeredjian; Chad B. Walton; Keith A. MacCannell; Jennifer Ecker; Fred Kruse; Joel T Outten; David L. Sutcliffe; Robert D. Gerard; Richard K. Bruick; Ralph V. Shohet

Background The response to hypoxia in tissues is regulated by the heterodimeric transcription factor Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1 (HIF-1). Methodology/Principal Findings We have created a strain of mice with inducible cardiomyocyte-specific expression of a mutated, oxygen-stable, form of HIF-1α. Cardiac function steadily decreased with transgene expression, but recovered after the transgene was turned off. Using long-oligo microarrays, we identified 162 transcripts more than 3-fold dysregulated in these hearts after transgene expression. Among the down-regulated genes the transcript for SERCA was reduced 46% and the protein 92%. This led us to an evaluation of calcium flux that showed diminished reuptake of cytoplasmic calcium in myocytes from these hearts, suggesting a mechanism for cardiac dysfunction. Conclusions/Significance These results provide a deeper understanding of transcriptional activity of HIF in the heart, and show that enhanced HIF-1 activity is sufficient to cause contractile dysfunction in the adult heart. HIF is stabilized in the myocardium of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, and our results suggest that HIF could be contributing directly to the contractile dysfunction in this disease.


Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2018

Second annual Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) report: Pre-implant characteristics and outcomes

Elizabeth D. Blume; Christina VanderPluym; Angela Lorts; J. Timothy Baldwin; Joseph W. Rossano; David L.S. Morales; Ryan S. Cantor; Marissa A. Miller; James D. St. Louis; Devin Koehl; David L. Sutcliffe; Pirooz Eghtesady; James K. Kirklin; David N. Rosenthal

BACKGROUND Expanded use of pediatric ventricular assist devices (VADs) has decreased mortality in children awaiting heart transplantation. Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs), a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored North American database, provides a platform to understand this emerging population. METHODS Between September 2012 and September 2016, patients aged younger than 19 years who underwent VAD implantation were enrolled in Pedimacs. FDA approved durable devices as well as temporary support devices were included. The second annual report updates the current Pedimacs data. Patients implanted with temporary devices are included in Pedimacs and this analysis includes this group of paracorporeal continuous flow VADs. RESULTS Over the 4 years, 42 hospitals implanted 432 devices in 364 patients less than 19 yrs of age. Diagnoses included cardiomyopathy in 223 (61%), myocarditis in 41 (11%), and congenital heart disease in 77 (21%), of which 48 had single-ventricle physiology. At implant, 87% were at Intermacs patient profile 1 or 2. The age distribution of children (59% male) supported on VAD included 69 (19%) aged younger than 1 year, 66 (18%) aged 1 to 6 years, 56 (15%) aged 6 to 10 years, and 173 (48%) aged 11 to 19 years. Median follow-up was 2.2 months (range, 1 day to 41.5 months). Median (interquartile) age at implant was 1.7 (0.3-10.0) years for paracorporeal continuous-flow pumps (n = 60), 1.7 (0.4-5.3) years for paracorporeal pulsatile pumps (n = 105), and 15.0 (11.3-16.9) years for implantable continuous-flow pumps (n = 174). Support strategies included LVAD in 293 (80%), biventricular device in 55 (15%), and total artificial heart in 8 (2%). Nearly 50% of patients underwent transplantation within 6 months, with overall mortality of 19%. Adverse event burden continues to be high. CONCLUSIONS Pedimacs constitutes the largest longitudinal pediatric VAD registry. Preimplant data across centers will be helpful at creating shared protocols with which to improve outcomes. Adverse events continue to be the major challenge, especially among the young critically ill children with complex congenital disease.


American Heart Journal | 2012

Use of a highly sensitive assay for cardiac troponin T and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide to diagnose acute rejection in pediatric cardiac transplant recipients.

Adrian K. Dyer; Aliessa P. Barnes; David E. Fixler; Tejas Shah; David L. Sutcliffe; Ibrahim A. Hashim; Mark H. Drazner; James A. de Lemos

BACKGROUND Biomarkers have been proposed to augment or replace endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) to diagnose acute transplant rejection (AR). A new, highly sensitive assay for troponin T detects levels of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) 10- to 100-fold lower than standard assays but has not been investigated in transplant patients. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has not been evaluated in pediatric transplant patients. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the association of cTnT and NT-proBNP with AR in pediatric cardiac transplant patients. METHODS Plasma was obtained at the time of EMB from pediatric patients ≥ 1 year old. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide was measured in fresh plasma at the time of biopsy, and cTnT was measured from frozen, stored samples using the highly sensitive assay for troponin T. Biomarker data were correlated with EMB results. Cellular AR was defined as an International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation biopsy score of grade ≥ 2R. RESULTS Fifty-three blood samples were obtained from 42 patients (mean age 11 years). Seven episodes of AR occurred in 5 patients. Biopsies with vs without AR were associated with higher cTnT (median [interquartile range {IQR}] 66 [45-139] vs 7 [2-13] pg/mL, P = .001) and NT-proBNP (median [IQR] 11,169 [280-23,317] vs 334 [160-650] pg/mL, P < .01). After successful treatment of AR in 5 patients, cTnT fell markedly (median [IQR] 53.5 [44.8-66.5] to 10.7 [1.5-16.4], P = .05). CONCLUSION In this pilot study, we found marked elevation of cTnT and NT-proBNP among children with AR. Moreover, reduction in cTnT levels after treatment paralleled improvement in EMB results. If these findings are confirmed in larger prospective studies, monitoring with these biomarkers may obviate surveillance EMB.


Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2017

Post-transplant outcomes in pediatric vad patients: A pedimacs-pediatric heart transplant study linkage analysis

David L. Sutcliffe; Elizabeth Pruitt; Ryan S. Cantor; Justin Godown; John Lane; Mark W. Turrentine; Sabrina P. Law; Jodie L. Lantz; James K. Kirklin; Daniel Bernstein; Elizabeth D. Blume

BACKGROUND Pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) support as bridge to transplant has improved waitlist survival, but the effects of pre-implant status and VAD-related events on post-transplant outcomes have not been assessed. This study is a linkage analysis between the PediMACS and Pediatric Heart Transplant Study databases to determine the effects of VAD course on post-transplant outcomes. METHODS Database linkage between October 1, 2012 and December 31, 2015 identified 147 transplanted VAD patients, the primary study group. The comparison cohort was composed of 630 PHTS patients without pre-transplant VAD support. The primary outcome was post-transplant survival, with secondary outcomes of post-transplant length of stay, freedom from infection and freedom from rejection. RESULTS At implant, the VAD cohort was INTERMACS Profile 1 in 33 (23%), Profile 2 in 89 (63%) and Profile 3 in 14 (10%) patients. The VAD cohort was older, larger, and less likely to have congenital heart disease (p < 0.0001). However, they had greater requirements for inotrope and ventilator support and increased liver and renal dysfunction (p < 0.0001), both of which normalized at transplant after device support. Importantly, there were no differences in 1-year post-transplant survival (96% vs 93%, p = 0.3), freedom from infection (81% vs 79%, p = 0.9) or freedom from rejection (71% vs 74%, p = 0.87) between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric VAD patients have post-transplant outcomes equal to that of medically supported patients, despite greater pre-implant illness severity. Post-transplant survival, hospital length of stay, infection and rejection were not affected by patient acuity at VAD implantation or VAD-related complications. Therefore, VAD as bridge to transplant mitigates severity of illness in children.


Pediatric Transplantation | 2018

Comparison of basiliximab vs antithymocyte globulin for induction in pediatric heart transplant recipients: An analysis of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation database

Ryan J. Butts; Anne I. Dipchand; David L. Sutcliffe; Maria Bano; V. Vivian Dimas; Robert Morrow; Bibhuti B. Das; Richard Kirk

This study aims to compare 2 common induction strategies, basiliximab and ATG. Analysis of the ISHLT transplant registry was performed. The database was queried for pediatric heart transplants from January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2015, who had received induction with basiliximab or ATG. Primary end‐point was graft survival. Secondary end‐points included 1‐year survival and 1‐year conditional survival. There were 3158 heart transplants who received induction with basiliximab or ATG. The ATG cohort was younger, more likely to have congenital heart disease or be a retransplant, have a higher PRA, longer ischemic time, and been transplanted earlier in the study period (all P<.01). There was no difference in graft loss in the basiliximab cohort compared to the ATG cohort (HR 1.18 P=.06). On conditional 1‐year survival analysis, basiliximab induction was associated with graft loss (HR=1.35 95% CI 1.1‐1.7, P<.01), and in the propensity‐matched cohort, the basiliximab cohort was more likely to experience rejection prior to discharge (P=.04). Infection prior to discharge was more common in the antithymocyte cohort. Induction with ATG is associated with improved late graft survival compared to basiliximab.


Archive | 2018

Future of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Children and Young Adults

David L. Sutcliffe; Robert D.B. Jacquiss


Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2018

Pre-Transplant Amiodarone Use and Outcomes in Children After Heart Transplantation

Ryan J. Butts; Anne I. Dipchand; David L. Sutcliffe; Maria Bano; Robert Morrow; Richard Kirk


Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2018

Pretransplant Amiodarone Use and Post-transplant Outcomes in Pediatric Heart Transplant: A Propensity Score Analysis of the ISHLT Transplant Registry

Ryan J. Butts; Anne I. Dipchand; David L. Sutcliffe; Maria Bano; Robert Morrow; Richard Kirk


Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2018

Post-transplant Mortality and the Components of Donor Organ Ischemic Time in Pediatric Heart Transplantation

Ryan R Davies; T.J. Pirolli; Maria Bano; Ryan J. Butts; David L. Sutcliffe; Richard Kirk; Robert D.B. Jaquiss


Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2018

Utilization and Outcomes for BiVADs in Pedimacs Patients

Ryan J. Butts; David L. Sutcliffe; Ryan R Davies; Robert D.B. Jaquiss; T.J. Pirolli; Maria Bano; R. Morrow; A. Gao; S. Zhang; Richard Kirk

Collaboration


Dive into the David L. Sutcliffe's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maria Bano

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ryan J. Butts

Medical University of South Carolina

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James K. Kirklin

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ryan S. Cantor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elizabeth Pruitt

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Lane

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Justin Godown

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge