David Lambert
Trinity College, Dublin
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David Lambert.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 2005
Matthew B. McQueen; Bernie Devlin; Stephen V. Faraone; Vishwajit L. Nimgaonkar; Pamela Sklar; Jordan W. Smoller; Rami Abou Jamra; Margot Albus; Silviu-Alin Bacanu; Miron Baron; Thomas B. Barrett; Wade H. Berrettini; Deborah Blacker; William Byerley; Sven Cichon; Willam Coryell; Nicholas John Craddock; Mark J. Daly; J. Raymond DePaulo; Howard J. Edenberg; Tatiana Foroud; Michael Gill; T. Conrad Gilliam; Marian Lindsay Hamshere; Ian Richard Jones; Lisa Jones; S H Juo; John R. Kelsoe; David Lambert; Christoph Lange
Several independent studies and meta-analyses aimed at identifying genomic regions linked to bipolar disorder (BP) have failed to find clear and consistent evidence of linkage regions. Our hypothesis is that combining the original genotype data provides benefits of increased power and control over sources of heterogeneity that outweigh the difficulty and potential pitfalls of the implementation. We conducted a combined analysis using the original genotype data from 11 BP genomewide linkage scans comprising 5,179 individuals from 1,067 families. Heterogeneity among studies was minimized in our analyses by using uniform methods of analysis and a common, standardized marker map and was assessed using novel methods developed for meta-analysis of genome scans. To date, this collaboration is the largest and most comprehensive analysis of linkage samples involving a psychiatric disorder. We demonstrate that combining original genome-scan data is a powerful approach for the elucidation of linkage regions underlying complex disease. Our results establish genomewide significant linkage to BP on chromosomes 6q and 8q, which provides solid information to guide future gene-finding efforts that rely on fine-mapping and association approaches.
Molecular Psychiatry | 2002
P. Bennett; Ricardo Segurado; Ian Richard Jones; S. Bort; F. McCandless; David Lambert; J. Heron; C. Comerford; F. Middle; Aiden Corvin; G. Pelios; George Kirov; B. Larsen; T. Mulcahy; Nigel Melville Williams; R. O'Connell; E. O'Mahony; A. Payne; Michael John Owen; Peter Holmans; Nicholas John Craddock; Michael Gill
We have completed the first stage of a two-stage genome wide screen designed to identify chromosomal regions that may harbour susceptibility genes for bipolar affective disorder. The first stage screening sample included 509 subjects from 151 nuclear families recruited within the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. This sample contained 154 narrowly defined affected sibling pairs (DSM-IV BPI) and 258 broadly defined affected sibling pairs (DSM-IV BPI, SABP, BPII, BPNOS or MDD(R)), approximately two thirds of all families contained at least one other additional typed individual. All individuals were genotyped using 398 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers from Applied Biosystemss Linkage Mapping Set Version 2. The average inter-marker distance was 9.6 cM and the mean heterozygosity was 0.78. Analysis of these data using non-parametric linkage methods (MAPMAKER/SIBS) found no evidence for loci of major effect and no regions reached genome-wide significance for either suggestive or significant linkage. We identified 19 points across the genome where the MLS exceeded a value set for follow up in our second stage screen (MLS≥0.74 (equivalent to a nominal pointwise significance of 5%) under the narrowest diagnostic model). These points were on chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 17, 18 & X. Some of these points overlapped with previous linkage reports both within bipolar affective disorder and other psychiatric illnesses. Under the narrowest diagnostic model, the single most significant multipoint linkage was on chromosome 18 at marker D18S452 (MLS=1.54). Overall the highest MLS was 1.70 on chromosome 2 at marker D2S125, under the broadest diagnostic model.
Molecular Psychiatry | 2005
David Lambert; F. Middle; Marian Lindsay Hamshere; Ricardo Segurado; Rachel Raybould; Aiden Corvin; Elaine K. Green; E. O'Mahony; Ivan Nikolov; T. Mulcahy; Sayeed Haque; S. Bort; P. Bennett; Nadine Norton; Michael John Owen; George Kirov; Corinne Lendon; Lisa Jones; Ian Richard Jones; Peter Holmans; Michael Gill; Nicholas John Craddock
Bipolar affective disorder (BPAD) is a common psychiatric disorder with complex genetic aetiology. We have undertaken a genome-wide scan in one of the largest samples of bipolar affected sibling pairs (ASPs) using a two-stage approach combining sample splitting and marker grid tightening. In this second stage analysis, we have examined 17 regions that achieved a nominally significant maximum likelihood LOD score (MLS) threshold of 0.74 (or 1.18 for the X-chromosome) in stage one. The second stage has added 135 ASP families to bring the total stage 2 sample to 395 ASPs. In total, 494 microsatellite markers have been used to screen the human genome at a density of 10 cM in the first stage sample (260 ASPs) and 5 cM in the second stage. Under the broad diagnostic model, two markers gave LOD scores exceeding 3 with two-point analysis: D4S392 (LOD=3.30) and D10S197 (LOD=3.18). Multipoint analysis demonstrated suggestive evidence of linkage between BPAD and chromosomal regions 6q16–q21 (MLS=2.61) and 4q12–q21 (MLS=2.38). 6q16–q21 is of particular interest because our data, together with those from two recent genome scans, make this the best supported linkage region in BPAD. Further, our data show evidence of a gender effect at this locus with increased sharing predominantly within the male–male pairs. Our scan also provides support for linkage (MLS≥1.5) at several other regions that have been implicated in meta-analyses of bipolar disorder and/or schizophrenia including 9p21, 10p14–p12 and 18q22.
Molecular Psychiatry | 2007
Mark A. Bellgrove; Christopher D. Chambers; Katherine A. Johnson; Aoife Dáibhis; Michael Daly; Ziarih Hawi; David Lambert; Michael Gill; Ian H. Robertson
In everyday life, our sensory system is bombarded with visual input and we rely upon attention to select only those inputs that are relevant to behavioural goals. Typically, humans can shift their attention from one visual field to the other with little cost to perception. In cases of ‘unilateral neglect’, however, there is a persistent bias of spatial attention towards the same side as the damaged cerebral hemisphere. We used a visual orienting task to examine the influence of functional polymorphisms of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) on individual differences in spatial attention in normally developing children. DAT1 genotype significantly influenced spatial bias. Healthy children who were homozygous for alleles that influence the expression of dopamine transporters in the brain displayed inattention for left-sided stimuli, whereas heterozygotes did not. Our data provide the first evidence in healthy individuals of a genetically mediated bias in spatial attention that is related to dopamine signalling.
Neuropsychopharmacology | 2008
Mark A. Bellgrove; Katherine A. Johnson; Marie Cox; Aoife Dáibhis; Michael Daly; Ziarih Hawi; David Lambert; Michael Fitzgerald; Fiona McNicholas; Ian H. Robertson; Michael Gill; Aiveen Kirley
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a heritable childhood onset disorder that is marked by variability at multiple levels including clinical presentation, cognitive profile, and response to stimulant medications. It has been suggested that this variability may reflect etiological differences, particularly, at the level of underlying genetics. This study examined whether an attentional phenotype-spatial attentional bias could serve as a marker of symptom severity, genetic risk, and stimulant response in ADHD. A total of 96 children and adolescents with ADHD were assessed on the Landmark Task, which is a sensitive measure of spatial attentional bias. All children were genotyped for polymorphisms (3′ untranslated (UTR) and intron 8 variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)) of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1). Spatial attentional bias correlated with ADHD symptom levels and varied according to DAT1 genotype. Children who were homozygous for the 10-repeat allele of the DAT1 3′-UTR VNTR displayed a rightward attentional bias and had higher symptom levels compared to those with the low-risk genotype. A total of 26 of these children who were medication naive performed the Landmark Task at baseline and then again after 6 weeks of stimulant medication. Left-sided inattention (rightward bias) at baseline was associated with an enhanced response to stimulants at 6 weeks. Moreover, changes in spatial bias with stimulant medications, varied as a function of DAT1 genotype. This study suggests an attentional phenotype that relates to symptom severity and genetic risk for ADHD, and may have utility in predicting stimulant response in ADHD.
Molecular Psychiatry | 2006
David Lambert; F. Middle; Marian Lindsay Hamshere; Ricardo Segurado; Rachel Raybould; A. Corvin; Elaine K. Green; E. O'Mahony; Ivan Nikolov; T. Mulcahy; Sayeed Haque; S. Bort; P. Bennett; Nadine Norton; Michael John Owen; George Kirov; C. Lendon; Lisa A. Jones; Ian Jones; Peter Alan Holmans; Michael Gill; N. Craddock
Correction to: Molecular Psychiatry (2005) 10, 831–841. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001684 Following publication of the above article, the authors noticed that Figure 1 did not include a color key detailing the line colors. The key is indicated in the revised figure on pages 1141–1143.
Molecular Psychiatry | 2006
David Lambert; F. Middle; Marian Lindsay Hamshere; Ricardo Segurado; Rachel Raybould; A. Corvin; Elaine K. Green; E. O'Mahony; Ivan Nikolov; T. Mulcahy; Sayeed Haque; S. Bort; P. Bennett; Nadine Norton; Michael John Owen; George Kirov; C. Lendon; Lisa A. Jones; Ian Jones; Peter Alan Holmans; Michael Gill; Nicholas John Craddock
Correction to: Molecular Psychiatry (2005) 10, 831–841. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001684 Following publication of the above article, the authors noticed that Figure 1 did not include a color key detailing the line colors. The key is indicated in the revised figure on pages 1141–1143.
Archives of General Psychiatry | 2005
Marian Lindsay Hamshere; P. Bennett; Nigel Melville Williams; Ricardo Segurado; Alastair G. Cardno; Nadine Norton; David Lambert; Hywel Williams; George Kirov; Aiden Corvin; Peter Holmans; Lisa Jones; Ian Richard Jones; Michael Gill; Michael Conlon O'Donovan; Michael John Owen; Nicholas John Craddock
American Journal of Psychiatry | 2007
Ian Richard Jones; Marian Lindsay Hamshere; Jeanne-Marrie Nangle; P. Bennett; Elaine K. Green; Jess Heron; Ricardo Segurado; David Lambert; Peter Holmans; Aiden Corvin; Michael John Owen; Lisa A. Jones; Michael Gill; Nicholas John Craddock
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 2008
Katherine A. Johnson; Simon P. Kelly; Ian H. Robertson; Aisling Mulligan; Michael Daly; David Lambert; Caroline McDonnell; Thomas J. Connor; Ziarih Hawi; Michael Gill; Mark A. Bellgrove