Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David Lindquist is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David Lindquist.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2012

Outcomes from a labor and delivery team training program with simulation component

Maureen G. Phipps; David Lindquist; Edie McConaughey; James A. O'Brien; Christina Raker; Michael J. Paglia

We evaluated the implementation of a labor and delivery unit team training program that included didactic sessions and simulation training with an active clinical unit. Over an 18-month follow-up time period, our team training program showed improvements in patient outcomes as well as in perceptions of patient safety including the dimensions of teamwork and communication.


Academic Emergency Medicine | 2008

Defining Team Performance for Simulation‐based Training: Methodology, Metrics, and Opportunities for Emergency Medicine

Marc Shapiro; Roxane Gardner; Steven A. Godwin; Gregory D. Jay; David Lindquist; Mary Salisbury; Eduardo Salas

Across health care, teamwork is a critical element for effective patient care. Yet, numerous well-intentioned training programs may fail to achieve the desired outcomes in team performance. Hope for the improvement of teamwork in health care is provided by the success of the aviation and military communities in utilizing simulation-based training (SBT) for training and evaluating teams. This consensus paper 1) proposes a scientifically based methodology for SBT design and evaluation, 2) reviews existing team performance metrics in health care along with recommendations, and 3) focuses on leadership as a target for SBT because it has a high likelihood to improve many team processes and ultimately performance. It is hoped that this discussion will assist those in emergency medicine (EM) and the larger health care field in the design and delivery of SBT for training and evaluating teamwork.


Resuscitation | 2010

Comparison of sudden cardiac arrest resuscitation performance data obtained from in-hospital incident chart review and in situ high-fidelity medical simulation

Leo Kobayashi; David Lindquist; Ilse M. Jenouri; Kevin M. Dushay; Donna Haze; Elizabeth Sutton; Jessica L. Smith; Robert J. Tubbs; Frank Overly; John Foggle; Jennifer A. Dunbar-Viveiros; Mark S. Jones; Scott T. Marcotte; David L. Werner; Mary Cooper; Peggy B. Martin; Dominick Tammaro; Gregory D. Jay

INTRODUCTION High-fidelity medical simulation of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) presents an opportunity for systematic probing of in-hospital resuscitation systems. Investigators developed and implemented the SimCode program to evaluate simulations ability to generate meaningful data for system safety analysis and determine concordance of observed results with institutional quality data. METHODS Resuscitation response performance data were collected during in situ SCA simulations on hospital medical floors. SimCode dataset was compared with chart review-based dataset of actual (live) in-hospital resuscitation system performance for SCA events of similar acuity and complexity. RESULTS 135 hospital personnel participated in nine SimCode resuscitations between 2006 and 2008. Resuscitation teams arrived at 2.5+/-1.3 min (mean+/-SD) after resuscitation initiation, started bag-valve-mask ventilation by 2.8+/-0.5 min, and completed endotracheal intubations at 11.3+/-4.0 min. CPR was performed within 3.1+/-2.3 min; arrhythmia recognition occurred by 4.9+/-2.1 min, defibrillation at 6.8+/-2.4 min. Chart review data for 168 live in-hospital SCA events during a contemporaneous period were extracted from institutional database. CPR and defibrillation occurred later during SimCodes than reported by chart review, i.e., live: 0.9+/-2.3 min (p<0.01) and 2.1+/-4.1 min (p<0.01), respectively. Chart review noted fewer problems with CPR performance (simulated: 43% proper CPR vs. live: 98%, p<0.01). Potential causes of discrepancies between resuscitation response datasets included sample size and data limitations, simulation fidelity, unmatched SCA scenario pools, and dissimilar determination of SCA response performance by complementary reviewing methodologies. CONCLUSION On-site simulations successfully generated SCA response measurements for comparison with live resuscitation chart review data. Continued research may refine simulations role in quality initiatives, clarify methodologic discrepancies and improve SCA response.


American Journal of Medical Quality | 2014

A Simulation-Based Training Program Improves Emergency Department Staff Communication

Lynn Sweeney; Otis Warren; Liz Gardner; Adam Rojek; David Lindquist

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of Project CLEAR!, a novel simulation-based training program designed to instill Crew Resource Management (CRM) as the communication standard and to create a service-focused environment in the emergency department (ED) by standardizing the patient encounter. A survey-based study compared physicians’ and nurses’ perceptions of the quality of communication before and after the training program. Surveys were developed to measure ED staff perceptions of the quality of communication between staff members and with patients. Pretraining and posttraining survey results were compared. After the training program, survey scores improved significantly on questions that asked participants to rate the overall communication between staff members and between staff and patients. A simulation-based training program focusing on CRM and standardizing the patient encounter improves communication in the ED, both between staff members and between staff members and patients.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2009

High-Fidelity Medical Simulation as an Assessment Tool for Radiology Residents' Acute Contrast Reaction Management Skills

Robert J. Tubbs; Brian Murphy; Martha B. Mainiero; Marc Shapiro; Leo Kobayashi; David Lindquist; Jessica L. Smith; Nathan Siegel


Stroke | 2016

Abstract TP298: Code Stroke Simulation Training Benefits Junior Neurology Residents

Linda C. Wendell; Bradford B. Thompson; Mahesh V. Jayaraman; Muhib Khan; David Lindquist; Brian Silver; Karen L. Furie


MedEdPORTAL Publications | 2013

A Simulation-Based Resource for Improving Patient Safety and Improving the Patient Experience

Warren Otis; Lynn Sweeney; Adam Rojek; David Lindquist


Archive | 2009

Pearls and Pitfalls in Teaching: What Works, What does not?

Brian Clyne; David Lindquist


MedEdPORTAL Publications | 2009

CMS Transportable Simulation-Based Training Curriculum in Patient Safety

Marc J. Shapiro; Leo Kobayashi; David Lindquist; Christopher Beach; Eric M. Eisenberg; Shawna J. Perry; Robert L. Wears; Kavita Babu; Frank Overly; Pat Croskerry; Ravi S. Behara; Lexa Murphy; Mary Vanderhoef; Cherri Hogbood


Annals of Emergency Medicine | 2008

134: Preliminary Analysis of In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Simulation (SimCode) Training Program

Leo Kobayashi; Marc J. Shapiro; Donna Haze; I.M. Jenouri; David Lindquist; Elizabeth Sutton; Mark S. Jones; S. Marcotte; Peggy B. Martin; Gregory D. Jay

Collaboration


Dive into the David Lindquist's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge