David M. Boruta

Management of women with uterine papillary serous cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) review☆

OBJECTIVE Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) is a clinically and pathologically distinct subtype of endometrial cancer. Although less common than its endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) counterpart, UPSC accounts for a disproportionate number of endometrial cancer related deaths. To date, limited prospective trials exist from which evidence-based management can be developed. This review summarizes the available literature concerning UPSC in an effort to provide the clinician with information pertinent to its management. METHODS MEDLINE was searched for all research articles published in English between January 1, 1966 and May 1, 2009 in which the studied population included women diagnosed with UPSC. Although preference was given to prospective studies, studies were not limited by design or by numbers of subjects given the paucity of available reports. RESULTS UPSC is morphologically and genetically different from EEC. Women often present with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding, but may also present with abnormal cervical cytology, ascites, or a pelvic mass. In some cases, the diagnosis may be made with endometrial biopsy, while in other cases it is not made until the time of definitive surgery. Metastatic disease is common and best identified via comprehensive surgical staging. Local and distant recurrences occur frequently, with extra-pelvic relapses reported most commonly. Optimal cytoreduction and adjuvant platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy appear to improve survival, while adjuvant radiotherapy may contribute to loco-regional disease control. CONCLUSIONS Women diagnosed with UPSC should undergo comprehensive surgical staging and an attempt at optimal cytoreduction. Platinum/taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in the treatment of both early- and advanced-stage patients. Careful long-term surveillance is indicated as many of these women will recur. Prospective clinical trials of women with UPSC are necessary in order to delineate the optimal therapy for women with newly diagnosed and recurrent disease.

Contained power morcellation within an insufflated isolation bag.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique for contained power morcellation within an insufflated isolation bag at the time of uterine specimen removal during minimally invasive gynecologic procedures. METHODS: Over the study period of January 2013 to April 2014, 73 patients underwent morcellation of the uterus or myomas within an insufflated isolation bag at the time of minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy. This technique involves placing the specimen into a large plastic bag within the abdomen, exteriorizing the opening of the bag, insufflating the bag within the peritoneal cavity, and then using a power morcellator within the bag to remove the specimen in a contained fashion. Procedures were performed at four institutions and included multiport laparoscopy, single-site laparoscopy, multiport robot-assisted laparoscopy, or single-site robot-assisted laparoscopy. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were collected for the cases. RESULTS: Surgical specimen morcellation within an insufflated isolation bag was successfully used in all cases. The median operative time was 114 minutes (range 32–380 minutes), median estimated blood loss was 50 mL (range 10–500 mL), and the median specimen weight was 257 g (range 53–1,481 g). There were no complications related to the contained morcellation technique nor was there visual evidence of tissue dissemination outside of the isolation bag. CONCLUSION: Morcellation within an insufflated isolation bag is a feasible technique. Methods for morcellating uterine tissue in a contained manner may provide an option to minimize the risks of open power morcellation while preserving the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

Management of women with clear cell endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) review

OBJECTIVE Clear cell endometrial cancer (CCE) is an uncommon but important disease because of its aggressive behavior. Furthermore, prospective, randomized studies are either too difficult or impossible because of the small number of women affected. This review explores the differences between clear cell and endometrioid endometrial cancer. In addition, it uses available evidence to determine the best approach to management. METHODS Medline was searched between January 1, 1966 and December 31, 2008 for all publications in English where the studied population included women diagnosed with CCE. Qualifying studies must have had at least 30 patients. RESULTS Clear cell histology is diagnosed in less than 6% of all endometrial cancers and its incidence increases with age. Diagnosis can be made using the same tests that are used in the diagnosis of other types of endometrial cancer. Clear cell histology is morphologically and genetically different from the more prevalent endometrioid endometrial cancer histology. It shares many similarities with clear cell neoplasms of the ovary and kidney. Comprehensive surgical staging is critical in order to plan appropriate postoperative management. Adjuvant pelvic and/or whole abdominal radiotherapy have not been shown to be clearly beneficial in women diagnosed with clear cell endometrial cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatinum, taxol and doxorubicin either in a doublet or triplet combination has demonstrated efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Women diagnosed with CCE require comprehensive surgical staging. Platinum based adjuvant chemotherapy in a doublet or triplet format in combination with paclitaxel and/or doxorubicin should be considered as part of treatment of these women. Careful long term surveillance following treatment is indicated given the higher rate of recurrence compared to endometrioid endometrial cancer.

First 100 early endometrial cancer cases treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a multicentric retrospective study

OBJECTIVE We sought to assess feasibility and perioperative outcomes for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in early endometrial cancer. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective multicentric study of 100 early endometrial cancer cases undergoing LESS from July 2009 through July 2011. RESULTS All patients underwent total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy by LESS. Pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy were performed in 48 and 27 patients, respectively. A median of 16 pelvic lymph nodes (range, 1-33) and 7 paraaortic lymph nodes (range, 2-28) were retrieved. Both median operative time (129 minutes; range, 45-321) and estimated blood loss (70 mL; range, 10-500) were greater when staging lymphadenectomy was performed (P values = .001). Four intraoperative and 4 postoperative complications were observed. Conversion to standard laparoscopy and laparotomy was necessary for completion of 1 case each. Patients responded positively regarding cosmetic result and minimal postoperative pain control. CONCLUSION LESS further minimizes the invasive nature of surgery and is feasible for treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer.

Tumor size, depth of invasion, and histologic grade as prognostic factors of lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer: A SEER analysis

OBJECTIVES The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the risk of nodal metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer, using the Mayo criteria, in a population-based analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from the SEER registry was reviewed for endometrial cancer cases diagnosed between 1988 and 2010. Patients were considered at low-risk for nodal metastasis if their tumors were histologic grade 1 or 2, myometrial invasion was less than 50%, and tumor size equal to or less than 2 cm. Patients not meeting these criteria were considered at high-risk for nodal involvement. RESULTS The final study group consisted of 19,329 women with surgically staged endometrial cancer. Of these, 1035 (5.3%) had lymph node involvement. Based on Mayo criteria, 4095 (21.1%) patients were found to be at low-risk and 15,234 (78.9%) at high-risk for nodal metastasis. Low-risk features were associated with a 1.4% risk for lymph node metastasis, compared to 6.4% in patients with high-risk features (p<0.001). When myometrial invasion was removed from the analysis, low-risk pathologic features were associated with a 2.4% risk of lymph node metastasis, compared to 10.4% in patients with high-risk features (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In a population-based analysis, women with low-risk endometrial cancer, as defined by the Mayo criteria, have a low rate of lymph node metastasis.

Carcinosarcoma of the ovary: A case-control study

INTRODUCTION Carcinosarcoma of the ovary is a rare tumor with a grim prognosis. Chemotherapy for these tumors is chosen according to guidelines established for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The purpose of this study is to compare response to chemotherapy and survival in patients with advanced stage carcinosarcoma of the ovary. METHODS We identified women with advanced carcinosarcoma of the ovary who underwent first-line platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy. Each case was matched to two women with serous EOC. Cases and controls were matched by age, stage, and year of diagnosis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate overall survival (OS) data. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Fifty women treated with first line platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy had advanced carcinosarcoma of the ovary and were selected as cases. The response rates to chemotherapy for cases and controls were 62% and 83% (P=0.03), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 11 months (95% CI, 8 to 14 months) versus 16 months (95% CI, 12 to 21 months; P=0.02) and median overall survival was 24 months (95% CI, 18 to 29 months) versus 41 months (95% CI, 33 to 49 months; P=0.002) for cases and controls, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients with advanced carcinosarcoma of the ovary have a poorer response to platinum and taxane-based first-line chemotherapy and worse survival, compared to patients with serous EOC. Aggressive surgical treatment may play an important role. However, other alternative systemic therapeutic approaches should be sought for patients with carcinosarcoma of the ovary.

Recurrent endometrial cancer.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States. The majority of women are diagnosed with early-stage, low-grade endometrioid tumors that are highly curable with primary surgery. Patients with more advanced and/or higher grade disease require multimodality therapy and have a higher risk for recurrence. Although uterine papillary serous carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma are diagnosed infrequently, they account for almost half of all relapses. As women with recurrent endometrial cancer constitute a heterogeneous group, an individualized approach is required. We review the treatment options of surgery, radiation, hormonal therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and biological agents.

Patient, treatment and discharge factors associated with hospital readmission within 30 days after surgical cytoreduction for epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE Hospital readmissions are common, costly and increasingly viewed as adverse events. In gynecologic oncology, data on readmissions are limited. The goal of this study was to examine the patient, treatment and discharge factors associated with unplanned readmission after cytoreductive surgery. METHODS We identified all patients with stages II-IV ovarian cancer who underwent surgical cytoreduction at our institution between 2003 and 2011. A retrospective chart review was performed, and clinical variables were extracted. Utilizing linear and logistic regression, these clinical variables were correlated with risk of readmission. RESULTS A total of 460 patients were included in the analysis, with the majority having a stage IIIC high grade serous cancer. Optimal cytoreduction (<1.0 cm residual disease) was obtained in 368 patients (81%), and 233 patients (50%) underwent at least one radical procedure. Perioperative complications were observed in 148 patients (32%). A large proportion of our cohort was discharged to rehabilitation facilities (12%) or with a visiting nurse (38%). Fifty five patients (12%) were readmitted within 30 days. On multivariate logistic regression, reoperation and perioperative cardiopulmonary event were the only factors associated with readmission (OR=3.2, 95% CI=1.7-6.0). Discharge home with ancillary services was not protective against readmission, even when controlling for perioperative complications (OR=1.18, 95% CI=0.53-2.64). CONCLUSIONS Readmission after surgical cytoreduction affected 12% of our population. Multivariate analyses suggested perioperative complications, particularly reoperation and cardiopulmonary event, placed the patient at the greatest risk. Age, comorbidities, surgical radicality and discharge with visiting nurse services/rehabilitation facility did not affect the likelihood of readmission.

Racial disparities in treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the patterns of care and survival for African American and white women with high-grade endometrial cancer. METHODS: The linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare databases were queried to identify patients diagnosed with grade 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma, uterine carcinosarcoma, uterine clear cell carcinoma, and uterine serous carcinoma between 1992 and 2009. The effect of treatment modality on survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 9,042 patients met study eligibility criteria. African Americans had definitive surgery (76.8% compared with 88.7%; P<.001) less frequently. There was no difference in the rate of adjuvant treatment between the groups. In the crude models for both all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality, African American women had an increased overall and disease-specific hazard of death compared with white women. The overall hazard ratio for African American women was 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5–1.7), and the disease-specific hazard ratio was 1.5 (95% CI 1.3–1.6). Over the entire study period, after adjusting for stage, age, period of diagnosis, registry region, urban compared with rural setting, marital status, treatment, surgery, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities, there was no association between race and lower disease-specific survival (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 1–1.2; P=.06). CONCLUSION: African American women had lower cancer-specific and all-cause survival compared with white women. Controlling for treatment, sociodemographics, comorbidities, and histopathologic variables eliminated the difference between African American and white women in the disease-specific analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III

Racial disparities in cervical cancer survival over time

The purpose of this study is to examine changes over time in survival for African American (AA) and white women diagnosed with cervical cancer (CC).