David M. Kendall

Effects of hemipancreatectomy on insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in healthy humans

Pancreatic tissue obtained by hemipancreatectomy from healthy living related donors has been transplanted into recipients with Type I diabetes mellitus. To determine the metabolic consequences of this procedure for the donors, we carried out oral glucose-tolerance testing and 24-hour monitoring of serum glucose levels and urinary C-peptide excretion as a measure of insulin secretion in 28 donors, both before and one year after hemipancreatectomy. The mean fasting serum glucose level was significantly higher one year after the procedure (mean +/- SD, 5.4 +/- 0.9 vs. 4.9 +/- 0.5 mmol per liter; P less than 0.003), as was the serum glucose value two hours after the administration of glucose (8.7 +/- 2.9 vs. 6.5 +/- 1.0 mmol per liter; P less than 0.001). The fasting serum insulin level was significantly lower one year after hemipancreatectomy (33.0 +/- 21.6 vs. 38.4 +/- 21.6 pmol per liter; P less than 0.05), as was the area under the insulin curves during the oral glucose-tolerance test (52,554 +/- 22,320 vs. 76,230 +/- 33,354 pmol per liter per minute; P less than 0.04). The mean 24-hour serum glucose-profile value was higher at one year, and the 24-hour urinary C-peptide excretion was lower in the 17 donors who underwent these studies. Seven of the 28 donors had abnormal glucose tolerance one year after hemipancreatectomy; however, insulin secretion in these 7 donors was indistinguishable from that in the 21 donors who had normal glucose tolerance. All 28 donors had fasting serum glucose concentrations lower than 7.8 mmol per liter, and their mean 24-hour plasma glucose levels remained within the normal range. We conclude that in healthy donors hemipancreatectomy results in a deterioration of insulin secretion and glucose tolerance, as measured one year later. Further study is required to ascertain whether the development of clinical diabetes mellitus is a risk inherent in hemipancreatectomy.

Preserved Insulin Secretion and Insulin Independence in Recipients of Islet Autografts

BACKGROUND Transplantation of pancreatic islets, rather than whole pancreas, has been introduced as a treatment for diabetes mellitus. We studied five patients ranging in age from 12 to 37 years who had severe chronic pancreatitis for which they underwent total pancreatectomy followed by isolation and hepatic transplantation of their own islets. METHODS All patients had remained insulin-independent for 1 to 7 1/2 years after transplantation. The numbers of islets transplanted ranged from 110,000 to 412,000. Islet function was assessed by measuring the plasma insulin responses to intravenous glucose and arginine and the plasma glucagon responses to hypoglycemia and arginine. In one patient, islet function was studied during catheterization of the hepatic vein, portal vein, and splenic artery and by analysis of a liver-biopsy specimen. RESULTS After transplantation, the mean (+/- SD) fasting plasma glucose concentration was 122 +/- 47 mg per deciliter (6.8 +/- 2.6 mmol per liter) and the hemoglobin A1c concentration was 6.0 +/- 0.8 percent in the five patients. The values were most abnormal--214 mg per deciliter (11.9 mmol per liter) and 7.3 percent, respectively--in the patient who received only 110,000 islets. The acute plasma insulin responses to glucose and to arginine in the five patients were 23 +/- 13 and 26 +/- 10 microU per milliliter (168 +/- 94 and 184 +/- 70 pmol per liter), respectively, as compared with 58 +/- 6 and 37 +/- 8 microU per milliliter (416 +/- 44 and 267 +/- 61 pmol per liter) in the normal subjects. The peak plasma glucagon responses to insulin and arginine were 21 +/- 4 and 65 +/- 36 pg per milliliter, respectively, as compared with 125 +/- 28 and 156 +/- 99 pg per milliliter in the normal subjects. All five patients had plasma epinephrine but not pancreatic polypeptide responses to hypoglycemia. The results of the hepatic-vein catheterization in one patient indicated that the transplanted islets released insulin and glucagon in response to arginine. Immunoperoxidase staining of this patients liver-biopsy specimen showed that the islets contained insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin but not pancreatic polypeptide. CONCLUSIONS Intrahepatic transplantation of as few as 265,000 islets can result in the release of insulin and glucagon at appropriate times and in prolonged periods of insulin independence.

Defective Glucagon Secretion During Sustained Hypoglycemia Following Successful Islet Allo- and Autotransplantation in Humans

Defective glucagon secretion during hypoglycemia is characteristic of long-standing type I diabetes. To determine whether this defect can be corrected by successful intrahepatic islet transplantation, we performed studies of hypoglycemia in four nondiabetic patients with chronic pancreatitis who had undergone total pancreatectomy and successful intrahepatic islet autotransplantation, in two type I diabetic recipients of successful intrahepatic islet allotransplantation, and in matched control subjects. We examined 1) whether intrahepatic islet autotransplantation provides glucagon secretion during prolonged periods of hypoglycemia and 2) whether intrahepatic islet allotransplantation in type I diabetic patients and consequent long-term normoglycemia reestablishes native α-cell responses to hypoglycemia. Glucagon secretion was assessed during 3-h hypoglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp studies. The islet autograft recipients were studied 63 ± 19 months posttransplant, and all were insulinindependent and normoglycemic (HbA1c, 5.8 ±± 0.2%). Neither allograft recipient required exogenous insulin and maintained HbA1c levels of 5.7 and 6.4% 30 and 34 months posttransplant, respectively. All recipients were normoglycemic (fasting glucose: autograft recipients, 5.6 ± 0.1 mmol/l; allograft recipient #1, 6.3 mmol/l; allograft recipient #2, 5.8 mmol/l) at the time of study. During hypoglycemia, no increase in glucagon secretion was observed in either the auto- or allotransplant recipients, whereas healthy control subjects and recipients of kidney transplantation had significant increases in glucagon. In contrast, both allo- and autograft recipients had glucagon responses to intravenous arginine. These data uniquely demonstrate that: 1) intrahepatic islet transplant grafts secrete glucagon in response to arginine, but fail to secrete glucagon in response to sustained hypoglycemia; and 2) the restoration of sustained normoglycemia for over 2 years in type I diabetic patients may not reestablish glucagon responses from the native pancreas during hypoglycemia. Transplantation sites other than the liver may be required to achieve normal glucagon secretion from the transplanted islets.

Pancreas Transplantation Restores Epinephrine Response and Symptom Recognition During Hypoglycemia in Patients With Long-Standing Type I Diabetes and Autonomic Neuropathy

Impaired epinephrine secretion and symptom unawareness are characteristic of severe hypoglycemia in individuals with long-standing type I diabetes. Recently, the avoidance of clinical hypoglycemia has been reported to improve epinephrine and symptom responses to hypoglycemia in type I patients. However, the extent to which these defects can be restored in individuals with long-standing type I diabetes and autonomic neuropathy has not been assessed, nor has it been determined whether pancreas transplantation, which not only obviates hypoglycemia but also prevents hyperglycemia, results in the complete recovery of either epinephrine response or symptom awareness during insulin-induced hypoglycemia. We performed stepped hypoglycemic clamp studies in successful pancreas transplantation recipients to assess epinephrine and other counterregulatory hormone responses during hypoglycemia and to determine the degree to which hypoglycemic symptom recognition could be restored. Thirteen pancreas transplant recipients and matched control subjects were studied utilizing stepped hypoglycemic clamp protocol to achieve target glucose levels of 3.9, 3.3, 2.8, and 2.2 mmol/l (70, 60, 50, and 40 mg/dl, respectively). Plasma epinephrine response was significantly greater in healthy control subjects and pancreas transplant patients compared with type I subjects at the glucose plateaus of 3.9, 3.3, and 2.8 mmol/l. However, epinephrine response in pancreas transplant recipients was significantly less than that seen in either healthy control subjects or nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients at each of these glucose plateaus. The magnitude of the epinephrine response in pancreas transplant type I patients did not correlate with either the duration of diabetes, the duration of transplantation, or the measures of autonomic nerve function. Hypoglycemic symptom recognition was significantly greater in pancreas transplant subjects than type I patients and did not differ between pancreas transplant and control groups. No improvement in norepinephrine response was observed after pancreas transplantation, while glucagon responses to hypoglycemia were normalized in pancreas transplant patients. In conclusion, these studies uniquely demonstrate that successful pancreas transplantation improves epinephrine response and normalizes hypoglycemia symptom recognition in patients with long-standing diabetes and established autonomic neuropathy. No correlation was observed between the severity of autonomic neuropathy or the duration of diabetes and the recovery of either the epinephrine or symptom responses to hypoglycemia.

The Defective Glucagon Response From Transplanted Intrahepatic Pancreatic Islets During Hypoglycemia Is Transplantation Site–Determined

The optimal site for pancreatic islet cell transplantation is presently unclear, although the liver has been the most commonly used. However, glucagon secretion from islets that have been autotransplanted in liver has been reported to be unresponsive to hypoglycemia yet responsive to arginine. To determine whether this selective glucagon secretory defect is related to the intrahepatic site of islet implantation or to the process of transplantation per se, we studied counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in dogs with pancreatic islet autotransplantation in the hepatic parenchyma (the intrahepatic [IH] group, n = 9) or the peritoneal cavity (the intraperitoneal [IP] group, n = 9), following total pancreatectomy, and compared them with the responses in normal controls (n = 10). Dogs were subjected to a hypoglycemic hyperinsulinemic (5 mU · kg−1 min−1) clamp for 90 min under general anesthesia. Arterial glucose concentrations were clamped at 2.7 mmol/l for the final 45 min of the clamp. Immediately following the clamp, glucagon responses to IV arginine (5 g) were also assessed. During hypoglycemia, glucagon responses in the IH group (maximal incremental glucagon = 33 ± 21 ng/l; glucagon area under curve [AUC] = 713 ± 1,022 ng · 1−1 · min−1) were significantly lower than either the IP (maximal incremental glucagon = 92 ± 32 ng/l; glucagon AUC = 4,090 ± 1,600 ng · 1−1 · min−1) or control (maximal incremental glucagon = 154 ± 71 ng/l; glucagon AUC = 6,943 ± 2,842 ng · 1−1 · min−1) group (IH vs. IP group, P < 0.05; control vs. IH group, P < 0.01). Glucagon responses in the IP group did not differ significantly from the control group. Epinephrine responses to hypoglycemia were similar in all groups, whereas neither of the transplanted groups (IH and IP) had pancreatic polypeptide responses. There was a prompt rise in plasma glucagon after intravenous arginine in all groups. These data indicate that glucagon unresponsiveness to hypoglycemia is specific to intrahepatically transplanted islets, rendering the liver a disadvantageous site for optimal α-cell function.

Improvement of Glycemic Control, Triglycerides, and HDL Cholesterol Levels With Muraglitazar, a Dual (α/γ) Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor Activator, in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy

OBJECTIVE—We sought to evaluate the effects of muraglitazar, a dual (α/γ) peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR) activator within the new glitazar class, on hyperglycemia and lipid abnormalities. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was performed in 1,159 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. Patients received once-daily doses of either 5 mg muraglitazar or 30 mg pioglitazone for a total of 24 weeks in addition to open-label metformin. Patients were continued in a double-blind fashion for an additional 26 weeks. RESULTS—Analyses were conducted at week 24 for HbA1c (A1C) and at week 12 for lipid parameters. Mean A1C at baseline was 8.12 and 8.13% in muraglitazar and pioglitazone groups, respectively. At week 24, muraglitazar reduced mean A1C to 6.98% (−1.14% from baseline), and pioglitazone reduced mean A1C to 7.28% (−0.85% from baseline; P < 0.0001, muraglitazar vs. pioglitazone). At week 12, muraglitazar and pioglitazone reduced mean plasma triglyceride (−28 vs. −14%), apolipoprotein B (−12 vs. −6%), and non-HDL cholesterol (−6 vs. −1%) and increased HDL cholesterol (19 vs. 14%), respectively (P < 0.0001 vs. pioglitazone for all comparisons). At week 24, weight gain (1.4 and 0.6 kg, respectively) and edema (9.2 and 7.2%, respectively) were observed in the muraglitazar and pioglitazone groups; at week 50, weight gain and edema were 2.5 and 1.5 kg, respectively, and 11.8 and 8.9%, respectively. At week 50, heart failure was reported in seven patients (five with muraglitazar and two with pioglitazone), and seven deaths occurred: three from sudden death, two from cerebrovascular accident, and one from pancreatic cancer in the muraglitazar group and one from perforated duodenal ulcer in the pioglitazone group. CONCLUSIONS—We found that 5 mg muraglitazar resulted in greater improvements in A1C and lipid parameters than a submaximal dose of 30 mg pioglitazone when added to metformin. Weight gain and edema were more common when muraglitazar was compared with a submaximal dose of pioglitazone.

Consensus Report of the Coalition for Clinical Research—Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose

The Coalition for Clinical Research—Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Scientific Board, a group of nine academic clinicians and scientists from the United States and Europe, convened in San Francisco, California, on June 11–12, 2008, to discuss the appropriate uses of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and the measures necessary to accurately assess the potential benefit of this practice in noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Thirteen consultants from the United States, Europe, and Canada from academia, practice, and government also participated and contributed based on their fields of expertise. These experts represent a range of disciplines that include adult endocrinology, pediatric endocrinology, health education, mathematics, statistics, psychology, nutrition, exercise physiology, and nursing. This coalition was organized by Diabetes Technology Management, Inc. Among the participants, there was consensus that: protocols assessing the performance of SMBG in noninsulin treated T2DM must provide the SMBG intervention subjects with blood glucose (BG) goals and instructions on how to respond to BG data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); intervention subjects in clinical trials of SMBG-driven interventions must aggressively titrate their therapeutic responses or lifestyle changes in response to hyperglycemia; control subjects in clinical trials of SMBG must be isolated from SMBG-driven interventions and not be contaminated by physician experience with study subjects receiving a SMBG intervention; the best endpoints to measure in a clinical trial of SMBG in T2DM include delta Hemoglobin A1c levels, hyperglycemic events, hypoglycemic events, time to titrate noninsulin therapy to a maximum necessary dosage, and quality of life indices; either individual randomization or cluster randomization may be appropriate methods for separating control subjects from SMBG intervention subjects, provided that precautions are taken to avoid bias and that the sample size is adequate; treatment algorithms for assessing SMBG in T2DM may include a dietary, exercise, and/or medication intervention, which are all titratable according to the SMBG values; the medical literature contains very little information about the performance of SMBG in T2DM from RCTs in which treatment algorithms were used for dysglycemic values; and research on the performance of SMBG in T2DM based on sound scientific principles and clinical practices is needed at this time.

Eating disorders and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

The eating disorders anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa have been reported to occur in Type I diabetes mellitus. Although prevalence estimates vary, the most rigorous studies yield rates similar to the population at large. Intentional insulin omission is more common, especially in young diabetic women, and at times may indicate an eating disorder in Type I diabetic patients. Both diagnosable eating disorders and intentional insulin omission are associated with worse glycemic control and higher rates of secondary diabetic complications. Recognition of these conditions, followed by carefully coordinated treatment involving both diabetes care providers and mental health providers, is necessary to improve treatment outcome.

Type 2 Diabetes: Assessing the Relative Risks and Benefits of Glucose-lowering Medications

The selection of appropriate pharmacologic therapy for any disease requires a careful assessment of benefit and risk. In the case of type 2 diabetes, this decision typically balances the benefits accrued from improved glycemic control with the risks inherent in glucose-lowering medications. This review is intended to assist therapeutic decision-making by carefully assessing the potential benefit from improved metabolic control relative to the potential risks of a wide array of currently prescribed glucose-lowering agents. Wherever possible, risks and benefits have been expressed in terms of absolute rates (events per 1000 patient-years) to facilitate cross-study comparisons. The review incorporates data from new studies (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation, Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes, and the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial), as well as safety issues associated with newer glucose-lowering medications.

Restored hypoglycemic counterregulation is stable in successful pancreas transplant recipients for up to 19 years after transplantation.

Background. Pancreas transplantation has been shown to fully restore glucagon response and partially restore epinephrine response to hypoglycemia during the first few years after transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes. However, prior studies have not examined hypoglycemic counterregulation in any pancreas transplant recipient of more than 6 years’ duration. Methods. To determine whether restoration of hypoglycemic counterregulation is maintained over a prolonged period after transplantation, we studied counterregulatory responses and symptom recognition in two groups of pancreas transplant recipients using a stepped hypoglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp. Group 1 consisted of 11 successful transplant recipients of 11 to 19 years’ duration (mean±SE, 13.9±0.7 years). Group 2A consisted of seven successful pancreas transplant recipients of 5 to 11 years’ duration (mean±SE, 8.7±0.9 years) who had been studied approximately 5 years earlier using the same stepped, hypoglycemic clamp technique. Results. Both groups had significant rises in plasma glucagon during the hypoglycemic clamp similar to that seen in short-term recipients and normal controls. Both groups also had significant increases in plasma epinephrine responses similar to that seen in short-term transplant recipients but less than that of normal control subjects. The mean symptom scores of group 1 were significantly less than those of the control group at glucose levels of 60 and 50 mg/dL but not at 40 mg/dL. The mean symptom scores of group 2A were not significantly different than that of control subjects. Conclusion. These results indicate that the restoration of hypoglycemic counterregulation by pancreas transplantation remains stable in successful pancreas transplant recipients for up to 19 years after transplantation.