David M. Rancour

Characterization of AtCDC48. Evidence for multiple membrane fusion mechanisms at the plane of cell division in plants.

The components of the cellular machinery that accomplish the various complex and dynamic membrane fusion events that occur at the division plane during plant cytokinesis, including assembly of the cell plate, are not fully understood. The most well-characterized component, KNOLLE, a cell plate-specific soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF)-attachment protein receptor (SNARE), is a membrane fusion machine component required for plant cytokinesis. Here, we show the plant ortholog of Cdc48p/p97, AtCDC48, colocalizes at the division plane in dividing Arabidopsis cells with KNOLLE and another SNARE, the plant ortholog of syntaxin 5, SYP31. In contrast to KNOLLE, SYP31 resides in defined punctate membrane structures during interphase and is targeted during cytokinesis to the division plane. In vitro-binding studies demonstrate that AtCDC48 specifically interacts in an ATP-dependent manner with SYP31 but not with KNOLLE. In contrast, we show that KNOLLE assembles in vitro into a large approximately 20S complex in an Sec18p/NSF-dependent manner. These results suggest that there are at least two distinct membrane fusion pathways involving Cdc48p/p97 and Sec18p/NSF that operate at the division plane to mediate plant cytokinesis. Models for the role of AtCDC48 and SYP31 at the division plane will be discussed.

In Planta Analysis of the Cell Cycle-Dependent Localization of AtCDC48A and Its Critical Roles in Cell Division, Expansion, and Differentiation

CDC48/p97 is a conserved homohexameric AAA-ATPase chaperone required for a variety of cellular processes but whose role in the development of a multicellular model system has not been examined. Here, we have used reverse genetics, visualization of a functional Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CDC48 fluorescent fusion protein, and morphological analysis to examine the subcellular distribution and requirements for AtCDC48A in planta. Homozygous Atcdc48A T-DNA insertion mutants arrest during seedling development, exhibiting decreased cell expansion and displaying pleiotropic defects in pollen and embryo development. Atcdc48A insertion alleles show significantly reduced male transmission efficiency due to defects in pollen tube growth. Yellow fluorescent protein-AtCDC48A, a fusion protein that functionally complements the insertion mutant defects, localizes in the nucleus and cytoplasm and is recruited to the division mid-zone during cytokinesis. The pattern of nuclear localization differs according to the stage of the cell cycle and differentiation state. Inducible expression of an Atcdc48A Walker A ATPase mutant in planta results in cytokinesis abnormalities, aberrant cell divisions, and root trichoblast differentiation defects apparent in excessive root hair emergence. At the biochemical level, our data suggest that the endogenous steady-state protein level of AtCDC48A is dependent upon the presence of ATPase-active AtCDC48A. These results demonstrate that CDC48A/p97 is critical for cytokinesis, cell expansion, and differentiation in plants.

Protein Domain-Domain Interactions and Requirements for the Negative Regulation of Arabidopsis CDC48/p97 by the Plant Ubiquitin Regulatory X (UBX) Domain-containing Protein, PUX1

CDC48/p97 is an essential AAA-ATPase chaperone that functions in numerous diverse cellular activities through its interaction with specific adapter proteins. The ubiquitin regulatory X (UBX)-containing protein, PUX1, functions to regulate the hexameric structure and ATPase activity of AtCDC48. To characterize the biochemical mechanism of PUX1 action on AtCDC48, we have defined domains of both PUX1 and AtCDC48 that are critical for interaction and oligomer disassembly. Binding of PUX1 to AtCDC48 was mediated through a region containing both the UBX domain and the immediate C-terminal flanking amino acids (UBX-C). Like other UBX domains, the primary binding site for the UBX-C of PUX1 is the Na domain of AtCDC48. Alternative plant PUX protein UBX domains also bind AtCDC48 through the N terminus but were found not to be able to substitute for the action imparted by the UBX-C of PUX1 in hexamer disassembly, suggesting unique features for the UBX-C of PUX1. We propose that the PUX1 UBX-C domain modulates a second binding site on AtCDC48 required for the N-terminal domain of PUX1 to interact with and promote dissociation of the AtCDC48 hexamer. Utilizing Atcdc48 ATP hydrolysis and binding mutants, we demonstrate that PUX1 binding was not affected but that hexamer disassembly was significantly influenced by the ATP status of AtCDC48. ATPase activity in both the D1 and the D2 domains was critical for PUX1-mediated AtCDC48 hexamer disassembly. Together these results provide new mechanistic insight into how the hexameric status and ATPase activity of AtCDC48 are modulated.

The Microtubule Plus-End Tracking Proteins SPR1 and EB1b Interact to Maintain Polar Cell Elongation and Directional Organ Growth in Arabidopsis

This work shows that Arabidopsis EB1b and SPR1, two microtubule plus-end tracking proteins, interact both genetically and biochemically. These proteins have complex interactions as they load onto microtubules and direct polar cell expansion and chiral organ growth in response to directional cues. The microtubule plus-end tracking proteins (+TIPs) END BINDING1b (EB1b) and SPIRAL1 (SPR1) are required for normal cell expansion and organ growth. EB proteins are viewed as central regulators of +TIPs and cell polarity in animals; SPR1 homologs are specific to plants. To explore if EB1b and SPR1 fundamentally function together, we combined genetic, biochemical, and cell imaging approaches in Arabidopsis thaliana. We found that eb1b-2 spr1-6 double mutant roots exhibit substantially more severe polar expansion defects than either single mutant, undergoing right-looping growth and severe axial twisting instead of waving on tilted hard-agar surfaces. Protein interaction assays revealed that EB1b and SPR1 bind each other and tubulin heterodimers, which is suggestive of a microtubule loading mechanism. EB1b and SPR1 show antagonistic association with microtubules in vitro. Surprisingly, our combined analyses revealed that SPR1 can load onto microtubules and function independently of EB1 proteins, setting SPR1 apart from most studied +TIPs in animals and fungi. Moreover, we found that the severity of defects in microtubule dynamics in spr1 eb1b mutant hypocotyl cells correlated well with the severity of growth defects. These data indicate that SPR1 and EB1b have complex interactions as they load onto microtubule plus ends and direct polar cell expansion and organ growth in response to directional cues.

Protein Antigen Expression in Escherichia coli for Antibody Production

Escherichia coli is a frequently used expression system for the generation of protein encoded by genes from diverse kingdoms and, thus, it is well suited for the production of protein antigens for antibody generation. It is a system of choice for many due to factors such as (1) the commercial availability of a vast array of reagents and materials needed for cloning, expression, and purification and (2) the potential high protein yields that can be acquired in a timely and cost-effective manner. This chapter will focus on (1) the general principles to keep in mind when choosing an antigen to express and (2) the use of a modified pGEX vector system (Rancour et al., J. Biol. Chem. 279:54264-54274, 2004) to use in its expression. Simplified protocols are provided for (1) assessing the expression of your protein, (2) testing whether your protein is or is not expressed as a soluble product, (3) performing bulk purifications of soluble or insoluble E. coli-expressed protein to acquire enough to be used for a complete immunization protocol, and (4) an optional procedure for epitope tag removal from your expressed protein of interest in order to avoid the unnecessary and sometimes unwanted production of antibodies against the fusion protein affinity chromatography tag. These four procedures have been used extensively and successfully in our lab as a basis for the production of recombinant protein and subsequent antibody production.