David McKelvie
University of Edinburgh
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David McKelvie.
Speech Communication | 2001
David McKelvie; Amy Isard; Andreas Mengel; Morten Baun Møller; Michael Grosse; Marion Klein
Abstract This paper describes the design and implementation of the MATE workbench, a program which provides support for the annotation of speech and text. It provides facilities for flexible display and editing of such annotations, and complex querying of a resulting corpus. The workbench offers a more flexible approach than most existing annotation tools, which were often designed with a specific annotation scheme in mind. Any annotation scheme can be used with the MATE workbench, provided it is coded using XML markup (linked to the speech signal, if available, using certain conventions). The workbench uses a transformation language to define specialised editors optimised for particular annotation tasks, with suitable display formats and allowable editing operations tailored to the task. The workbench is written in Java, which means that it is platform-independent. This paper outlines the design of the workbench software and compares it with other annotation programs.
conference on applied natural language processing | 1997
David McKelvie; Chris Brew; Henry S. Thompson
This paper describes the LT NSL system (McKelvie et al, 1996), an architecture for writing corpus processing tools. This system is then compared with two other systems which address similar issues, the GATE system (Cunningham et al, 1995) and the IMS Corpus Workbench (Christ, 1994). In particular we address the advantages and disadvantages of an SGML approach compared with a non-SGML database approach.
Computers and The Humanities | 1997
David McKelvie; Chris Brew; Henry S. Thompson
This paper describes the LT NSL system (McKelvie et al., 1996), an architecture for writing corpus processing tools. This system is then compared with two other systems which address similar issues, the GATE system (Cunningham et al., 1995) and the IMS Corpus Workbench (Christ, 1994). In particular we address the advantages and disadvantages of an SGML approach compared with a non-sgml database approach.
Archive | 1997
Henry S. Thompson; David McKelvie
Archive | 1996
Chris Brew; David McKelvie
14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences | 1999
Holly Branigan; R. J. Lickley; David McKelvie
Archive | 1996
Henry S. Thompson; Ronald G. Tobin; David McKelvie; Chris Brew
language resources and evaluation | 1998
Susan Armstrong; Masja Kempen; David McKelvie; Dominique Petitpierre; Reinhard Rapp; Henry S. Thompson
conference of the international speech communication association | 1998
Amy Isard; David McKelvie; Henry S. Thompson
Archive | 1998
Amy Isard; David McKelvie; B. Cappelli; Stefan Evert; Arne Fitschen; Ulrich Heid; Michael Kipp; Mark H. Klein; Andreas Mengel; M. M ller; Norbert Reithinger