David N. Gans
University of Minnesota
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David N. Gans.
Health Affairs | 2009
Lawrence P. Casalino; Sean Nicholson; David N. Gans; Terry Hammons; Dante Morra; Theodore Karrison; Wendy Levinson
Physicians have long expressed dissatisfaction with the time they and their staffs spend interacting with health plans. However, little information exists about the extent of these interactions. We conducted a national survey on this subject of physicians and practice administrators. Physicians reported spending three hours weekly interacting with plans; nursing and clerical staff spent much larger amounts of time. When time is converted to dollars, we estimate that the national time cost to practices of interactions with plans is at least
Health Affairs | 2016
Lawrence P. Casalino; David N. Gans; Rachel Weber; Meagan Cea; Amber Tuchovsky; Tara F. Bishop; Yesenia Miranda; Brittany A. Frankel; Kristina B. Ziehler; Meghan M. Wong; Todd B. Evenson
23 billion to
Health Affairs | 2011
Dante Morra; Sean Nicholson; Wendy Levinson; David N. Gans; Terry Hammons; Lawrence P. Casalino
31 billion each year.
Health Care Management Review | 2016
Robert F. Coulam; John E. Kralewski; Bryan Dowd; David N. Gans
Each year US physician practices in four common specialties spend, on average, 785 hours per physician and more than
Health Affairs | 2005
David N. Gans; John E. Kralewski; Terry Hammons; Bryan Dowd
15.4 billion dealing with the reporting of quality measures. While much is to be gained from quality measurement, the current system is unnecessarily costly, and greater effort is needed to standardize measures and make them easier to report.
Health Affairs | 2008
Robert A. Berenson; Terry Hammons; David N. Gans; Stephen Zuckerman; Katie Merrell; William S. Underwood; Aimee Williams
Physician practices, especially the small practices with just one or two physicians that are common in the United States, incur substantial costs in time and labor interacting with multiple insurance plans about claims, coverage, and billing for patient care and prescription drugs. We surveyed physicians and administrators in the province of Ontario, Canada, about time spent interacting with payers and compared the results with a national companion survey in the United States. We estimated physician practices in Ontario spent
Archive | 2005
David N. Gans; John E. Kralewski; Terry Hammons; Bryan Dowd
22,205 per physician per year interacting with Canadas single-payer agency--just 27 percent of the
Physician Executive | 2010
John E. Kralewski; Bryan Dowd; Therese M. Zink; David N. Gans
82,975 per physician per year spent in the United States. US nursing staff, including medical assistants, spent 20.6 hours per physician per week interacting with health plans--nearly ten times that of their Ontario counterparts. If US physicians had administrative costs similar to those of Ontario physicians, the total savings would be approximately
Archive | 2009
Stephen Zuckerman; Katie Merrell; Robert A. Berenson; David N. Gans; William S. Underwood; Aimee Williams; Shari M. Erickson; Terry Hammons
27.6 billion per year. The results support the opinion shared by many US health care leaders interviewed for this study that interactions between physician practices and health plans could be performed much more efficiently.
The Journal of ambulatory care management | 2002
Barry R. Greene; John E. Kralewski; David N. Gans; Dawn I. Klinkel
Background: Although there are numerous studies of the factors influencing the adoption of quality assurance (QA) programs by medical group practices, few have focused on the role of group practice administrators. Purpose: To gain insights into the role these administrators play in QA programs, we analyzed how medical practices adopted and implemented the Medicare Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), the largest physician quality reporting system in the United States. Methodology: We conducted focus group interviews in 2011 with a national convenience sample of 76 medical group practice administrators. Responses were organized and analyzed using the innovation decision framework of Van de Ven and colleagues. Findings: Administrators conducted due diligence on PQRS, influenced how the issue was presented to physicians for adoption, and managed implementation thereafter. Administrators’ recommendations were heavily influenced by practice characteristics, financial incentives, and practice commitments to early adoption of quality improvement innovations. Virtually, all who attempted it agreed that PQRS was straightforward to implement. However, the complexities of Medicare’s PQRS reports impeded use of the data by administrators to support quality management. Discussion: Group practice administrators are playing a prominent role in activities related to the quality of patient care—they are not limited to the business side of the practice. Especially, as PQRS becomes more nearly universal after 2014, Medicare should take account of the role that administrators play, by more actively engaging administrators in shaping these programs and making it easier for administrators to use the results. Practice Implications: More research is needed on the rapidly evolving role of nonphysician administration in medical group practices. Practice administrators have a larger role than commonly understood in how quality reporting initiatives are adopted and used and are in an exceptional position to influence the more appropriate use of these resources if supported by more useful forms of quality reporting.