David N. Sundberg
Iowa State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David N. Sundberg.
Weed Science | 2004
Matt Liebman; Fabian D. Menalled; Douglas D. Buhler; Tom L. Richard; David N. Sundberg; Cynthia A. Cambardella; Keith A. Kohler
Abstract Hoop structures bedded with crop residues are becoming increasingly popular for swine production in the northcentral United States. Compost made from bedding materials and swine manure can be used as a soil amendment. A 3-yr field experiment was conducted in Boone, IA, to determine how composted swine manure affected selected soil characteristics and nutrient uptake, growth, and seed production of corn and three weed species (giant foxtail, velvetleaf, and common waterhemp) grown in mixture with corn. Two soil management systems, designed to provide equivalent amounts of N to corn, were compared: one that received composted manure and an average of 118 kg N ha−1 as synthetic fertilizer and another that received no composted manure and an average of 143 kg N ha−1 as synthetic fertilizer. Soil organic matter, P, K, and early-season NO3-N levels were greater in the (+) compost system. The N concentration of velvetleaf shoots, the P concentration of giant foxtail and common waterhemp shoots, and the K concentration of shoots of all three weed species also were greater in the (+) compost system. Compost application consistently increased common waterhemp height, common waterhemp biomass, and velvetleaf height, but increased velvetleaf biomass in only 1 yr and had no effect on giant foxtail height or biomass. Measurements of weed seed production, conducted in the final year of the study, showed that compost increased velvetleaf and common waterhemp seed production but had no effect on giant foxtail seed production. Compost consistently increased corn height and leaf K concentration but generally had no effect on corn yield. Results of this study indicate that large differences can exist among crop and weed species in their response to soil amendments. Depending on the weed species present, use of composted swine manure may increase requirements for weed management in corn production systems. Nomenclature: Common waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer AMATA; giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. SETFA; velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus ABUTH; corn, Zea mays L.
Gcb Bioenergy | 2015
Meghann E. Jarchow; Matt Liebman; Shashi Dhungel; Ranae Dietzel; David N. Sundberg; Robert P. Anex; Michael L. Thompson; Teresita Chua
Cellulosic bioenergy production provides opportunities to utilize a range of cropping systems that can enhance the multifunctionality of agricultural landscapes. In a 9‐ha field experiment located on fertile land in Boone County, IA, USA, we directly compared a corn‐soybean rotation harvested for grain, continuous corn harvested for grain and stover, continuous corn harvested for grain and stover with a rye cover crop, newly reconstructed prairie harvested for biomass and fertilized with nitrogen, and unfertilized newly reconstructed prairie harvested for biomass. Comparisons were made using four performance indicators: harvestable yield, net energy balance (NEB), root production, and nutrient balances. We found trade‐offs among systems in terms of the measured performance indicators. Continuous corn systems were the highest yielding, averaging 13 Mg ha−1 of harvested biomass (grain plus stover), whereas fertilized and unfertilized prairies produced the least harvested biomass at 8.8 and 6.5 Mg ha−1, respectively. Mean NEBs were highest in continuous corn systems at 45.1 GJ ha−1, intermediate in the corn‐soybean rotation at 28.6 GJ ha−1, and lowest in fertilized and unfertilized prairies at 11.4 and 10.5 GJ ha−1, respectively. Concomitant with the high yields of the continuous corn systems were the large nutrient requirements of these systems compared to the prairie systems. Continuous corn with rye required three times more nitrogen inputs than fertilized prairie. Root production, on the other hand, was on average seven times greater in the prairie systems than the annual crop systems. On highly fertile soils, corn‐based cropping systems are likely to play an important role in maintaining the high productivity of agricultural landscapes, but alternative cropping systems, such as prairies used for bioenergy production, can produce substantial yield, require minimal externally derived inputs, and can be incorporated into the landscape at strategic locations to maximize the production of other ecosystem services.
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems | 2013
Robin Gómez Gómez; Matt Liebman; David N. Sundberg; Craig Chase
Cropping systems that include forage legumes and small grains in addition to corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] can achieve similar or higher crop productivity and economic return than simpler corn–soybean rotations. We hypothesized that this rotation effect occurs regardless of the crop genotype planted and the herbicide and cultivation regime selected for weed management. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a 3-year experiment that compared three cropping systems: a conventional 2-year corn–soybean rotation, a 3-year corn–soybean–oat (Avena sativa L.)/red clover (Trifolium pretense L.) rotation, and a 4-year corn–soybean–oat/alfalfa–alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) rotation. Within each cropping system, two contrasting sets of management strategies were used: (i) genetically engineered corn with resistance to insect pests (Ostrinia nubilalis Hubner and Diabrotica spp.) plus the broadcast application of pre-emergence herbicides, followed in the rotation by a genetically engineered soybean variety with resistance to the herbicide glyphosate plus the post-emergence broadcast application of glyphosate; and (ii) nongenetically engineered corn plus the banded application of post-emergence herbicides, followed in the rotation by a nongenetically engineered soybean and banded application of several post-emergence herbicides. The two management strategies were identified as ‘GE’ and ‘non-GE.’ Corn yield was higher in the 3-year (12.51Mgha �1 ) and 4-year (12.79Mgha �1 ) rotations than in the conventional 2-year (12.16Mgha �1 ) rotation, and was also 2% higher with the GE strategy than with the non-GE strategy. Soybean yield was similar among rotation systems in 2008, but higher in the 3- and 4-year systems than the 2-year rotation in 2009 and 2010. Soybean yield was similar between management strategies in 2008, but higher in the GE strategy in 2009, and similar between strategies in the 3- and 4-year rotations in 2010. Increases in rotation length were accompanied by 88–91% reductions in synthetic N fertilizer application, and the use of the non-GE rather than the GE strategy was accompanied by a 93% reduction in herbicide active ingredients applied. Averaged over the period of 2008–2010, net returns to land and labor were highest for the 3-year rotation managed with either the GE (
Agronomy Journal | 2008
Andrew H. Heggenstaller; Robert P. Anex; Matt Liebman; David N. Sundberg; Lance R. Gibson
928ha �1 yr �1 ) or non-GE (
Agronomy Journal | 2008
Matt Liebman; Lance R. Gibson; David N. Sundberg; Andrew H. Heggenstaller; Paula R. Westerman; Craig Chase; Robert G. Hartzler; Fabian D. Menalled; Adam S. Davis; Philip M. Dixon
936ha �1 yr �1 ) strategies, least in the 2-year rotation managed with the non-GE strategy (
Weed Science | 2006
Matt Liebman; David N. Sundberg
738ha �1 yr �1 ), and intermediate in the other rotation×management combinations. Our results indicate that more diverse crop rotation systems can be as profitable as conventional corn–soybean systems and can provide farmers with greater flexibility in crop management options.
Weed Research | 2009
C L Williams; Matt Liebman; Paula R. Westerman; Jaclyn K. Borza; David N. Sundberg; Brent J. Danielson
Weed Research | 2014
Matt Liebman; Zach J. Miller; C L Williams; Paula R. Westerman; Philip M. Dixon; A Heggenstaller; Adam S. Davis; Fabian D. Menalled; David N. Sundberg
Archive | 2014
Matt Liebman; Meghann E. Jarchow; Ranae Dietzel; David N. Sundberg
Archive | 2013
Matt Liebman; Craig Chase; Ann M. Johanns; David N. Sundberg