David Nicolás

Trends in Transmission of Drug Resistance and Prevalence of Non-B Subtypes in Patients with Acute or Recent HIV-1 Infection in Barcelona in the Last 16 Years (1997-2012).

Objectives To evaluate the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and non-B subtypes in patients with acute/recent HIV-1 infection in Barcelona during the period 1997-2012. Methods Patients from the “Hospital Clínic Primary HIV-1 Infection Cohort” with a genotyping test performed within 180 days of infection were included. The 2009 WHO List of Mutations for Surveillance of Transmitted HIV-1 Drug Resistance was used for estimating the prevalence of TDR and phylogenetic analysis for subtype determination. Results 189 patients with acute/recent HIV-1 infection were analyzed in 4 time periods (1997-2000, n=28; 2001-4, n=42; 2005-8, n=55 and 2009-12, n=64). The proportion of patients with acute/recent HIV-1 infection with respect to the total of newly HIV-diagnosed patients in our center increased over the time and was 2.18%, 3.82%, 4.15% and 4.55% for the 4 periods, respectively (p=0.005). The global prevalence of TDR was 9%, or 17.9%, 9.5%, 3.6% and 9.4% by study period (p=0.2). The increase in the last period was driven by protease-inhibitor and nucleoside-reverse-transcriptase-inhibitor resistance mutations while non-nucleoside-reverse-transcriptase inhibitor TDR and TDR of more than one family decreased. The overall prevalence of non-B subtypes was 11.1%, or 0%, 4.8%, 9.1% and 20.3 by study period (p=0.01). B/F recombinants, B/G recombinants and subtype F emerged in the last period. We also noticed an increase in the number of immigrant patients (p=0.052). The proportion of men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) among patients with acute/recent HIV-1 infection increased over the time (p=0.04). Conclusions The overall prevalence of TDR in patients with acute/recent HIV-1 infection in Barcelona was 9%, and it has stayed relatively stable in recent years. Non-B subtypes and immigrants proportions progressively increased.

Integrase strand-transfer inhibitor polymorphic and accessory resistance substitutions in patients with acute/recent HIV infection

Objectives The most recent guidelines suggest using integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (InSTIs) as the preferred antiretroviral regimens for naive HIV-infected individuals. However, resistance to InSTIs is not monitored in many centres at baseline. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of InSTI resistance substitutions in newly diagnosed patients with acute/recent HIV infection. Methods Genotypic drug resistance tests were performed in all consecutive patients prospectively enrolled with a documented infection of <6 months, from 12 May 2015 to 12 May 2016. Sequences were obtained by high-throughput sequencing. Results Five out of 36 consecutive patients (13.89%, 95% CI = 4.67–29.5) with acute/recent HIV infection were detected to have strains carrying InSTI polymorphisms or substitutions conferring low-level resistance to raltegravir and elvitegravir. Four patients had the 157Q polymorphism and one patient had the Q95K substitution. All cases were MSM patients infected with subtype B strains. Viral loads ranged from 2.92 to 6.95 log10 copies/mL. In all cases, the mutational viral load was high. Three patients initiated dolutegravir-based regimens and became undetectable at first viral load control. There were no major viral or epidemiological differences when compared with patients without InSTI substitutions. Conclusions Although signature InSTI substitutions (such as Y143R/C, N155H or Q148K/R/H) were not detected, polymorphisms and substitutions conferring low-level resistance to raltegravir and elvitegravir were frequently found in a baseline genotypic test. All cases were infected with subtype B, the most frequent in Europe. In the context of primary HIV infection, virological response should be carefully monitored to evaluate the impact of these InSTI polymorphisms and substitutions.

Update on antiretroviral treatment during primary HIV infection

Primary HIV-1 infection covers a period of around 12 weeks in which the virus disseminates from the initial site of infection into different tissues and organs. In this phase, viremia is very high and transmission of HIV is an important issue. Most guidelines recommend antiretroviral treatment in patients who are symptomatic, although the indication for treatment remains inconclusive in asymptomatic patients. In this article the authors review the main virological and immunological events during this early phase of infection, and discuss the arguments for and against antiretroviral treatment. Recommendations of different guidelines, the issue of the HIV transmission and transmission of resistance to antiretroviral drugs, as well as recently available information opening perspectives for functional cure in patients treated in very early steps of HIV infection are also discussed.

HIV treatment outcomes in Europe and North America: what can we learn from the differences?

The access to antiretroviral treatment has been largely enlarged in Europe and North America in recent years, due to treatment guidelines that recommend earlier initiation of therapy. However, there are differences and heterogeneities in the health systems and in access and retention to care between different countries and regions, and for different subpopulations among the same country that impact in the final goal, that patients remain undetectable and in good health.

Infection with human retroviruses other than HIV-1: HIV-2, HTLV-1, HTLV-2, HTLV-3 and HTLV-4

HIV-1 is the most prevalent retrovirus, with over 30 million people infected worldwide. Nevertheless, infection caused by other human retroviruses like HIV-2, HTLV-1, HTLV-2, HTLV-3 and HTLV-4 is gaining importance. Initially confined to specific geographical areas, HIV-2, HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 are becoming a major concern in non-endemic countries due to international migration flows. Clinical manifestations of retroviruses range from asymptomatic carriers to life-threatening conditions, such as AIDS in HIV-2 infection or adult T-cell lymphoma/leukemia or tropical spastic paraparesis in HTLV-1 infection. HIV-2 is naturally resistant to some antiretrovirals frequently used to treat HIV-1 infection, but it does have effective antiretroviral therapy options. Unfortunately, HTLV still has limited therapeutic options. In this article, we will review the epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, pathogenic and therapeutic aspects of infections caused by these human retroviruses.

A case of Mycoplasma hominis disseminated infection in a human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected pregnant woman with hypogammaglobulinemia

We describe the case of a disseminated infection due to Mycoplasma hominis in a 25-weeks pregnant woman with vertically transmitted human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infection on combined antiretroviral therapy. Her CD4þ T-cell count was 600 cells/mm and the plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load was undetectable. She had been diagnosed with Burkitt’s lymphoma, and was successfully treated with chemotherapy. One year later, hypogammaglobulinemia attributed to rituximab treatment was detected, and she started treatment with human immunogobulins (Igs). Her last IgA, IgM, and IgG serum levels were <0.30 g/L, <0.21 g/L, and 3.4 g/L, respectively. The patient was admitted to our hospital with 48 hours of fever, cough, and mucopurulent sputum. C-reactive protein was 94.5 mg/L and white cell count 12.90 10/ L. Chest X-ray showed alveolar infiltrates in the lingula and right pulmonary base (Fig. 1A). Empiric broadspectrum antibiotics with meropenem and vancomycin were started (she had been treated for a communityacquired pneumonia 1 month previously). However, high fever persisted. A computed tomography scan showed right supraclavicular and bilateral paratracheal adenopathies and consolidations in both pulmonary bases. A bronchoalveolar lavage was performed and all microbiologic results were negative, including polymerase chain reaction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The patient developed respiratory failure and was transferred to the intensive care unit. A mediastinoscopy was done with biopsies of the adenopathies. Afterwards, a massive right pleural effusion appeared (Fig. 1B). Fetal maturation and HIV prophylaxis with zidovudine were then started and a cesarean section was performed. The baby was transferred to the incubator. A pleural drainage was performed

Voriconazole and cobicistat-boosted antiretroviral salvage regimen co-administration to treat invasive aspergillosis in an HIV-infected patient

Juan Ambrosioni1*†, Sandra Coll2†, Christian Manzardo1, David Nicolás1, Fernando Agüero1, José Luis Blanco1, Montse Tuset3, Mercé Brunet4, José M. Gatell1 and José M. Miró1 Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clinic-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Pharmacy Service, Hospital ClinicIDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Toxicology and Pharmacology Service, Hospital Clinic-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Safe Reduction in CD4 Cell Count Monitoring in Stable, Virally Suppressed Patients With HIV Infection or HIV/Hepatitis C Virus Coinfection

BACKGROUND It has been suggested that routine CD4 cell count monitoring in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-monoinfected patients with suppressed viral loads and CD4 cell counts >300 cell/μL could be reduced to annual. HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is frequent, but evidence supporting similar reductions in CD4 cell count monitoring is lacking for this population. We determined whether CD4 cell count monitoring could be reduced in monoinfected and coinfected patients by estimating the probability of maintaining CD4 cell counts ≥200 cells/µL during continuous HIV suppression. METHODS The PISCIS Cohort study included data from 14 539 patients aged ≥16 years from 10 hospitals in Catalonia and 2 in the Balearic Islands (Spain) since January 1998. All patients who had at least one period of 6 months of continuous HIV suppression were included in this analysis. Cumulative probabilities with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator stratified by the initial CD4 cell count at the period of continuous suppression initiation. RESULTS A total of 8695 patients were included. CD4 cell counts fell to <200 cells/µL in 7.4% patients, and the proportion was lower in patients with an initial count >350 cells/µL (1.8%) and higher in those with an initial count of 200-249 cells/µL (23.1%). CD4 cell counts fell to <200 cells/µL in 5.7% of monoinfected and 11.1% of coinfected patients. Of monoinfected patients with an initial CD4 cell count of 300-349 cells/µL, 95.6% maintained counts ≥200 cells/µL. In the coinfected group with the same initial count, this rate was lower, but 97.6% of coinfected patients with initial counts >350 cells/µL maintained counts ≥200 cells/µL. CONCLUSIONS From our data, it can be inferred that CD4 cell count monitoring can be safely performed annually in HIV-monoinfected patients with CD4 cell counts >300 cells/µL and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with counts >350 cells/µL.

Cyclosporine A in addition to standard ART during primary HIV-1 infection: pilot randomized clinical trial.

Background: Initiating ART during acute/recent HIV-1 infection reduces viral reservoir formation. It has been proposed that, during this phase, the size of the viral reservoir could be further reduced by the association of immunomodulatory therapy with ART. Contradictory results have emerged, however, from two trials evaluating the impact on immune recovery and the viral reservoir of adding cyclosporine A to ART during primary HIV-1 infection. Patients and methods: Twenty patients with acute/recent HIV-1 infection were randomized to receive ART alone (tenofovir, emtricitabine and lopinavir/ritonavir) or associated with 8 weeks of cyclosporine A (0.3–0.6 mg/kg twice daily). The impact on viral load, immune response and integrated and non-integrated DNA viral reservoir at 0, 8 and 36 weeks of treatment was evaluated. Results: The estimated median time from HIV-1 infection to ART onset was 63 days (IQR 53; 79.5) with 90% of patients at Fiebig V stage. No significant differences were observed in viral load decay, CD4 T cell recovery, immune response markers or the evolution of integrated DNA at week 8 (end of cyclosporine A) and week 36 between groups. However, non-integrated DNA significantly increased in the cyclosporine A arm between weeks 0 and 36. Cyclosporine A was well tolerated. Conclusions: Adding cyclosporine A to ART during acute/recent infection did not improve immune recovery. However, unintegrated DNA increased in the cyclosporine A group, suggesting an anti-integration effect, a point warranting further research (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00979706).

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine plus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir or cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir as a single-tablet regimen for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis

Objectives To assess HIV-1 post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) non-completion at day 28, comparing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir versus cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir as a single-tablet regimen (STR), using tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine with both of these therapies. Methods A prospective, open, randomized clinical trial was performed. Individuals attending the emergency room due to potential sexual exposure to HIV and who met criteria for PEP were randomized 1:3 into two groups receiving either 400/100 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 38) or 150/150 mg of elvitegravir/cobicistat (n = 119), with both groups also receiving 245/200 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine. Five follow-up visits were scheduled at days 1, 10, 28, 90 and 180. The primary endpoint was PEP non-completion at day 28. Secondary endpoints were adherence, adverse effects and rate of seroconversions. Clinical trials.gov number: NCT08431173. Results Median age was 32 years and 95% were males. PEP non-completion at day 28 was 36% (n = 57), with a trend to be higher in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm [lopinavir/ritonavir 47% (n = 18) versus elvitegravir/cobicistat 33% (n = 39), P = 0.10]. We performed a modified ITT analysis including only those patients who attended on day 1. PEP non-completion in this subgroup was higher in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm than in the elvitegravir/cobicistat arm (33% versus 15%, respectively, P = 0.04). Poor adherence was significantly higher in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm versus the elvitegravir/cobicistat arm (47% versus 9%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Adverse events were reported by 73 patients (59%), and were significantly more common in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm (90% versus 49%, P = 0.0001). A seroconversion was observed in the elvitegravir/cobicistat arm in a patient with multiple exposures before and after PEP. Conclusions A higher PEP non-completion, poor adherence and adverse events were observed in patients allocated to the lopinavir/ritonavir arm, suggesting that STR elvitegravir/cobicistat is a well-tolerated antiretroviral for PEP.