Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David P. Hurlstone is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David P. Hurlstone.


The Lancet | 2001

Association of adult coeliac disease with irritable bowel syndrome: a case-control study in patients fulfilling ROME II criteria referred to secondary care

David S. Sanders; Martyn J Carter; David P. Hurlstone; Alison Pearce; Anthony Milford Ward; Mark E. McAlindon; Alan J. Lobo

BACKGROUND Irritable bowel syndrome has a high prevalence. Consensus diagnostic criteria (ROME II) based on symptoms have been established to aid diagnosis. Although coeliac disease can be misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome, no prospective study has been published in which patients with this disorder are investigated for coeliac disease. We aimed to assess the association of coeliac disease with irritable bowel syndrome in patients fulfilling ROME II criteria. METHODS We undertook a case-control study at a university hospital. 300 consecutive new patients who fulfilled Rome II criteria for irritable bowel syndrome, and 300 healthy controls (age and sex matched) were investigated for coeliac disease by analysis of serum IgA antigliadin, IgG antigliadin, and endomysial antibodies (EMA). Patients and controls with positive antibody results were offered duodenal biopsy to confirm the possibility of coeliac disease. FINDINGS 66 patients with irritable bowel syndrome had positive antibody results, of whom 14 had coeliac disease (11 EMA positive, three EMA negative). Nine patients with positive antibody results were lost to follow-up or refused biopsy (only one EMA-positive patient refused biopsy), and 43 had normal duodenal mucosa. Two controls, both of whom were EMA positive, had coeliac disease. Compared with matched controls, irritable bowel syndrome was significantly associated with coeliac disease (p=0.004, odds ratio=7.0 [95% CI 1.7-28.0]). INTERPRETATION Patients with irritable bowel syndrome referred to secondary care should be investigated routinely for coeliac disease. With only EMA, three of 14 cases would have been missed.


Gut | 2004

Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy

David P. Hurlstone; Simon S. Cross; R Slater; David S. Sanders; S. R. Brown

Background: Diminutive and flat colorectal lesions can be difficult to detect using conventional colonoscopic techniques. Previous data have suggested that pan-chromoscopy may improve detection rates. No randomised control trial has been performed examining detection rates of such lesions while controlling for extubation time and lavage effect. Aim: We conducted a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic chromoscopic colonoscopy for the detection of diminutive and flat colorectal lesions while controlling for extubation time and lavage effect. Methods: Consecutive patients attending for routine colonoscopy were randomised to either pan-chromoscopy using 0.5% indigo carmine (IC) or targeted chromoscopy (control group). A minimum diagnostic extubation time was set at eight minutes with controls undergoing a matched volume of saline wash. Results: A total of 260 patients were randomised; 132 controls and 128 to pan-colonic chromoscopy. Extubation times did not differ significantly between the control (median 15 minutes (range 8–41)) and chromoscopy (median 17 minutes (range 8–39)) groups. The volume of IC used in the pan-chromoscopy group (median 68 ml (range 65–90)) and normal saline used in the control group (69 ml (range 60–93)) did not differ significantly. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the total number of adenomas detected (p<0.05) with significantly more diminutive (<4 mm) adenomas detected in the pan-chromoscopy group (p = 0.03). Pan-chromoscopy diagnosed more diminutive and flat lesions in the right colon compared with controls (p<0.05), with more patients with multiple adenomas (>3) detected using pan-chromoscopy (p<0.01). Hyperplastic lesions were more commonly detected in the pan-chromoscopy group compared with controls (p<0.001). More hyperplastic polyps were detected in the left colon (86% rectosigmoid) using chromoscopy compared with controls. Conclusion: Chromoscopy improves the total number of adenomas detected and enhances the detection of diminutive and flat lesions. Importantly, eight diminutive lesions had foci of high grade dysplasia. Chromoscopy may benefit patients, assuming a high risk of colorectal cancer, and help in risk stratification and planning follow up colonoscopy intervals.


Gut | 2004

Colonoscopic resection of lateral spreading tumours: a prospective analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection

David P. Hurlstone; David S. Sanders; Simon S. Cross; I. J. Adam; A. J. Shorthouse; S. Brown; K Drew; Alan J. Lobo

Background: Lateral spreading tumours are superficial spreading neoplasms now increasingly diagnosed using chromoscopic colonoscopy. The clinicopathological features and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection for lateral spreading tumours (G-type “aggregate” and F-type “flat”) has yet to be clarified in Western cohorts. Methods: Eighty two patients underwent magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy using the Olympus CF240Z by a single endoscopist. All patients had received a previous colonoscopy where an endoscopic diagnosis of lateral spreading tumour was made. All lesions were examined initially using indigo carmine chromoscopy to delineate contour followed by crystal violet for magnification crypt pattern analysis. A 20 MHz “mini probe” ultrasound was used if T2 disease was suspected. Following endoscopic mucosal resection, patients were followed up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months using total colonoscopy. Results: Eighty two lateral spreading tumours were diagnosed in 80 patients (32% (26/82) F-type and 68% (56/82) G-type). G-type lesions were larger than F-type (G-type mean 42 (SD 14) mm v F-type 24 (6.4) mm; p<0.01). F-type lesions were more common in the right colon (F-type 77% (20/26) compared with G-type 39% (22/56); p<0.01) and more often associated with invasive disease (stage T2) (66% (10/15) v 33% (5/15); p<0.001). Fifty eight lesions underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (G-type 64% (37/58)/F-type 36% (21/58)). Local recurrent disease was detected in 17% of patients (10/58), all within six months of the index resection. Piecemeal resection and G-type morphology were significantly associated with recurrent disease (p<0.1). Overall “cure” rates for lateral spreading tumours using endoscopic mucosal resection at two years of follow-up was 96% (56/58). Conclusions: Endoscopic mucosal resection for lateral spreading tumours, staged as T1, is a safe and effective treatment despite their large size. Endoscopic mucosal resection may be an alternative to surgery in selected patients.


The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2003

A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom

David P. Hurlstone; Simon S. Cross; Ian Adam; Andrew J. Shorthouse; Steven Brown; David S. Sanders; Alan J. Lobo

OBJECTIVES:Flat and depressed colorectal lesions are now reported in Western populations. The malignant potential, anatomical distribution, and other clinicopathological features have not been established in this group. This study aimed to assess prospectively the prevalence, clinicopathological, and endoscopic features of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom.METHODS:A single endoscopist performed colonoscopy on 850 consecutive patients presenting for routine colonoscopy. All endoscopies were performed using a high magnification colonoscope with chromoscopy to facilitate detection of flat and depressed colorectal lesions.RESULTS:A total of 458 flat lesions were identified. Of these, 173 (38%) were hyperplastic and 285 (62%) adenomatous or beyond. Of the 173 hyperplastic flat lesions, 162 (94%) were located in the recto-sigmoid region. Of the 267 adenomas, 66 (25%) had areas of high grade dysplasia (HGD), with 54/66 (82%) being present in the right colon. Flat lesions <8 mm in diameter was more likely to contain HGD than those <8 mm (p < 0.001). Nine of the 10 (90%) flat invasive adenoacarcinomas were in the right colon and all had a depressed morphological component. In contrast, HGD was observed in 58/466 (12%) of protuberant (sessile/pedunculated) adenomas of which 95% (55/58) were located in the left colon. In addition, HGD was present in 17% of all sessile adenomas versus 44.6% of flat lesions >8 mm in diameter (p = 0.001). Of the 14 protuberant carcinomas, 13/14 (93%) were in the left colon. Synchronous lesions were found in 96/816 (12%) of cases. Of the 816 patients with two or more left-sided protuberant adenomas <8 mm (with or without HGD), 89 (11%) had one or more flat lesions in the right colon with HGD.CONCLUSIONS:Flat adenomas and carcinomas have a high malignant potential compared to protuberant lesions and have a propensity for developing in the right hemi-colon. Total colonoscopy is required to detect such lesions, as only 18% of flat lesions would be in reach of the flexible sigmoidoscope.


Gut | 2004

Efficacy of high magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum: a prospective analysis

David P. Hurlstone; Simon S. Cross; I. J. Adam; A. J. Shorthouse; S. R. Brown; David S. Sanders; Alan J. Lobo

Background: High magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy (HMCC) permits the in vivo examination of the colorectal pit pattern, which has a high correlation with stereomicroscopic appearances of resected specimens. This new technology may provide an “optical biopsy” which can be used to aid diagnostic precision and guide therapeutic strategies. Conflicting data exist concerning the accuracy of this technique when discriminating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions, particularly when flat and depressed. Aim: To prospectively examine the efficacy of HMCC for the diagnosis of neoplasia in flat and depressed colorectal lesions using standardised morphological, pit pattern, and histopathological criteria. Clinical recommendations for the use of HMCC are made. Methods: Total colonoscopy was performed on 1850 patients by a single endoscopist from January 2001 to July 2003 using the C240Z magnifying colonoscope. Identified lesions were classed according to the Japanese Research Society guidelines, and pit pattern according to Kudos modified criteria. Pit pattern appearances were then compared with histopathology. Results: A total of 1008 flat lesions were identified. The sensitivity and specificity of HMCC in distinguishing non-neoplastic from neoplastic lesions were 98% and 92%, respectively. However, when using HMCC to differentiate neoplastic/non-invasive from neoplastic/invasive lesions, sensitivity was poor (50%) with a specificity of 98%. Diagnostic accuracy was not influenced by size or morphological classification of lesions. Conclusion: HMCC has a high overall accuracy at discriminating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions but is not 100% accurate. HMCC is a useful diagnostic tool in vivo but presently is not a replacement for histology. Requirements for further education and training in these techniques need to be addressed.


Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2008

What is the role of serologic testing in celiac disease? A prospective, biopsy-confirmed study with economic analysis.

Andrew D. Hopper; Marios Hadjivassiliou; David P. Hurlstone; Alan J. Lobo; Mark E. McAlindon; William Egner; Graeme Wild; David S. Sanders

BACKGROUND & AIMS The optimal serologic tests for the detection of celiac disease and follow-up assessment remains controversial. Our aim was to evaluate all current immunologic assays for diagnosing celiac disease using the gold standard of duodenal biopsy. We also assessed whether tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody is a quantitative marker for histologic severity. METHODS Consecutive adult patients referred for gastroscopy without a previous known diagnosis of celiac disease were recruited (group 1). Concurrently, patients with a known diagnosis of celiac disease on a gluten-free diet for more than 1 year undergoing repeat duodenal biopsy were identified (group 2). All patients had duodenal biopsies and serologic analysis performed for immunoglobulin(Ig) A and antibodies to human immunoglobulin (Ig)A-tTG, IgA-gliadin, IgG-gliadin, and IgA-endomysial antibody. RESULTS Two thousand patients were recruited in the first group. Seventy-seven (3.9%) patients were diagnosed with new celiac disease. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for IgA tTG were 90.9%, 90.9%, 28.6%, and 99.6%. When adopting a 2-step approach using tTG first and then EMA the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 85.7%, 98.6%, 71.7%, and 99.7%, respectively. The use of nondeamidated IgA/IgG gliadin antibodies conferred no additional diagnostic benefit when considering the detection of adult celiac disease. In the second group 48 patients with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet were identified. Sixteen of 48 of these patients had persisting villous atrophy, but 7 of 16 (44%) had a normal tTG level. CONCLUSIONS IgA tTG alone is a sensitive marker for celiac disease. A normal tTG level does not predict recovery of villous atrophy in patients with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet.


British Journal of Surgery | 2007

Achieving R0 resection in the colorectum using endoscopic submucosal dissection.

David P. Hurlstone; Robert James Atkinson; David S. Sanders; Mike Thomson; Simon S. Cross; S. Brown

Endoscopic mucosal resection is established for the removal of non‐invasive colorectal tumours smaller than 20 mm but is unsatisfactory for larger lesions. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of lesions larger than 20 mm. A UK‐based prospective feasibility study of ESD for colorectal tumours was undertaken; primary endpoints were R0 resection, safety and recurrence.


The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2005

The role of high-magnification-chromoscopic colonoscopy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer screening: a prospective "back-to-back" endoscopic study.

David P. Hurlstone; M Karajeh; Simon S. Cross; Mark E. McAlindon; Steve Brown; Michael D. Hunter; David S. Sanders

BACKGROUND:In hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer flat and diminutive adenomas occur, particularly in the right colon. Such lesions may assume a high risk of malignant transformation. Interval cancers are known to occur in this group. Chromoscopic colonoscopy enhances detection in patients assuming a moderate to high lifetime risk of colorectal cancer.AIM:To prospectively assess the efficacy of high-magnification-chromoscopic colonoscopy for the detection of neoplastic lesions in patients undergoing hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer screening.METHODS:Twenty-five asymptomatic patients fulfilling modified Amsterdam criteria underwent “back-to-back” colonoscopy. Conventional colonoscopy with targeted chromoscopy was performed initially followed by pan-colonic chromoscopic colonoscopy. Diagnostic extubation times and volumes of normal saline and indigo carmine (IC) were controlled.RESULTS:Using conventional colonoscopy and targeted chromoscopy 24 lesions were detected in 13 patients (20 exophytic/4 flat). Pan-colonic chromoscopy identified a further 52 lesions in 16 patients (17 exophytic/35 flat). Pan-chromoscopy identified significantly more adenomas than conventional colonoscopy (p = 0.001) and a significantly high number of flat adenomas (p = 0.004).CONCLUSIONS:Pan-colonic chromoscopic colonoscopy improves detection of significant neoplastic lesions in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer screening. Pan-chromoscopy may help better stratify colorectal cancer “risk” in this cohort and aid planning of surveillance colonoscopic follow-up.


Postgraduate Medical Journal | 2002

Changing face of adult coeliac disease: experience of a single university hospital in South Yorkshire

David S. Sanders; David P. Hurlstone; R O Stokes; Farzana Rashid; A Milford-Ward; Marios Hadjivassiliou; Alan J. Lobo

Objective: To determine the incidence and presenting features of adult coeliac disease in a single university hospital in South Yorkshire. Design: A retrospective case finding study. Data were obtained from pathology and immunology databases, clinical notes, dietetic records, and patient questionnaires. Setting: Royal Hallamshire Hospital in South Yorkshire, England. Participants: All recorded cases of coeliac disease. Main outcome measures: Crude annual incidence rates for coeliac disease was obtained. The numbers of coeliac antibody profiles requested per year from the Royal Hallamshire Hospital were ascertained. Age at diagnosis, sex, year of diagnosis, presenting symptoms, associated conditions, and delay in diagnosis was documented. In addition the specialty of the clinician who made the diagnosis was noted. Results: There were 264 cases in total (male n=86, ratio 1:2). Mean age at diagnosis was 44.9 years (range 1–82, median 44.5). A trend was observed from 1990 to 2000 inclusive, of an annual increase in the incidence of coeliac disease. There has been a coincidental increase in the measurement of associated antibodies. Although 28.4% of patients presented with gastrointestinal symptoms, 20.1% had iron deficiency anaemia. The ratio of typical to atypical symptoms was 1:2.5. (single sample test of proportions p<0.001). The diagnosis was made by a gastroenterologist in only 52.7% of cases. The median duration of symptoms before the diagnosis of coeliac disease was 4.9 years (range 0.25–16 years). Conclusion: Coeliac disease is now presenting more commonly without gastrointestinal symptoms and often to specialties other than gastroenterology. Although more cases are diagnosed, this may be a reflection of increasing recognition rather than a true increase in incidence.


Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology | 2007

Is there an association between coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel diseases? A study of relative prevalence in comparison with population controls

John S. Leeds; Barbara S. Höroldt; Reena Sidhu; Andrew D. Hopper; K Robinson; Bonnie Toulson; Lynn Dixon; Alan J. Lobo; Mark E. McAlindon; David P. Hurlstone; David S. Sanders

Objective. The relationship between coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of coeliac disease in IBD and the prevalence of IBD in coeliac disease. Material and methods. Patients were enrolled from specialist IBD and coeliac clinics. Antigliadins, endomysial, tissue transglutaminase antibody and total IgA levels were measured in IBD patients. Patients with positive antibodies were offered a duodenal biopsy. The notes on coeliac patients were reviewed for colonoscopic and biopsy findings. Controls were recruited from the local population. Results. The study included 305 patients with coeliac disease, 354 with IBD and 601 healthy controls. The IBD group comprised 154 ulcerative colitis (UC) cases, 173 Crohns disease, 18 indeterminate colitis and 9 cases of microscopic colitis. Forty-seven patients had positive antibodies and 3 had villous atrophy on biopsy. All three patients had positive anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies but only two were endomysial antibody (EMA) positive. Ten coeliac patients had IBD (5 UC and 5 lymphocytic colitis). Five controls had coeliac disease and 2 had IBD (1 Crohns disease and 1 UC). Stepwise multiple logistic regression showed only antibody positivity as being significant (p<0.0001). Conclusions. The prevalence of IBD in coeliac disease was increased 10-fold compared with that in controls (odds ratio 9.98, 95% CI 2.8–45.9, p=0.0006), while the prevalence of coeliac disease in IBD was comparable with that in controls (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI, 0.24–4.29, p=1.0).

Collaboration


Dive into the David P. Hurlstone's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David S. Sanders

Royal Hallamshire Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan J. Lobo

Royal Hallamshire Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark E. McAlindon

Royal Hallamshire Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew D. Hopper

Royal Hallamshire Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. R. Brown

Northern General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Brown

Royal Hallamshire Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mike Thomson

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge