David P. Tew
University of Bristol
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David P. Tew.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science | 2014
Kestutis Aidas; Celestino Angeli; Keld L. Bak; Vebjørn Bakken; Radovan Bast; Linus Boman; Ove Christiansen; Renzo Cimiraglia; Sonja Coriani; Pål Dahle; Erik K. Dalskov; Ulf Ekström; Thomas Enevoldsen; Janus Juul Eriksen; Patrick Ettenhuber; Berta Fernández; Lara Ferrighi; Heike Fliegl; Luca Frediani; Kasper Hald; Asger Halkier; Christof Hättig; Hanne Heiberg; Trygve Helgaker; Alf C. Hennum; Hinne Hettema; Eirik Hjertenæs; Stine Høst; Ida Marie Høyvik; Maria Francesca Iozzi
Dalton is a powerful general‐purpose program system for the study of molecular electronic structure at the Hartree–Fock, Kohn–Sham, multiconfigurational self‐consistent‐field, Møller–Plesset, configuration‐interaction, and coupled‐cluster levels of theory. Apart from the total energy, a wide variety of molecular properties may be calculated using these electronic‐structure models. Molecular gradients and Hessians are available for geometry optimizations, molecular dynamics, and vibrational studies, whereas magnetic resonance and optical activity can be studied in a gauge‐origin‐invariant manner. Frequency‐dependent molecular properties can be calculated using linear, quadratic, and cubic response theory. A large number of singlet and triplet perturbation operators are available for the study of one‐, two‐, and three‐photon processes. Environmental effects may be included using various dielectric‐medium and quantum‐mechanics/molecular‐mechanics models. Large molecules may be studied using linear‐scaling and massively parallel algorithms. Dalton is distributed at no cost from http://www.daltonprogram.org for a number of UNIX platforms.
Chemical Reviews | 2012
Christof Hättig; Wim Klopper; Andreas Köhn; David P. Tew
Explicitly Correlated Electrons in Molecules Christof H€attig, Wim Klopper,* Andreas K€ohn, and David P. Tew Lehrstuhl f€ur Theoretische Chemie, Ruhr-Universit€at Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany Abteilung f€ur Theoretische Chemie, Institut f€ur Physikalische Chemie, Karlsruher Institut f€ur Technologie, KIT-Campus S€ud, Postfach 6980, D-76049 Karlsruhe, Germany Institut f€ur Physikalische Chemie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universit€at Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom
Journal of Chemical Physics | 2005
David P. Tew; Wim Klopper
We have investigated the correlation factors exp(-zetar12), r12 exp(-zetar12), erfc(zetar12), and r12 erfc(zetar12) in place of the linear-r12 term for use in explicitly correlated electronic-structure methods. The accuracy obtained with all of these correlation factors is significantly greater than that obtained with the plain correlation factor r12. Polarization functions that are more diffuse than those of standard basis sets give even better results. The correlation factor exp(-zetar12) is very close to the optimum correlation factor for helium and outperforms the others.
Journal of Chemical Physics | 2010
Christof Hättig; David P. Tew; Andreas Köhn
We propose a novel explicitly correlated coupled-cluster singles and doubles method CCSD(F12(*)), which retains the accuracy of CCSD-F12 while the computational costs are only insignificantly larger than those for a conventional CCSD calculation.
Journal of Chemical Physics | 2006
Miriam Heckert; Mihály Kállay; David P. Tew; Wim Klopper; Juergen Gauss
To reduce remaining basis-set errors in the determination of molecular equilibrium geometries, a basis-set extrapolation (BSE) scheme is suggested for the forces used in geometry optimizations. The proposed BSE scheme is based on separating the Hartree-Fock and electron-correlation contributions and uses expressions obtained by straightforward differentiation of well established extrapolation formulas for energies when using basis sets from Dunnings hierarchy of correlation-consistent basis sets. Comparison with reference data obtained at the R12 coupled-cluster level [CCSD(T)-R12] demonstrates that BSE significantly accelerates the convergence to the basis-set limit, thus leading to improvements comparable to or even better than those obtained by increasing the cardinal number in the used basis set by one. However, BSE alone is insufficient to improve agreement with experiment, even after additional consideration of inner-shell correlation and quadruple-excitation effects (mean error and standard deviation with extrapolation are -0.014 and 0.047 pm in comparison with mean error and standard deviation of -0.002 and 0.036 pm without extrapolation). Improvement is obtained only when other contributions of similar magnitude as the BSE contributions (e.g., pentuple-excitation effects and relativistic effects) are also considered. A rather large discrepancy (of the order of a few tenths of a picometer) is observed for the F(2) molecule indicating an enhanced basis-set requirement for the various contributions in this case.
Molecular Physics | 2008
Trygve Helgaker; Wim Klopper; David P. Tew
We review the current status of quantum chemistry as a predictive tool of chemistry and molecular physics, capable of providing highly accurate, quantitative data about molecular systems. We begin by reviewing wave-function based electronic-structure theory, emphasizing the N-electron hierarchy of coupled-cluster theory and the one-electron hierarchy of correlation-consistent basis sets. Following a discussion of the slow basis-set convergence of dynamical correlation and basis-set extrapolations, we consider the methods of explicit correlation, from the early work of Hylleraas in the 1920s to the latest developments in such methods, capable of yielding high-accuracy results in medium-sized basis sets. Next, we consider the small corrections to the electronic energy (high-order virtual excitations, vibrational, relativistic, and diagonal Born–Oppenheimer corrections) needed for high accuracy and conclude with a review of the composite methods and computational protocols of electronic-structure theory.
Journal of Computational Chemistry | 2011
Rafa l A. Bachorz; Florian A. Bischoff; Andreas Glöß; Christof Hättig; Sebastian Höfener; Wim Klopper; David P. Tew
A detailed description of the explicitly correlated second‐order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2‐F12) method, as implemented in the TURBOMOLE program package, is presented. The TURBOMOLE implementation makes use of density fitting, which greatly reduces the prefactor for integral evaluation. Methods are available for the treatment of ground states of open‐ and closed‐shell species, using unrestricted as well as restricted (open‐shell) Hartree–Fock reference determinants. Various methodological choices and approximations are discussed. The performance of the TURBOMOLE implementation is illustrated by example calculations of the molecules leflunomide, prednisone, methotrexate, ethylenedioxytetrafulvalene, and a cluster model for the adsorption of methanol on the zeolite H‐ZSM‐5. Various basis sets are used, including the correlation‐consistent basis sets specially optimized for explicitly correlated calculations (cc‐pVXZ‐F12).
Journal of Chemical Physics | 2006
David P. Tew; Wim Klopper
The basis set limit Møller-Plesset second-order equilibrium bond lengths of He2, Be2, and Ne2, accurate to 0.01a0, are computed to be 5.785a0, 5.11a0, and 6.05a0. The corresponding binding energies are 22.4+/-0.1, 2180+/-20, and 86+/-2 muE(h), respectively. An accuracy of 95% in the binding energy requires an aug-cc-pV6Z basis or larger for conventional Møller-Plesset theory. This accuracy is obtained using an aug-cc-pV5Z basis if geminal basis functions with a linear correlation factor are included and with an aug-cc-pVQZ basis if the linear correlation factor is replaced by exp(-gammar(12)) with gamma=1. The correlation factor r(12) exp(-gammar(12)) does not perform as well, describing the atom more efficiently than the dimer. The geminal functions supplement the orbital basis in the description of both the short-range correlation, at electron coalescence, and the long-range dispersion correlation and the values of gamma that give the best binding energies are smaller than those that are optimum for the atom or the dimer. It is important to sufficiently reduce the error due to the resolution of the identity approximation for the three- and four-electron integrals and we recommend the complementary auxiliary basis set method. The effect of both orbital and geminal basis set superposition error must be considered to obtain accurate binding energies with small orbital basis sets. In this respect, we recommend using exp(-gammar(12)) with localized orbitals and the original orbital-variant formalism.
Journal of Chemical Physics | 2008
Andreas Köhn; Gareth W. Richings; David P. Tew
An implementation of the full explicitly correlated coupled-cluster singles and doubles model CCSD-F12 using a single Slater-type geminal has been obtained with the aid of automated term generation and evaluation techniques. In contrast to a previously reported computer code [T. Shiozaki et al., J. Chem. Phys. 129, 071101 (2008)], our implementation features a reduced dependence on the auxiliary basis set due to the use of a reformulated evaluation of the so-called Z-intermediate rather than straight forward insertion of an auxiliary basis expansion, which allows an unambiguous comparison to more approximate CCSD-F12 models. First benchmark results for total correlation energies and reaction energies indicate an excellent performance of the much cheaper CCSD(F12) model.
Journal of Chemical Physics | 2011
David P. Tew; Benjamin Helmich; Christof Hättig
We present an algorithm for computing explicitly correlated second- and third-order Møller-Plesset energies near the basis set limit for large molecules with a cost that scales formally as N(4) with system size N. This is achieved through a hybrid approach where locality is exploited first through orbital specific virtuals (OSVs) and subsequently through pair natural orbitals (PNOs) and integrals are approximated using density fitting. Our method combines the low orbital transformation costs of the OSVs with the compactness of the PNO representation of the doubles amplitude vector. The N(4) scaling does not rely upon the a priori definition of domains, enforced truncation of pair lists, or even screening and the energies converge smoothly to the canonical values with decreasing occupation number thresholds, used in the selection of the PNO basis. For MP2.5 intermolecular interaction energies, we find that 99% of benchmark basis set limit correlation energy contributions are recovered using an aug-cc-pVTZ basis and that on average only 50 PNOs are required to correlate the significant orbital pairs.