David P. Winchester

Pancreatic cancer : A report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985-1995, using the national cancer database

BACKGROUND The National Cancer Database is an electronic registry system sponsored jointly by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1985 to 1995 were analyzed for trends in stage of disease, treatment patterns, and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN Seven annual requests for data were issued by the National Cancer Database from 1989 through 1995. Data on 100,313 patients were voluntarily submitted using a standardized reporting format. RESULTS The anatomic site distribution was: head, 78%; body, 11%; and tail, 11%. The ratios of limited to advanced disease (Stage I/Stage IV) were 0.70 for tumors in the head, 0.24 for body tumors, and 0.10 for tail tumors. Of all patients, 83% did not have a surgical procedure and 58% did not have cancer-directed treatment. Resection was done for 9,044 (9%) patients, including 22% of those with Stage I disease. The overall 5-year survival rate was 23.4% for patients who had pancreatectomy, compared with 5.2% for those who had no cancer-directed treatment. CONCLUSIONS Overall survival rates for pancreatic cancer have not changed in 2 decades. A small minority of patients presented with limited, resectable disease, but the best survival rates per stage were achieved after surgical resection. Five-year survival rates after resection reported herein corroborated the improved survival rates of more recent large, single institution studies.

Extent of Surgery Affects Survival for Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Background:The extent of surgery for papillary thyroid cancers (PTC) remains controversial. Consensus guidelines have recommended total thyroidectomy for PTC ≥1 cm; however, no study has supported this recommendation based on a survival advantage. The objective of this study was to examine whether the extent of surgery affects outcomes for PTC and to determine whether a size threshold could be identified above which total thyroidectomy is associated with improved outcomes. Methods:From the National Cancer Data Base (1985–1998), 52,173 patients underwent surgery for PTC. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Cox Proportional Hazards modeling stratified by tumor size was used to assess the impact of surgical extent on outcomes and to identify a tumor size threshold above which total thyroidectomy is associated with an improvement in recurrence and long-term survival rates. Results:Of the 52,173 patients, 43,227 (82.9%) underwent total thyroidectomy, and 8946 (17.1%) underwent lobectomy. For PTC <1 cm extent of surgery did not impact recurrence or survival (P = 0.24, P = 0.83). For tumors ≥1 cm, lobectomy resulted in higher risk of recurrence and death (P = 0.04, P = 0.009). To minimize the influence of larger tumors, 1 to 2 cm lesions were examined separately: lobectomy again resulted in a higher risk of recurrence and death (P = 0.04, P = 0.04). Conclusions:The results of this study demonstrate that total thyroidectomy results in lower recurrence rates and improved survival for PTC ≥1.0 cm compared with lobectomy. This is the first study to demonstrate that total thyroidectomy for PTC ≥1.0 cm improves outcomes.

Esophageal cancer: results of an American College of Surgeons patient care evaluation study1

BACKGROUND The last two decades have seen changes in the prevalence, histologic type, and management algorithms for patients with esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presentation, stage distribution, and treatment of patients with esophageal cancer using the National Cancer Database of the American College of Surgeons. STUDY DESIGN Consecutively accessed patients (n = 5,044) with esophageal cancer from 828 hospitals during 1994 were evaluated in 1997 for case mix, diagnostic tests, and treatment modalities. RESULTS The mean age of patients was 67.3 years with a male to female ratio of 3:1; non-Hispanic Caucasians made up most patients. Only 16.6% reported no tobacco use. Dysphagia (74%), weight loss (57.3%), gastrointestinal reflux (20.5%), odynophagia (16.6%), and dyspnea (12.1%) were the most common symptoms. Approximately 50% of patients had the tumor in the lower third of the esophagus. Of all patients, 51.6% had squamous cell histology and 41.9% had adenocarcinoma. Barretts esophagus occurred in 777 patients, or 39% of those with adenocarcinoma. Of those patients that underwent surgery initially, pathology revealed stage I (13.3%), II (34.7%), III (35.7%), and IV (12.3%) disease. For patients with various stages of squamous cell cancer, radiation therapy plus chemotherapy were the most common treatment modalities (39.5%) compared with surgery plus adjuvant therapy (13.2%). For patients with adenocarcinoma, surgery plus adjuvant therapy were the most common treatment methods. Disease-specific overall survival at 1 year was 43%, ranging from 70% to 18% from stages I to IV. CONCLUSIONS Cancer of the esophagus shows an increasing occurrence of adenocarcinoma in the lower third of the esophagus and is frequently associated with Barretts esophagus. Choice of treatment was influenced by tumor histology and tumor site. Multimodality (neoadjuvant) therapy was the most common treatment method for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. The use of multimodality treatment did not appear to increase postoperative morbidity.

National Failure to Operate on Early Stage Pancreatic Cancer

Background:Despite studies demonstrating improved outcomes, pessimism persists regarding the effectiveness of surgery for pancreatic cancer. Our objective was to evaluate utilization of surgery in early stage disease and identify factors predicting failure to undergo surgery. Methods:Using the National Cancer Data Base (1995–2004), 9559 patients were identified with potentially resectable tumors (pretreatment clinical Stage I: T1N0M0 and T2N0M0). Multivariate models were employed to identify factors predicting failure to undergo surgery and assess the impact of pancreatectomy on survival. Results:Of clinical Stage I patients 71.4% (6823/9559) did not undergo surgery; 6.4% (616/9559) were excluded due to comorbidities; 4.2% (403/9559) refused surgery; 9.1% (869/9559) were excluded due to age; and 38.2% (3,644/9559) with potentially resectable cancers were classified as “not offered surgery.” Of the 28.6% (2736/9559) of patients who underwent surgery, 96.0% (2630/2736) underwent pancreatectomy, and 4.0% (458/2736) had unresectable tumors. Patients were less likely to undergo surgery if they were older than 65 years, were black, were on Medicare or Medicaid, had pancreatic head lesions, earned lower annual incomes, or had less education (P < 0.0001). Patients were less likely to receive surgery at low-volume and community centers. Patients underwent surgery more frequently at National Cancer Institute/National Comprehensive Cancer Network-designated cancer centers (P < 0.0001). Patients who were not offered surgery had significantly better survival than those with Stage III or IV disease but worse survival than patients who underwent pancreatectomy for Stage I disease (P < 0.0001). Conclusions:This is the first study to characterize the striking underuse of pancreatectomy in the United States. Of early stage pancreatic cancer patients without any identifiable contraindications, 38.2% failed to undergo surgery.

Validation of the 6th edition AJCC pancreatic cancer staging system: Report from the National Cancer Database

With the development of stage‐specific treatments for pancreatic cancer, controversies exist concerning optimal clinical and pathologic staging. The most recent edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual 6th Edition included some notable modifications. In anticipation of the 7th editions publication, the authors evaluated the predictive ability of the current pancreatic adenocarcinoma staging system.

Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone and Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Node-Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE For women with breast cancer, the role of completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after identification of nodal metastases by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been questioned. Our objectives were to assess national nodal evaluation practice patterns and to examine differences in recurrence and survival for SLNB alone versus SLNB with completion ALND. PATIENTS AND METHODS From the National Cancer Data Base (1998 to 2005), women with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent SLNB and who had nodal metastases were identified. Practice patterns and outcomes were examined for patients who underwent SLNB alone versus SLNB with completion ALND (median follow-up, 63 months). RESULTS Of 97,314 patients, 20.8% underwent SLNB alone, and 79.2% underwent SLNB with completion ALND. In 2004 to 2005, patients were significantly more likely to undergo SLNB alone if they were older, had smaller tumors, or were treated at non-National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. In patients with macroscopic nodal metastases (n = 20,075 during 1998 to 2000), there was a nonsignificant trend toward better outcomes for completion ALND (v SLNB alone) after analysis was adjusted for differences between the two groups: axillary recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.06) and overall survival (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.04). In patients with microscopic nodal metastases (n = 2,203 during 1998 to 2000), there were no significant differences in axillary recurrence or survival for patients who underwent SLNB alone versus completion ALND. CONCLUSION Compared with SLNB alone, completion ALND does not appear to improve outcomes for breast cancer patients with microscopic nodal metastases; however, there was a nonsignificant trend toward better outcomes with completion ALND for those with macroscopic disease.

The National Cancer Data Base report on colon cancer

BACKGROUND Commission on Cancer data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) report time trends in stage of disease, treatment patterns, and survival for patients with selected cancers. The most current data (1993) for patients with colon cancer are described. METHODS Five calls for data yielded 3,700,000 cases of cancer for the years 1985 through 1993 from hospital cancer registeries across the U.S., including 36,937 cases of colon cancer from 1988 and 44,812 from 1993. RESULTS Interesting trends are as follows: (1) the elderly ( > 80 years) present with earlier stage disease than younger patients; (2) the National Cancer Institute recognized cancer centers have more patients with advanced disease than other types of hospitals; (3) all ethnic groups have generally similar stages of disease at presentation, except for African-Americans who have a slightly higher incidence of Stage IV disease; (4) the proximal migration of the primary cancer continues with 54.7% of primary colon cancer arising in the right colon in 1993 compared with 50.9% in 1988; (5) an interaction between grade and stage of cancer seems present; and (6) patients with Stage III colon cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a 5% improvement in 5-year relative survival. CONCLUSIONS The NCDB data are useful for reporting what cancer treatments are being administered and what outcomes are occurring in the U.S. The data suggest an important biologic role for grade of cancer. They also suggest that African-Americans and other ethnic groups have the same outcome as non-Hispanic whites but that access to medical care may still be less. Finally, the utility of adjuvant therapy for Stage III colon cancer may just be beginning to be appreciated.

Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma.

Multidisciplinary guidelines for management of invasive breast carcinoma from the American College of Radiology, the American College of Surgeons, the College of American Pathology, and the Society of Surgical Oncology have been updated to reflect the continuing advances in the diagnosis and treatment of invasive breast cancer. The guidelines provide a framework for clinical decision‐making for patients with invasive breast carcinoma based on review of relevant literature and include information on patient selection and evaluation, technical aspects of surgical treatment, techniques of irradiation, and follow‐up care.

Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients.

Background:Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) have a poorly defined natural history, and a staging system is not available. The objective of this study was to identify factors predicting survival after pancreatectomy for PNETs and to establish a postresection prognostic score. Patients and Methods:From the National Cancer Data Base (1985–2004), patients were identified who underwent PNET resection. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess the impact of patient, tumor, treatment, and hospital factors on survival. A prognostic score based on the predictive factors from the Cox model was developed. Results:Three thousand eight hundred fifty-one patients underwent resection for PNETs. Five-year overall survival was 59.3%, and the 10-year survival was 37.7%. On multivariable analysis, age, grade, distant metastases, tumor functionality, and type of resection were independent predictors of survival after resection of PNETs (P < 0.0001). Gender, race, socioeconomic status, tumor size, nodal status, margins, adjuvant chemotherapy, and hospital volume were not associated with survival. Age, grade, and distant metastases were the most significant predictors of survival and were incorporated into a PNET postresection prognostic score. The prognostic score correlated with outcomes and offered excellent survival discrimination by each of the 3 score subgroups: 76.7%, 50.9%, and 35.7% (P < 0.0001). The concordance index was 0.63 (95% CI 0.59–0.67), indicating reasonable agreement between actual outcomes and that predicted by the prognostic score. Conclusions:The prognostic score can be used to predict outcomes, guide adjuvant treatment, and stratify patients for clinical trials.

The National Cancer Data Base 10-year survey of breast carcinoma treatment at hospitals in the United States

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a joint project of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society, is a cancer management and outcome data base for health care organizations. It provides a comparative summary of patient care that is used by participating hospitals and communities for self‐assessment. The most current (1995) data are described herein.