David Polsky

Aberrant miR-182 expression promotes melanoma metastasis by repressing FOXO3 and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor.

The highly aggressive character of melanoma makes it an excellent model for probing the mechanisms underlying metastasis, which remains one of the most difficult challenges in treating cancer. We find that miR-182, member of a miRNA cluster in a chromosomal locus (7q31–34) frequently amplified in melanoma, is commonly up-regulated in human melanoma cell lines and tissue samples; this up-regulation correlates with gene copy number in a subset of melanoma cell lines. Moreover, miR-182 ectopic expression stimulates migration of melanoma cells in vitro and their metastatic potential in vivo, whereas miR-182 down-regulation impedes invasion and triggers apoptosis. We further show that miR-182 over-expression promotes migration and survival by directly repressing microphthalmia-associated transcription factor-M and FOXO3, whereas enhanced expression of either microphthalmia-associated transcription factor-M or FOXO3 blocks miR-182s proinvasive effects. In human tissues, expression of miR-182 increases with progression from primary to metastatic melanoma and inversely correlates with FOXO3 and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor levels. Our data provide a mechanism for invasion and survival in melanoma that could prove applicable to metastasis of other cancers and suggest that miRNA silencing may be a worthwhile therapeutic strategy.

Focus on melanoma.

Much remains to be learned about the pathogenesis of melanoma. How do different receptors and signaling pathways regulate uncontrolled growth, invasion, and metastases? What is the role of solar exposure in the etiology of melanoma? As genetics and cell biology reveal pathways and key molecules, new targets for prevention and therapy will appear. Mouse models that recapitulate human melanoma and the relevant pathways should allow better preclinical models for screening and developing new classes of therapeutic agents.

The histone variant macroH2A suppresses melanoma progression through regulation of CDK8

Cancer is a disease consisting of both genetic and epigenetic changes. Although increasing evidence demonstrates that tumour progression entails chromatin-mediated changes such as DNA methylation, the role of histone variants in cancer initiation and progression currently remains unclear. Histone variants replace conventional histones within the nucleosome and confer unique biological functions to chromatin. Here we report that the histone variant macroH2A (mH2A) suppresses tumour progression of malignant melanoma. Loss of mH2A isoforms, histone variants generally associated with condensed chromatin and fine-tuning of developmental gene expression programs, is positively correlated with increasing malignant phenotype of melanoma cells in culture and human tissue samples. Knockdown of mH2A isoforms in melanoma cells of low malignancy results in significantly increased proliferation and migration in vitro and growth and metastasis in vivo. Restored expression of mH2A isoforms rescues these malignant phenotypes in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrate that the tumour-promoting function of mH2A loss is mediated, at least in part, through direct transcriptional upregulation of CDK8. Suppression of CDK8, a colorectal cancer oncogene, inhibits proliferation of melanoma cells, and knockdown of CDK8 in cells depleted of mH2A suppresses the proliferative advantage induced by mH2A loss. Moreover, a significant inverse correlation between mH2A and CDK8 expression levels exists in melanoma patient samples. Taken together, our results demonstrate that mH2A is a critical component of chromatin that suppresses the development of malignant melanoma, a highly intractable cutaneous neoplasm.

Intra- and Inter-Tumor Heterogeneity of BRAFV600EMutations in Primary and Metastatic Melanoma

The rationale for using small molecule inhibitors of oncogenic proteins as cancer therapies depends, at least in part, on the assumption that metastatic tumors are primarily clonal with respect to mutant oncogene. With the emergence of BRAFV600E as a therapeutic target, we investigated intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity in melanoma using detection of the BRAFV600E mutation as a marker of clonality. BRAF mutant-specific PCR (MS-PCR) and conventional sequencing were performed on 112 tumors from 73 patients, including patients with matched primary and metastatic specimens (n = 18). Nineteen patients had tissues available from multiple metastatic sites. Mutations were detected in 36/112 (32%) melanomas using conventional sequencing, and 85/112 (76%) using MS-PCR. The better sensitivity of the MS-PCR to detect the mutant BRAFV600E allele was not due to the presence of contaminating normal tissue, suggesting that the tumor was comprised of subclones of differing BRAF genotypes. To determine if tumor subclones were present in individual primary melanomas, we performed laser microdissection and mutation detection via sequencing and BRAFV600E-specific SNaPshot analysis in 9 cases. Six of these cases demonstrated differing proportions of BRAFV600Eand BRAFwild-type cells in distinct microdissected regions within individual tumors. Additional analyses of multiple metastatic samples from individual patients using the highly sensitive MS-PCR without microdissection revealed that 5/19 (26%) patients had metastases that were discordant for the BRAFV600E mutation. In conclusion, we used highly sensitive BRAF mutation detection methods and observed substantial evidence for heterogeneity of the BRAFV600E mutation within individual melanoma tumor specimens, and among multiple specimens from individual patients. Given the varied clinical responses of patients to BRAF inhibitor therapy, these data suggest that additional studies to determine possible associations between clinical outcomes and intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity could prove fruitful.

Oncogenes in melanoma

Transformation of normal melanocytes into melanoma cells is accomplished by the activation of growth stimulatory pathways, typically leading to cellular proliferation, and the inactivation of apoptotic and tumor suppressor pathways. Small molecule inhibitors of proteins in the growth stimulatory pathways are under active investigation, and their application to melanoma patients would represent a new treatement strategy to inhibit cell proliferation or induce cell death. We provide a general overview of the mechanisms of oncogene activation and the functions of oncogenes. Lastly, we review oncogenic events in melanoma.

A Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Metastatic Melanoma with Tissue Correlates

Background Sorafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma was explored in this multi-institutional phase II study. In correlative studies the impact of sorafenib on cyclin D1 and Ki67 was assessed. Methodology/Principal Findings Thirty-six patients treatment-naïve advanced melanoma patients received sorafenib 400 mg p.o. twice daily continuously. Tumor BRAFV600E mutational status was determined by routine DNA sequencing and mutation-specific PCR (MSPCR). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for cyclin D1 and Ki67 was performed on available pre- and post treatment tumor samples. The main toxicities included diarrhea, alopecia, rash, mucositis, nausea, hand-foot syndrome, and intestinal perforation. One patient had a RECIST partial response (PR) lasting 175 days. Three patients experienced stable disease (SD) with a mean duration of 37 weeks. Routine BRAFV600E sequencing yielded 27 wild-type (wt) and 6 mutant tumors, whereas MSPCR identified 12 wt and 18 mutant tumors. No correlation was seen between BRAFV600E mutational status and clinical activity. No significant changes in expression of cyclin D1 or Ki67 with sorafenib treatment were demonstrable in the 15 patients with pre-and post-treatment tumor samples. Conclusions/Significance Sorafenib monotherapy has limited activity in advanced melanoma patients. BRAFV600E mutational status of the tumor was not associated with clinical activity and no significant effect of sorafenib on cyclin D1 or Ki67 was seen, suggesting that sorafenib is not an effective BRAF inhibitor or that additional signaling pathways are equally important in the patients who benefit from sorafenib. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT00119249

Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node positivity in thin melanoma (≤1 mm)

Despite the lack of an established survival benefit of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, this technique has been increasingly applied in the staging of thin (≤1 mm) melanoma patients, without clear evidence to support this recommendation. The authors performed a meta‐analysis to estimate the risk, potential predictors, and outcome of SLN positivity in this group of patients.

PTEN Expression in Melanoma: Relationship with Patient Survival, Bcl-2 Expression, and Proliferation

Purpose: Inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene, phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN), is a major alteration in preclinical melanoma models. We investigated the clinical relevance of PTEN expression in the primary melanoma patients with extended follow-up. Experimental Design: We correlated PTEN expression with clinicopathologic variables and outcome in 127 primary melanomas (median follow-up, 12.8 years). We evaluated the associations between PTEN expression and proliferation and resistance to apoptosis (assessed by Ki-67 and Bcl-2, respectively). We also examined the effect of a favorable phenotype, defined as retained PTEN, low proliferative index, and low expression of Bcl-2 on disease-free survival and overall survival. Results: Altered PTEN, Bcl-2, and Ki-67 expressions were observed in 55 of 127 (43.3%), 61 of 127 (48%), and 43 of 114 (37.7%) of cases, respectively. Decreased PTEN expression correlated significantly with the ulceration (P = 0.01). Rates of disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with favorable phenotype were 72% and 74% at 5 years versus 64% and 64% in patients with an unfavorable phenotype. At 10 years, the rates of disease-free survival and overall survival were 72% and 68% for patients with a favorable phenotype but declined to 60% and 55% in patients with an unfavorable phenotype. However, relationships between both PTEN and Bcl2 and patient survival were not significant as well as the associations between PTEN and Bcl-2 or Ki-67. Conclusions: Our data suggest that altered PTEN expression is common in primary melanomas and is associated with aggressive tumor behavior. However, PTEN alone provided limited prognostic value. Our findings show the need to examine molecular alterations identified in preclinical studies using an adequately large cohort of patients with extended follow-up to better assess the magnitude of their clinical relevance.

Frequent p16-Independent Inactivation of p14ARF in Human Melanoma

BACKGROUND The tumor suppressors p14(ARF) (ARF) and p16(INK4A) (p16) are encoded by overlapping reading frames at the CDKN2A/INK4A locus on chromosome 9p21. In human melanoma, the accumulated evidence has suggested that the predominant tumor suppressor at 9p21 is p16, not ARF. However, recent observations from melanoma-prone families and murine melanoma models suggest a p16-independent tumor suppressor role for ARF. We analyzed a group of melanoma metastases and cell lines to investigate directly whether somatic alterations to the ARF gene support its role as a p16-independent tumor suppressor in human melanoma, assuming that two alterations (genetic and/or epigenetic) would be required to inactivate a gene. METHODS We examined the p16/ARF locus in 60 melanoma metastases from 58 patients and in 9 human melanoma cell lines using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect deletions, methylation-specific PCR to detect promoter methylation, direct sequencing to detect mutations affecting ARF and p16, and, in a subset of 20 tumors, immunohistochemistry to determine the effect of these alterations on p16 protein expression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS We observed two or more alterations to the ARF gene in 26/60 (43%) metastases. The p16 gene sustained two or more alterations in 13/60 (22%) metastases (P = .03). Inactivation of ARF in the presence of wild-type p16 was seen in 18/60 (30%) metastases. CONCLUSION Genetic and epigenetic analyses of the human 9p21 locus indicate that modifications of ARF occur independently of p16 inactivation in human melanoma and suggest that ARF is more frequently inactivated than p16.

Role of radiologic imaging at the time of initial diagnosis of stage T1b‐T3b melanoma

In patients with T1b‐T3b cutaneous melanoma the utility of radiologic imaging at the time of diagnosis is unclear. Whether initial imaging led to a change in stage or treatment plan was investigated.