David R. Badcock

Asymmetries in the Sensitivity to Motion in Depth: A Centripetal Bias

It is reasonable to ask whether observers are more sensitive to the pattern of image motion caused by forward locomotion through the environment than to the pattern caused by backward locomotion. The distribution of sensitivities of cells in MT does show such a bias, although this bias is minimal at small eccentricities. Additionally, both locomotion-induced stimulation and the sensitivities of MT cells suggest greater sensitivity should be obtained in the lower visual field. Previous research on this issue has usually employed frontoparallel motion in patterns presented to one side of the fixation point. Both centrifugal and centripetal biases have been obtained. In this study the stimuli present motion signals that travel radially from (or towards) the fixation point. These stimuli, which produce a strong percept of motion in depth, are an adaptation of the global-dot-motion stimulus employed by Newsome and Pare. With these stimuli we find that sensitivity to motion in depth is greater in the lower visual field than in the upper visual field, and that sensitivity is greater to centripetal motion than to either centrifugal or frontoparallel motion. This centrifugal bias in sensitivity decreases with eccentricity. The last two findings contradict the notion that the bias is produced by the visual experience induced by normal forward locomotion and also that the detection of motion in depth is subserved by MT.

Discriminating the Direction of Second-Order Motion at Short Stimulus Durations

We measured the ability of human observers to discriminate the direction of motion of different spatial patterns presented for durations ranging from 0.021 to 0.67 sec. The patterns were: (1) a vertical grating (spatial frequency 0.93 c/deg at 5% contrast); (2) a beat pattern made by adding vertical gratings of 6.3 and 5.4 c/deg both at 5% contrast moving in opposite directions (this pattern appears as a horizontally moving, 0.93 c/deg beat; i.e. spatial variation in the contrast of a stationary vertical grating of 5.8 c/deg); and (3) a plaid pattern made by adding gratings of 5.9 c/deg orientated +/- 81 deg from vertical (this pattern can also be expressed as a horizontally moving 1.9 c/deg beat in a horizontal grating of 5.8 c/deg). The direction of motion of the grating and the plaid pattern were discriminable at all durations tested. The direction of motion of the beat could only be discriminated at durations above approx. 200 msec. We suggest that this is a consequence of the fact that the moving beat is only visible to second-order mechanisms, and that second-order mechanisms for the analysis of motion operate more slowly than first-order mechanisms.

Low-frequency filtering and the processing of local-global stimuli

The role of low-spatial-frequency information in the processing of global stimuli made up of local elements was examined. After selective removal of low spatial frequencies two major changes occurred in the pattern of results. First, response times to global stimuli were significantly slower and the usual speed advantage of global over local processing was lost. Second, when processing local features the usual decrease in response speed when the local and global letters are not the same (consistency effect) was not obtained. These effects could not be explained by changes in error rate, by contrast variation resulting from the process of filtering, or by loss of visual sensitivity due to greater eccentricity of global images.

Global motion perception: Interaction of the ON and OFF pathways

A number of experiments were conducted to investigate the interaction of the ON and OFF pathways in the processing of global-motion signals. The stimulus employed was a variant of that used by Newsome and Pare [(1988) Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 2201-2211] in which a small subset of dots move in a common (global-motion) direction in a field of randomly moving dots. The threshold measure was the number of dots required to move in the global-motion direction for that direction to be detected. We found that: (1) the extraction of a global-motion signal carried by light dots (luminance above the background) was impaired by the addition of dark dots (luminance below the background) which did not carry the signal (noise dots); (2) sub-threshold summation occurs for global-motion signals carried by light and dark dots; and (3) a signal dot which changed luminance polarity (went from light to dark) did not result in a motion signal--either in the global-motion direction or in the opposite direction (reverse apparent motion). From these findings we conclude that the inputs to the motion sensitive cells have matched spatial opponency (the ON and OFF pathways remain separate at this level) but that they then combine to form a single pathway prior to the extraction of the global-motion signal. These findings are contrary to those predicted by models which advocate squaring or full-wave rectification prior to global motion processing.

Global motion perception: No interaction between the first- and second-order motion pathways

The experiments reported here address the issue of whether the pathways which extract motion from first-order and second-order spatial patterns remain separate or whether they combine at some higher level in the motion system to form a single pathway. The question is addressed by investigating the interaction of first-order and second-order stimuli in the processing of a global-motion stimulus [a variant of the task introduced by Newsome & Pare (Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 2201-2211, (1988)]. Two experimental procedures were used. The first consisted of determining the effect of the addition of dots of one type (e.g. first order) undergoing purely random motion on the ability to extract the global-motion signal carried by dots of the other type (e.g. second order). The second experimental procedure consisted of determining the effect of maintaining a coherent-motion signal in one type of dot, moving in the opposite direction to the global-motion direction, on the ability to extract the global-motion signal carried by dots of the other type. The dots were matched for their effectiveness in producing a global motion percept and the results for both procedures were the same. First-order dots impaired the ability to extract second-order global-motion, and second-order dots had no effect on first-order global-motion extraction. It is argued that the sensitivity of the second-order global-motion system to the first-order dots is due to the ability of the second-order local-motion detectors to detect these dots. The present results are thus interpreted as indicating that the first-order and second-order motion pathways remain separate up to and including the level in the motion system at which global-motion signals are extracted.

Global-motion Perception: Interaction of Chromatic and Luminance Signals

A global dot-motion stimulus was employed in order to investigate the interaction between luminance and chromatic signals in motion processing. Thresholds are determined by measuring the minimum number of dots which need to move in a coherent fashion in a field of randomly moving dots in order for the observers to be able to determine the direction of coherent motion. We found that: (1) observers could not track an achromatic signal-dot which changes its luminance polarity between frame transitions. The addition of a consistent chromatic signal allowed observers to track such a dot when the dot contained low- (8%) luminance contrast but this ability was impaired as the luminance contrast was increased; (2) the addition of chromatic contrast to a dot which contained consistent low-luminance contrast could result in threshold elevation. For fixed contrast chromatic and luminance signals, the presence and degree of threshold elevation depended upon the spatiotemporal properties of the dot motion; (3) the ability of observers to extract a global-motion signal carried by a group of dots of one colour was impaired by the addition of a number of additional-noise dots of a different colour. These results are interpreted as indicating that: (1) the motion-selective cells that are sensitive to chromatic signals are also sensitive to luminance signals; (2) the combined chromatic and luminance and purely luminance motion cells are pooled to form a single pathway prior to global-motion extraction; and (3) the negative interaction observed between the chromatic and luminance signals is likely to be due to the differences in the processing speeds of the combined luminance and chromatic and the purely luminance sensitive motion cells.

Detection and discrimination of moving stimuli: the effects of color, luminance, and eccentricity

Psychophysical detection and direction discrimination thresholds for 1c/o, 1-Hz Gabors are plotted in a Weberian long-middle-wavelength-sensitive cone contrast plane. The shape of these threshold contours suggests linear cone contributions to additive (delta L/Lb + delta M/Mb) and opponent (delta L/Lb - delta M/Mb) postreceptoral mechanisms. The opponent mechanism dominates thresholds at the fovea, but sensitivity decreases rapidly with eccentricity in comparison with the additive mechanism. Cone contributions to the mechanisms vary in a small and nonsystematic manner across the retina. The experiments show that the additive mechanism is directionally sensitive at detection threshold. At all eccentricities studied (0-24 degrees), 0.3-log-unit suprathreshold contrasts are necessary for the opponent mechanism to signal direction of motion.

Contrast sensitivity of the motion system

A number of experiments were conducted to investigate how global-motion performance varies with luminance contrast. When all the dots in the stimulus were the same contrast, performance improved with increasing contrast up to about the 15% level (Experiment 1). Increasing the contrast beyond this level had no additional effect on performance. When the contrast of a subgroup of the dots was varied, differential effects on performance could be obtained for contrasts up to the 80% level (Experiment 2). These results are interpreted as indicating that the performance saturation observed in Experiment 1 was due to the attainment of a performance ceiling at the global-motion level, and not due to contrast-response saturation of the underlying local-motion detectors. The results of earlier studies that have apparently found conflicting results (saturation vs no saturation) are discussed in light of the present results.

Calibration of a color monitor for visual psychophysics

It has become common for stimuli used in visual psychophysical experiments to be presented on high-resolution color cathode-ray tubes (CRTs) such as the Barco CDCT 6551. These enable a flexibility of color, spatial-frequency content, temporal-frequency content, duration, size, and position that is not provided by most other media. CRTs are, however, not perfect; they suffer from the effects of temporal instability, spatial variability, lack of phosphor constancy, gun interdependence, and gun nonlinearity. This paper describes methods of assessing these aspects of monitor performance with respect to how significant each may be in psychometric terms. Although every application of CRT use in visual psychophysics is different, some general rules can be formulated to help ensure that unwanted effects are kept to a minimum. For the CRT used in this study (Barco CDCT 6551), a warm-up time of 30-45 min is necessary before chromatic and luminous stability ensues. Restriction of individual gun outputs to within 10%-90% of the possible range ensures that the effects of gun interdependence and lack of phosphor constancy are negligible. Calibration methods dealing with the linearization of gun output are also discussed.

Motion Coherence Across Different Chromatic Axes

It has been reported that equiluminant plaid patterns constructed from component gratings modulated along different axes of a cardinal colour space fail to create a coherent impression of two-dimensional motion Krauskopf and Farell (1990). Nature, 348, 328–331. In this paper we assess whether this lack of interaction between cardinal axes is a general finding or is instead dependent upon specific stimulus parameters. Type I and Type II plaids were made from sinusoidal components (1 cpd) each modulated along axes in a cardinal colour space and presented at equivalent perceived contrasts. The spatial angular difference between the two components was varied from 5 to 90 deg whilst keeping the Intersection of Constraints (I.O.C.) solution of the pattern constant. Observers were required to indicate the perceived direction of motion of the pattern in a single interval direction-identification task. We find that: (i) When plaids were made from components modulated along the same cardinal axis, coherent “pattern” motion was perceived at all angular differences. As the angular difference between the components decreased in a Type II plaid, the perceived direction of motion moved closer to the I.O.C. solution and away from that predicted by the vector sum. (ii) A plaid made from components modulated along red-green and blue-yellow cardinal axes (cross-cardinal axis) did not cohere at high angular differences (>30 deg) but had a perceived direction of the fastest moving component. At lower angular differences, however, pattern motion was detected and approached the I.O.C. solution in much the same way as a same-cardinal axis Type II plaid. (iii) A plaid made from a luminance grating and a cardinal chromatic grating (red-green or blue-yellow) failed to cohere under all conditions, demonstrating that there is no interaction between luminance and chromatic cardinal axes. These results indicate that there are conditions under which red-green and blue-yellow cardinal components interact for the purposes of motion detection. Copyright