David Reineke

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) using the Edwards FORTIS device.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has demonstrated the feasibility of treating valvular heart disease with transcatheter therapy. On the back of this success, various transcatheter concepts are being evaluated to treat other valvular disease, especially mitral regurgitation (MR). The concepts currently approved to treat MR replicate surgical mitral valve repair. However, most of them cannot eliminate MR completely. Similar to TAVI, a transcatheter mitral valve implantation may provide a valuable alternative. The FORTIS transcatheter mitral valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) is a self-expanding device implanted via a transapical approach. We describe our experience and early results in the first five patients treated on compassionate grounds. We also describe the details of the device, selection criteria and technical details of implantation.

Acute Aortic Dissection Determines the Fate of Initially Untreated Aortic Segments in Marfan Syndrome

Background— The aim of the current study was to investigate incidence and causes of surgical interventions in primarily nontreated aortic segments after previous aortic repair in patients with Marfan syndrome. Methods and Results— Retrospective analysis of 86 consecutive Marfan syndrome patients fulfilling Ghent criteria that underwent 136 aortic surgeries and were followed at this institution in the past 15 years. Mean follow-up was 8.8±6.8 y. Thirty-day, 6-month, 1-year, and overall mortality was 3.5%, 5.8%, 7.0%, and 12.8%, respectively. Ninety-two percent of patients initially presented with aortic root, ascending aortic or arch lesions, whereas 8% presented with descending aortic or thoraco-abdominal lesions. Primary presentation was acute aortic dissection (AAD) in 36% (77% type A, 23% type B) and aneurismal disease in 64%. Secondary complete arch replacement had to be performed in only 6% of patients without AAD, but in 36% with AAD (P=0.0005). In patients without AAD, 11% required surgery on primarily nontreated aortic segments (5 of 6 patients experienced type B dissection during follow-up), whereas in patients after AAD, 48% underwent surgery of initially nontreated aortic segments (42% of patients with type A and 86% of those with type B dissection; P=0.0002). Conclusions— The need for surgery in primarily nontreated aortic segments is precipitated by an initial presentation with AAD. Early elective surgery is associated with low mortality and reintervention rates. Type B dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome is associated with a high need for extensive aortic repair, even if the dissection is being considered uncomplicated by conventional criteria.

Mortality and neurologic injury after surgical repair with hypothermic circulatory arrest in acute and chronic proximal thoracic aortic pathology: effect of age on outcome.

Background— The goal of this study was to determine whether advanced age affects mortality and incidence of neurological injury in patients undergoing surgical repair with hypothermic circulatory arrest in acute and chronic thoracic aortic pathology. Methods and Results— A university center audit was done of 523 consecutive patients (median age, 64 years; interquartile range, 56–71 years) between 2005 and 2010. Mortality in acute type A aortic dissection (207 patients) was 9.7%, and in chronic ascending aortic aneurysms (316 patients) was 2.2% (P<0.001). Neurological injury was observed in 16.9% of patients with acute type A aortic dissection (chronic ascending aortic aneurysms, 7.9%; P=0.002). Multivariable regression analysis revealed hypothermic circulatory arrest >40 minutes (odds ratio [OR], 4.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60–11.06; P=0.004) and redo surgery (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.11–10.64; P=0.03) but not age (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 0.73–5.38; P=0.18) as independent predictor of mortality. Emergency surgery (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.31–8.15; P=0.01) and extracardiac arteriopathy (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.26–4.50; P=0.008) but not age (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.93–3.48; P=0.08) were independent predictors of neurological injury. Conclusions— Age is not associated with increased risk for mortality and neurological injury in patients undergoing surgical repair for acute and chronic thoracic aortic pathology with hypothermic circulatory arrest. Extended hypothermic circulatory arrest times, reflecting the extent of disease, and redo surgery predict mortality, whereas emergency surgery and extracardiac arteriopathy predict neurological injury.

Experimental Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: Different Sites of Primary Entry Tears Cause Different Ways of Propagation

BACKGROUND Many dissections seem to also have a retrograde component. The aim of the study was to evaluate different sites of primary entry tears and the propagation of the dissecting membrane, antegrade and retrograde, in an experimental model of acute type B aortic dissection. METHODS The entire thoracic aortic aorta including the supraaortic branches was harvested from 26 adult pigs. An intimal tear of 15 mm was created by contralateral incisions sites 20 mm downstream the origin of the left subclavian artery. In 13 cases the dissection was created at the concavity and in 13 cases at the convexity. The aortic annulus was then sewn into a silicon ring of a driving chamber. The distal aorta was connected to a tubing with adjustable resistance elements. The circulation was driven by the pneumatically driven Vienna heart to mimic aortic flow and pressure. RESULTS Mean circulation time was 64 ± 45 minutes. A mean pressure of 152 ± 43 mm Hg and a mean flow of 4.5 ± 1.0 L/minute were reached. The median antegrade propagation length of the dissecting membrane was 65 mm. The median retrograde propagation length in primary entry tears at the convexity was 20 mm and was stopped by the left subclavian artery. In aortas with the primary entry tear at the concavity, median retrograde propagation length was 21 mm extending up to the ascending aorta in 16%. CONCLUSIONS In this experimental model of acute type B aortic dissection, we confirmed that many type B dissections do also have a retrograde component. At the convexity, this component is stopped by the left subclavian artery as an anatomic barrier. At the concavity, the propagation of the dissecting membrane may extend up to the ascending aorta and may therefore cause retrograde type A dissection. These findings may substantiate clinical need for treatment of type B dissections with a primary entry tear at the concavity.

What makes the difference between the natural course of a remaining type B dissection after type A repair and a primary type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES To analyse the outcome and need for intervention [surgery or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)] in patients after surgery for remaining type B dissection after type A repair and primary type B aortic dissection. METHODS Within a 10-year period, 247 patients with remaining type B after type A, and 112 patients with primary type B aortic dissection were analysed. We assessed the clinical outcome as well as the need for intervention (surgery or TEVAR) within the aortic arch and the thoracoabdominal aorta as well as risk factors. RESULTS The median follow-up was 23 months (interquartile range 5-52). There was a significant difference with regard to the status of the primary entry tear between patients after surgical repair of an acute type A aortic dissection and primary acute type B aortic dissection (patent vs. non-patent entry 35 vs. 83%, P < 0.001). The overall need for any kind of intervention (surgery or TEVAR) was 19%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a patent primary entry tear in patients after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection as an independent predictor for intervention (surgery or TEVAR) during follow-up [odds ratio (OR) 6.4; confidence interval (CI) 1.39-29.81, P = 0.017]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis did not reveal a patent primary entry tear in patients after acute type B aortic dissection as an independent predictor for intervention (surgery or TEVAR) during follow-up (OR 0.67; CI 0.27-1.69, P = 0.671). Finally, the thrombosis status of the false lumen was not an independent predictor for intervention (surgery or TEVAR) either in patients after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (OR 3.46; CI 0.79-15.16, P = 0.100) or in patients after acute type B aortic dissection (OR 0.77; CI 0.31-1.93, P = 0.580). CONCLUSIONS A remaining type B dissection after type A repair and a primary type B aortic dissection represent two distinct pathophysiological entities with regard to late outcome. The need for any kind of intervention in the thoracoabdominal aorta is significantly higher in primary type B aortic dissections. A remaining patent primary entry tear independently predicts the need for intervention (surgery or TEVAR) in patients after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection and, thereby, remains the main target of initial therapy. The thrombosis status of the false lumen seems to be of secondary importance.

Long-Term Results After Operations for Active Infective Endocarditis in Native and Prosthetic Valves

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the midterm results of patients who underwent operations for active infective endocarditis. METHODS Within a 10-year period, 141 patients with active infective endocarditis received surgical therapy. We assessed outcome, freedom from reinfection, and freedom from reintervention. Prosthetic valve endocarditis was included in this series. RESULTS Surgical strategies included valve replacement with a tissue valve in 62% of patients and valve repair in 29% of patients. In 29% of patients, reconstruction of the aortomitral continuity, left ventricular outflow tract, or sinus of Valsalva was preferably performed with 1 or more bovine pericardial patches. In-hospital mortality was 11% and postoperative stroke rate was 7%. Multivariate logistic regression revealed multivalve involvement (p=0.052; odds ratio [OR], 5.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-34.57), preoperative neurologic impairment (p=0.006; OR, 9.71; 95% CI, 1.92-49.09), and European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) in quartiles (p=0.023; OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.15-7.17) to be independent predictors for in-hospital death. One-year and 5-year actuarial survival was 77% and 69%, respectively. One-year and 5-year actuarial freedom from reinfection was 100% and 90%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 100%. Five-year survival was 74% for single-valve endocarditis and 46% for multivalve endocarditis (p<0.001). One-year freedom from reinfection was 100% for both single-valve and multivalve endocarditis; 5-year freedom from reinfection was 95% for single-valve endocarditis versus 67% for multivalve endocarditis (p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS Despite a high early mortality during the first year, surgical intervention for active infective endocarditis provided excellent results with regard to freedom from reinfection and reoperation. A strategy of extensive debridement, reconstruction of destroyed cardiac structures using xenopericardium, followed by valve replacement or repair is highly effective and shows favorable long-term outcomes.

Results After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcers

BACKGROUND Results after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers are uncertain. METHODS From 1997 to 2010, 72 patients (median age, 67 years) presented with penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (symptomatic, 58%; rupture, 36%). Median logistic EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) was 32. Mean follow-up was 42 months (range, 19 to 56 months). In-hospital mortality, occurrence of endoleaks, reinterventions, and survival were recorded. RESULTS In hospital mortality was 4%. The primary success rate was 100%. Actuarial survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 93%, 72%, and 60%. The early type I and III endoleak rate was 2.7%. The late type I and III endoleak rate was 4%. One late surgical conversion was performed. Aortic-related actuarial survival was 100% at 1 year and 98.6% at 5 and 10 years. Age older than 75 years (odds ratio, 8.928; 95% confidence interval, 2.05 to 38.93) was an independent predictor of survival. During follow-up, 21% of patients underwent a cardiovascular intervention. CONCLUSIONS Results after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers are excellent for early and late type I and III endoleak formation and aortic-related survival. Patients are mainly limited by age and by the aggressive underlying obliterative atherosclerotic process.

Long-Term Results after Proximal Thoracic Aortic Redo Surgery

Objective To evaluate early and mid-term results in patients undergoing proximal thoracic aortic redo surgery. Methods We analyzed 60 patients (median age 60 years, median logistic EuroSCORE 40) who underwent proximal thoracic aortic redo surgery between January 2005 and April 2012. Outcome and risk factors were analyzed. Results In hospital mortality was 13%, perioperative neurologic injury was 7%. Fifty percent of patients underwent redo surgery in an urgent or emergency setting. In 65%, partial or total arch replacement with or without conventional or frozen elephant trunk extension was performed. The preoperative logistic EuroSCORE I confirmed to be a reliable predictor of adverse outcome- (ROC 0.786, 95%CI 0.64–0.93) as did the new EuroSCORE II model: ROC 0.882 95%CI 0.78–0.98. Extensive individual logistic EuroSCORE I levels more than 67 showed an OR of 7.01, 95%CI 1.43–34.27. A EuroSCORE II larger than 28 showed an OR of 4.44 (95%CI 1.4–14.06). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a critical preoperative state (OR 7.96, 95%CI 1.51–38.79) but not advanced age (OR 2.46, 95%CI 0.48–12.66) as the strongest independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. Median follow-up was 23 months (1–52 months). One year and five year actuarial survival rates were 83% and 69% respectively. Freedom from reoperation during follow-up was 100%. Conclusions Despite a substantial early attrition rate in patients presenting with a critical preoperative state, proximal thoracic aortic redo surgery provides excellent early and mid-term results. Higher EuroSCORE I and II levels and a critical preoperative state but not advanced age are independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. As a consequence, age alone should no longer be regarded as a contraindication for surgical treatment in this particular group of patients.

Graft preservation solutions in cardiovascular surgery.

Vein grafts are still the most commonly used graft material in cardiovascular surgery and much effort has been spent in recent years on investigating the optimal harvesting technique. One other related topic of similar importance remained more or less an incidental one. The storage solutions of vein grafts following procurement and prior to implantation are, despite their assumed impact, a relatively neglected theme. There is no doubt that the endothelium plays a key role in long-term patency of vein grafts, but the effects of the different storage solutions on the endothelium remain unclear : In a review of the literature, we could find 20 specific papers that addressed the question, of which the currently available preservation solutions are superior, harmless, damaging or ineffective. The focus lies on saline and autologous whole blood. Besides these two storage media, novel or alternative solutions have been investigated with surprising findings. In addition, a few words will be spent on potential alternatives and novel solutions on the market. As there is currently no randomized clinical trial regarding saline versus autologous whole blood available, this review compares all previous studies and methods of analysis to provide a certain level of evidence on this topic. In summary, saline has negative effects on the endothelial layers and therefore may compromise graft patency. Related factors, such as distension pressure, may outbalance the initial benefit of autologous whole blood or storage solutions and intensify the harmful effects of warm saline. In addition, there is no uniform consent on the superiority of autologous whole blood for vein graft storage. This may open the door to alternatives such as the University of Wisconsin solution or one of the specific designed storage solutions like TiProtec™ or Somaluthion™. Whether these preservation solutions are superior or advantageous remains the subject of further studies.

Long-term follow-up after implantation of the Shelhigh® No-React® complete biological aortic valved conduit

OBJECTIVES Long-term follow-up reports after implantation of the Shelhigh® (Shelhigh, Inc., NJ, USA) No-React® aortic valved conduit used for aortic root replacement do not exist. METHODS Between November 1998 and December 2007, the Shelhigh® No-React® aortic valved conduit was implanted in 291 consecutive patients with a mean age of 69.6 ± 9.1 years, and 33.7% were female (n = 98). Indications were annulo-aortic ectasia (n = 202), aortic valve stenosis combined with ascending aortic aneurysm (n = 67), acute type A aortic dissection (n = 29), endocarditis (n = 26) and other related pathologies (n = 48) including 62 patients with previous cardiac surgery. Data from two cardiac institutions were analysed retrospectively using SPSS (SPSS Software IBM, Inc., 2014, NY, USA). RESULTS Operative mortality was 10% (n = 29). Main cause of death was cardiac failure in 15 patients (51.8%), neurological events in 6 patients (20.7%), respiratory failure in 4 patients (13.8%), bleeding complications in 2 patients (6.9%) and gastrointestinal ischaemia in 2 cases (6.9%). There were 262 hospital survivors and all were entered in the follow-up study (100% complete). During the long-term follow-up (mean 70.3 ± 53.1 in months), a total of 126/262 patients (44.3%) died. Main causes of death in patients after discharge were cardiac (n = 37, 14.1%), neurological (n = 15, 5.7%) respiratory (n = 12, 4.6%), endocarditis (n = 12, 4.6%) and peripheral vascular disease (n = 5, 1.9%). In 29 (11.1%) patients, the cause of death could not be determined. Reoperation was required in 25 (8.6%) patients due to infection of the conduit (n = 9), aortoventricular disconnection (n = 4), pseudoaneurysm formation (n = 4) and structural valve degeneration (n = 8). Reoperations were performed 5.0 ± 3.8 (range 0.1-11.7) years after index surgery. CONCLUSIONS The Shelhigh® No-React® aortic valved conduit showed satisfactory short-term operative results. However, the long-term follow-up revealed a relatively high rate of deaths, which may be explained by the epidemiology of the patient group, but a substantial proportion of deaths could not be clarified. The overall rate of reoperation (8.6%) during the mid-term follow-up is worrisome and the failures due to aortoventricular disconnection, endocarditis and pseudoaneurysm formation remain unexplained. The redo-procedures were technically demanding. We recommend close follow-up of patients with the Shelhigh® No-React® aortic valved conduit, because besides classical structural valve degeneration, unexpected findings may be observed.