David Ring

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Fractures of the Radial Head

BACKGROUND The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the functional results following open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the radial head and to determine which fracture patterns are most amenable to this treatment. METHODS Fifty-six patients in whom an intra-articular fracture of the radial head had been treated with open reduction and internal fixation were evaluated at an average of forty-eight months after injury. Thirty patients had a Mason Type-2 (partial articular) fracture, and twenty-six had a Mason Type-3 (complete articular) fracture. Twenty-seven of the fifty-six fractures were associated with a fracture-dislocation of the forearm or elbow or an injury of the medial collateral ligament. Fifteen of the thirty Type-2 fractures were comminuted. Fourteen of the twenty-six Type-3 fractures consisted of more than three fragments, and twelve consisted of two or three fragments. The result at the final evaluation was judged to be unsatisfactory when there was early failure of fixation or nonunion requiring a second operation to excise the radial head, <100 degrees of forearm rotation, or a fair or poor rating according to the system of Broberg and Morrey. RESULTS The result was unsatisfactory for four of the fifteen patients with a comminuted Mason Type-2 fracture of the radial head; all four fractures had been associated with a fracture-dislocation of the forearm or elbow, and all four patients recovered <100 degrees of forearm rotation. Thirteen of the fourteen patients with a Mason Type-3 comminuted fracture with more than three articular fragments had an unsatisfactory result. In contrast, all fifteen patients with an isolated, noncomminuted Type-2 fracture had a satisfactory result. Of the twelve patients with a Type-3 fracture that split the radial head into two or three simple fragments, none had early failure, one had nonunion, and all had an arc of forearm rotation of > or =100 degrees. CONCLUSIONS Although current implants and techniques for internal fixation of small articular fractures have made it possible to repair most fractures of the radial head, our data suggest that open reduction and internal fixation is best reserved for minimally comminuted fractures with three or fewer articular fragments. Associated fracture-dislocation of the elbow or forearm may also compromise the long-term result of radial head repair, especially with regard to restoration of forearm rotation.

Prospective multicenter trial of a plate for dorsal fixation of distal radius fractures

A new plate designed specifically to address complex wrist pathology was used for the internal fixation of 22 complex fractures of the distal radius in 22 patients in a prospective multicenter trial. The majority of fractures were group C2- and C3-type fractures according to the Comprehensive Classification of Fractures. No plate failures, loss of reduction, nonunions, or infections occurred. Within the average follow-up time of 14 months, the functional results (including an average motion of 76% and an average grip strength of 56% of the contralateral side) were comparable to those reported for similar fractures in previous investigations. Five patients had irritation of the tendons in the second dorsal compartment. This trial serves both as a verification of the safety and efficacy of this distal radius plate as well as a demonstration of its utility in the treatment of complex fractures of the distal radius.

Fractures of the distal humerus.

We present a rational approach to the classification and surgical management of intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus. The fractures are classified on the basis of the surgical anatomy of the distal humerus, which is divided into two skeletal columns held together by the trochlea. The basic surgical aim is to restore all three elements with sufficient stability to permit functional movement. The surgical tactics are presented in detail.

Monteggia fractures in adults.

The records concerning ten consecutive years of experience with Monteggia fractures in adult patients at a level-one trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-eight patients who had been followed for a minimum of two years (average, 6.5 years; range, two to fourteen years) were identified. There were twenty-five women and twenty-three men, and the average age was fifty-two years (range, eighteen to eighty-eight years). According to the classification of Bado, there were seven type-I, thirty-eight type-II, one type-III, and two type-IV injuries. Twenty-six patients (68 percent) who had a Bado type-II fracture had an associated fracture of the radial head; ten of these patients also had a fracture of the coronoid process as a single large fragment. The ulna was fixed with a tension band-wire construct supplemented with screws in three patients (all of whom had a Bado type-II fracture). An ulnar diaphyseal fracture was fixed with an intramedullary Steinmann pin in one patient. The remaining patients had fixation with a plate and screws. The fracture of the radial head was treated with either complete or partial excision of the fragments in twelve patients (with replacement with a silicone prosthesis in two), open reduction and internal fixation in ten patients, and no intervention in four patients. Nine patients, all of whom had a Bado type-II fracture, needed a reoperation within three months after the initial operation; five had revision of a loose ulnar fixation device, three had resection of the radial head, and one had removal of a wire that had migrated from the radial head into the elbow articulation. Other important complications included proximal radioulnar synostosis in three patients, ulnar malunion in three, posterolateral rotatory instability of the ulnohumeral joint in one, and instability of the distal radioulnar joint in one. At the most recent follow-up examination, which was performed after all of the reoperations and reconstructive procedures had been done, the average score according to the system of Broberg and Morrey was 86 points (range, 15 to 100 points). The result was excellent for eighteen patients, good for twenty-two, fair for two, and poor for six. Six of the eight patients who had an unsatisfactory (fair or poor) result had had a Bado type-II fracture with a concomitant fracture of the radial head. These unsatisfactory results were related to a malunited fracture of the coronoid process in two patients, a proximal radioulnar synostosis in one, a malunited fracture of the coronoid process and a proximal radioulnar synostosis in one, a malunion of the ulna in one, and painfully restricted rotation of the forearm after operative fixation of a comminuted fracture of the radial head in one. The other two unsatisfactory results were in a patient who had had a Bado type-I fracture in one who had had a Bado type-IV fracture. The results of the present series are much better than those reported in most earlier studies, suggesting that stable anatomical fixation of the ulnar fracture (including associated fracture fragments of the coronoid process) with a plate and screws inserted with use of current techniques of fixation leads to a satisfactory result in most adults who have a Monteggia fracture. The posterior (Bado type-II) fracture is the most common type of Monteggia fracture in adults. Problems with the elbow related to fractures of the coronoid process and the radial head, which are common with Bado type-II Monteggia fractures, remain the most challenging elements in the treatment of these injuries.

Psychosocial aspects of disabling musculoskeletal pain.

Psychosocial factors are important determinants of pain intensity and disability in patients with disabling musculoskeletal pain. The psychosocial aspects of disabling musculoskeletal pain include cognitive (e.g., beliefs, expectations, and coping style), affective (e.g., depression, pain anxiety, heightened concern about illness, and anger), behavioral (e.g., avoidance), social (e.g., secondary gain), and cultural factors. The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy and other treatments that address the psychosocial aspects of disabling musculoskeletal pain has been confirmed in numerous high-quality studies.

Current Concepts Review - Fracture-Dislocation of the Elbow*

The elbow joint is one of the most inherently stable articulations of the skeleton1,54,75,77. When a dislocation is not associated with a fracture, early mobilization after closed reduction is associated with a low risk of redislocation72,99, despite the fact that, in most patients, all of the capsuloligamentous stabilizers of the articulation of the elbow are ruptured19,45,48,49. When at least one of the osseous or articular component structures that contribute to stability of the elbow is disrupted, the risk of recurrent or chronic instability and arthrosis is increased11,50. Treatment of these injuries remains challenging in part because accurate definitions of the patterns of injury, the specific roles of the component structures contributing to stability of the elbow, and a rational approach to treatment have not been fully determined. Despite the preponderance of literature on traumatic injuries about the elbow, there are relatively little data specifically addressing combined osseous, articular, and ligamentous injury of the elbow11,34,50,107,124. The purposes of this review are to define the component structures that together make the elbow such a unique articulation and to provide an understanding of the treatment of complex fracture-dislocations of the elbow. The structure of the elbow reflects a balance between the functional requirements for spatial positioning of the hand and the need for sufficient stability to allow for the manipulation of heavy objects, throwing, and bearing weight1,54,61. Flexion and extension of the elbow at the ulnohumeral articulation alters the length of the strut holding the hand away from the trunk54. Furthermore, humans are capable of using the upper extremity for sophisticated …

Radial head arthroplasty with a modular metal spacer to treat acute traumatic elbow instability.

BACKGROUND The use of a metal radial head prosthesis to help stabilize an elbow with traumatic instability is appealing because internal fixation of multifragment, displaced fractures of the radial head is susceptible to either early or late failure. The newer modular prostheses are easier to size and implant, but their effectiveness has not been investigated, to our knowledge. METHODS Twenty-seven patients in whom a radial head replacement with a modular metal spacer prosthesis had been performed to treat traumatic elbow instability were evaluated with use of the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Evaluation Instrument (ASES), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH). Radiographs were evaluated for arthrosis, periprosthetic radiolucency, and heterotopic ossification. RESULTS Seven patients underwent one or more subsequent operations to treat residual instability, heterotopic ossification and elbow contracture, ulnar neuropathy, or a misplaced screw. In two of these patients, the prosthesis was removed as part of an elbow contracture release or to treat infection. At an average of forty months postoperatively, elbow motion in the entire group of twenty-seven patients averaged 131 degrees of flexion with a 20 degrees flexion contracture, 73 degrees of pronation, and 57 degrees of supination. Stability was restored to all twenty-seven elbows, and twenty-two patients had a good or excellent result according to the MEPI. Seventeen patients had radiographic evidence of lucency around the neck of the prosthesis that was not associated with increased pain, thirteen patients had clinically inconsequential heterotopic ossification anterior to the radial neck, and nine patients had radiographic changes in the capitellum. CONCLUSIONS An intentionally loosely placed modular metal radial head prosthesis can help to restore stability in conjunction with repair of other fractures and reattachment of the lateral collateral ligament to the epicondyle in the setting of traumatic elbow instability with a comminuted fracture of the radial head. While a prosthesis that is too large can cause problems, lucencies around the stem of the intentionally loose prosthesis and most changes in the capitellum do not appear to cause problems, at least in the short term.

Articular Fractures of the Distal Part of the Humerus

Background: The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify the patterns of distal humeral articular fractures and to analyze the results of open reduction and internal fixation of these injuries.Methods: The cases of twenty-one patients with an articular fracture of the distal part of the humerus were reviewed at an average of forty months after the injury. Five components of the injury were identified: (1) the capitellum and the lateral aspect of the trochlea, (2) the lateral epicondyle, (3) the posterior aspect of the lateral column, (4) the posterior aspect of the trochlea, and (5) the medial epicondyle. All fractures were reduced and were stabilized with implants buried beneath the articular surface.Results: All fractures healed, and no patient had residual ulnohumeral instability or weakness. Ten patients required a second operation: six, for release of an elbow contracture; two, for treatment of ulnar neuropathy; one, for removal of hardware causing symptoms; and one, because of early loss of fixation. The average arc of ulnohumeral motion was 96° (range, 55° to 140°). The results according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index were excellent in four patients, good in twelve, and fair in five.Conclusions: Apparent fractures of the capitellum are often more complex fractures of the articular surface of the distal part of the humerus. Treatment of these injuries with operative reduction and fixation with buried implants can result in satisfactory restoration of elbow function.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See Intructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Self-Reported Upper Extremity Health Status Correlates with Depression

BACKGROUND The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is the most widely used upper extremity-specific health-status measure. The DASH score often demonstrates greater variability than would be expected on the basis of objective pathology. This variability may be related to psychosocial factors. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the correlation between the DASH score and psychological factors for specific diagnoses with relatively limited variation in objective pathology. METHODS Two hundred and thirty-five patients with a single, common, discrete hand problem known to have limited variations in objective pathology completed the DASH questionnaire, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) to assess neuroticism, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale to quantify depressive symptoms, and the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS). Forty-five patients had carpal tunnel syndrome, forty-four had de Quervain tenosynovitis, forty-eight had lateral elbow pain, and seventy-one had a single trigger finger. In addition, twenty-seven patients were evaluated six weeks after a nonoperatively treated fracture of the distal part of the radius. Relationships between psychosocial factors and the DASH score were determined. RESULTS A significant positive correlation between the DASH score and depression was noted for all diagnoses (r = 0.38 to 0.52; p < 0.01 for all). The DASH score also correlated with pain anxiety for four of the five diagnoses (carpal tunnel syndrome, r = 0.40; de Quervain tendinitis, r = 0.46; lateral elbow pain, r = 0.42; and trigger finger, r = 0.24) (p < 0.05 for all). The DASH score was not correlated with neuroticism for any diagnosis. There was a highly significant effect of depression (as measured with the CES-D score) on the DASH score for all diagnoses. Both the CES-D score (F = 62.68, p < 0.0001) and gender (F = 11.36, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of the DASH score. CONCLUSIONS Self-reported upper extremity-specific health status as measured with the DASH score correlates with depression and pain anxiety but not neuroticism. These data support the contention that psychosocial factors have a strong influence on health-status measures.

Transolecranon fracture-dislocation of the elbow.

OBJECTIVE To characterize the prevalence, morphology, and prognosis of anterior (transolecranon) fracture-dislocations of the elbow. DESIGN Retrospective case series. SETTING A consecutive series of thirteen patients from a single level-one trauma center, plus four patients from the practices of two of the senior authors. PATIENTS Three of seventeen patients had simple, oblique fractures of the olecranon, and fourteen had complex, comminuted fractures of the proximal ulna, including fragmentation of the olecranon in seven patients, large coronoid fragments in eight patients, and segmental fractures of the ulna in six patients. Fourteen patients were male and three were female, with an average age of thirty-eight years (range, 18 to 78 years). INTERVENTION All fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Two one-third tubular plates had to be revised to 3.5-millimeter dynamic compression plates within six weeks of the initial operation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Elbow performance rating of Broberg and Morrey. RESULTS At an average follow-up of twenty-five months, overall outcome was rated as excellent in seven patients, good in eight, and fair in two. Mild posttraumatic arthritis was noted in only two patients. Large coronoid fragments and extensive comminution of the trochlear notch did not preclude a good result provided that stable, anatomic fixation was achieved. CONCLUSIONS Anterior elbow dislocations occur most often as a fracture-dislocation in which the distal humerus is driven through the olecranon, thereby causing a complex, comminuted fracture of the proximal ulna. This injury is frequently confused with anterior Monteggia lesions by virtue of the readily apparent radiocapitellar dislocation. Stable restoration of the appropriate contour and dimensions of the trochlear notch of the ulna will lead to a good result in most cases.