David S. Bailie

Severe chondrolysis after shoulder arthroscopy: A case series

HYPOTHESIS Chondrolysis has been observed after shoulder arthroscopy and results in severe glenohumeral complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty three cases of post-arthroscopic glenohumeral chondrolysis, occurring between 2005-2006, are reported following a variety of arthroscopic shoulder procedures. Presenting complaints, signs and symptoms, associated operative findings, and potential etiological factors are reviewed. Management options are summarized. RESULTS Of the 23 cases of chondrolysis identified in our practice over a two year period, 14 occurred in patients following labral repair using a bioabsorbable device. Seventeen of the 23 patients used a high volume intra-articular pain pump for 48 hours after surgery. Seven of the 23 cases had documented use of a thermal probe. Four cases occurred in shoulders with no reported use of fixation anchors, pain pumps, or thermal probes. All cases had at least a 20 cc intra-articular bolus injection of 0.25% bupivicaine with epinephrine. DISCUSSION This case series identifies several common factors that could be responsible for post-arthroscopic glenohumeral chondrolysis. No single mechanism can be implicated based on the results of this study. Although strong concerns are raised over the use of intra-articular local anesthetics, glenohumeral chondrolysis appears to be an unfortunate convergence of multiple factors that may initiate rapid dissolution of articular cartilage and degenerative changes. CONCLUSION Chondrolysis is a devastating complication of arthroscopic shoulder surgery that can result in long-term disabling consequences. Further research is required to specifically identify causative factors. Until this is a available, we strongly advise against the use of large doses of intra-articular placement of local anesthetics.

Cementless humeral resurfacing arthroplasty in active patients less than fifty-five years of age.

BACKGROUND Cementless humeral resurfacing arthroplasty is a bone-conserving arthroplasty option for patients with glenohumeral arthritis. It has been successful in the older patient population. However, data regarding the results of arthroplasty in younger, more active patients are lacking. We report the two-year results of this procedure in active patients who were less than fifty-five years of age. METHODS We reviewed prospectively collected clinical data on a series of thirty-six patients under fifty-five years of age with end-stage glenohumeral arthrosis, but without osteonecrosis, who had undergone a cementless humeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty performed by a single surgeon. All patients were followed for a minimum of two years. We assessed pain, function, and patient satisfaction and documented all complications. Radiographs were evaluated for implant loosening. RESULTS The thirty-six patients had a mean age of 42.3 years and were followed for a mean of 38.1 months. Scores measured with a visual analog pain scale, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scale, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scale all improved significantly from preoperatively to two years postoperatively (p < 0.001). Complications included one traumatic subscapularis rupture at six weeks, three cases of arthrofibrosis, and one deep hematoma. No obvious radiographic evidence of loosening was noted at the time of the latest follow-up. One shoulder was converted to a stemmed total shoulder arthroplasty at twenty-four months because of pain, but the implant was not loose at the revision. The remaining thirty-five patients were satisfied with the outcome at the time of the latest follow-up and had returned to their desired activity. CONCLUSIONS Cementless humeral resurfacing arthroplasty is a viable treatment option for younger, active patients. Early results indicate that the desired function and pain relief can be expected. Implant loosening and glenoid wear do not appear to be concerns in the short term despite the high activity levels of many patients. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine if these results persist.

Reliability of scapular classification in examination of professional baseball players.

BackgroundClinically evaluating the scapulothoracic joint is challenging. To identify scapular dyskinesis, clinicians typically observe scapular motion and congruence during self-directed upper extremity movements. However, it is unclear whether this method is reliable.Questions/purposesWe therefore determined the interrater reliability of a scapular classification system in the examination of professional baseball players.MethodsSeventy-one healthy uninjured professional baseball players between the ages of 18 and 32 years volunteered to participate. We used a digital video camera to film five repetitions of scapular plane elevation while holding a 2-pound weight. Four examiners then independently classified the motions on video into one of four types. Interrater reliability analysis using the kappa (k) statistic was performed for: (1) classifying each scapula into one of the four types; (2) classifying each scapula as being abnormal (Types I–III) or normal (Type IV); and (3) classifying both scapula as both being symmetric (both normal or both abnormal) or asymmetric (one normal, one abnormal).ResultsWe found low reliability for all analyses. In classifying each scapula as one of the four types, reliability was k = 0.245 for the left limb and k = 0.186 for the right limb. When considering the dichotomous classifications (abnormal versus normal), reliability was k = 0.264 for left and k = 0.157 for right. For bilateral symmetry/asymmetric, reliability was k = 0.084.ConclusionWe found low reliability of visual observation and classification of scapular movement. Clinical Relevance Current evaluation strategies for evaluating subtle scapular abnormalities are limited.Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical anatomy of the posterior shoulder: Effects of arm position and anterior-inferior capsular shift

The purposes of this study were to evaluate anatomically various surgical intervals to the posterior shoulder and to determine the effects of varying arm positions and anterior-inferior capsular shift (AICS) on the relation of the posterior neurovascular structures to fixed bony landmarks. Fourteen cadaveric shoulders were dissected. The posterior surgical anatomy was defined, and the distances from fixed bony landmarks to neurovascular and musculotendinous structures were determined with digital calipers. Measurements were made with the arm in various positions and repeated after AICS. The most direct anatomic approach to the posterior shoulder was through a deltoid split in the raphe from the posterolateral corner of the acromion (PLCA), followed by an infraspinatus (IS) splitting incision. The IS/teres minor interval was at the inferior aspect of the glenoid rim and was difficult to locate in all specimens. The distance to the axillary nerve from the PLCA averaged 65 mm and decreased by an average of 14 mm (22%) with abduction and by 19 mm (29%) with extension. The posterior humeral circumflex artery was located along the humeral neck and was vulnerable to injury during lateral capsular dissection. The suprascapular nerve had multiple branches to the IS with most penetrating the muscle at its inferior portion. The closest branch to the glenoid rim was an average of 20 mm medial from it. No branch entered at the level of the IS raphe. The anatomic relations of the suprascapular nerve were unchanged after AICS. On the basis of this study, surgical exposure of the posterior shoulder with a deltoid split from the PLCA, followed by an IS split, appears to be anatomically safe. The arm position should be in neutral rotation, especially if previous anterior capsular procedures have been performed, which can alter the posterior neurovascular anatomic relations.

Humeral Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty With Meniscal Allograft in a Young Patient With Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

STUDY DESIGN Case report. BACKGROUND Management of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis in young, active patients is challenging due to the significant functional limitations and progression of the disease, coupled with the limited lifespan of prosthetic implants presently in use. The purpose of this report is to present the detailed rehabilitation program and outcome of a patient who suffered an initial glenohumeral dislocation and, following multiple surgical interventions, required shoulder hemiarthroplasty and biologic glenoid resurfacing to return to function. CASE DESCRIPTION An objectively based rehabilitation protocol was used for this patient following shoulder hemiarthroplasty. Data collected included passive and active range of motion, isometric rotational strength, and functional outcome scores to include the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) and American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) outcome measures. OUTCOMES Progressive improvements in active and passive range of motion were documented at numerous points during postoperative rehabilitation, including 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The patients initial functional outcome scores improved from 2/100 to 90/100 in the SANE and from 17/100 to 85/100 for the ASES rating scales. At 2 years postsurgery the SANE score was 60/100 and ASES 68/100. DISCUSSION Early postoperative range of motion exercises performed in a range protecting the subscapularis, coupled with a progressive program of rotator cuff and scapular strengthening exercises, resulted in decreased pain, improved range of motion, and return to work in a limited capacity following hemiarthroplasty with biologic glenoid resurfacing. Further research in series of patients following this procedure will help to establish optimal treatment guidelines and prognosis for young active patients with severe glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapy, level 4.

Muscular Activation During Plyometric Exercises in 90° of Glenohumeral Joint Abduction

Background: Plyometric exercises are frequently used to increase posterior rotator cuff and periscapular muscle strength and simulate demands and positional stresses in overhead athletes. The purpose of this study was to provide descriptive data on posterior rotator cuff and scapular muscle activation during upper extremity plyometric exercises in 90° of glenohumeral joint abduction. Hypothesis: Levels of muscular activity in the posterior rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers will be high during plyometric shoulder exercises similar to previously reported electromyographic (EMG) levels of shoulder rehabilitation exercises. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Twenty healthy subjects were tested using surface EMG during the performance of 2 plyometric shoulder exercises: prone external rotation (PERP) and reverse catch external rotation (RCP) using a handheld medicine ball. Electrode application included the upper and lower trapezius (UT and LT, respectively), serratus anterior (SA), infraspinatus (IN), and the middle and posterior deltoid (MD and PD, respectively) muscles. A 10-second interval of repetitive plyometric exercise (PERP) and 3 repetitions of RCP were sampled. Peak and average normalized EMG data were generated. Results: Normalized peak and average IN activity ranged between 73% and 102% and between 28% and 52% during the plyometric exercises, respectively, with peak and average LT activity measured between 79% and 131% and between 31% and 61%. SA activity ranged between 76% and 86% for peak and between 35% and 37% for average activity. Muscular activity levels in the MD and PD ranged between 49% and 72% and between 12% and 33% for peak and average, respectively. Conclusion: Moderate to high levels of muscular activity were measured in the rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers during these plyometric exercises with the glenohumeral joint abducted 90°.

CHAPTER 26 – Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Athletic Shoulder

The most common reasons and diagnostic classifi cations for which shoulder arthroplasty is performed are degenerative osteoarthritis, secondary degenerative osteoarth ritis, capsulorrhaphy arthropathy, and rheumatoid arthritis.1 Although all four of these can be found in the athletic shoulder, degenerative osteoarthritis occurring solely from repetitive overuse and wear or secondary to athletic trauma, as well as capsulorrhaphy arthropathy, are particularly common indications in the athlete. A brief overview of each diagnostic classifi cation has impli cations for the role of shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of arthritis in the athletic shoulder.