David S. Caldwell

Coping with rheumatoid arthritis pain: catastrophizing as a maladaptive strategy

&NA; The present study examined catastrophizing in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Subjects were 223 RA patients who were participants in a longitudinal study. Each patient completed the Catastrophizing scale of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) on 2 occasions separated by 6 months (time 1, time 2). The Catastrophizing scale is designed to measure negative self‐statements, castastrophizing thoughts and ideation (sample items = ‘I worry all the time about whether it will end,’ ‘It is awful and I feel that it overwhelms me’). Data analysis revealed that the Catastrophizing scale was internally reliable (alpha = 0.91) and had high test‐retest reliability (r = 0.81) over a 6 month period. Correlational analyses revealed that catastrophizing recorded at time 1 was related to pain intensity ratings, functional impairment on the Arthritis Impact Measurement scale (AIMS), and depression at time 2. Predictive findings regarding catastrophizing while modest were obtained after controlling for initial scores on the dependent variables, demographic variables (age, sex, socioeconomic status), duration of pain, and disability support status. Taken together, these findings suggest that catastrophizing is a maladaptive coping strategy in RA patients. Further research is needed to determine whether cognitive‐behavioral interventions designed to decrease catastrophizing can reduce pain and improve the physical and psychological functioning of RA patients.

The relationship of gender to pain, pain behavior, and disability in osteoarthritis patients: the role of catastrophizing

&NA; One hundred and sixty‐eight patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knees participated in this study. Of the participants, 72 were men and 96 were women. All participants completed the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS), underwent a 10 min standardized observation session to assess their pain behavior, and completed the Catastrophizing Scale of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) and the Depression Scale of the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised (SCL‐90R). The study found that there were significant differences in pain, pain behavior, and physical disability in men and women having OA. Women had significantly higher levels of pain and physical disability, and exhibited more pain behavior during an observation session than men. Further analyses revealed that catastrophizing mediated the relationship between gender and pain‐related outcomes. Once catastrophizing was entered into the analyses, the previously significant effects of gender were no longer found. Interestingly, catastrophizing still mediated the gender–pain relationship even after controlling for depression. These findings underscore the importance of both gender and catastrophizing in understanding the OA pain experience and may have important implications for pain assessment and treatment.

Pain coping skills training in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain: A comparative study

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a cognitive-behavioral intervention designed to improve pain coping skills could reduce pain, physical disability, psychological disability, and pain behavior in osteoarthritic knee pain patients. Patients in this study were older adults (mean age=64 years) having persistent pain (mean duration=12 years), who were diagnosed as having osteoarthritis of the knee on the basis of medical evaluation and x-rays. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: pain coping skills training, arthritis education, or a standard care control condition. Patients in the pain coping skills training condition (n=32) attended 10 weekly group sessions training them to recognize and reduce irrational cognitions and to use attention diversion and changes in activity patterns to control and decrease pain. Arthritis education subjects (n=36) attended 10 weekly group sessions providing them with detailed information on osteoarthritis. Standard care control subjects (n=31) continued with their routine care. Measures of coping strategies, pain, psychological disability, physical disability, medication use, and pain behavior were collected from all subjects before and after treatment. Results indicated that patients receiving pain coping skills training had significantly lower levels of pain and psychological disability post-treatment than patients receiving arthritis education or standard care. Correlational analyses revealed that patients in the pain coping skills training group who reported increases in the perceived effectiveness of their coping strategies were more likely to have lower levels of physical disability post-treatment. Taken together, these findings indicate that pain coping skills training can reduce pain and psychological disability in osteoarthritis patients. Future studies should examine whether behavioral rehearsal or spouse training can strengthen the effects of pain coping skills training in order to reduce physical disability and pain behavior as well as pain and psychological disability.

Spouse-assisted coping skills training in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of a spouse-assisted pain-coping skills training intervention on pain, psychological disability, physical disability, pain-coping, and pain behavior in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knees. METHODS Eighty-eight OA patients with persistent knee pain were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: 1) spouse-assisted pain-coping skills training, (spouse-assisted CST), 2) a conventional CST intervention with no spouse involvement (CST), or 3) an arthritis education-spousal support (AE-SS) control condition. All treatment was carried out in 10 weekly, 2-hour group sessions. RESULTS Data analysis revealed that at the completion of treatment, patients in the spouse-assisted CST condition had significantly lower levels of pain, psychological disability, and pain behavior, and higher scores on measures of coping attempts, marital adjustment, and self-efficacy than patients in the AE-SS control condition. Compared to patients in the AE-SS control condition, patients who received CST without spouse involvement had significantly higher post-treatment levels of self-efficacy and marital adjustment and showed a tendency toward lower levels of pain and psychological disability and higher scores on measures of coping attempts and ratings of the perceived effectiveness of pain-coping strategies. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that spouse-assisted CST has potential as a method for reducing pain and disability in OA patients.

Effects of spouse-assisted coping skills training and exercise training in patients with osteoarthritic knee pain: a randomized controlled study

&NA; This study tested the separate and combined effects of spouse‐assisted pain coping skills training (SA‐CST) and exercise training (ET) in a sample of patients having persistent osteoarthritic knee pain. Seventy‐two married osteoarthritis (OA) patients with persistent knee pain and their spouses were randomly assigned to: SA‐CST alone, SA‐CST plus ET, ET alone, or standard care (SC). Patients in SA‐CST alone, together with their spouses, attended 12 weekly, 2‐h group sessions for training in pain coping and couples skills. Patients in SA‐CST+ET received spouse‐assisted coping skills training and attended 12‐weeks supervised ET. Patients in the ET alone condition received just an exercise program. Data analyses revealed: (1) physical fitness and strength: the SA‐CST+ET and ET alone groups had significant improvements in physical fitness compared to SA‐CST alone and patients in SA‐CST+ET and ET alone had significant improvements in leg flexion and extension compared to SA‐CST alone and SC, (2) pain coping: patients in SA‐CST+ET and SA‐CST alone groups had significant improvements in coping attempts compared to ET alone or SC and spouses in SA‐CST+ET rated their partners as showing significant improvements in coping attempts compared to ET alone or SC, and (3) self‐efficacy: patients in SA‐CST+ET reported significant improvements in self‐efficacy and their spouses rated them as showing significant improvements in self‐efficacy compared to ET alone or SC. Patients receiving SA‐CST+ET who showed increased self‐efficacy were more likely to have improvements in psychological disability. An intervention that combines spouse‐assisted coping skills training and exercise training can improve physical fitness, strength, pain coping, and self‐efficacy in patients suffering from pain due to osteoarthritis.

Recent advances and future directions in the biopsychosocial assessment and treatment of arthritis.

This article provides an overview of the emerging literature on biopsychosocial assessment and treatment for two of the most common forms of arthritis: osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. The article is divided into 3 parts. In the 1st part, the basic elements of the biopsychosocial approach to assessing and treating persons having arthritis is described. In the 2nd part, the authors evaluate studies of biopsychosocial approaches to the assessment of arthritis pain and disability. Six research areas are reviewed: learned helplessness, depression, stress, pain coping, self-efficacy, and the social context of arthritis. The 3rd part of the article reviews studies that testing the efficacy of biopsychosocial treatment approaches for persons having osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Spouse-assisted coping skills training in the management of knee pain in osteoarthritis : Long-term followup results

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term effects of a spouse-assisted coping skills intervention in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knees, and to evaluate how pre- to posttreatment changes in marital adjustment and self-efficacy relate to long-term improvements in pain, psychological disability, physical disability, pain coping, and pain behavior. METHODS A followup study was conducted with 88 OA patients who had been randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment conditions: 1) spouse-assisted coping skills training (spouse-assisted CST), 2) a conventional CST intervention with no spouse involvement, and 3) an arthritis education-spousal support (AE-SS) control condition. To evaluate long-term outcome, comprehensive measures of self-efficacy, marital adjustment, pain, psychological disability, physical disability, pain coping, and pain behavior were collected from these individuals at 6 and 12 months posttreatment. RESULTS Data analysis revealed that, at 6-month followup, patients in the spouse-assisted CST condition scored higher on measures of coping and self-efficacy than those in the AE-SS control group. At 6-month followup, patients who received CST without spouse involvement showed a significantly higher frequency of coping attempts and reported higher levels of marital adjustment than those in the AE-SS control group. At 12-month followup, patients in the spouse-assisted CST condition had significantly higher overall self-efficacy than those in the AE-SS control condition. In addition, patients in both the spouse-assisted CST and CST only conditions tended to show improvements in physical disability at the 12-month followup. Individual differences in outcome were noted at the 12-month followup. Patients in the spouse-assisted CST condition who reported initial (pre- to posttreatment) increases in marital adjustment had lower levels of psychological disability, physical disability, and pain behavior at 12-month followup. However, for patients in the conventional CST and AE-SS control conditions, increases in marital adjustment occurring over the initial phase of treatment were related to increases in pain and decreases in scores on the Pain Control in Rational Thinking factor of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Finally, patients in the spouse-assisted CST condition who showed pre- to posttreatment increases in self-efficacy were more likely to show decreases in pain, psychological disability, and physical disability at 12-month followup. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that spouse-assisted CST can enhance self-efficacy and improve the coping abilities of OA patients in the long term. Individual differences in the long-term outcome of spouse-assisted CST were noted, with some patients (those showing increases in marital satisfaction and self-efficacy) showing much better outcomes than others.

Pain coping strategies and coping efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: a daily process analysis

Abstract Data from daily diaries were used to analyze pain coping processes in rheumatoid arthritis patients. For 30 consecutive days, 53 individuals described the pain coping strategies they used that day and rated the efficacy of their coping, joint pain, and positive and negative mood. Relations among variables were examined across‐persons and within‐persons over time. At the across‐persons level of analysis, (i) daily coping efficacy was unrelated to pain coping or pain intensity, and (ii) the more frequent daily use of a wide variety of pain coping strategies was correlated with greater pain. Within‐person analyses provided unique information about the relations among coping, pain, and mood not apparent in the across‐persons results. Specifically, these analyses showed that increases in daily coping efficacy were not only related to decreases in pain, but also to decreases in negative mood and increases in positive mood. Time‐lagged effects of coping and coping efficacy were also found. Individuals who reported high levels of coping efficacy on one day had lower levels of pain on the subsequent day. The daily use of pain reduction efforts and relaxation strategies also contributed to an improvement in next‐day pain and an enhancement of positive mood. The implications of these findings for the assessment of pain and coping in rheumatoid arthritis patients are discussed.

Osteoarthritic knee pain: a behavioral analysis.

&NA; This study used behavioral assessment techniques to analyze pain in osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Elghty‐seven OA patients having chronic knee pain served as subjects. Pain behavior was evaluated using a standard observation method and functional impairment was assessed using the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Data analysis revealed that pain and limitations in physical activities were the most common functional impairments and that the most frequently observed pain behavior was guarded movement. Predictive analyses indicated that disability support status and scores on a Pain Control and Rational Thinking factor of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) were predictive of functional impairment. Patients receiving disability support payments were much more functionally limited than those not receiving this financial support. Patients scoring high on the Pain Control and Rational Thinking factor of the CSQ were much less functionally impaired, walked a 5 m course more rapidly and moved from a standing to a sitting or reclining position more quickly than patients scoring low on this factor. The implications of these results for behavioral treatment of OA knee pain are discussed.

The relationship of arthritis self-efficacy to daily pain, daily mood, and daily pain coping in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

There is an increasing awareness in the medical community that psychosocial variables such as beliefs in self-efficacy are important determinants of treatment outcome. However, before measures of self-efficacy are widely incorporated into clinical practice, there needs to be a better understanding of how they relate to daily pain, mood and coping. In the present study 128 rheumatoid arthritis patients completed diaries for 30 days in which they provided daily ratings of joint pain, negative and positive mood, the use of pain coping strategies, and coping efficacy. The patients then participated in an evaluation session during which measures of self-efficacy (the Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale (ASES)), demographic variables, and medical status were collected. A series of hierarchical regression analyses was conducted to determine the degree to which self-efficacy measures collected at the time of the evaluation session were related to daily diary measures collected during the 30 preceding days. The results revealed that self-efficacy was significantly related to daily ratings of pain, mood, coping and coping efficacy. Interestingly, the findings regarding self-efficacy were obtained even after taking into account the effects of important demographic and medical status variables. Taken together, these results suggest that self-efficacy ratings collected from arthritis patients at the time of an evaluation session may well be related to recent experiences of daily pain and mood, as well as the daily use and perceived effectiveness of pain coping strategies.