David S. Hall
University of the Pacific (United States)
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David S. Hall.
Sex Roles | 1996
Roseann Hannon; Todd Kuntz; Sonja Van Laar; Jennifer Williams; David S. Hall
Effects of level of resistance and type of sexual behavior on judgments regarding sexual aggression on a date were studied. Participants were 138 female and 57 male college students who read one of six vignettes (three levels of resistance × two types of sexual behavior) describing a date in which unwanted sexual behavior occurred. Gender-neutral names (Chris and Pat) were used in the vignettes, and sex of aggressor and victim was not specified. Participants completed identical scales describing degree of disapproval of the aggressors behavior from three different perspectives: their own viewpoint (Participant Rating), the victims viewpoint (Victim Rating), and the aggressors viewpoint (Aggressor Rating). Both Participant and Victim Ratings showed significant differences between levels of resistance, and significant but smaller differences due to participant gender. Participant ratings showed a significant but small difference between types of sexual behavior. The aggressors overall behavior was labeled as date/acquaintance rape by 52.9% of participants for the vignette involving physical resistance and intercourse.
Sex Roles | 2000
Roseann Hannon; David S. Hall; Holly Nash; Jean Formati; Tina Hopson
The effects of sex of aggressor and victim (male/female, female/male, male/male, female/female) on judgments regarding sexual aggression on a date were studied. Participants were 415 female and 279 male community college students (M age = 23.0 years; 47.3% European American, 18.6% Latin American, 7.5% African American, 7.8% South East Asian American, 3.7% Asian American, and 15.1% other) who read one of four vignettes describing a date in which forced intercourse occurred. Participants rated degree of disapproval of the aggressors behavior from their own viewpoint (Participant Rating), the victims viewpoint (Victim Rating), and the aggressors viewpoint (Aggressor Rating). Results of 4 × 2 (Vignette × Participant Gender) ANOVAs of Participant Rating and Victim Rating indicated similar disapproval of the aggressor for all couple types except for female aggressor/male victim, for whom disapproval was significantly lower. The aggressors overall behavior was rated as date/acquaintance rape by 46.6–55.4% of participants for all vignettes except the female aggressor/male victim vignette (18.7%).
Sex Roles | 1995
Roseann Hannon; David S. Hall; Todd Kuntz; Sonja Van Laar; Jennifer Williams
Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality | 1998
Jason J. Burrow; Roseann Hannon; David S. Hall
Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality | 2012
David S. Hall
Archive | 2010
Roseann Hannon; David S. Hall; Vianey Gonzalez; Holly Cacciapaglia
Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality | 2014
David S. Hall
Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality | 2013
David S. Hall
Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality | 2013
David S. Hall
Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality | 2013
David S. Hall