David S. Heeszel
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David S. Heeszel.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
David S. Heeszel; Douglas A. Wiens; Sridhar Anandakrishnan; Richard C. Aster; Ian W. D. Dalziel; Audrey D. Huerta; Andrew A. Nyblade; T. J. Wilson; J. Paul Winberry
The seismic velocity structure of Antarctica is important, both as a constraint on the tectonic history of the continent and for understanding solid Earth interactions with the ice sheet. We use Rayleigh wave array analysis methods applied to teleseismic data from recent temporary broadband seismograph deployments to image the upper mantle structure of central and West Antarctica. Phase velocity maps are determined using a two-plane-wave tomography method, and are inverted for shear velocity using a Monte-Carlo approach to estimate three-dimensional velocity structure. Results illuminate the structural dichotomy between the East Antarctic Craton and West Antarctica, with West Antarctica showing thinner crust and slower upper mantle velocity. West Antarctica is characterized by a 70-100 km thick lithosphere, underlain by a low velocity zone to depths of at least 200 km. The slowest anomalies are beneath Ross Island and the Marie Byrd Land dome, and are interpreted as upper mantle thermal anomalies possibly due to mantle plumes. The central Transantarctic Mountains are marked by an uppermost mantle slow velocity anomaly, suggesting that the topography is thermally supported. The presence of thin, higher velocity lithosphere to depths of about 70 km beneath the West Antarctic Rift System limits estimates of the regionally averaged heat flow to less than 90 mW/m2. The Ellsworth-Whitmore block is underlain by mantle with velocities that are intermediate between those of the West Antarctic Rift System and the East Antarctic Craton. We interpret this province as Precambrian continental lithosphere that has been altered by Phanerozoic tectonic and magmatic activity.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014
David S. Heeszel; Helen Amanda Fricker; Jeremy N. Bassis; Shad O'Neel; Fabian Walter
Iceberg calving is a dominant mass loss mechanism for Antarctic ice shelves, second only to basal melting. An important process involved in calving is the initiation and propagation of through-penetrating fractures called rifts; however, the mechanisms controlling rift propagation remain poorly understood. To investigate the mechanics of ice shelf rifting, we analyzed seismicity associated with a propagating rift tip on the Amery Ice Shelf, using data collected during the austral summers of 2004–2007. We apply a suite of passive seismological techniques including icequake locations, back projection, and moment tensor inversion. We confirm previous results that show ice shelf rifting is characterized by periods of relative quiescence punctuated by swarms of intense seismicity of 1 to 3 h. Even during periods of quiescence, we find significant deformation around the rift tip. Moment tensors, calculated for a subset of the largest icequakes (Mw > −2.0) located near the rift tip, show steeply dipping fault planes, horizontal or shallowly plunging stress orientations, and often have a significant volumetric component. They also reveal that much of the observed seismicity is limited to the upper 50 m of the ice shelf. This suggests a complex system of deformation that involves the propagating rift, the region behind the rift tip, and a system of rift-transverse crevasses. Small-scale variations in the mechanical structure of the ice shelf, especially rift-transverse crevasses and accreted marine ice, play an important role in modulating the rate and location of seismicity associated with the propagating ice shelf rifts.
Geology | 2018
Weisen Shen; Douglas A. Wiens; Tim Stern; Sridhar Anandakrishnan; Richard C. Aster; Ian W. D. Dalziel; Samantha E. Hansen; David S. Heeszel; Audrey D. Huerta; Andrew A. Nyblade; T. J. Wilson; J. Paul Winberry
The 3000-km-long Transantarctic Mountains (TAMs), which separate cratonic East Antarctica from tectonically active West Antarctica, remain one of the least understood of Earth’s major mountain ranges. The tectonic mechanism that generates the high elevation, as well as the processes that produce major differences between various sectors of the TAMs, are still uncertain. Here we present newly constructed seismic images of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath central Antarctica derived from recently acquired seismic data, indicating ongoing lithospheric foundering beneath the southern TAMs. These images reveal an absence of thick, cold cratonic lithosphere beneath the southern TAMs. Instead, an uppermost-mantle slow seismic anomaly extends across the mountain front and 350 km into East Antarctica, beneath a high plateau near the South Pole. Under the slow anomaly, a relatively high-wavespeed root is found at ~200 km depth, connected with the East Antarctic lithosphere, suggesting that sinking lithosphere has been replaced at shallow depths by warm, slow-velocity asthenosphere. A mantle lithosphere foundering model is proposed to interpret these images, which best explains the present large area of high elevation and the uplift of the TAMs, as well as Miocene-age volcanism in the Mount Early region.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015
Qingjun Meng; David S. Heeszel; Lingling Ye; Thorne Lay; Douglas A. Wiens; Minghai Jia; Phil R. Cummins
The Tonga subduction zone is among the most seismically active regions and has the highest plate convergence rate in the world. However, recorded thrust events confidently located on the plate boundary have not exceeded Mw 8.0, and the historic record suggests low seismic coupling along the arc. We analyze two major thrust fault earthquakes that occurred in central Tonga in 2006 and 2009. The 3 May 2006 Mw 8.0 event has a focal mechanism consistent with interplate thrusting, was located west of the trench, and caused a moderate regional tsunami. However, long-period seismic wave inversions and finite-fault modeling by joint inversion of teleseismic body waves and local GPS static offsets indicate a slip distribution centered ~65 km deep, about 30 km deeper than the plate boundary revealed by locations of aftershocks, demonstrating that this was an intraslab event. The aftershock locations were obtained using data from 7 temporary seismic stations deployed shortly after the mainshock, and most lie on the plate boundary, not on either nodal plane of the deeper mainshock. The fault plane is ambiguous and investigation of compound rupture involving co-seismic slip along the megathrust does not provide a better fit, although activation of megathrust faulting is responsible for the aftershocks. The 19 March 2009 Mw 7.6 compressional faulting event occurred below the trench; finite-fault and W-phase inversions indicate an intraslab, ~50 km deep centroid, with ambiguous fault plane. This event also triggered megathrust faulting. There continues to be a paucity of large megathrust earthquakes in Tonga.
Archive | 2018
Phil R. Cummins; James Whatman; Anna-Lisa Lahtinen; John Beavan; L. M. Wallace; Douglas A. Wiens; Patrick J. Shore; David S. Heeszel; Michael Bevis; Eric Kendrick; Frederick W. Taylor; Tevita Malolo; Kelepi Mafi; Sione Nonu; Tevita Fatai; Apai Moala
The very large and rare Mw ~7.9 Earthquake of 3 May 2006 in the Kingdom of Tonga aroused great interest among both Tongan scientists and their colleagues in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. To investigate the earthquake we formed a collaborative research group of scientists from Australia, New Zealand, Tonga, and the United States. We brought in seven seismographs from Australia and the US to supplement the three-station network already in Tonga and eight GPS receivers primarily for the islands west of the earthquake epicenter. In addition, we made coastal observations to determine the regional pattern of subsidence associated with the earthquake. The GPS instruments can measure horizontal and vertical motion quite precisely, but only after the earthquake from the time of deployment onward, except for some sites on Tongatapu, Vava’u, and Lifuka that had been occupied by GPS receivers in the past. This report describes our efforts.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2010
Samantha E. Hansen; Andrew A. Nyblade; David S. Heeszel; Douglas A. Wiens; Patrick J. Shore; Masaki Kanao
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2013
David S. Heeszel; Douglas A. Wiens; Andrew A. Nyblade; Samantha E. Hansen; Masaki Kanao; Meijan An; Yue Zhao
Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2012
Huw J. Horgan; Sridhar Anandakrishnan; Robert W. Jacobel; Knut Christianson; Richard B. Alley; David S. Heeszel; Stefano Picotti; Jacob I. Walter
Geophysical Journal International | 2014
Natalie J. Accardo; Douglas A. Wiens; Stephen Hernandez; Richard C. Aster; Andrew A. Nyblade; Audrey D. Huerta; Sridhar Anandakrishnan; T. J. Wilson; David S. Heeszel; Ian W. D. Dalziel
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems | 2008
David S. Heeszel; Douglas A. Wiens; Patrick J. Shore; Hajime Shiobara; Hiroko Sugioka