David Scholfield

Proof of Concept Trial of Tanezumab for the Treatment of Symptoms Associated With Interstitial Cystitis

PURPOSE In this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled phase 2 study we investigated tanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits nerve growth factor as a treatment for interstitial cystitis pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with interstitial cystitis received a single intravenous dose of 200 μg/kg tanezumab or placebo. Patients recorded daily pain scores (on an 11-point numerical rating scale) 7 days before attending study visits and completed a urinary symptom diary for 3 of those days. Patients also completed the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index questionnaire and a global response assessment. The primary end point was change in average daily numerical rating scale pain score from baseline to week 6. Secondary end points included global response assessment, Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index score, micturition and urgency episode frequency per 24 hours, and mean voided volume per micturition. The incidence of adverse events was also assessed. RESULTS A total of 34 patients received tanezumab and 30 received placebo. At week 6 tanezumab produced a significant reduction from baseline in average daily pain score vs placebo (treatment difference [LS mean, 90% CI] was -1.4 [-2.2, -0.5]). A significantly higher proportion of patients on tanezumab responded as improved in the global response assessment and tanezumab also significantly reduced urgency episode frequency vs placebo. Tanezumab had no significant effect on Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index score, micturition frequency or mean voided volume per micturition. The most common adverse events were headache (tanezumab 20.6%, placebo 16.7%) and paresthesia (tanezumab 17.6%, placebo 3.3%). CONCLUSIONS Tanezumab has shown preliminary efficacy in the treatment of pain associated with interstitial cystitis.

Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Healthy Older Subjects Treated with Fesoterodine

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the cognitive effects of fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg versus placebo in healthy older adults. Methods: This was an active– and placebo–controlled, double–blind, double–dummy crossover study conducted using healthy volunteers (aged 65–85 years) with baseline Mini–Mental State Examination score ≥ 26. The study comprised 4 treatment periods: fesoterodine 4 mg for 6 days; fesoterodine 4 mg for 3 days followed by fesoterodine 8 mg for 3 days; placebo for 6 days; and placebo for 6 days with alprazolam 1 mg on day 6. The treatment sequence was randomized, with a 3– to 6–day washout between periods. Subjects completed computer–based cognitive assessments and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test on day 1 (before dosing) and day 6 (after dosing) of each period. The primary endpoint was the Detection task; secondary endpoints were the Identification task, 1–card learning task, Continuous Paired Associate Learning task, Groton Maze Learning Task, and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Results: Among 18 subjects in the per protocol set, changes from baseline to day 6 with fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg were not significantly different from placebo for any endpoint (P < 0.05); alprazolam produced significant impairment in all endpoints versus placebo (P < 0.05). No serious adverse events were reported; the most common adverse events were dry mouth for fesoterodine and sedation for alprazolam. No sedation was reported with fesoterodine. Conclusion: In healthy older adults, fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg once daily had no statistically significant effects versus placebo on any cognitive function assessed, including memory; alprazolam 1 mg produced statistically significant deterioration.

Efficacy and safety of fesoterodine 8 mg in subjects with overactive bladder after a suboptimal response to tolterodine ER

To assess fesoterodine 8 mg efficacy over time and vs. placebo in subjects with overactive bladder (OAB) who responded suboptimally to tolterodine extended release (ER) 4 mg.

Superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg vs 4 mg in reducing urgency urinary incontinence episodes in patients with overactive bladder: results of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled EIGHT trial

To assess the superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg vs 4 mg for improvement in urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes and other diary variables, diary‐dry rate (proportion of patients with >0 UUI episodes on baseline diary and 0 UUI episodes on post‐baseline diary), and improvements in measures of symptom bother, health‐related quality of life (HRQL), and other patient‐reported outcomes (PROs).

Dose-escalating study of the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fesoterodine in children with overactive bladder

OBJECTIVE To determine the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of fesoterodine, and assess the utility of 3-day bladder diaries (exploratory objective) in pediatric subjects with neurogenic detrusor overactivity or idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS In this 8-week open-label study, subjects (8-17 years, >25 kg) received fesoterodine 4 mg for 4 weeks, then 8 mg for 4 weeks. Blood samples were obtained at weeks 4 and 8. RESULTS Of 21 subjects enrolled, 11 had neurogenic detrusor overactivity and 10 had idiopathic OAB; 1 discontinued (personal reasons). Mean age and weight were 13.2 years and 54.0 kg for boys (n = 12) and 13.1 years and 49.2 kg for girls (n = 9). 5-Hydroxy-methyltolterodine plasma concentrations did not differ by diagnosis and were consistent with predictions based on adult data. Treatment-related adverse events (all mild or moderate) included 1 event each of dry mouth, constipation, dry eyes and blurred vision, and 2 events each of nausea and increased post-void residual volume. Three-day bladder diaries proved feasible. CONCLUSIONS Oral administration of fesoterodine in pediatric subjects (>25 kg) with idiopathic OAB or neurogenic detrusor overactivity produced steady-state plasma 5-hydroxy-methyltolterodine exposures similar to those in adults. The doses given were well tolerated.

Fesoterodine clinical efficacy and safety for the treatment of overactive bladder in relation to patient profiles: a systematic review

Abstract Objective: To summarize published evidence on the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of fesoterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in relation to patient clinical and demographic profiles. Methods: A systematic review of published articles on fesoterodine was conducted via a PubMed search. Articles were identified using the search term fesoterodine, with limits of human species and abstract available. Review and meta-analysis articles, validation studies, articles focused on treatment compliance/adherence, meeting abstracts, and articles not focused on oral fesoterodine administration in human subjects were excluded. Data from retained articles were summarized descriptively. Results: Of 137 articles identified, 61 (15 articles on the pharmacology and 46 articles on the efficacy and/or safety of fesoterodine) met inclusion criteria. Superiority trials demonstrated the additional efficacy of fesoterodine 8 mg versus fesoterodine 4 mg and tolterodine extended release 4 mg in treating OAB. Prospective trials in specific patient populations indicated beneficial effects of fesoterodine in elderly patients, vulnerable elderly patients, patients dissatisfied with or with a suboptimal response to previous antimuscarinic therapy, patients with urge urinary incontinence (UUI) or nocturnal urgency, and men with persistent LUTS during alpha-blocker treatment. With two effective doses, the fesoterodine dose can be adjusted to achieve optimal efficacy and tolerability in individual patients. The most common adverse events during fesoterodine treatment are dry mouth and constipation. Conclusions: Extensive evidence demonstrates the efficacy and safety of fesoterodine in relieving OAB symptoms, including urgency, urinary frequency, UUI, and nocturnal urgency, in patients with various clinical and demographic profiles. Trial results provide valuable information on fesoterodine treatment in specific patient populations, including both elderly and vulnerable elderly patients. Potential limitations of this review are that only English language articles in PubMed were searched and included.

Flexible dosing with fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg: a systematic review of data from clinical trials

To systematically review dose‐escalation data from flexible‐dose studies of fesoterodine and summarise factors associated with dose‐escalation decisions.

Measurement of Urethral Closure Function in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence

PURPOSE We assessed the use of urethral pressure reflectometry in detecting pressure increases in the female urethra and compared the usefulness of urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in a pharmacodynamic intervention study. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study 17 women with stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence received 4 mg esreboxetine or placebo for 7 to 9 days followed by a washout period before crossing over treatments. Urethral pressure reflectometry and urethral pressure profilometry were performed before and at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS The urethral opening pressure measured with urethral pressure reflectometry increased significantly compared to placebo by 13.7 cm H(2)O (p <0.0001) with an observed within subject standard deviation of 5.4. The increase in maximum urethral closure pressure was 8.4 cm H(2)O compared to placebo (p = 0.06) and for maximum urethral pressure the increase was 9.9 cm H(2)O (p = 0.04). However, the within subject SD for these parameters was higher at 11.4 and 12.2, respectively, implying lower power for these analyses. While receiving esreboxetine patients had significantly fewer incontinence episodes and reported a treatment benefit (global impression of change) compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS The opening pressure measured with urethral pressure reflectometry was less variable compared to the parameters measured with urethral pressure profilometry (maximum urethral closure pressure and maximum urethral pressure). Consequently using urethral pressure reflectometry would result in a more efficient study design when investigating pharmacological effects on the urethra in future studies. We also found that esreboxetine was well tolerated, and had a positive and clinically relevant effect on urethral closure function and symptoms of stress urinary incontinence.

Investigation of a Ca2+ Channel α2δ Ligand for the Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Phase II Trial

PURPOSE We investigated PD-0299685, a Ca(2+) channel α2δ ligand, for interstitial cystitis pain in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled phase IIa study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome received 30 or 60 mg PD-0299685 daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary end points were change in average daily worst pain severity score (on an 11-point numerical rating scale) and change in Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index score from baseline to week 12. Secondary end points included global response assessment, micturition and urgency episode frequency per 24 hours and mean voided volume per micturition. Incidence of adverse events was also assessed. RESULTS Of 161 patients 54 received 30 mg PD-0299685 daily, 55 received 60 mg PD-0299685 daily and 52 received placebo. At week 12 the 60 mg dose produced a clinically significant reduction in daily worst pain severity score from baseline compared to placebo (treatment difference [90% CI] -0.82 [-1.72, 0.08]). A greater proportion of patients taking 60 mg PD-0299685 daily demonstrated improvement in global response assessment. PD-0299685 had no clinically significant effect on the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index score or urinary end points. More patients discontinued due to treatment related adverse events with 30 or 60 mg PD-0299685 daily than with the placebo. CONCLUSIONS PD-0299685 failed to demonstrate positive proof of concept for the treatment of pain and other urinary end points associated with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome.

Development of a predictive model for urgency urinary incontinence.

The ability to set realistic expectations of treatment response in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) can have an impact on patient engagement and adherence to study medication. In order to help set treatment expectations for OAB, a Physician Predictive Tool has been developed based on predictive modelling. Models have been developed utilizing data from eight Phase 3 and 4 fesoterodine clinical trials and these models enable the prediction of individual treatment response in subjects with OAB, based on various baseline characteristics. The data utilized and covariates that were hypothesized to influence treatment response are described. The model selection and development process are also outlined, and the final model and some example results utilizing this model are presented. Finally, we discuss the potential benefits and limitations of such a predictive tool.