Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David Schroeder is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David Schroeder.


Journal of Physical Oceanography | 2014

Impact of Variable Atmospheric and Oceanic Form Drag on Simulations of Arctic Sea Ice

Michel Tsamados; Daniel L. Feltham; David Schroeder; Daniela Flocco; Sinead L. Farrell; Nathan T. Kurtz; Seymour W. Laxon; Sheldon Bacon

Over Arctic sea ice, pressure ridges and floe and melt pond edges all introduce discrete obstructions to the flow of air or water past the ice and are a source of form drag. In current climate models form drag is only accounted for by tuning the air–ice and ice–ocean drag coefficients, that is, by effectively altering the roughness length in a surface drag parameterization. The existing approach of the skin drag parameter tuning is poorly constrained by observations and fails to describe correctly the physics associated with the air–ice and ocean–ice drag. Here, the authors combine recent theoretical developments to deduce the total neutral form drag coefficients from properties of the ice cover such as ice concentration, vertical extent and area of the ridges, freeboard and floe draft, and the size of floes and melt ponds. The drag coefficients are incorporated into the Los Alamos Sea Ice Model (CICE) and show the influence of the new drag parameterization on the motion and state of the ice cover, with the most noticeable being a depletion of sea ice over the west boundary of the Arctic Ocean and over the Beaufort Sea. The new parameterization allows the drag coefficients to be coupled to the sea ice state and therefore to evolve spatially and temporally. It is found that the range of values predicted for the drag coefficients agree with the range of values measured in several regions of the Arctic. Finally, the implications of the new form drag formulation for the spinup or spindown of the Arctic Ocean are discussed.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

The impact of variable sea ice roughness on changes in Arctic Ocean surface stress: A model study

Torge Martin; Michel Tsamados; David Schroeder; Daniel L. Feltham

The Arctic sea ice cover is thinning and retreating, causing changes in surface roughness that in turn modify the momentum flux from the atmosphere through the ice into the ocean. New model simulations comprising variable sea ice drag coefficients for both the air and water interface demonstrate that the heterogeneity in sea ice surface roughness significantly impacts the spatial distribution and trends of ocean surface stress during the last decades. Simulations with constant sea ice drag coefficients as used in most climate models show an increase in annual mean ocean surface stress (0.003 N/m2 per decade, 4.6%) due to the reduction of ice thickness leading to a weakening of the ice and accelerated ice drift. In contrast, with variable drag coefficients our simulations show annual mean ocean surface stress is declining at a rate of −0.002 N/m2 per decade (3.1%) over the period 1980–2013 because of a significant reduction in surface roughness associated with an increasingly thinner and younger sea ice cover. The effectiveness of sea ice in transferring momentum does not only depend on its resistive strength against the wind forcing but is also set by its top and bottom surface roughness varying with ice types and ice conditions. This reveals the need to account for sea ice surface roughness variations in climate simulations in order to correctly represent the implications of sea ice loss under global warming.


Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A | 2015

Processes controlling surface, bottom and lateral melt of Arctic sea ice in a state of the art sea ice model

Michel Tsamados; Daniel L. Feltham; Alek A. Petty; David Schroeder; Daniela Flocco

We present a modelling study of processes controlling the summer melt of the Arctic sea ice cover. We perform a sensitivity study and focus our interest on the thermodynamics at the ice–atmosphere and ice–ocean interfaces. We use the Los Alamos community sea ice model CICE, and additionally implement and test three new parametrization schemes: (i) a prognostic mixed layer; (ii) a three equation boundary condition for the salt and heat flux at the ice–ocean interface; and (iii) a new lateral melt parametrization. Recent additions to the CICE model are also tested, including explicit melt ponds, a form drag parametrization and a halodynamic brine drainage scheme. The various sea ice parametrizations tested in this sensitivity study introduce a wide spread in the simulated sea ice characteristics. For each simulation, the total melt is decomposed into its surface, bottom and lateral melt components to assess the processes driving melt and how this varies regionally and temporally. Because this study quantifies the relative importance of several processes in driving the summer melt of sea ice, this work can serve as a guide for future research priorities.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015

The refreezing of melt ponds on Arctic sea ice

Daniela Flocco; Daniel L. Feltham; E. Bailey; David Schroeder

The presence of melt ponds on the surface of Arctic sea ice significantly reduces its albedo, inducing a positive feedback leading to sea ice thinning. While the role of melt ponds in enhancing the summer melt of sea ice is well known, their impact on suppressing winter freezing of sea ice has, hitherto, received less attention. Melt ponds freeze by forming an ice lid at the upper surface, which insulates them from the atmosphere and traps pond water between the underlying sea ice and the ice lid. The pond water is a store of latent heat, which is released during refreezing. Until a pond freezes completely, there can be minimal ice growth at the base of the underlying sea ice. In this work, we present a model of the refreezing of a melt pond that includes the heat and salt balances in the ice lid, trapped pond, and underlying sea ice. The model uses a two-stream radiation model to account for radiative scattering at phase boundaries. Simulations and related sensitivity studies suggest that trapped pond water may survive for over a month. We focus on the role that pond salinity has on delaying the refreezing process and retarding basal sea ice growth. We estimate that for a typical sea ice pond coverage in autumn, excluding the impact of trapped ponds in models overestimates ice growth by up to 265 million km3, an overestimate of 26%.


Science Advances | 2017

The frequency and extent of sub-ice phytoplankton blooms in the Arctic Ocean

Christopher Horvat; David R. Jones; Sarah Iams; David Schroeder; Daniela Flocco; Daniel L. Feltham

Recent thinning and ponding of Arctic sea ice may have led to frequent, extensive phytoplankton blooms under sea ice. In July 2011, the observation of a massive phytoplankton bloom underneath a sea ice–covered region of the Chukchi Sea shifted the scientific consensus that regions of the Arctic Ocean covered by sea ice were inhospitable to photosynthetic life. Although the impact of widespread phytoplankton blooms under sea ice on Arctic Ocean ecology and carbon fixation is potentially marked, the prevalence of these events in the modern Arctic and in the recent past is, to date, unknown. We investigate the timing, frequency, and evolution of these events over the past 30 years. Although sea ice strongly attenuates solar radiation, it has thinned significantly over the past 30 years. The thinner summertime Arctic sea ice is increasingly covered in melt ponds, which permit more light penetration than bare or snow-covered ice. Our model results indicate that the recent thinning of Arctic sea ice is the main cause of a marked increase in the prevalence of light conditions conducive to sub-ice blooms. We find that as little as 20 years ago, the conditions required for sub-ice blooms may have been uncommon, but their frequency has increased to the point that nearly 30% of the ice-covered Arctic Ocean in July permits sub-ice blooms. Recent climate change may have markedly altered the ecology of the Arctic Ocean.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012

Impact of melt ponds on Arctic sea ice simulations from 1990 to 2007

Daniela Flocco; David Schroeder; Daniel L. Feltham; Elizabeth C. Hunke


Ocean Modelling | 2015

Interactions between wind-blown snow redistribution and melt ponds in a coupled ocean–sea ice model

Olivier Lecomte; Thierry Fichefet; Daniela Flocco; David Schroeder; Martin Vancoppenolle


Geoscientific Model Development Discussions | 2017

The sea ice model component of HadGEM3-GC3.1

Jeff Ridley; Edward W. Blockley; A. B. Keen; J. G. L. Rae; Alex West; David Schroeder


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012

Impact of melt ponds on Arctic sea ice simulations from 1990 to 2007: IMPACT OF MELT PONDS ON ARCTIC SEA ICE

Daniela Flocco; David Schroeder; Daniel L. Feltham; Elizabeth C. Hunke


The Cryosphere Discussions | 2016

Impact of refreezing melt ponds on Arctic sea ice basal growth

Daniela Flocco; Daniel L. Feltham; David Schroeder; Michel Tsamados

Collaboration


Dive into the David Schroeder's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michel Tsamados

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elizabeth C. Hunke

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Bailey

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge