David Szalay
McMaster University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David Szalay.
Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2013
Mohammad Qadura; Farhan Pervaiz; John Harlock; Ashraf Alazzoni; Forough Farrokhyar; Kamyar Kahnamoui; David Szalay; Theodore Rapanos
BACKGROUND The objective of this study is to provide an up-to-date meta-analysis on the short- and long-term mortality rates of elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) via the open and endovascular approaches. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, conference proceeding from major vascular meetings were searched for randomized trials comparing open vs elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of AAAs. A random-effects model was used for analysis. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of open vs EVAR were calculated for short- and long-term mortality and reintervention rates. RESULTS The analysis encompassed four randomized controlled trials with a total of 2783 patients. The open repair group resulted in significantly increased 30-day postoperative all-cause mortality compared with EVAR repair group (3.2% vs 1.2%; RR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.60-4.94); however, there is no statistical difference in the long-term all-cause mortality between both groups (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.10). Interestingly, fewer patients underwent reintervention procedures in the open repair group compared with those who had EVAR repair (9.3% vs 18.9%; RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40-0.60), but this finding is doubtful due to the large heterogeneity. Lastly, no statistical difference in long-term mortality rates attributable to cardiovascular disease (CVD), aneurysm related, or stroke were found between the two types of repair. CONCLUSIONS Results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that the 30-day all-cause mortality rate is higher with open than with EVAR repair; however, there is no statistical difference in the long-term all-cause and cause-specific mortality between both groups. The reintervention rate attributable to procedural complication was higher in the EVAR group. Because of the equivalency of long-term outcomes and the short-term benefits of EVAR, an endovascular-first approach to AAAs can be supported by the meta-analysis.
Annals of Surgery | 2017
B. M. Biccard; David Julian Ashbridge Scott; Matthew T. V. Chan; Andrew Archbold; C. Y. Wang; Alben Sigamani; Gerard Urrútia; Patricia Cruz; Sadeesh Srinathan; David Szalay; John Harlock; Jacques G. Tittley; Theodore Rapanos; Fadi Elias; Michael J. Jacka; Germán Málaga; Valsa Abraham; Otavio Berwanger; Félix R. Montes; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Matthew T. Hutcherson; Clara K. Chow; Carisi Anne Polanczyk; Wojciech Szczeklik; Gareth L. Ackland; Luc Dubois; Robert J. Sapsford; Colin Williams; Olga Lucía Cortes; Yannick Le Mananch
Objective: To determine the prognostic relevance, clinical characteristics, and 30-day outcomes associated with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) in vascular surgical patients. Background: MINS has been independently associated with 30-day mortality after noncardiac surgery. The characteristics and prognostic importance of MINS in vascular surgery patients are poorly described. Methods: This was an international prospective cohort study of 15,102 noncardiac surgery patients 45 years or older, of whom 502 patients underwent vascular surgery. All patients had fourth-generation plasma troponin T (TnT) concentrations measured during the first 3 postoperative days. MINS was defined as a TnT of 0.03 ng/mL of higher secondary to ischemia. The objectives of the present study were to determine (i) if MINS is prognostically important in vascular surgical patients, (ii) the clinical characteristics of vascular surgery patients with and without MINS, (iii) the 30-day outcomes for vascular surgery patients with and without MINS, and (iv) the proportion of MINS that probably would have gone undetected without routine troponin monitoring. Results: The incidence of MINS in the vascular surgery patients was 19.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 15.7%–22.6%). 30-day all-cause mortality in the vascular cohort was 12.5% (95% CI 7.3%–20.6%) in patients with MINS compared with 1.5% (95% CI 0.7%–3.2%) in patients without MINS (P < 0.001). MINS was independently associated with 30-day mortality in vascular patients (odds ratio, 9.48; 95% CI, 3.46–25.96). The 30-day mortality was similar in MINS patients with (15.0%; 95% CI, 7.1–29.1) and without an ischemic feature (12.2%; 95% CI, 5.3–25.5, P = 0.76). The proportion of vascular surgery patients who suffered MINS without overt evidence of myocardial ischemia was 74.1% (95% CI, 63.6–82.4). Conclusions: Approximately 1 in 5 patients experienced MINS after vascular surgery. MINS was independently associated with 30-day mortality. The majority of patients with MINS were asymptomatic and would have gone undetected without routine postoperative troponin measurement.
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | 2013
John Harlock; Mohammad Qadura; George K. Lee; David Szalay
An infected aortic endograft is an uncommon event, and when it happens it can be of significant morbidity and mortality to the patient. We present here a case of a patient with an infected aortic endograft following percutaneous translumbar sac embolization for a type II endoleak leading to sac expansion. The cultured pathogen was Propionibacterium acnes, a commonly occurring skin bacterium that leads to the clinical condition “acne vulgaris.” The patient underwent graft explantation and reconstruction with autogenous femoral vein. To our knowledge, there are no previously published reports of aortic graft infections with P acnes.
Trauma Case Reports | 2017
Kathryn L. Howe; Mina Guirgis; Grant Woodman; F. Victor Chu; M.J. Cooper; Theodore Rapanos; David Szalay
Traumatic dissection of the innominate artery is a rare clinical entity. Management of a patient with motorsensory compromise and dissection extending to the subclavian and right common carotid arteries is quite rare and can be quite involved. Here we present such a case and discuss the unique peri-operative decision-making in the context of what is reported in the literature. Restoration of motorsensory function is critical and in this case, requiring a multi-disciplinary team.
Annals of Vascular Surgery | 1999
David Szalay; Daniel Wong; Thomas F. Lindsay
Canadian Journal of Surgery | 1997
Juan R. Sanabria; Tadaaki Hiruki; David Szalay; Ved Tandan; Steven Gallinger
American Journal of Surgery | 2013
Deepak Dath; Jen Hoogenes; Edward D. Matsumoto; David Szalay
Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2014
Marko Simunovic; Franco DeNardi; Angela Coates; David Szalay; Kevin W. Eva
Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2018
Brandon McGuinness; Fadi Elias; Khatija Pinky Ali; James Namburi; Mirza Shahzaib Ahmad; Beverley Chan; David Szalay; Theodore Rapanos
Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2018
Kathryn L. Howe; David Szalay; Linda Gould; Stefan Pagliuso; Lisa Fronzi; Barbra Kubilius; Louise MacRae; Almunder Algird; Christine Hawkes; Brian van Adel; Ramiro Larrazabal; Wieslaw Oczkowski; Demetrios J. Sahlas